A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


WSJ Circles Wagons:
Blames Benghazi-Gate
on Intelligence Community

Breitbart's Big Journalism, by AWR Hawkins

Original Article

Posted By:Photoonist, 10/20/2012 4:42:35 PM

It appears Obama surrogates in the mainstream media are circling the wagons in the days leading up to the Oct. 22 foreign policy debate. Case in point -- the Wall Street Journal's Oct 18 report providing a smokescreen for U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice. Written in a way that admits the Obama administration's story did change, the report creates a caveat by suggesting the change wasn't official until weeks after Rice appeared Sunday news shows to blame the Benghazi attack on a YouTube video. Moreover, the WSJ report pins the changing story on the intelligence community, thereby protecting Obama

Comments:
The leftists trying to protect 0bama's behind don't seem to realize that their reasoning and excuses are so contorted that no one can follow them, except 0bama's crazed leftist base who will pretend. Everyone else takes the simple and obvious story that the 0bama regime lied and never gave a damn. The WSJ has become largely a horrible news source with 1 or 2 exceptions a day. And that's why no one misses that most of their stories require a subscription.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: quark, 10/20/2012 4:54:51 PM     (No. 8948553)

Oh, ok, so it was the "intelligence community" that invented the 'video did it' excuse....

They obviously need to be replaced.


Reply 2 - Posted by: fireman28, 10/20/2012 4:58:14 PM     (No. 8948561)

Saw a Democrap Congresscritter on FOX trying to blame Romney, FOX and the American public for B-Gate.

"We need to pull together after a crisis", he said instead of asking questions.

Yea, but Bush and Reagon addressed us from the Oval Office and told us we had a problem.

The Won sluffed it off on some minor U-tube video; a bump in the road; and not being Optimal.

Can't wait on Romney to ask some hard questions on Monday.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ivehadit, 10/20/2012 5:04:40 PM     (No. 8948573)

What has happened to the WSJ? They have become a big dissappointment...the leftist Murdochs have infiltrated Rupert's newspaper perhaps? Some in Rupert's family are very leftist and hate FoxNews, as I understand it. I worry.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Toledo, 10/20/2012 5:09:52 PM     (No. 8948582)

No. 3. Good Lord. Check your facts.


Reply 5 - Posted by: hadass23, 10/20/2012 5:12:04 PM     (No. 8948589)

The obama team has turned the Central Intelligence Agency and Secret Service into horny college like fraternities & sororities.

They whore and party every chance they get.

From Cartagena, Colombia to Washington, DC the perversions are widespread. Even the Oval Office is used by the Clinton's to soil a young intern reputation by forcing her to provide fellatio.


Reply 6 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 10/20/2012 5:33:02 PM     (No. 8948627)

And just WHO is in charge of the intelligence community? Maybe if BO hadn't been skipping those intelligence briefings he would be up to date. Further, are we to believe that the intelligence community ONLY communicates with the president when a "final" report is generated. They don't give him daily updates? For God's sake, our ambassador was KILLED! Are we to believe that BO was so uninterested and the intelligence community so dysfunctional that none of this was properly communicated. Sorry, not believable. And even if true(which would be VERY scary), WHOSE fault is it that these things are such a mess? The buck stops at BO's desk no matter how much he tries to squirm out of it.

Of course, this is the man who is responsible for nothing. Not the economy, not the explosion in poverty, not the loss of household income, not the chaos in the world, not the explosion in energy prices, not the catastrophic increase in the debt, not Fast and Furious, not anything.


Reply 7 - Posted by: kennedylaw, 10/20/2012 5:52:40 PM     (No. 8948655)

When every nearly intelligence agency in the world said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and Bush and most Democrats relied on those intelligence reports, it was entirely Bush's fault. Bush lied.

Now, when U.S. intelligence agencies didn't even say what Obama claims, it was still entirely their fault.

"The buck stops here." - Harry S Truman

"What buck? I never got the buck. Bush must have stolen the buck." - Barry H. Obama


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: judy, 10/20/2012 6:24:58 PM     (No. 8948718)

The WSJ is more left than NYTimes.


Reply 9 - Posted by: FlyRight, 10/20/2012 6:28:49 PM     (No. 8948724)

I must be living in an alternative universe. I read the WSJ everyday, 7 days a week. It is NOT a leftist publication.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Objectivity, 10/20/2012 6:37:33 PM     (No. 8948751)

To all: the WSJ, excepting its editorial team, has become not much more than Bloomberg news. And Bloomberg news is, in my observation 'left' & willingly more biased politically & ideologically than the NYTimes Business Section team.

Why is that you ask? As some here have identified, apart from Rupert and in part to fall-out from UK hacking scanda, lefty younger Murdochs (who do hate Roger Ailes and are 'embarrased' by Fox) and Euro-News Corp managers/Directors brought in a flaming Europhile who made Bloomberg news competitive in London & Europe.

I hear/read that he is gradually extinguishing old WSJ.

I have noticed this for last 2 years in the 'content product' this clown is producing. This longtime WSJer (who also used to admire The Economist & FT but no longer does so) will probably cancel my online subscription to WSJ and even drop Barrons which I've read since the late 1980s. Seems financial journalists juast can't help themselves to even obliquely revela their political leanings.

As a consumer I want useful data & insight ..... Not cheap opinion.


Reply 11 - Posted by: AppleAnnie, 10/20/2012 7:15:31 PM     (No. 8948843)

#4, poster #3 is obviously concerned. We're all on edge until the election is over. We worry. Sometimes we vent. Mostly we need to hang together to get this jerk out of the Oval Office.


Reply 12 - Posted by: hadass23, 10/20/2012 7:15:50 PM     (No. 8948844)

WSJ has drifted into the ranks of libtards.

Bernanke's willingness to cause inflation to help keep stock prices high isn't working for the American family.

The economy will be a better place without the WSJ.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: srhcb, 10/20/2012 7:20:22 PM     (No. 8948848)

The Journal is so last-milenium.

If you want business news, read Investors Business Daily.


Reply 14 - Posted by: zorba, 10/20/2012 7:44:13 PM     (No. 8948903)

I read the Journal every day. Most of the criticisms here about their viewpoint are hogwash. I suspect most of the commentors don't read the WSJ.


Reply 15 - Posted by: rocket scientist, 10/20/2012 8:57:16 PM     (No. 8949007)

I gave up on the WSJ long ago. They are being infested by Leftie Liberals. That's how the Progressives work - they infest a formerly trusted and respected publication/organization. Look what happened to Newsweak.


Reply 16 - Posted by: grampstosix, 10/20/2012 8:57:26 PM     (No. 8949008)

#9 The WSJ is only published six days a week.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Hazymac, 10/20/2012 9:01:03 PM     (No. 8949013)

It's the editorial page of the WSJ that's conservative (for the most part!). Anyone who has read the entire paper for the past forty years could tell you that the reportage is as liberal as the WaPo and the NYT.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 10/20/2012 9:51:40 PM     (No. 8949078)

Part of Obe's desperation to make Libya a routine nation that overturned a dictator and is now a budding democracy IS because he
defied congress and the Constitution to wage an air war to overturn a foreign government.
He alone is responsible for giving his Muslim brotherhood a victory that has created another Islamic disaster.
He acted as if he is a monarch with total power to decide our foreign conduct.
His current actions to cover his error created the lies and left a US Ambassador and his too few security agents to die.
An honorable man would resign.
A dishonorable man should be removed by ballot.


Reply 19 - Posted by: ivehadit, 10/20/2012 10:21:06 PM     (No. 8949126)

Some need to check their facts about the Murdoch family.


Reply 20 - Posted by: rexhandsom, 10/20/2012 11:54:52 PM     (No. 8949222)

I agree 15 ... turning to mush , the Lady seems to be the last of the right, the moderator on with the WSJ show on Fox has gone to the dark side..


Reply 21 - Posted by: NYbob, 10/21/2012 12:24:08 AM     (No. 8949238)

Yeah, because he went to Harvard, the moron needs an intelligence directive to post more than 2 guards at the hottest spot for rioting, upheaval and general terrorism on the anniversary of a terrorist high water mark. The real problem with the delay in getting the golfer up to speed was the fact that he could not find the Oval office or that other place where he gets a lot of reports that he stacks in a 'get to later' pile. This lightweight hasn't put in a solid week of work on any major problem since he had that oath administered a second time by Wrong way Roberts.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Objectivity, 10/21/2012 12:26:33 AM     (No. 8949243)

I do not post to vent or waste hot air/useless typing. See my earlier post. WSJ is being destroyed by a flaming purple suit loving clown. Don't trust me....do your own research. I'll bet anyone they end up agreeing with my portrayal.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 707875




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"



MA Senate: Elizabeth
Warren Defeats Scott Brown
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM     Post Reply
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.

Republicans lose ground
in bid to take over Senate
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM     Post Reply
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican

CNN Reports Romney Internal
Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM     Post Reply
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting
until 2 a.m.' in Florida
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM     Post Reply
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.

No surprises for Obama,
Romney in early projections
CNN, by Tom Cohen    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political

Exit polls 2012: Hurricane
Sandy not a factor
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM     Post Reply
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.

Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney
winning independents
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by

Obama, Romney locked in tight race
with battlegrounds too close to call
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:24:14 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney and President Obama each racked up early and expected victories Tuesday night in relatively safe territory, while some of the biggest battlegrounds that will decide the election remained too close to call. All the big swing states where polls have closed -- Florida, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and North Carolina -- were too close to call, Fox News projects. (Snip) Obama will also win three of Maine's four electoral votes, Fox News projects. It is unclear where the state's fourth electoral vote will fall. The latest batch of poll closings, and results, has allowed Obama to take

Romney wins South Carolina
Market Watch, by Robert Schroeder    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:53:12 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney was projected the winner in South Carolina on Tuesday night, taking home the state’s nine electoral votes. So far Tuesday the former Massachusetts governor has taken other reliably red states including Kentucky and West Virginia. Romney leads in the Electoral College with 24 electoral votes to President Obama’s three.

Ohio exit poll: More Democrats vote,
but independents back Romney
CBS News, by Brian Montopoli    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:45:37 PM     Post Reply
As expected, the presidential race is tight in Ohio, where the polls just closed: President Obama is winning women 55 percent to 44 percent in the early CBS News exit poll, while Mitt Romney is leading 52 percent to 46 percent among men. Women made up 51 percent of the electorate, compared to 49 percent among women. Thirty-nine percent of voters so far identified themselves as Democrats, compared to 30 percent calling themselves Republican. Thirty-one percent identified as independent or something else, and Romney has a big edge among this group - 56 percent to 40 percent for Mr. Obama.

Romney Projected To
Win West Virginia
MetroNews [W. Virginia], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:35:52 PM     Post Reply
As expected, Republican candidate for President, Mitt Romney, won West Virginia’s five electoral votes in Tuesday’s General Election over President Barack Obama. National media outlets called the race in West Virginia shortly after polls closed at 7:30 p.m. President Obama’s fate in West Virginia has never been in question, as he garnered just 60 percent of the democratic vote in the May primary. The other 40 percent of that vote went to Texas federal inmate Keith Judd, who was placed on the ballot in West Virginia. President Obama has been hugely unpopular in the Mountain State since he first ran

Exit poll show voters lean
toward GOP compared to 2008
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:18:08 PM     Post Reply
Early exit polls show Election Day voters are slightly more Republican than in 2008 and broadly concerned about the state of the U.S. economy. Six in 10 voters said the economy is their top issue according to the poll, which was released by The Associated Press and conducted on behalf of a consortium of media companies. Less than a quarter of voters said their families were better off than four years ago — a point seized on by many Republicans as the results leaked out.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
64 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

61 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

42 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

39 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

The Secrets of Princeton
38 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

37 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

36 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

   

Post Reply   Close thread 707875





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS