The comments are hilarious.

These talking points do not make any sense.

I would press Obama and Crowley to see if they meant that Obama's comments in the Rose Garden, specifically "acts of terror" indicated whether or not the administration felt that the attack was terrorism or not. Pick, Mr. President and wing lady.

If not terrorism, then Romney was correct and Obama was not truthful at the debate. If terrorism, then why did the administration change the story and trot Susan Rice out on 5 shows to claim otherwise? Either way, Obama and wing lady are trapped.

Regarding the "lethargic pace" defense for awarding Obama more time, I do not believe that the debate rules regarding equal visibility were based on the units of words spoken. Otherwise, Obama could have filibustered the entire 90 minutes by spitting out a word every 30 to 60 seconds, thus shutting out Romney, correct? Since the units were time, the manner in which the candidates used their time (slow or fast cadence) was their choice.

If Ms. Crowley wasn't up to the task, she should have bowed out. Her bias showed loud and clear in that debate when she was supposed to be a neutral party.

Maybe, next, they can explain why Mitt Romney was able to defeat 0 and their heavy hitter simultaneously? Also, this memo is very poorly worded. So much for 'journalism'...

Good thing they don't keep time based on 0bama's thinking speed...

#4 I suspect this memo was written by Candy Crowley herself, which explains why its poorly worded.

The fly on the wall becomes the fly in the ointment.

Given a choice Crowley would much rather be derided by the right than the left. If she wasn't clearly in the tank for Obama she would have a a slew of death threats to wake up to and hate mail by the scores.
These people are always going to circle the wagons for each other .

Just on this one thing about Obama, I'll have to agree with CNN. He is pretty slow!

Being "amused" at CNN's obfuscation regarding the biased and unbelievably intrusive Crowley is not all that appropriate when we step back and realize that CNN is a Marxist-enabler whose in-the-tank candidate will finish ruining America with CNN's complete approval. Hilarious?
Not So Much. Crowley was Obama's agent and for that she is praised by the CNN explainers. Blame the RNC for continually agreeing to disadvantageous debate moderators ... you can't fix stupid.

Let me point out two completely unrelated facts here.

1. Crowley just happened to have with her a transcript of Zero's speech.
2. Zero asked Crowley to check the transcript of his speech, indicating he knew she had it.

Q: How did Zero know Crowley had the transcript?

Candy Crowley had a transcript of the Rose Garden press conference where BO addressed the violent acts against our embassies overseas. She said she had that transcript because she knew the questions that would be asked, and had the transcript for reference.

The question did not reference the Rose Garden statement or violence to our other embassies, but asked who was responsible for denying assistance to the Ambassador, despite his calls for help. How/why did BO even know she had that particular transcript, as he yelled out to her, 'Get the transcript'.

Fat Cath just confirmed what I already knew. And no amount of spin will peck my interest to ever watch CNN again. For me I will express my opinion with my remote

It would be hard to have less credibility than the Obama Administration, but CNN managed.

0bama did not say act (or acts) of terror. He specifically and exclusively used the plural. Any reasonable adult would connect these to all acts going back to World Trade I. The subsequent constant harping on the video by him and his minions completely validates only this view.

Obama, Fat Candy Crowley and CNN simply lied.
'Complicit' is the word you are looking for.

"Barry, did that mean boy get more words than you?Come on, you wait here. Mommy CNN will make sure that you get more minutes. You can say ahhhh and ummmm more slowly now. "

Unreal.

Looking at the bright side, Crowleys performance clearly illustrated how far into the sewer media in general, and CNN in particular, have sunken to protect their chosen one. Keep up the good work, CNN, more votes for Romney!

Check out the picture of crowley's desk. Does it not remind you of a fifteen year old girl's unserious desk? Goes along with a sophomoric mind.

I would recommend rasberries and thunderous pharts. It was a two man tag team of Obam and Crowly vs Romney.

Her performance and the management response is EXACTLY why the network is failing.