Nothing that comes out is going to make the media go against obama. Those are the facts. We just have to pray that the pundits are wrong, and Romney will win the electoral vote. I'm becoming increasingly anxious...

The families of the deceased deserves answers along with the American people.

I watched the interview on Fox this morning.
IIRC, it was Senator Warner (not Udall) who refused to answer the question of whether or not the drone was armed. He said, "This Senator has no comment." I thought it an odd comment to say the least and I felt he was covering up the fact that the drone was armed and ready to deliver.

General Ham got the axe in minutes which shows that some things can be decided smartly. Other things politically sensitive takes months to make a decision on.

So we had a decision to move out by General Ham that was countermanded in minutes by being "Relieved of Command". That shows that Obama was in the loop. Panetta would not have made that decision by himself.

The Admiral was also relieved, I would presume, when he ordered aircraft launches based on Ham's action and he was ordered to stand down as well.

Things are coming to a head right on time.

Breit Baier has a detailed account of the events at Benghazi on FOX right now, with another report coming this evening.

FOX is investigating and reporting the facts. The alphabets simply are not.

Ty Woods KNEW the drones were there and ARMED. That is why he was firing the LASER targeting device. If there was no help in the area he would not have wasted his time doing that. He knew they were there and did the best he could.

I read that the mortar team had night vision capability on their cell phones which made the laser designator beam visable hence endangering Woods who was focusing it on the target.Woods would not have lit up the target knowing of the dangers of exposing himself if he didn't know armed drones or an AC130 gunship was overhead. The fact that he was training the laser is evidence for the presence of armed aircraft and proves the orders were not given to fire. Only Obama as CIC had the authority to order AFRACOM Gen Ham to stand down.

Fox News was the onLY news network that pressed the issue during the Sunday morning news programs -and host Chris Wallace raised a very interesting point when pushing for an answer from Senator Tom Udall (D) , regarding whether or not the drones that flew over the compound during the Benghazi Massacre were in fact armed with weaponry. Senator Udall refused to answer that question raising the now very real possibility that help flew directly over the heads of the Benghazi compound though someone refused to initiate an attack order against the terrorists who were at that very moment killing Americans.

Amazingly, Chris Wallace pressed this to both Udall and the feckless Warner person, who couldn't risk taking a breath as he raced through the Obama talking points, which Wallace hilariously mentioned. Neither would say whether the drones were armed or not. Later, in the panel, Wallace remarked that both were obviously nervous about that question.

If they won't talk, the obvious conclusion is that the drones WERE armed.

Re #3, both Udall and Warner refused to answer Chris Wallace's question about whether the drones were armed.

We watched the program and the transcript was just posted.

#9 Thank you. I somehow missed Sen. Udall's obfuscationon the question.
Warner was "feckless." ha, ha.

I think Gen Carter Ham was relieved on the spot for resisting the stand down order when they had drones in position to attack the terrorists. Ty Woods gave away his position for few precious seconds which eventually cost his life when he lased the target. He was hoping the drones would fire before the mortar team could fire back at him - he was betrayed.