Yahoo News. Enough said.

Jeff tries to paint Obama as a win.

Unfortunately, the Prez mock outrage about questioning Libya is lame, stale and totally from the Dem playbook.

Obama waging his finger at us is a great reminder of Pres Clinton and Monica.

It did not work then and does not work now.
Plus add a dead CIA agent now.

Why are we posting Yahoo, it's not a news source.

Yahoo is a search engine that is advertisement driven.

Their so called news is an editorial blog.

Tried to "vote" on the CNN poll right after the debate, vote count for O was increasing and showing 100% for him. Tried four times and the vote for Romney stayed at 0% while O's kept going up. Finally on the fifth try it registered and votes for Romney started showing. So it looks like they gave O a huge head start.

Obama was flailing wildly and if you count the number of blows struck, as in a prize fiht, he probably had the edge. He was, however, spouting gibberish and nonsense.

If Obama exposed himself and looked like he had tourette syndrome Greenfield and the MSM would still say he won...Obama lost on Energy/Economy/His Record/and the lie on Benghazi...he proved why he governs like an ideologically driven fool

I didn't realize that debated could be won by lying, having the moderator lie for you and by getting extra time. This bastid ALWAYS needs people to change his diapers and wiping his chin!! He cannot stand on his own, ever! He actually CALLED on Crowley to lie for him, to repeat his lies, and she did...amazing!!! The socialist left can go to HADES!

Jeff you are in dreamland once again, check the facts not the lsm drool and you'll see Romney won on the economy, jobs and demeanor.

He didn't win and he had huge assists from the moderator. What scares me is that he has a foreign policy debate coming up and he clearly doesn't want to talk about that.

What's he going to do to get out of it?

All your debate are belong to us!

Greenfield, what a maroon. Sure, Obama won if all he had to do was show up and talk AND the listener believe everything he said. Most of his important replies were lies. The rest were boilerplate garbage.

Why is there, in American politics, such a large capacity to believe and forgive Democrat perfidity?

Too bad? Go to blazes you media liar. Greenfield's smug take on everything was tiresome before, now that I see how deep he is into the neocommunist left, I will go out of my way to avoid anything he says.

"Obama wins the second debate. Too bad it's not the one that mattered"

Translation:

"Team Obama lost yet again, just not as badly this time"

"That's not true." The new rebutal after a blatant lie.

FTA: In every debate, whatever the format, whatever the questions, there is one and only one way to identify the winner: Who commands the room? Who drives the narrative? Who is in charge? More often than not on Tuesday night, I think, Obama had the better of it.

Does it matter what he actually says?

It's funny.. it almost feels to me like Obama won, too.. if only because he didn't receive the knock-out punches he should have. And I still don't understand why Mitt didn't explicitly confront him with the fact that after the embassy murders the administration had immediately started disseminating the red herring that it was because of the video. Am I missing something?

However. I do think though that the more the nation sees of these two together, the more they will turn to Mitt and/or away from Bams. Even the libs must be weary of the S whistles and the unfeeling cadence of his speech, whereas Mitt comes off definitely more likeable, wonderful and even visionary. Not to mention Bams' evasiveness.

I agree with #2.

Obama won the debate if you accept lying before the American people as a legitimate premise. Otherwise, not so much.

Nice try Yahoo but you lose again....

Obama only succeded in not repeating his first debate performance. He did not win or lose.

No, Jeff, Obama was not a winner. He acted like a spoiled child. His performance was nothing more than showing off for the adults. The adoring big, momma Crowley, like mothers of spoiled children, didn't seem to care that Barry's misbehavior was a reflection on her.

Sorry, no matter how badly you want it to be, Obama did NOT win.

I call BS. But then again, it helps when the moderator of the debate jumps in to participate on your behalf.

Kind of like when your Sec of State attemps to take the blame for your Administration's mishandling of Libya...

Took a quick look at the 36,000+ responses. They mocked the article.

"Who commands the room? Who's in charge? Who drives the Narrative?" If that decides the winner, Crowley won!

0bama did NOT win the debate. I was happy to see the Luntz focus groups see all the wonderful potential in Romney. Unlike the owners of "0bama phones," all these people who possess these FREE phones used them to Tweet they want to kill Romney, because they might lose their Food Stamps and Free Phones. How sick has this society become?

Sorry. Obama might get a 3-2 decision call on points but everybody saw the rabbit punches and the shot below the belt that the referee ignored. He won but he didn't win. The kind of mix up that leaves the paying spectator bitter. The fix was in.

Obama never answered the question about $4.00 gas either. He actually didn't give a direct answer all night.
Too bad he is playing to the "low information" voters who can't tell fact from lie.

So the liar wins and the person telling the truth loses? Ok, right, if that makes you happy go to your fantasy corner and suck your thumb.

Folks, there are two distinct things under discussion here, and they are different: Who won the debate, and who actually deserved to win the debate. Mitt Romney was disciplined, factual, and effective. Barack Obama was dishonest, facile, and evasive. Mitt deserved to win. However, he was working against a biased room, slanted questions, and the Immoderator, Candy Crowley. Under those circumstances, it would have been virtually impossible for Mitt to score a clean victory, and he didn't.

#4 and #15 get it exactly right: Obama won this round narrowly on points, but Romney is neither down nor out. My guess is Romney won the post-debate coverage and may be on track to win this election.

All your moderator are belong to us