 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Desperate and dirty! Obama goes for jugular in ugly clashes with Romney during fiery debate - but will it turn round his ailing campaign?
Daily Mail [UK], by Toby Harnden, Hugo Gye
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 10/17/2012 5:05:26 AM
|
| A bristling Barack Obama went on a relentless attack in the second presidential debate, but his rival Mitt Romney gave no ground as the two men clashed repeatedly during angry and at times electric exchanges on Tuesday night. Clearly arriving with a different game plan after his lacklustre performance in Denver two weeks ago, Obama assailed Romney on his tax rate, his tax plan, his stance on the auto bailout, women’s rights and his plans to stand up to China. And this time he didn’t shy away from personal assaults on Romney’s wealth, his record at Bain
|
Comments: The intervention by Crowley, siding with Obama on whether or not he referred to the Benghazi attack as a terrorist attack, had to have been arranged beforehand or, at the very least, anticipated by Crowley. It was just too pat. Even if it wasn't, she should not have stood in his corner. The Telegraph was quick to point out at the end of the debate that Crowley afforded Obama more time than Romney.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Deedo, 10/17/2012 5:45:01 AM (No. 8939156)
When pressed on who and why more security was withheld from the Benghazi consulate after repeated requests, the President got all indignant about Romney politicizing the tragedy. Then, without breaking a sweat, Obama brags about how he killed Osama Bin Laden (surely that's not political s/o).
Worse yet, Obama is bragging that the tireless action of countless intelligence officials, the military and especially Seal Team 6 don't count; that Obama gets all the credit personally. He claims credit for the deeds of others.
In stark and quiet contrast, Romney has countless personal acts of charity and humanitarianism that he actually did do, and never, ever discusses them, for he does these acts not for personal glory. If Obama gave to charity, he would undoubtedly keep reminding us. Obama may soon brag about the Girl Scout cookies he once bought.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/17/2012 6:01:41 AM (No. 8939164)
The good ship 0bama hit an iceberg about two weeks ago, the whole side is ripped open, it has lost it's momentum, and it is going down slowly. Things will get much uglier before it settles on the bottom. By next week, the left will see that nothing can save the ship or the captain.
Three weeks until the election. The end of the 0bama's tyranny is in sight!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
lazyman, 10/17/2012 6:43:13 AM (No. 8939218)
Thought Mitt did well considering it was two to one against him when you count the fat lady.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 10/17/2012 6:48:57 AM (No. 8939222)
Obama is more in his element when engaging a sympathetic mob...uh, town hall audience....sorry. I'll be curious to see how he does in the last debate when the format is supposed to be the same as the first.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bmw50, 10/17/2012 6:59:10 AM (No. 8939240)
Obama is all about perception. But perception is not reality and that is where Obama fails. Notice what all the taking heads are saying; nothing about the substance of what Obama says, just how "HE'S BACK", how well he fought, and using terms like "jugular" "firey" and "turned around his ailing campaign" (words from the title of this article). If Obama gained ground, he did so because Romney blew past a couple of barn-door wide opportunities and failed to capitalize on them. Obama has nothing to make this country better, period. Obama is a small man with no character and a perverted ideology on how to run a country. His government was and always will be about Chicago croney politics, nothing more.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
kayjaymac, 10/17/2012 7:05:06 AM (No. 8939245)
He didn't SAY anything, but he didn't say it even louder than in the first debate.
All I heard was blah blah blah from him.
It was excruciating to watch. The worst part was his pleading, ''Candy, Candy..." whenever Mitt went a little long or he wanted to interrupt.
Like a toddler pulling on his mom's skirt to get her attention to tattle on his brother.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Lala, 10/17/2012 7:10:12 AM (No. 8939252)
It's a shame Obama is not as aggressive with Americas enemies. I am praying that Mitt asks him what he meant when he told the Russians that he would be more flexible after the election. I thought it was treasonous then and I still think it is treasonous.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff, 10/17/2012 7:14:29 AM (No. 8939258)
I gave this one an hour before I bailed out for the Yankees game. He did just what I expected - more energized and aggresive, but ugly, negative, pompous, arrogant, dishonest. I will give Barry credit for finally producing something shovel ready, because he was shovelling it deep last night. The questions from the bimbo undecided were inane, and the Phat Candy tag teaming with Barry was par for the course. May she never be allowed to moderate another debate again. Credit Mitt for holding his own against this nonsense.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
suziesuburbanite, 10/17/2012 7:21:46 AM (No. 8939271)
A most petulant performance
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Rob_NC, 10/17/2012 7:27:48 AM (No. 8939283)
..Mitt still gets my bet....but sadly the margin of victory tells me this a really sick country..
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 10/17/2012 7:54:59 AM (No. 8939344)
I'm sending the governor yet another donation this morning. He may not really need my money, but the action sure makes me feel I'm helping.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/17/2012 7:55:16 AM (No. 8939345)
WE all knew going into this debate crowley was in obama's corner -- so what's new?
President Romney looked "Presidential" -- and explained his plan to get America moving again....
LZK
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 10/17/2012 7:59:39 AM (No. 8939363)
Well, I saw the Islam ring was pointedly visible again. I watched Mitt do a great job about his economic plan. I laughed as Obama scurried off back to his stool when Mitt confrontd him about his turn to speak, making Obama look like a wimp(perception). I listened to Mitt make a great argument as to why he is not like Bush. He made Obama look little and silly. Great job Mr. Romney.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Grambo, 10/17/2012 8:02:54 AM (No. 8939372)
Crowley didn’t disappoint with her partisan performance and choice of audience questions. All thorugh the interview I couldn’t take my eyes off those huge scars on the left side of Obama’s head. I kept wishing Romney would say, “By the way, Mr. President, where did you (or Bari Shabbaz) get those scars?”
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Mermaid1, 10/17/2012 8:05:31 AM (No. 8939378)
Whose idea was it to have Meatloaf moderate this debate?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Raristotle, 10/17/2012 8:11:57 AM (No. 8939392)
OP--I thought the same thing (that Crowley's intervention was prepared beforehand). Right after Crowley defending Obama's lie, the television camera went to crowd-shot. Michelle Obama, herself, was leading the instant applause.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Newtsche, 10/17/2012 8:25:42 AM (No. 8939422)
Favorite moment, Obama to Romney --
"Yours is bigger than mine." (laughter)
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/17/2012 8:30:06 AM (No. 8939432)
Don't think he's gained a thing more than a few pats on the back by his media. Physically he looks underfed. The Chicago dudes have a name for it. They call it "the slims." They've seen it before.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
saucy, 10/17/2012 8:30:40 AM (No. 8939433)
First came LIE after LIE after LIE - then Bamster's whiney voice, his scatterbrained logic, his recollections from years on the teleprompter and finally the flashes of bitter anger followed immediately with a broad evil smile.
All - very offputting. Signs of a looser.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 10/17/2012 8:31:10 AM (No. 8939435)
@16 I've seen comments this morning that Candy Crowley spent Sunday at the White House. It's fairly obvious. So true, #10 and so funny, #15.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
hadass23, 10/17/2012 8:37:17 AM (No. 8939447)
Obama, just like the Black Panthers who blocked white voters from the polls in 2008, Obama tried to intimidate and bully Romney last night. Mitt Romney is made of sterner stuff than liberal liars.
Romney won the debate because Mitt exposed Obama's failures in the economy, increasing deficits, and high unemployment.
70,000,000 Americans heard last night the plight of 23,000,000 million unemployed who are are looking for work to support our families. Republicans can help create work while Democrats insist on more tax and spend policies which has bankrupted the USA.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
This9, 10/17/2012 8:38:28 AM (No. 8939451)
When Romney got in BO face about energy. He was great. He absolutely made BO very small. Physically and mentally dominating our unqualified POTUS
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
stryker714, 10/17/2012 8:43:18 AM (No. 8939467)
Right #13. I was on the lookout for that ring but was not watching on a hd tv-could not discern. The camera team must have known the story, b/c whenever they framed Obama in the camera, with ring prevalent, they quickly changed shots/cameras so no time to analyze. Obama never carried the microphone in his left hand, which would have made his ring hand easier to see.
Did anyone hear the audience seem to gasp when Obama was talking about the price of gas? When he said, "we aren't going back to that....era"? He said the reason gas was low under Bush was b/c of the lousy economy! Ha! I'm sure the Saudi Royal family has nothing to do with it! Kickbacks couldn't possibly be the reason it's high. /s off.
When asked about F&F, Obama threw a herring about Romney voting for/not some gun law, then changed the subject to education.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 10/17/2012 8:49:38 AM (No. 8939492)
Turn around Obama's ailing campaign? This debate confirmed again what any reasonably prudent man or woman, who has been paying attention the last six-years, has known all along.......Barry is simply an undocumented, dishonest, petty, professional street agitator who has never held a regular job in the real world and doesn't have a clue!
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 10/17/2012 8:53:06 AM (No. 8939503)
CNN had a poll that asked if undecided viewers changed their minds about whom to vote for after the debate. 25% moved to Obama, 25% moved to Romney, and the rest were unmoved. Obama only slowed his decent.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
fed-up, 10/17/2012 8:54:16 AM (No. 8939506)
Romney missed so many opportunities though. I was hoping to hear him mention all the failed green energy plants that wasted tax payer money. WE have heard the same talking points now for every debate. The last debate he must hone in on the juglar. Repeat as necessary, wasted money, emtpy chair foreign policy, lies on Lybia.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
dman, 10/17/2012 9:21:54 AM (No. 8939593)
NerØbama obviously had similar debate prep to what Biden had, with similar effect. Watching him simply reminded me of Uncle Joe.
Yes, there were missed opportunities and unforced errors on both sides, as well as a bad call by a corrupt "referee". Unlike a sporting event, however, the "game" didn't end when the clock ran out. Victory or defeat will be determined not by points and rules, but by the credibility of the candidates. That process continues through NOvember 6th.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 10/17/2012 9:26:27 AM (No. 8939609)
Sorry. I turned the thing off about 9:20 pm, being unable to stand Obama's fusillade of jive b.s., not to mention the sound of his voice. Glad to read Romney held his own, however.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
beca, 10/17/2012 9:26:44 AM (No. 8939610)
lies dont win debates and o told plenty of them
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
saurkrut, 10/17/2012 9:31:12 AM (No. 8939622)
I find it truly disturbing that anyone reviewing this administration's record for the past four years, and who has true love for this country would even consider voting for this affirmative action president.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
bpl40, 10/17/2012 9:52:10 AM (No. 8939683)
Why was Benghazi held till the end of the debate? So Poison Candy could step in and declare the debate over if things got out of hand. If you don't see an Axelrod/Crowley inter connect here look me up to sell you a bridge.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/17/2012 9:56:19 AM (No. 8939698)
17, did he really say that?
After Duh Wun's middle-finger salutes and his previous history of tacky double entendres, it would not surprise me in the least.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
privateer, 10/17/2012 10:09:40 AM (No. 8939748)
I wish some gifted cartoonist like Ramirez et. al. would draw one of : a toddler-sized Zero, hanging onto a mother's skirt wailing :Candy, Candy!"
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/17/2012 10:10:09 AM (No. 8939750)
"That tense moment saw the audience burst into a round of applause - despite rules meant to restrict any displays of partisanship from the crowd."
Nope. That was MICHELLE. Not the audience. She was clapping very loudly in an obvious attempt to get others to join in. Real Clear Politics has the tape.. Watch the bottom of the screen:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/17/michelle_obama_broke_agreed_upon_rules_clapped_at_debate.html
However, while people talk about Crowley and Libya and the WSJ editorializes about Obama not having a plan, everyone seems to have misssed what I believe was the most important statement of the night, made by Obama during his closing. Obama again stated that everyone is "entitled to their fair share."
NO, we are NOT. Neither America nor Christianity has ever been about guaranteeing outcomes. Neither America nor Christianity has ever been about making sure everyone gets the same size piece of the pie. No one is ENTITLED to a FAIR SHARE. That's socialism.
And if the Wall Street Journal's editorial writers want to know what Obama's plan is, they need look no further than that statement to divine it. It says all you need to know about his ideology and his intentions.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
TinCan, 10/17/2012 10:37:04 AM (No. 8939844)
#26 et al, Not missed opportunties; saving the good stuff for the last "Hoo - Rah" Monday. Broadsides, expend all ammo!
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Butch59, 10/17/2012 11:18:36 AM (No. 8939980)
The wife and I were out last night, so we missed most of the debate, but did get home in time to see the last part about Libya. I simply couldn't believe my ears when Obozo said that he did call the attackers "terrorists" and was even more astounded when the fat lady jumped in to back him up. Do these people really believe that we can't simply call up the speech and read it for ourselves? And I was disappointed when Romney didn't come back and state exactly what Obozo did say.
Overall, the portion that I did see, Romney was capable and did a good job. But, as I read the morning headlines, the whole thing is being reported as I expected. If you are a Dims, Obozo hit one out of the park (he didn't) and if you are a Republican, then Romney came out on top. As many of us here at LCom, I will wait until Nov. 6 (or 7th) to see how the majority view all of this.
Lastly, here's praying the Mitt CAN slam one out of the park next Monday.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
zbogwan2, 10/17/2012 11:19:56 AM (No. 8939984)
Gov. Romney pointed out all of Obamas broken promises and the true condition of the economy under Obamas watch. Same was devastating at the least. Obama just sang the same old out of tune songs,so to speak.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
rileysmom, 10/17/2012 11:32:54 AM (No. 8940017)
Obama was a racist!! When speaking of illegal immigrants with criminal records, he threw out the "gang banger" phrase. Racist! Doesn't he know that Hispanics and Blacks think that phrase is code for them? I think he should apologize immediately!! s/
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
lylacat, 10/17/2012 11:50:20 AM (No. 8940077)
I was happy to see the Luntz focus groups see all the wonderful potential in Romney after the debate. Unlike the owners of "0bama phones," all these people who possess these FREE phones used them to Tweet they want to kill Romney, because they might lose their Food Stamps and Free Phones. How sick has this society become?
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Newtsche, 10/17/2012 12:11:37 PM (No. 8940147)
Yes, #32, in talking about financial portfolios, a lame attempt to point out Romney's wealth.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
mathman, 10/17/2012 12:26:14 PM (No. 8940180)
With Obama, what you see is what you get. His promises? We know now he will not keep them. His opinions? We know now that he makes them up. His own history? It's the fault of Bush. Jobs? The fault is in the rascally Republicans. Energy? we must believe in his vision, despite his manifest ability to see nothing. Petulant, whining, constantly tugging on the skirt of the moderator, cannot hold his own, running on an empty record. What a waste of egg and sperm!
Should be the permanent end of affirmative action.
And, by the way, blame Bush. And the typhoon. And the Euro crisis. And those nice Muslims who refuse to believe that he is a nice guy. And those intelligence folks at State who messed everything up. And any other straw man he can think of. Excuse me. I mean, that his advisors can think of, since he doesn't think (he is so smart he does not need to think).
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
formerlyphelps, 10/17/2012 12:33:27 PM (No. 8940203)
FTA: “And Obama even suggested that his rival would lower gas prices only by taking the economy to 'the verge of collapse'.”
0-bama actually stated the reason gas prices were $1.86 when he took office was because the economy was so terrible. He then elaborated that gas prices are high now because he has expanded oil and gas production and the economy is recovering.
So to 0-bama high prices = good economy, low prices = economic crisis. No one in the audience laughed at this absurd economically illiterate notion.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp, 10/17/2012 12:34:40 PM (No. 8940208)
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp, 10/17/2012 12:36:33 PM (No. 8940215)
It was all over when the fat lady sang. The debate was rigged. I'll bet Obama knew every single question ahead of time.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
mickturn, 10/17/2012 1:01:20 PM (No. 8940268)
The nastiness in the man comes out. He has absolutely nothing to run on so he gets into a snit and disrespects everything and everyone. Yea, we need to give this bad actor another 4 years...yea, right! Oh, he lies about almost everything.......
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
simple simon, 10/17/2012 1:22:33 PM (No. 8940331)
Last night I go this feeling that Romney's eyes have been opened and he is no longer fighting for an election but rather fighting for justice and righteousness. It's flipped from a competition in his eyes to a battle against evil - I think he really gets it now and that steel jaw against Obama is real.
I'm personally more encouraged than ever before about the right man in the right place at the right time - can you imagine if we had a 'politician' in there fighting for us right now?
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
butch, 10/17/2012 2:15:59 PM (No. 8940474)
#3 nails it. Mitt Romney had to debate two opponents last night, and he did pretty darned well.
Candy Crowley disgraced herself with her "correction" of Gov. Romney's statement about Libya with that ridiculous bit about Obama's Sept. 12 announcement in the Rose Garden when Obama actually used the word "terror." (No matter that the entire administration lied for weeks thereafter about what happened in Libya.)
Ms. Crowley telling Gov. Romney to sit down was crass and rude.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
bighambone, 10/17/2012 4:33:49 PM (No. 8940789)
Look, Obama's entire campaign is premised on calling Romney names and trashing sound business oriented proposals that Romney has made to get the economy back on track and create millions of new jobs. Obama has no economic plan of his own that he can speak of, other then borrowing money from China and then spending it, thus further ramping up the deficit.
Obama has perfected rhetoric designed to make his socialist oriented policies look seemingly reasonable to the uninformed, but anyone with a brain and an education has figured out that socialism, no matter how Obama describes it, in terms of "fairness" and "giving everybody an equal shot" has never worked anyplace where it has been tried, because the socialists have failed to answer the question, what do they do when they run out of everyone else's money?
This is a very important election indeed!
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
larryp, 10/17/2012 4:34:12 PM (No. 8940790)
so what is Obama going to say about the Muslim man that wanted to blow him up? that he is a nice guy but mis-directed?
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 10/17/2012 5:23:28 PM (No. 8940887)
#15 get it right and stop insulting Mrs. Jabba the Hut
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 10/17/2012 5:50:01 PM (No. 8940922)
#49 that man( stupid 18 year old) may have plotted to blow up the NY fed bank but the Obama was the first target addition is merely a quick wag the dog ploy to gain sympathy for an endangered Obe. Poor dog may become lunch if it doesn't work..
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 10/17/2012 6:08:24 PM (No. 8940949)
Candy Crowley was obnoxious and obviously partisan. If Obama needs her help to win a debate, he's showing his weakness vs. Romney.
#47, Of course Crowley was crass and rude to Mr. Romney when she told him to sit down. She will, however, remember that tiny "victory" with satisfaction for the rest of her life.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/17/2012 9:08:51 PM (No. 8941159)
While Romney could have made the empty chair statement last night, may as well save it for next week and really go for Obie's jugular.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
danu, 10/17/2012 11:57:24 PM (No. 8941380)
All the interactions between Blubbing Barri and his Dear block-and-tackle Mummy, the questions, the Michelle outburst, the handy-dandy Rose Garden transcript all point to the fact that they had the entire bit 'wired'.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
An English class for trolls, professional offence-takers and climate activists
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by James Delingpole
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/7/2013 10:38:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Should Michael Mann be given the electric chair for having concocted arguably the most risibly inept, misleading, cherry-picking, worthless and mendacious graph--the Hockey Stick--in the history of junk science? Should George Monbiot be hanged by the neck for his decade or so´s hysterical promulgation of the great climate change scam and other idiocies too numerous to mention? Should Tim Flannery be fed to the crocodiles for the role he has played in the fleecing of the Australian taxpayer and the diversion of scarce resources into pointless projects like all the eyewateringly expensive desalination plants built as a result of his
|
|
Call illegals ‘irregulars’ says Eurocrat
|
|
Daily Express [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 9:11:37 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior Eurocrat sparked outrage last night after calling for the phrase “illegal immigrant” to be banned from the European Union.[Snip] She has instructed EU Commission staff to refer to foreigners who break border control laws as “irregular migrants” or simply “people” instead. But her attempt to dictate how the issue of immigration is discussed was savaged last night. UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage said: “Now the EU is even trying to change the language. “This sounds like something straight out of the pages of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. It shows that what we are dealing with here
|
Michael Philpott is a perfect parable for our age: His story shows the pervasiveness of evil born out of welfare dependency
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by A. N. Wilson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:56:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
His house, his booze, his drugs, his women and his 17 children were paid for by a benefits system meant to be a safety net for the truly needy.[Snip] This was one of the most horrible crimes committed against children in Britain in recent years. It was cynical. It was calculating. And it was done out of malice in a ham-fisted plot which went wrong. The trial spoke volumes about the sheer nastiness of the individuals involved. But it also lifted the lid on the bleak and often grotesque world of the welfare benefit scroungers--of whom there are not dozens,
|
The reef that regenerated: Researchers find corals in Northern Australia healed themselves in just 12 years
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Mark Prigg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/6/2013 8:07:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A coral reef in Northern Australia severely damaged by warming seas has managed to completely heal itself in just 12 years, stunned researchers have found. The team found that being left alone to breed on its own was key. The discovery raises hope that other damaged reefs could ´regenerate´. The new research shows that an isolated reef off the northwest coast of Australia that was severely damaged by a period of warming in 1998. It was hit by coral bleaching, caused by higher water temperatures that break down the coral´s symbiotic relationship with algae that provide food for coral growth.
|
North Korea moves second missile as UN chief warns ´nuclear threat is not a game´
|
|
Daily Express [UK], by Charlotte Meredith
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/5/2013 5:36:43 AM
Post Reply
|
|
North Korea has transported two more missiles to the east coast, Seoul military sources have revealed, triggering speculation that it is ready for an abrupt missile launch. North Korea has loaded two intermediate-range missiles onto mobile launchers and hidden them in an unidentified facility near the east coast, South Korea´s Yonhap news agency has said. "It has been confirmed that North Korea, early this week, transported two Musudan mid-range missiles by train to the east coast and loaded them on vehicles equipped with launch pads," Yonhap quoted the official as saying. The official said the mobile launchers had since
|
Is North Korea really looking to start a war?
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Shashank Joshi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/4/2013 3:47:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As the US and China grow increasingly involved, Kim Jong-un must be brought into line if war is not to be triggered by an act of recklessness. There are two schools of thought about what lies behind North Korea’s increasingly frenzied posturing. The first goes like this: the rhetoric emanating from Pyongyang--including calls to “break the waists of the crazy enemies [and] totally cut their windpipes”--is no worse than their decades-old ritualistic promises to turn South Korea into a “sea of fire”. What we are witnessing, according to this theory, is nothing more than an inexperienced leader
|
Islamism is winning the cognitive war – thanks to manipulative and gullible journalists
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Richard Landes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/4/2013 3:43:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anyone who remembers the halcyon dreams of the 1990s, of civil society spreading the world over, heralding a new peaceful, global millennium, must marvel at the path the young 21st century has taken. Even those who paid attention to global Jihad before the millennium could not imagine how vulnerable the West would prove in the coming, wildly asymmetrical war. Those who, over the course of the last 13 years, have awakened to the ever-growing danger of Islamism and to the astonishing inability of decent people--Muslims and non-Muslims--to effectively oppose its aggressions, owe themselves a brief lesson in cognitive warfare, and
|
Sanford defeats Bostic to claim 1st District GOP runoff
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Robert Behre
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/2/2013 8:49:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The political race many had anticipated would unfold in the 1st congressional district--the national comedian’s sister versus the once-disgraced governor angling for a comeback--is here. Former Gov. Mark Sanford won Tuesday’s GOP runoff over former Charleston County Councilman Curtis Bostic, according to unofficial results. Sanford now faces five more weeks on the campaign trail before a May 7 showdown with Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, whose business background and moderate politics are expected to create a tight contest. Lowcountry voters haven’t elected a Democrat from the 1st District for more than three decades, but Colbert Busch already has shown
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Is going gluten-free healthier for everybody?
|
|
The Week, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|