A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Should you let your dog kiss you?
WTOP-FM [Washington, DC], by Madeline Tallman

Original Article

Posted By:Slimepuppy, 10/18/2012 7:59:57 PM

Washington - For lovers of canine companions, one may be getting more than just unconditional affection from those sloppy dog kisses. A new study published in the journal Archives of Oral Biology found that dog owners had a higher rate of a certain disease-causing bacteria in their mouths. So those who are turned off by the sticky mess may have more evidence to back their stance. Japanese researchers examined dental plaque from 66 dogs and 81 people who came to an animal clinic or training school in 2011. They found "periodontopathic bacteria" -- the microscopic little guys

Comments:
...the REAL question is, after reading about Obama's fondness for guy-pals, is:

Should you let your POTUS kiss you?

Please post source properly & article to word limit. LCom Staff.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: tren9, 10/18/2012 8:04:09 PM     (No. 8944033)

Typical American person has 27 different kinds of bacteria in his/her mouth. About 20 of them are helpful in keeping you healthy. I think the dog should be worried about kissing you.


Reply 2 - Posted by: JimS, 10/18/2012 8:04:21 PM     (No. 8944034)

Yes, but try not to eat him


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ziel, 10/18/2012 8:08:28 PM     (No. 8944041)

Every dog has ability to lick his / her private parts.
There is no way I would ever allow dog to lick my face as well as go and lay on the couch.
Dog place is on the floor or on his mattress.
That's it.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 10/18/2012 8:16:20 PM     (No. 8944053)

My dogs are my best friends but noo face time and I keep my hands clean....c'mere baby!


Reply 5 - Posted by: M Stuart, 10/18/2012 8:17:39 PM     (No. 8944055)

Dogs lick their hinderparts and then lick your child in the mouth spreading worm eggs and whatever is on their butts.

I don't think so!


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bubbasuncle, 10/18/2012 8:18:20 PM     (No. 8944057)

My dogs kiss me all the time, except after they kill a mouse or a snake. That said, I'd rather kiss them then the Mooch!


Reply 7 - Posted by: neanderthal, 10/18/2012 8:26:55 PM     (No. 8944076)

It's still magnitudes safer to kiss your dog than it is a new girl/boy friend.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 10/18/2012 8:43:31 PM     (No. 8944105)

Go ahead and kiss your dogs.

If they die...they die !!


Reply 9 - Posted by: Sanspeur, 10/18/2012 8:45:31 PM     (No. 8944109)

Anyone seen BO , the 4 legged one, lately...?


Reply 10 - Posted by: jeffblair, 10/18/2012 8:54:18 PM     (No. 8944125)

I cringe whenever I see somebody kissing a dog or any other animal.


Reply 11 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 10/18/2012 9:19:07 PM     (No. 8944162)

Kiss yes, but then he has to buy me dinner to go any further.


Reply 12 - Posted by: get er done, 10/18/2012 9:29:01 PM     (No. 8944180)

The saliva of dogs which have been bitten by ticks may contain a parasite which has been linked to arthritis, Alzheimers and other ailments.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: oriton, 10/18/2012 9:37:13 PM     (No. 8944193)

I trained my dog not to kiss or to lick anyone but himself. I even scold him for licking his backside sometimes. He's so human like he probably thinks that he doesn't want to kiss me either. He likes hugs though.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Sully, 10/18/2012 9:49:44 PM     (No. 8944224)

THEY

LICK

THEM

SELVES

Before they lick your face. Only an unmitigated idiot allows a dog to lick his or her face.


Reply 15 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 10/18/2012 9:56:15 PM     (No. 8944241)

Dial soap did a commercial on this a few years back. It showed a dog drinking out of the toilet, then licking its owner's face. The narrator said, "you're not as clean as you think...."


Reply 16 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 10/18/2012 10:28:50 PM     (No. 8944305)

Poor Woofie.....


Reply 17 - Posted by: Sherlock, 10/18/2012 11:10:23 PM     (No. 8944418)

I thought Front line Plus and Harts killed fleas,ticks, and worms...no?
I donot allow my dog to give me kisses, but she does jump-up on the sofa at times, be kinda hard now to try and train her not to.


   

 

  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 707582




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Slimepuppy"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Slimepuppy"



Should you let your dog kiss you?
WTOP-FM [Washington, DC], by Madeline Tallman    Original Article
Posted By: Slimepuppy- 10/18/2012 7:59:57 PM     Post Reply
Washington - For lovers of canine companions, one may be getting more than just unconditional affection from those sloppy dog kisses. A new study published in the journal Archives of Oral Biology found that dog owners had a higher rate of a certain disease-causing bacteria in their mouths. So those who are turned off by the sticky mess may have more evidence to back their stance. Japanese researchers examined dental plaque from 66 dogs and 81 people who came to an animal clinic or training school in 2011. They found "periodontopathic bacteria" -- the microscopic little guys



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama´s Official Snub Of
Thatcher Funeral Shows
How Small He Is

68 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/16/2013 7:06:13 PM     Post Reply
Protocol: President Obama declined to send a high-level delegation to Wednesday´s funeral of Britain´s Margaret Thatcher. It´s a measure of how little he values the special relationship — and a sign of his own smallness. Back in more gracious times, vice presidents routinely attended funerals of foreign dignitaries. As such, the presence of Vice President Joe Biden — if not Obama himself — would seem fitting for as significant a U.S. ally as the late Prime Minister Thatcher, if not out of warmth of feeling, then simply to represent the U.S.´ gratitude. Thatcher´s uncompromising friendship

Barack Obama can´t pass gun control
despite 90 per cent support. Truly,
he is a lame-duck president

68 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Tim Stanley    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/18/2013 6:42:40 AM     Post Reply
Yesterday, the most modest of gun control proposals died in the Senate. It would have expanded background checks to people purchasing weapons at gun shows and online sales, enjoyed 90 per cent support among the public and came on the back of the tragedy at Newtown. Yet, despite all that it had going for it, the Toomey-Manchin bill raised just 54 votes--six short of the number necessary for passage. “This is a pretty shameful day for Washington,” said Obama afterwards. It wasn’t exactly a red letter day for him, either. Why did the no-brainer bill fail? Four reasons:

Obama angrily denounces
gun-rights groups as willful liars

63 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2013 6:37:42 PM     Post Reply
President Obama angrily blamed the defeat Wednesday of his centerpiece gun-control proposal on lies spread by the National Rifle Association, calling it “a pretty shameful day for Washington.” “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill,” Mr. Obama said in the White House rose garden about 90 minutes after the vote. “It came down to politics.” As he spoke, Mr. Obama was surrounded by family members of victims of the Newtown, Conn., school shooting. Also with him was former Rep. Gabby Giffords of Arizona, wounded in an assassination attempt.

   

 



 
Boston Marathon bombings
present new test for Obama

50 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/17/2013 6:01:37 AM     Post Reply
Authorities on Tuesday revealed little new information about the terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon, the most high-profile bombing on U.S. soil in more than a decade and a tragedy that presents a new test for President Obama. Obama, like all Americans, is standing by, waiting for answers as to who planted two bombs improvised from pressure cookers at the finish line of the storied race, and why. Three Americans were killed in Monday´s attack and more than 170 others were injured. "Anytime bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror," Obama said,

Senate rejects background checks
on gun purchases in 54-46 vote

45 replie(s)
Hill [Washington,DC], by Alexander Bolton    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 4/17/2013 4:41:19 PM     Post Reply
The Senate delivered a devastating blow to President Obama’s agenda to regulate guns Wednesday by defeating a bipartisan proposal to expand background checks. It failed by a vote of 54 to 46, with 5 Democrats voting against it. Only 4 Republicans supported it. Democratic Sens. Mark Pryor (Ark.), Max Baucus (Mont.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), Mark Begich (Alaska) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) voted against it. Reid supported the measure but voted against it to preserve his ability to bring the measure up again. GOP Sens. John McCain (Ariz.), Susan Collins (Maine), Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Mark Kirk

MSNBC’s Joy Reid Praises Obama’s
Reaction To Terror, Says Bush Dis-
appeared for ‘Couple Weeks’ After 9/11

41 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/16/2013 3:38:34 PM     Post Reply
MSNBC contributor Joy-Ann Reid told the host of Now, Alex Wagner, that she thought President Barack Obama’s response to the attack on the Boston Marathon on Monday was powerful and comforting in a way that President George W. Bush’s response to the attacks of September 11, 2001, was not. She accused Bush of being unavailable to the American people for the “first couple weeks” after the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Reid told Wagner that the president’s statement actively combatted the intention of the terrorists, which is to make their targets feel “discombobulated.” “Having, sort of

CNN: Pressure Cooker Bomb
´Right Wing´ Signature

39 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Lee Stranahan    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/17/2013 8:56:39 AM     Post Reply
An article published on CNN´s website makes an unproven claim that pressure cooker bombs like the ones used at the Boston Marathon terror attack are a ´signature´ of ´right-wing extremists.´ The article was co-written by Jennifer Roland and Peter Bergen. Bergen is the CNN ananlyst made the claim that right-wing extremists could be behind the bombing less than two hours after it took place. The article says (emphasis added) :A senior U.S. counterterrorism investigator told CNN that pressure cooker bombs have also been a signature of extreme right-wing individuals in the

Let’s hope the Boston Marathon
bomber is a white American

38 replie(s)
SALON, by David Sirota    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/17/2013 7:38:32 AM     Post Reply
As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

Obama: Gun lobby ´lied´ about
background check bill

38 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 4/17/2013 6:09:57 PM     Post Reply
Washington — President Barack Obama says the Senate’s opposition to a bill that would have expanded background checks for gun buyers marks a “shameful day” in Washington. He says a minority of senators decided “it wasn’t worth it” to protect the nation’s children. Obama spoke in the Rose Garden shortly after the Senate vote rejecting a bipartisan effort to expand federal background checks to more firearms buyers. (Snip) The president pinned the blame for the measures failure, though five Democrats also opposed the plan. He also said the gun lobby and its allies “willfully lied” about background check bill.

Mark Kelly threatens to back
challenger to Flake over gun votes

37 replie(s)
The Hill [DC], by Daniel Strauss    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2013 4:33:26 PM     Post Reply
Mark Kelly, the husband of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), is threatening to back an election challenge against Sen. Jeff Flake if the Arizona Republican votes against legislation to expand background checks. At a Christian Science Monitor breakfast on Tuesday, Kelly said he would back an opponent to Flake if the "right candidate" was available and if the senator failed to support a background check bill, according to reports. Flake, who is not up for reelection until 2018, has been close to Kelly and Giffords. But Kelly said the issue of control trumped their ties.

Top Dem sees ´train wreck´
for Obama health law

36 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/17/2013 4:11:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- A senior Democratic senator who helped write President Barack Obama´s health care law stunned administration officials Wednesday, saying openly he thinks it´s headed for a "train wreck" because of bumbling implementation. "I just see a huge train wreck coming down," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., told Obama´s health care chief during a routine budget hearing that suddenly turned tense. Baucus is the first top Democrat to publicly voice fears about the rollout of the new health care law, designed to bring coverage to some 30 million uninsured Americans through a mix

Republicans pull plug
on Mark Sanford

35 replie(s)
Politico, by Alex Isenstadt    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2013 3:06:52 PM     Post Reply
National Republicans are pulling the plug on Mark Sanford’s suddenly besieged congressional campaign, POLITICO has learned — a potentially fatal blow to the former South Carolina governor’s dramatic comeback bid. Blindsided by news that Sanford’s ex-wife has accused him of trespassing and concluding he has no plausible path to victory, the National Republican Congressional Committee has decided not to spend more money on Sanford’s behalf ahead of the May 7 special election. “Mark Sanford has proven he knows what it takes to win elections. At this time, the NRCC will not be engaged in this special election,”

   

Post Reply   Close thread 707582





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS