 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
So who won the presidential debates' fashion face-off? Michelle Obama comes out on top as style set deal their verdicts
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 10/23/2012 4:08:34 PM
|
| Last night marked the third and final presidential debate, where, on the sidelines of policy disputes and quips on Big Bird, binders and bayonets, a fierce First Lady fashion face-off has been taking place. From their power suiting debut, to bolts of hot pink, and finally, last night's easy, elegant comfort, Michelle Obama and Ann Romney have gone head to head with their mirroring outfit choices in the race to the White House. At Florida's Lynn University Monday night, the First Lady stepped out in the same lace-detailed Thom Browne dress she wore a month ago to the Democratic National
|
Comments: Guess I'm not stylish. I like Ann's dress much better. Why? Because I'm tall and big and it would look better on me than the lacy number worn by the Mooch. And that glitzy bow pin thing is awful.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Keekng, 10/23/2012 4:11:23 PM (No. 8956084)
She would have been more attractive in a face covering burka.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
smidgen, 10/23/2012 4:21:43 PM (No. 8956114)
I thought the FLOTUS had on a Halloween costume.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ZurichMike, 10/23/2012 4:27:20 PM (No. 8956128)
The comic character Shirley Q. Liquor commented on Michelle's poofy red print dress at the Dem Convention as follows: "She looked like a two-toned push-up Popsicle in a Mary Tyler Moore wig." (honey)
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MMC, 10/23/2012 4:30:54 PM (No. 8956138)
If floral couch material is your choice of dressing- Michelle does well. She wears it like a Mack Truck
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
convert, 10/23/2012 4:31:02 PM (No. 8956139)
According to the press, every Democratic woman is the most beautiful, stylish perfect woman ever. Every Republican/conservative woman is awful....Think how classy and beautiful Laura Bush always looks. Think how dropdead gorgeous Sarah Palin always looked, Michelle Bachman....but the press has nothing kind to say---ever--about these ladies. Ann Romney will experience the same thing, despite the fact that she, too , is gorgeous and stylish and looks way younger than her years. Very telling.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
hooter, 10/23/2012 4:33:27 PM (No. 8956146)
Wasn't overwhelmed by either dress, but if I had to pick it would be Mrs. Romney. Michelle is just sloppy looking and what a drab color choice.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DARling, 10/23/2012 4:36:05 PM (No. 8956156)
Michelle looks like a wallflower who was asked to dance to the last song.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MtGardenerview, 10/23/2012 4:55:12 PM (No. 8956228)
She really needs a backup beeper
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
cactus, 10/23/2012 5:01:23 PM (No. 8956251)
I suspect Mrs Romney doesn't worry too much about the latest proclamations from the fashion gurus. I think she's secure in her own skin and doesn't need affirmation from know-it-alls. She has a lot of women backing her in that.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Peach1, 10/23/2012 5:01:59 PM (No. 8956253)
I didn't care for either of their outfits. Mrs. Romney looks much better in suit dresses. Just my two cents!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Keekng, 10/23/2012 5:28:07 PM (No. 8956315)
#8, thanks for the great laugh!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 10/23/2012 5:28:34 PM (No. 8956316)
Michelle seems attracted to dresses with fussy treatments, like lace, beads, applique--and don't forget that two-toned devil dress from Grant Park. Not good looks for such a big woman, and I can't stand the frequent bare arms, though she seems to be covering up more lately. Weight gain?
Mrs. Romney seems comfortable in her own skin--wearing things that usually flatter, and dabbling in various styles. But she never looks inappropriate, which you can't say about Mrs. Obama.
For this occasion, I think the green dress Ann Romney wore was more suitable than Michelle Obama's was.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/23/2012 5:36:21 PM (No. 8956335)
In our family we have always called things like Moochelle's "a dumb dress"... Not good, not bad, just dumb.
The kind of dress one might pick up as a steal after three markdowns, then get it home and wonder forever "why wear that?" when so many things would look so much better.
Muddy grey and black lace are awful on a dark black woman like Mooch. And the placement of the lace emphasizes her linebacker shoulders and wide-load butt while diminishing her already diminished boobs. She was said to have added the belt, which places an eye-catching bow just above that rear protuberance.
Bleah.
I was not crazy about Anne Romney's dress, but I don't like many prints. But she looked comfortable in it - and happy. The Romney's interaction with each other and their big family is the most attractive thing about them. The Obots looked like a couple of orphans on the dais after the debate.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JudithC, 10/23/2012 5:36:58 PM (No. 8956336)
…that anyone could consider the Big Moo a fashion setter borders on the bizarre. This gargantuan has been named to that role by various RAT bloggers who would love to have her worthy of the title as she oils her bowed and bare legs, wears clothes that are at least 2 sizes too small, 8 inches too short, and highlight her thunder thighs or thong underpants. And when you throw in her retread belts made from rubber that flies off 18 wheelers on freeways…what does one say except, "sorry, dear, you just don't get it, do you?"
The grey and black lace number last night...at least she's consistent in wearing something all wrong as usual. Ann Romney has a natural fashion sense and knows enough to wear clothes that fit and to leave the cheap and tacky 5' wide plastic pins in the trash for someone else to find. She not only looks lovely and gracious, she is and I'll bet we wait a long time to see her with legs crossed in a way-too-short-skin-tight-dress while being photographed from below a stage, or see her schlumping down the steps of Airforce one wearing cutoff bluejean shorts, one of those incredibly awful tops, and her hair pulled back making her look like she just got up 15 minutes before getting on the plane.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/23/2012 5:43:59 PM (No. 8956354)
After #14 gets warmed up, she'll come back and tell us what she really thinks!
(Great post!)
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
rubberneck, 10/23/2012 5:49:42 PM (No. 8956366)
Meeeeeee-OWWWWWWWW! (-;
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Smart11344, 10/23/2012 6:02:24 PM (No. 8956387)
Who cares? Why is this important?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Penney, 10/23/2012 6:08:21 PM (No. 8956397)
The fashionistas have been way off-track throughout the past 4 years! Who can possibly now pay any attention to their frumpy design opinions?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Straitpath, 10/23/2012 6:12:20 PM (No. 8956406)
It's interesting and fun.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 10/23/2012 6:17:25 PM (No. 8956412)
I don't take much interest in articles about clothes. However, a few months ago I saw a photo of Michelle in her high school prom dress. I must say that one took my attention. The skirt was slit almost to her crotch and exposed a very shaply leg. She looked good in it but it was not my idea of a dress suitable for a young girl.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Annalucia, 10/23/2012 6:45:45 PM (No. 8956465)
It's the Daily Mail: they've been having fun with Michelle's clothes for the last for years. Always the deadpan description, accompanied by these REALLY BIZARRE photographs ;-)
Dunno what they're going to do once Barry and Michelle are gone. Zero in on Prince Andrew's daughters, I guess - they don't seem to have any taste either.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
udanja99, 10/23/2012 7:50:38 PM (No. 8956567)
Mooch has no bigger s@ck-ups on the planet than the fashion critics.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
farmwife, 10/23/2012 8:24:23 PM (No. 8956624)
I don't care much about Michelle Obama's clothes, some of them are fine and some are awful. What I am really tired of is how the press is determined to make us yokels understand that she has the greatest fashion sense since Jackie O. She doesn't. And neither does whoever dresses her.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 10/23/2012 10:19:18 PM (No. 8956780)
#8, now THAT'S funny! Thanks for the laugh!
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
oriton, 10/23/2012 10:24:38 PM (No. 8956788)
Poster 14, those shorts that stumbled off AF-1 are proof that this woman is not a fashionista and I don't care how many designers or magazines try to tell us that she is. No woman with great style and a chic fashion sense would be caught dead in those shorts, with hot mess hair, riding on AF-1 much less stepping off AF-1 into the public eye. Even the "ladies" on the Housewives shows could teach her a thing or two about dressing. They know the cameras are always on.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Sherlock, 10/23/2012 10:46:47 PM (No. 8956820)
hell will freeze over before that old nag looks good in anything but a oat bag around her neck
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 10/23/2012 10:51:21 PM (No. 8956827)
Sorry, but why should we let women vote if this, and access to free birth control, is the paramount concern in these times?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
amylu, 10/23/2012 10:52:13 PM (No. 8956830)
...and then there's those godawful eyebrows, painted about an inch above her natural brow line, causing her to have a surprised look, like she just stuck a fork in the toaster.
I sometimes suspect her make-up and wardrobe "assistants" are Republican moles.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 10/23/2012 10:55:57 PM (No. 8956839)
ROTFLMAO #3!!! (Gurrrrrl)
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
mmdemimonde, 10/23/2012 11:33:03 PM (No. 8956894)
michelle always reminds me of a man in drag, she's very masculine (i guess that's what barack sees in her). it makes for interesting fantasy play during sex. and she always stuffs her huge feet into kitten heels..not a good look. ann (IMO)looks like the quintessential first lady...grace, beauty and dignity.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 10/24/2012 1:34:01 AM (No. 8957003)
Anna Wintour, Vogue fashion queen notified all designers to not offer clothes to Mrs. Romney or expect her wrath. When she called Oscar De La Renta on the carpet for Anne wearing their dress to the 1st debate, their PR firm confirmed they did not work with her and would never send her clothes... that Mrs. Romney buys their clothes off the rack.
Nice people, eh?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
An English class for trolls, professional offence-takers and climate activists
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by James Delingpole
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/7/2013 10:38:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Should Michael Mann be given the electric chair for having concocted arguably the most risibly inept, misleading, cherry-picking, worthless and mendacious graph--the Hockey Stick--in the history of junk science? Should George Monbiot be hanged by the neck for his decade or so´s hysterical promulgation of the great climate change scam and other idiocies too numerous to mention? Should Tim Flannery be fed to the crocodiles for the role he has played in the fleecing of the Australian taxpayer and the diversion of scarce resources into pointless projects like all the eyewateringly expensive desalination plants built as a result of his
|
|
Call illegals ‘irregulars’ says Eurocrat
|
|
Daily Express [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 9:11:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior Eurocrat sparked outrage last night after calling for the phrase “illegal immigrant” to be banned from the European Union.[Snip] She has instructed EU Commission staff to refer to foreigners who break border control laws as “irregular migrants” or simply “people” instead. But her attempt to dictate how the issue of immigration is discussed was savaged last night. UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage said: “Now the EU is even trying to change the language. “This sounds like something straight out of the pages of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. It shows that what we are dealing with here
|
Michael Philpott is a perfect parable for our age: His story shows the pervasiveness of evil born out of welfare dependency
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by A. N. Wilson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:56:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
His house, his booze, his drugs, his women and his 17 children were paid for by a benefits system meant to be a safety net for the truly needy.[Snip] This was one of the most horrible crimes committed against children in Britain in recent years. It was cynical. It was calculating. And it was done out of malice in a ham-fisted plot which went wrong. The trial spoke volumes about the sheer nastiness of the individuals involved. But it also lifted the lid on the bleak and often grotesque world of the welfare benefit scroungers--of whom there are not dozens,
|
The reef that regenerated: Researchers find corals in Northern Australia healed themselves in just 12 years
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Mark Prigg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:07:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A coral reef in Northern Australia severely damaged by warming seas has managed to completely heal itself in just 12 years, stunned researchers have found. The team found that being left alone to breed on its own was key. The discovery raises hope that other damaged reefs could ´regenerate´. The new research shows that an isolated reef off the northwest coast of Australia that was severely damaged by a period of warming in 1998. It was hit by coral bleaching, caused by higher water temperatures that break down the coral´s symbiotic relationship with algae that provide food for coral growth.
|
North Korea moves second missile as UN chief warns ´nuclear threat is not a game´
|
|
Daily Express [UK], by Charlotte Meredith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/5/2013 5:36:43 AM
Post Reply
|
|
North Korea has transported two more missiles to the east coast, Seoul military sources have revealed, triggering speculation that it is ready for an abrupt missile launch. North Korea has loaded two intermediate-range missiles onto mobile launchers and hidden them in an unidentified facility near the east coast, South Korea´s Yonhap news agency has said. "It has been confirmed that North Korea, early this week, transported two Musudan mid-range missiles by train to the east coast and loaded them on vehicles equipped with launch pads," Yonhap quoted the official as saying. The official said the mobile launchers had since
|
Is North Korea really looking to start a war?
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Shashank Joshi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/4/2013 3:47:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As the US and China grow increasingly involved, Kim Jong-un must be brought into line if war is not to be triggered by an act of recklessness. There are two schools of thought about what lies behind North Korea’s increasingly frenzied posturing. The first goes like this: the rhetoric emanating from Pyongyang--including calls to “break the waists of the crazy enemies [and] totally cut their windpipes”--is no worse than their decades-old ritualistic promises to turn South Korea into a “sea of fire”. What we are witnessing, according to this theory, is nothing more than an inexperienced leader
|
Islamism is winning the cognitive war – thanks to manipulative and gullible journalists
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Richard Landes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/4/2013 3:43:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anyone who remembers the halcyon dreams of the 1990s, of civil society spreading the world over, heralding a new peaceful, global millennium, must marvel at the path the young 21st century has taken. Even those who paid attention to global Jihad before the millennium could not imagine how vulnerable the West would prove in the coming, wildly asymmetrical war. Those who, over the course of the last 13 years, have awakened to the ever-growing danger of Islamism and to the astonishing inability of decent people--Muslims and non-Muslims--to effectively oppose its aggressions, owe themselves a brief lesson in cognitive warfare, and
|
Sanford defeats Bostic to claim 1st District GOP runoff
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Robert Behre
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/2/2013 8:49:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The political race many had anticipated would unfold in the 1st congressional district--the national comedian’s sister versus the once-disgraced governor angling for a comeback--is here. Former Gov. Mark Sanford won Tuesday’s GOP runoff over former Charleston County Councilman Curtis Bostic, according to unofficial results. Sanford now faces five more weeks on the campaign trail before a May 7 showdown with Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, whose business background and moderate politics are expected to create a tight contest. Lowcountry voters haven’t elected a Democrat from the 1st District for more than three decades, but Colbert Busch already has shown
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|