A Message From Lucianne
 Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy
|
|
The Panetta Doctrine
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/28/2012 10:02:20 PM
|
| The secretary of defense in his best grown-up voice says: “(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.” It seems obvious that Panetta is trying protect Obama from responsibility
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Michaelus, 10/28/2012 10:03:57 PM (No. 8970471)
Yet another reason to have some respect for Nathan Bedford Forrest - an American who would did not wait.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 10/28/2012 10:11:33 PM (No. 8970478)
More outrageous than Panetta's lies, is the MSM ignoring them.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Halfvast Conspirator, 10/28/2012 10:14:50 PM (No. 8970484)
Leon Pancetta is no General Ham
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Lala, 10/28/2012 10:27:12 PM (No. 8970495)
Lol #3. I guess according to this sad excuse for a SoD, firemen should not rescue anyone or put out a fire until its determined how it started.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 10/28/2012 10:28:24 PM (No. 8970497)
What I'm getting out of Secretary of Defense Panetta's explanations is that he's a triple dipple anal-retentive, Obsessive-compulsive paranoid personality type who can't bring himself to approve anything that isn't a gold-plated sure thing.
If you flipped a coin and gave him both heads and tails, would he be paralyzed with fear of it landing on it's edge?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
synchronicity, 10/28/2012 10:41:39 PM (No. 8970506)
Leaders lead. Followers follow. Political hacks do whatever they are paid to do up to and including being complicit in the deaths of innocent people.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LittleHoodedMonk, 10/28/2012 10:45:14 PM (No. 8970511)
FTA: ''The message to our diplomats and troops: You’re on your own.''
I can guarantee that if Hillary had been in some Middle Eastern country, doing the pro-Muslim, 0bama apology-tour and someone really tried to take a shot at her, here's what would happen. Before she could change her soiled pants-suit, press the ''Reset'' button, and suddenly find another true religion, every American asset within a 500-mile radius would be deployed to bail Herself out.
What I believe is this: Two CIA agents countered direct orders to standdown, not in the hope of being heroes, but rather to rescue Ambassador Stevens. And, they probably believed that their act would shake the others in the CIA safe house to do the right thing and follow and help out. They were wrong in 0bamaland, where the goal of a government employee is to survive and get out alive, or not under a bus. So, four men were murdered.
Anyone in the chain of command who had the ability to act and didn't, beginning at the White House, at the State Department, Defense Department, CIA, or any other ''listening post,'' has blood on their hands and deserve to be hounded till the end of their days. No true American soldier would stand for and fight if this type of betrayal was waiting for them on the field of battle. Our belief in God will guide US in, but our fellow man will help get US out...always.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
nina584, 10/28/2012 10:48:33 PM (No. 8970517)
Panetta is a well known progressive socialist who hates the military.He was placed there to destroy the military. Who will fight if they are willing to leave you behind. He used to head a progressive center before being draftes by BO.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Highvoltage, 10/28/2012 11:03:41 PM (No. 8970533)
Abe Lincoln kept trying to get general McClellan to attack, but the general was always wanting more information. Eventually Lincoln fired him.
Is Dempsey and Panetta the dunces here. They had a C130 gunship at their disposal and that doesn't require troops on the ground exposed to the enemy and they had good intelligence from the compound and drones overhead. How much more did they want?
Of course they are covering for Obama's failure to protect these brave Americans who dies.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bighambone, 10/28/2012 11:03:46 PM (No. 8970534)
Too bad that Congress will not hear from General Ham until after the election.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/28/2012 11:20:10 PM (No. 8970547)
The Panetta doctrine has been an oath of allegiance to Benedict Arnold and the betrayal of every branch of our military. He's up for the award of worst of the clinton holdovers.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
birddog, 10/29/2012 12:32:52 AM (No. 8970626)
The Panetta Doctrine..."WE will make the Gutsy Call to send in troops only in circumstances where we can build a life sized mock-up of the buildings we want to attack and train there for three months...contingent of course on weather"
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/29/2012 12:38:28 AM (No. 8970630)
The 'Panetta Doctrine' would have kept us out of every conflict we have ever been in, including the American Revolution.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
suejeanne, 10/29/2012 12:50:45 AM (No. 8970638)
They didn't even give them a bayonet.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
suejeanne, 10/29/2012 12:56:39 AM (No. 8970645)
I wonder - if either Leon Panetta or Hillary Clinton decide to resign "to spend more time with their families" - perhaps Colin Powell would gladly step in to help President Obama - he is already familiar with the State dept. having been the SOS for GW before Condoleeza, right? Also, former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, if I recall correctly -
I wonder when it is going to happen -
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
KTWO, 10/29/2012 1:14:39 AM (No. 8970652)
To paraphrase,
Panetta 2012 '"We couldn't be sure."
Donald Rumsfeld 2006 "As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time."
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 10/29/2012 1:58:12 AM (No. 8970677)
General ham wasn't the only general or naval commander suddenly recalled on the spot. The other two must have also refused to stand down and were dumped.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/29/2012 2:41:30 AM (No. 8970686)
The Hillary/Obama video cover up had one purpose:
"What happens in Benghazi stays in Benghazi."
Ht/NRO
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
northeast, 10/29/2012 11:46:57 AM (No. 8971610)
Albrite, wHat good is the military if you do not use it.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
mickturn, 10/29/2012 11:55:48 AM (No. 8971647)
A COWARD's Response...well we didn't want anyone to get hurt so we sold their lives down the Muslim river of death!
How special, a POTUS & SECDEF that can't find both testicles with a magnifying glass, a flashlight and tweezers.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Ariel Castro, Cleveland Kidnapper,
Is a Registered Democrat
|
|
American Thinker, by Oleg Atbashian
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/9/2013 7:28:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
According to voter registration records, Ariel Castro, the Cleveland kidnapper, is a registered Democrat. He was also the alleged leader among the three Castro brothers, who were arrested this week, and the owner of the house at 2207 Seymour Ave., where the three abducted local women had been kept in captivity for over a decade. Why is this important? Whenever a crime or a scandal captures national attention, the pattern in the mainstream media is to either identify the culprit as a Republican or hold silence -- in which case we can rest assured that the culprit
|
| |
|
|
Senate defeats expansion of gun rights
|
|
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:27:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Senate beat back a new push to expand gun rights Wednesday, defeating a plan to let gun owners carry their weapons on federal lands in states where it would otherwise be legal. Still, Wednesday’s vote drew more support than last month’s efforts to impose new gun controls in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, suggesting that Second Amendment supporters retain the momentum in the gun debate. The 56-43 vote was four shy of the 60 needed to be adopted under Senate rules. At stake was the ability
|
White House struggles to respond
to new Benghazi revelations
|
|
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:24:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House on Wednesday stood by its story that the Obama administration remained unsure exactly who was responsible for the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi nearly five days after it occurred even though new revelations show Ansar al-Sharia’s direct involvement. Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and a self-described whistleblower, testified before a Congressional committee Wednesday that the body of Ambassador J. Christpher Stevens was missing for hours during the attack after being dragged out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi.
|
At Benghazi hearing, State
Dept. officials challenge
administration review of attacks
|
|
Washington Post, by Ernesto Londoño and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:16:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Three State Department officials provided a riveting, emotional account of last year’s fatal attack on U.S. installations in eastern Libya on Wednesday as they charged senior government officials with withholding embarrassing facts and failing to take enough responsibility for security lapses. The testimony provided new details on the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults on U.S. installations in Benghazi and their aftermath. But the new information failed to break the political logjam the attacks spawned, with Republicans and Democrats offering starkly different interpretations of what happened and who within the U.S. government is to blame.
|
Obama’s false hopes for
2014 — and his legacy
|
|
Washington Post, by George F. Will
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:09:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Thirty-one months ago Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell affronted the media and other custodians of propriety by saying something common-sensical. On Oct. 23, 2010, he said: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” He meant that America needed conservative change from the statist course of Obama’s presidency (the stimulus, Obamacare, etc.), therefore America needed a president who would not veto such change. By similar reasoning, Obama today could sensibly say, and probably has said to himself
|
7 Things We Learned from the
Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing
|
|
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:56:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Republicans mishandled the Benghazi whistleblowers’ hearing. What should have been stretched across several days to give the nation time to digest it all, was instead packed into a single day filled with an overwhelming amount of information. The media’s attention span is not that long. The verdict in the Jodi Arias trial came along in the afternoon and blew Benghazi off the networks, most of which didn’t want to cover it at all. Even Fox joined the drive-by media, taking Benghazi off the air in favor of the irrelevant Arias trial
|
The Benghazi Hearing:
Did It Matter?
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:52:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Today’s Benghazi hearing had many dramatic moments and added significantly to our knowledge of that disaster. For example, we now know that there were multiple instances when special ops would-be rescuers were told to stand down, leading Lt. Col. Gibson to tell Greg Hicks, “This is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.” Obvious questions remain to be answered: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton hide behind the military, saying or implying that doing nothing to try to save the besieged Americans in Benghazi
|
Hillary Hasn’t Heard
the End of Benghazi
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 10:49:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democrats arrived at the House Oversight Committee’s hearing on the Benghazi terror attack determined to defend the reputation of the person that most believe will be their presidential candidate in 2016. Ranking member Elijah Cummings and his colleagues thundered at Chair Darrel Issa and any other Republican who dared to raise questions about the way the State Department responded not only to the attack but also to questions about the aftermath, determined to cast the entire event as a partisan ambush. But the testimony of the three whistleblowers overshadowed their complaints
|
Benghazi Hearing Aims to Reveal
High Level Decision-Makers
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 8:28:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee say there will be “explosive” revelations that will come forth during the Committee’s hearing on Wednesday when three State Department witnesses reveal what they knew the night the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya were attacked by terrorists. Committee members will be hearing the testimonies of State Department employees Greg Hicks, Mark Thompson, and Eric Nordstrom. The Committee appears to be interested in finding out who ultimately made the decision to tell military assets not to send help
|
Obama says chemical use
in Syria is only ‘perceived’
|
|
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:05:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama defiantly defended his reluctance to increase the U.S.intervention in Syria, saying he has yet to receive clear, corroborated evidence to back up initial intelligence reports of small-scale use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime and would not make a decision based on a “hope and a prayer.” Mr. Obama last summer said chemical use by Syrian leader Bashar Assad would be a “red line” that would change his calculus about authorizing U.S. action in that country’s civil war. Reports last week suggested
|
As red ink recedes, pressure
fades for budget deal
|
|
Washington Post, by Lori Montgomery and Zachary A. Goldfarb
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 10:03:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
After four years of trillion-dollar deficits, the red ink is receding rapidly in Washington, easing pressure on policymakers but shattering hopes for a summertime budget deal. Federal tax revenue is up and spending is down thanks to an improving economy, tax hikes enacted in January and the automatic budget cuts known as the sequester. The sunnier outlook means that President Obama will be able to pay the nation’s bills for months without seeking additional borrowing authority from Congress — probably until Oct. 1, according to independent forecasts.
|
Graham: ‘I Think the Dam Is
About to Break on Benghazi’
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/7/2013 9:55:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) wrote Tuesday he believes major revelations about the lead up to the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, are imminent, in a Facebook message: “I think the dam is about to break on Benghazi. We’re going to find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks. “We’re going to find political manipulation seven weeks before an election. We’re going to find people asleep at the switch when it comes to the State Department, including Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Republican probe of Benghazi
attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Sanford gets second chance:
On political scrapheap 4 years ago,
ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
White House struggles to respond
to new Benghazi revelations
|
|
Washington Times, by Susan Crabtree
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/8/2013 11:24:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House on Wednesday stood by its story that the Obama administration remained unsure exactly who was responsible for the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi nearly five days after it occurred even though new revelations show Ansar al-Sharia’s direct involvement. Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and a self-described whistleblower, testified before a Congressional committee Wednesday that the body of Ambassador J. Christpher Stevens was missing for hours during the attack after being dragged out of the diplomatic post in Benghazi.
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC:
Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Dem Congressman At Benghazi
Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,
|
Benghazi: Incompetence,
but no cover-up
|
|
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --
|
Stephen Hawking backs
boycott of Israeli academics
|
|
Associated Press, by Gregory Katz and Aron Heller
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/8/2013 12:08:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
British physicist Stephen Hawking has dropped plans to attend a major international conference in Israel in June, citing his belief that he should respect a Palestinian call to boycott contacts with Israeli academics. The University of Cambridge released a statement Wednesday indicating that Hawking had told the Israelis last week that he would not be attending "based on advice from Palestinian academics that he should respect the boycott." University officials said they had "previously understood" that Hawking´s decision was based solely on health concerns — he is 71 and has severe disabilities — but had now been told otherwise by Hawking´s office.
|
Fox Analyst Shreds ‘Cowardly,
Duplicitous’ Admin Over Benghazi:
‘Sacrificed American Lives For Politics’
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:47:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Ahead of the Benghazi hearings in which three witnesses are set to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade invited Fox News analyst Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to discuss the issue. Peters was unflinching in his criticism of the “cowardly” Obama administration — and the “establishment media” that aids it. “Is this a national security coverup?” Kilmeade asking, explaining that the witness testimony is expected to say the administration was deceitful in its handling of the situation. “The administration, facing the election, went into panic mode, wanted to contain it,”
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution
implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
Mark Sanford wins South
Carolina special election
|
|
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.
|
| | |
|
