I was yelling at the TV as I was watching these idiots. What do they think this is, a high school debate class? I mean, this is THE election of our lifetimes, and I know that is said every election but this time it really is true!

I think both George and Charles are two very smart people, but I agree with Mark on this one.
People don't vote because one person does better on a college debating scoring system.
They vote for the person that makes them feel good and safe if that person gets elected.
Nothing Obama said gained more votes. He may not have lost as many votes as the first debate, but he continued to lose votes.
Romney came across as a very smart and caring guy that can save the USA from continued decline.
Obama preached to his minions. He did not convince anyone that voting for him was a good idea.
On that basis Romney won big!

Levin raises valid points, as does the OP.

Charles and George want to keep attending D.C. Parties!

A tired observation but true nonetheless, politics is a game to inside the beltway types and, yes, totally out of touch. It's a mutual admiration society of asshats.

Really does seem like these idiots think that if a politician tells an obvious lie, it should be accepted as fact unless the other debater came to the debate with conclusive evidence that it is a lie.

If you back out all of obama's lies from the second debate, he probably did worse than the first debate.

Just to add, obama lies for a hobby. One quick lie he threw out (haven't seen anybody else pick up) is that he said the U.S. Dollar is higher today than when he took office. This is amazing not just because it isn't true, it is also amazing because it wasn't a topic, nobody is criticizing obama for driving the dollar down. obama figures he is so good at lying, he can just make them up as he goes.

For the dour among us, even a close election win bodes badly as the pendulum continues its swing toward the takers. No. Only a rout will do.

Levin and others see the light.

There is too much at stake for others not to see it.

Well stated #5.

"For the dour among us, even a close election win bodes badly as the pendulum continues its swing toward the takers. No. Only a rout will do."
Well said, #8, but I'm afraid that even a rout will only slow down the swing of the pendulum. It's heading toward 'the takers' regardless of outcome.

As usual America's voice "crying in the wilderness" nails it!

It would be most beneficial for the cause if, between now and November 6th, Doctor "K" and Professor Will both got out beyond the 495 Beltway and spent some quality time here in "flyover country" mixing and mingling with us "peasants."

I was not able to listen to Mark's show last evening, as we attended the Romney rally in Leesburg, VA. But reading Mark's comments, I agree with him 100 percent.

Obama lost and will keep on losing because he cannot explain the following...(a depressingly long list), that affects everybody:

-the high unemployment
-the rotten real estate market
-the scandals like Operation Fast 'n Furious
-crony capitalism like Solindra
-job killing regulations like Obama Care
-high gas prices and a failed energy policy
-military cuts and gays in the military
-high debt, with the promise for deeper debt
-failure to pass a budget
-failure to lead Congress

#13, Did Denis Miller open for Mitt? Miller is certainly doing his part in this election.

Mark Levin is a national treasure and a true patriot. May God bless him.

"Hope for the best, plan for the worst!"

I want Obama-Mao defeated, but I plan to arrange my life further on him not being defeated: A win win for me...while we lose if he is re-elected.

I just don't want to go over the cliff early.

On my bucket list are:

* have a beer with Mark Levin
* have another beer with Mark Levin

He's right on this; we here at L.com read and made comments on Will's column as well as Dr. K's.

Levin is right. It's Obama vs. Us. And we are at the edge.

A high school debate would be far better run and I hope better argued on both sides.

I used to like Levin and I admire his spirit, but he gets just a tad carried away, and doesn't have that friendly mode that make Hannity and Rush so easy to listen to. It's always *work* to listen to Levin!

Mark is an outstanding observer of the political life, with hardly any other to take second place. Americans can trust his word all the way to the voting booth. George Will and Dr. Krauthammer are what they profess to be, video educated talk show types. Both are okay, with Krauthammer being the better of the two. Mark has written a solid book on judges in America, and the Supreme Court. His voice should always be listened to and debated because it usually shows a viewpoint understanding the Constitution and the Founding Fathers who wrote it.

There is always room for good cop - bad cop in the sphere of political commentary along the conservative spectrum - and it is a spectrum. Levin, like Rush, Will, K and others are essentially in the political entertainment business and they each have their situational strong points in areas of economics, foreign policy, energy, projection of power, etc. Levin tends to appeal to my combative side but I don't take his every utterance on every issue to the bank any more than I would Will's.