 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Clinton Accepts Blame for Benghazi
Wall Street Journal, by Monica Langley
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Photoonist, 10/16/2012 12:30:42 AM
|
| U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she takes responsibility for security at the American diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, where Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died in an attack last month. "I take responsibility," Mrs. Clinton said in a recent interview in her office. "I'm the Secretary of State with 60,000-plus employees around the world. This is like a big family…It's painful, absolutely painful." (Snip) She also spoke in advance of the second presidential debate, which will occur Tuesday night. Both security arrangements in Benghazi and the administration's differing explanations of whether the attack was the result
|
Comments: Not exactly. It was ''the fog of war.'' Or her mind was Jello or something. Nobody could be expected to know she claims. But the facts say otherwise as everybody on the ground in Benghazi and other parts of Libya had been aware of the increasing threat for months and had officially complained about it. This means that they were ignored, from the State Dept to higher up. The question is, how much higher up? Hillary can claim the buck stops with her BUT her employment, barring impeachment, begins and ends with 0bama. The buck stops at his desk. Problem
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/16/2012 12:31:21 AM (No. 8936181)
...Problem is, he's rarely there.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
reaganrepublican, 10/16/2012 12:40:38 AM (No. 8936188)
By taking the blame, Hillary has destroyed any chance of any type of public office. Would she really take the proverbial bullet for O? She can claim credit for the most incompetent State Department since Madeline Albright, would a Clinton really do this? Does this really take the pressure off of O? (I dont think so, but it is very interesting)
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
grounded, 10/16/2012 12:56:18 AM (No. 8936203)
Hillary jumps under the Bam Bus. With her generous keister, I'm not sure how she made the slide. Lotsa Lube no doubt. Say hi to Granny Toot and the Reverend Wright under there.
Way to take one for the team, Hill. Now you're hopin' they'll remember your tremendous sacrifices come 2016. I mean you stuck by philandering Bill when any woman with an ounce of self respect would have sent his sorry butt packing. The nomination in 2008 was supposed to the payoff for that bit of selflessness until the Dem power brokers tossed you overboard for the Magic Mulatto, and all that historic BS. Oh well, a little nip and tuck work and some Botox and Lipo and you'll be ready for the show.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
TruthandJustice, 10/16/2012 12:59:11 AM (No. 8936205)
Hillary is trying to keep Obama in office...to keep justice at bay....if these communist subversives loose power...the investigations will reveal the for the traitors they are...Tyranny has arrived
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 10/16/2012 1:03:07 AM (No. 8936210)
A 60,000 member family with a sociopath as their Head. Pretty scary stuff.
All Hillary cares about is her future political power. When she annihilated women her husband raped/molested/boinked, her "Scorched Earth Policy" used from information gathered from her "Bimbo Alert Squad" . . . . well, what's an Ambassador or two?
Janet Reno took "full responsibility" for Waco & it meant absolutely nothing. This doesn't either.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Gr8Shiphandler, 10/16/2012 1:04:00 AM (No. 8936211)
Anyone with a bit of integrity would resign.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rob_NC, 10/16/2012 1:07:09 AM (No. 8936215)
...isn`t this pathetic the only one with any balls in this administration is a woman...no Hillary try as you might to protect this wh the buck stops with him....no wonder Michele always seem to have such a scowl.....hiding behind a skirt......unreal
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Cavallodifiero, 10/16/2012 1:11:11 AM (No. 8936217)
Janet Reno took responsibility for the Waco TX murders and then said now can I get back to work for the American people, with the same cold heart of Hillary Clinton.
The American people must not let it rest but rather insist on an investigation and call for her resignation regardless of the outcome of an investigation, because she lied throughout this entire mess.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ForNow, 10/16/2012 1:13:23 AM (No. 8936221)
I'd had a thought much earlier today, if not last night, what if Hillary takes some blame NOW, then Obama takes same blame AFTER the election (if he's reelected) toward restoring her viability as a presidential candidate in 201t. I didn't say anything about it because I didn't want to those folks to start thinking along those lines if they hadn't already. Nevertheless it's such an obvious thing to think of.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 10/16/2012 1:19:52 AM (No. 8936227)
Responsibility with no accountability or consequences = USELESS.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
suejeanne, 10/16/2012 1:23:57 AM (No. 8936233)
"the same cold heart" . . . beautifully put.
they got away with Waco - when Janet Reno "took responsibility" but no questions were answered and she did not resign . . .
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
danu, 10/16/2012 1:35:28 AM (No. 8936245)
Shrillary's admitting guilt?? Let the lawsuits begin!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 10/16/2012 1:41:03 AM (No. 8936246)
"I believe we need a president who believed what Harry Truman believed. That buck stopped in the Oval Office." -Hillary! Clinton, on the campaign trial, criticizing Obama, January 2008.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
country boy, 10/16/2012 3:08:36 AM (No. 8936283)
I'm with #10 and others. Admitting responsibility then "let's just move on" is like wrecking somebody's car, admitting it, then just walking away. How about paying for it????
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/16/2012 3:11:10 AM (No. 8936284)
Not good enough. The SoS carries out the policies of the pResident. Even if hellary is responsible for the lax security, 0 orchestrated the lies and coverup efforts. 0 came up with the lies about "the video made them do it." 0 lied to the American people, the UN and the world, and he is still lying.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
pickle1, 10/16/2012 3:57:39 AM (No. 8936298)
Never believe that Hillary and obama are not on the same side.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Spidey, 10/16/2012 4:49:24 AM (No. 8936330)
It's amazing to me this attack went on for 5-6 hours and there wasn't anybody available to parachute in from another area.No back up soldiers 5 or 6 hours away?
Hillary taking the blame isn't close to being heroic.She's protecting herself from further inquiries from congress and others as well as helping Obama the day before a make or break debate.
Of course she is to blame for ignoring requests for more security but that's not what she's taking blame for.
Her and Obama made a $70,000 video to be shown in Pakistan blaming the video long after they knew different.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Coy860, 10/16/2012 7:11:44 AM (No. 8936454)
This certainly won't endear Obama to womens' voters. Obama is busy fund raising with Hollyweirds, Hillary fell into the scotch bottle and our Ambassador got killed. On the other side, you have a serious, self-made man and a beautiful wife and family who wants to govern, rather than rule. Time to clean out the sewer that the current administration is.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
ruready?, 10/16/2012 7:12:12 AM (No. 8936455)
That will make a bump in the road.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 10/16/2012 7:12:22 AM (No. 8936456)
Hillary is through thanks to Obama. Her supporters should remember this on November 6. I don't think this was how the Clinton's planned it to end for them.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 10/16/2012 7:12:52 AM (No. 8936458)
No, #7, not balls! She's terrified cuz she knows first hand how Arkancide works!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Janjan, 10/16/2012 7:14:57 AM (No. 8936463)
#2 have to disagree with you there. She did this precisely so she could still run for President.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
papasparky, 10/16/2012 7:19:00 AM (No. 8936471)
For Hillary ("shame on you barack obama") Clinton, dodging future questions will seem anticlimactic after dodging bullets on the tarmac of a foreign airfield. /s
Let's hope the Romney administration makes those questions for Hillary and all her lying cohorts more lethal than Hillary's imaginary bullets.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
sadc, 10/16/2012 7:23:09 AM (No. 8936478)
Obama and Hillary are Alinsky-ites and the goal is always power and the means is always revolution. Hillary has Huma at her right side, which equals Muslim Brotherhood. They fail to realize that collapsing the system and bringing in a caliphate does not bode well for Hillary, or Huma and never for the arm bearing Moochelle, nor their daughters. Arrogance is their fuel.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Reilly, 10/16/2012 7:26:50 AM (No. 8936482)
How convenient. She's in Peru. Nobody can ask her why she was telling lies standing somberly next to those caskets. What rubbish!
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
bighambone, 10/16/2012 7:28:01 AM (No. 8936484)
Big Deal. Everybody already knows that as Secretary of State Hilliary Clinton is responsible for everything that happens within the Dept. of State including security at the embassies and consulates abroad.
What is happening now is Clinton is trying to outwardly give Barack Obama some political cover on this issue that is sure to come up in the debate tonight, and be a factor in the election. She is just showing the Democrats that she will fall on her sword to help the Obama/Biden ticket get re-elected. She has to do that to garner future Democrat Party support if she intends to run for President in 2016 on the Democrat ticket.
The fact remains that Obama as President is responsible to see that Clinton and every other of his appointees do their jobs. Obviously they did not, as the security at the consulate in Banghazi was so ineffective that the US Ambassador and other Americans were murdered there by radical Islamist terrorists, a fact that both Clinton and Obama won't even directly admit.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
altura81, 10/16/2012 7:31:09 AM (No. 8936493)
Hillary has somehow managed to become acceptable to the public. We need to remember who she really is. She has a reason for this action. We just don't know what it is yet.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
zbogwan2, 10/16/2012 7:34:49 AM (No. 8936498)
If this Benghazi Terrorist Attack occurred in Outer Schmolia and there were no phones,cameras,video feeds or instant transmission of pictures and data, then I could see Hillary using the "fog of war" statement.Hillary, Obama, the MSM and the rest of Obama's mob covered this attack with lie after lie. Consequences and accountability must happen for these lies.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
globalwarmer, 10/16/2012 7:43:27 AM (No. 8936512)
Just another totally incompetent Democrat boob clamoring for power. I hope this proves to be the figurative nail in both her's and Obama's coffins.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
gartrell bibberts, 10/16/2012 7:47:36 AM (No. 8936518)
Supreme Court seat?
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
FenwayFrank, 10/16/2012 7:47:51 AM (No. 8936519)
Who's the staff joker who wrote the byline for this Must Read?
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
chance_232, 10/16/2012 7:49:22 AM (No. 8936522)
Simple question: WHO appointed Hillary?
Hint: It WASNT Bush.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 10/16/2012 7:53:37 AM (No. 8936529)
I'm sorry - I don't buy any of it.
My diabolical intrigue hat stays on my head. Why would she do this? There has to be an upside for her.... Or was she threatened? That's almost too easy, with Huma constantly by her side.
She says she still believes in the Arab Spring idea of ''democracy'' (pure democracy = mobocracy, which is what we see there), and she says ''Democracy is hard. It's a never-completed journey.'' Never-completed? Hmmmmm.....
We at L.com know enough about all of them that we ought to realize there is no good being done here. Hillary has an agenda - the only questions are (1) what is hers, exactly? and (2) how much longer can she and Obama keep one-upping each other? (Or, 'one-undering', as the case may actually be.)
21 days, my friends. THREE WEEKS.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
fireman28, 10/16/2012 8:05:54 AM (No. 8936550)
Unfortunately there is a practice called "burrowing in" in federal service.
It means that most of Hillary's liberal appointees at State will convert to "federal employees" at high grades.
It means that libs will still be in charge sfter Romney wins.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/16/2012 8:11:12 AM (No. 8936560)
The PIAPS is mightily displeased and somehow, some way, Fauxbama will be sent the bill.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
rustycfc, 10/16/2012 8:12:16 AM (No. 8936561)
if she takes the blame, that means she killed those Americans in libya.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 10/16/2012 8:15:38 AM (No. 8936569)
Darned right she did.....6,000 people to watch over so how could she possibly blah blah blah? What I CAN'T figure out is what she gets out of falling on her sword for a man she despises ...or maybe she thinks her chances in 2016 would be worse if she doesn't stand up a little bit. And then there is the question opt why Bill, the "racist", is out there for Obama........is it simply that he can't say no to ask audience or camera time? It HAS to be more than simple Party loyalty.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Throwback, 10/16/2012 8:15:39 AM (No. 8936570)
#17, options were available. However,they would have resulted in a pile of expired terrorists at the compound. Bad optics.
Better to loose four than have to explain to the MB a few hundred dead "protestors". Don't want people mad at us. Hard to sing Kumbaya and explain the shell casings at the same time.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Judith, 10/16/2012 8:17:02 AM (No. 8936571)
HOW is this any different than her entire career? She has been a career stooge and she is behaving true to form. What amazes me is that the feminist women are so enthralled by her. Her successes have ALL been linked to the man/men she is serving. And, as far as I can see, everyone has abused her and paid no price for that abuse. Not even by her feminist supporters.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Felixcat, 10/16/2012 8:30:15 AM (No. 8936599)
I'm confused. Was the attack on the consulate a criminal act or an act of war (fog of war indeed)? So Hillary says she's responsible - and? I thought the youtube video was responsible?
Hillary (at the minimum) knew exactly what was taking place in Benghazi. 11 years after 9/11 and the billions poured into our intelligence community (which a part does exist at State) and either no one paid attention, ignored what was taking place or the exalted intelligence community really dropped the ball (highly doubtful in this case). Look - Benghazi may not abe Paris France but for this Administration to act as if the only way they would know what was taking place on the ground was to wait for some guy on horseback to deliver a message is ridiculous.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Pgvoisin, 10/16/2012 8:44:58 AM (No. 8936633)
So.....
The Secretary of State is now the POTUS?
"Fog of WAR"?
War sounds Presidential in scope.
Who is in charge here?
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
bpl40, 10/16/2012 8:48:47 AM (No. 8936637)
With Hillary there is always a big butt.. Did I misspell that??
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/16/2012 8:49:18 AM (No. 8936638)
Well -- someone had to fall on the sword.....
WE don't want obama looking incompetent -- toooo late....
If he didn't know and "uncle joe bite me" didn't know -- WHY not.....aren't they running the country as the top people in charge??????
LZK
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 10/16/2012 8:51:05 AM (No. 8936646)
If Romney goes in, many of the decisions that MUST BE MADE will have opposition. The next dhimmocrat will play on that and use it for a platform. I think Hillary will try to portray herself as a good party supporter to "help" BamBam.
If 0bama goes back in, even the dhimmocrats will not vote D after what he would do in a second term.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
faldo, 10/16/2012 8:52:26 AM (No. 8936648)
Taking the blame in the friendly confines of her office means absolutely nothing. Hold a press conference and face the fire, or shut up and let the criminal inquiry continue.
Thanks for nothing WSJ. The column might have been written by Monica Langley, but this has Rupert's diabolical paw prints all over it...!
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
pianogirl88, 10/16/2012 8:53:55 AM (No. 8936652)
It would be interesting to know exactly what she was promised for falling on this political sword. IIRC, she still has an enormous amount of debt left over from her 2008 presidential bid. The Won has hundreds of millions of dollars in his campaign chest, some of which could be headed to the the Hillbillies to help with the debt.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
asu86pe, 10/16/2012 8:53:56 AM (No. 8936654)
Sorry for the 2nd post but I could not find my previous quote in this story but this one from YAHOO News:
http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-im-responsible-consulate-security-065346821.html
About two thirds down in this article you'll find this:
FTA: Clinton told Fox News Channel that "the decisions about security are made by security professionals. But we're going to review everything to be sure we're doing what needs to be done in an increasingly risky environment."
SHE said it, this administration did it; made the environment increasingly RISKIER!
TRUTH!
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
dotonbut, 10/16/2012 9:16:52 AM (No. 8936658)
In her comments to CNN in Peru, Mrs. Clinton said President Barack Obama and Mr. Biden weren't involved in security decisions at the consulate in Benghazi. "I want to avoid some kind of political gotcha," she said.
Oh, and 60,000 staff to look after, that’s tough. Yea, I guess you cannot expect her to pay special attention to the one US Embassy that is situated in a country in the middle of a civil war where at least two thirds of the population hates the United States, and where our embassy has been attacked 3 times in the past few months. I guess on the other hand she DID give them special attention. She reduced their security staff after more had been requested.
I read comments after the CNN and other web reports on this incident and it is really scary to see how many people are willing to accept Hillary Clinton’s explanation of events without question. I considered posting a comment similar to the one above on the CNN blog but what’s the use?
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Luckyx3, 10/16/2012 9:41:04 AM (No. 8936708)
Too little, too late. Unfortunately, for the families of those who were killed, it won't make any difference.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 10/16/2012 9:51:19 AM (No. 8936731)
"Never believe that Hillary and obama are not on the same side."
Yes and no, depending on the particular contest...
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/16/2012 9:52:32 AM (No. 8936736)
No fan of Hillary, but she just showed herself to be the only adult in the Obama administration. Hillary 2, Obama 0. But there is more.
Hillary has now officially de-linked Benghazi from the Youtube video. Last week the State Department said that they had no idea why the White House linked Benghazi to the video. With Hillary's mea culpa, Benghazi is now an isolated terrorist attack that exploited a security failure by the State Department. Bad, but compartmentalized. And that now opens up the HUGE question: why did the White House link Benghazi to the video? Remember, the Cairo embassy issued an apology BEFORE any "demonstrations" even began. Did someone at the White House know they were coming? Who? When? And did they have a prepackaged narrative about them ready to roll out? When was Obama's UN speech written?
Hillary knows. Others know. She is inviting the questions as directly as she can. Please, someone begin asking them.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
mabelkitty, 10/16/2012 9:53:10 AM (No. 8936738)
She already stated she was leaving at the end of Obama's first term. For reasons I cannot comprehend, she has decided to write off any future Presidential runs and carry the stain in history of being the most ineffective SOS in recent memory.
They must have something good on her to get her to agree to it. Next item? How will Bill campaign for Obama when all he will be asked is how his wife messed up so badly. This doesn't exactly burnish his how legacy.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
saurkrut, 10/16/2012 9:55:45 AM (No. 8936744)
Fog of war my a--! Didn't some of the articles that were written on the attack state that drones were actually recording the attack? If true, then who was receiving the video feed from the drones?
It would be interesting to know what the affirmative action president actually is holding over the Clintons to keep them quiet.
As for accountability, over 50 died at Waco - many of them children - with no one held accountable. What makes anyone think that there will be accountability on this latest incident? Oversight of the executive branch by the legislative branch of our government has been very lacking in my view.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 10/16/2012 9:56:33 AM (No. 8936746)
Hillary had responsibility for security and didn't do it. We got that from reading job descriptions. The question now is: Who invented the story about spontaneous protests and the video? Who ordered the film maker arrested? How did American arms get into the hands of Al Queda? Why are Military and security personnel being used to win hearts and minds? That's a political job, not a military or security function.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
mrduc, 10/16/2012 9:56:53 AM (No. 8936747)
Also don't forget that both Fat Ankles and the Great Stainmaker have political designs for Chelsea down the road. Taking a hit for the good ol jackass party will put a lot of politcal favor in Chelsea's donk account, especially if 0bama survives and wins in three weeks.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
mabelkitty, 10/16/2012 9:57:16 AM (No. 8936749)
One mor thing: She was pressured in to doing this the night before the second debate in an attempt to keep Obama from having to dance and deflect from his answer.
This won't put it to bed - it only creates more questions than answers with many folks wanting to know why she hasn't resigned yet.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
starboard, 10/16/2012 9:58:21 AM (No. 8936753)
At the top levels (including POTUS) this whole debacle can be summed up in one word...incompetance.
This is not over for Hillary and Obama is going to get his walking papers this coming November 6th.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
mabelkitty, 10/16/2012 9:59:15 AM (No. 8936757)
Are they all still under Secret Service Protection, including Chelsea?
It would be bad form to criticize these people if your life depended on them.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 10/16/2012 9:59:20 AM (No. 8936758)
Hillary has always been more of a man than our Affirmative Action hologram, preezy of the steezy.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
dman, 10/16/2012 10:00:44 AM (No. 8936761)
Hillary's "mia kinda culpa" is a joke. First, her comments are in the spirit of Bill's "what the meaning of is .. is". "Security professionals" is code for "do not question this - these people know more than you do". If "security professionals" made these decisions, have they been named - and fired? An ambassador was assassinated. Was Hillary actually aware of the security threats? She didn't exactly say. Was any of this briefed to the President? Again, crickets.
Hillary simply pretended to fall on her sword. But in politics, perception is everything, don'cha know.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
Billyc, 10/16/2012 10:19:28 AM (No. 8936813)
# 1 you are on the mark. Remember that Obama is addicted so has to have is daily cigarettre jolt.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 10/16/2012 10:28:01 AM (No. 8936840)
Oh come on LDotters, can't anyone else but the dumb potter see the rope-a-dope here? Hillary took the blame because His High Holiness is losing the women's votes. Tonight at the debate, Obama and Crowley will force Romney to "hit the girl" anyway they can by making Romney disparage poor, sweet, wonderful Hillary. I promise you tonight's and the rest of the week's headlines will be how Romney attacked wonderfully responsible and humble Hillary who courageously took the blame for Benghazi. Women's vote will be back in His High Holy Worshipness' camp. Are the voters THAT stupid, you ask? Watch what happens. I promise you, YES they are. And check the time stamp. I'm posting this before Rush makes my exact same point.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
weejun, 10/16/2012 10:31:31 AM (No. 8936848)
I'm sending you a bill for my keyboard, on which I just spit my coffee, #42. Best post of the day!!!
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
Marzon, 10/16/2012 10:37:17 AM (No. 8936860)
I have no idea why she would do this, but it will have the fortunate result of making sure the media MUST cover the Libya story again today, and that can only work to Romney's advantage since there are still so many unanswered questions. And if she thinks this will let Zippy off the hook in the debate, she's crazy. There are at least a dozen lines of attack Romney can use regarding Libya and all Zippy can reply is with "It's not my fault, Hillary even said so!" which will make him look even more pathetic.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
geminale, 10/16/2012 10:40:00 AM (No. 8936866)
Hmmm, "Fog of War"...is that something like a "Brain Fog"? Seems just as subjective and hard to diagnose. Or maybe it's like Tom Hank's "Brain Cloud" in Joe Vs. the Volcano...
"You mean you were diagnosed with something called a brain cloud and didn't ask for a second opinion?"
A Fog of War? I have no response to that.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 10/16/2012 10:40:47 AM (No. 8936869)
Another gigantic blunder by Obama. What woman is not going (at least eventually) to see this as Obama the cowardly lying sleazeball hiding behind Hillary?
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
jimboendaatl, 10/16/2012 10:45:07 AM (No. 8936874)
More lies from this administration. "Fog of War"...they must really think we're stupid.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 10/16/2012 10:51:28 AM (No. 8936889)
So the stories from this administration have morphed from "spontaneous protest" to a "war" ?
All of it lies.
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
penelopewaits, 10/16/2012 10:54:30 AM (No. 8936894)
She looks like the only man in the room. We are waiting for someone to take responsibility and this highlights the fact that the president is an empty chair.
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 10/16/2012 10:56:22 AM (No. 8936901)
Were I Mitt, I'd ask one question tonight of Jug Ears...'Mr. President, why are you hiding behind Secretary Clinton's Pantsuit and not taking responsibility for the massacre in Benghazi?'
|
Reply 71 - Posted by:
Butch59, 10/16/2012 10:59:30 AM (No. 8936911)
I guess that these people in the WH assume that we, the unwashed masses, are to stupid to put together the time line on the events in Benghazi. About what happened, when, what the security situation was, etc. As such, they just belch out any story that they think sounds good. And we're supposed to believe it.
As for why PIAPS fell on her sword on this matter, I have another angle. It will be her way, in 2016, to quietly to remind the Dim power brokers of what she did to help Obozo get re-elected. It will by her ace in the hole to get them to surround her and provide the money and manpower for HER run in 2016. Further, I think that the bent one is behind this type of thinking.
|
Reply 72 - Posted by:
rlwo, 10/16/2012 11:11:36 AM (No. 8936933)
I really dislike it when someone makes these grand mea culpa statements. Like Richard Clarke did in 2001 hearings.
|
Reply 73 - Posted by:
johnwayne, 10/16/2012 11:13:27 AM (No. 8936940)
The Taliban and jihadists hide behind women, too.
|
Reply 74 - Posted by:
FiddlePig, 10/16/2012 11:16:41 AM (No. 8936945)
A tragic figure… There are few women more used and abused by men than Hillary Clinton… humiliated by husband Bill’s many trysts, she now falls on her sword to protect Obama’s dismal (Islamic appeasement policy) Libya/Mideast failures! In process this “confession” most likely destroys any chance for another presidential run. Her political loyalty has turned her into the ultimate pasty. I question her judgment, bit IMHO she is much more the “man” than Bill or Barak. How does ANYONE want four more years of this?
|
Reply 75 - Posted by:
Jobe, 10/16/2012 11:23:17 AM (No. 8936960)
She may have added a large "but" to her assumption of responsibility, but that large but is also a large "butt". Also, having been in a supervisory role for many years, I learned that one may delegate authority, but one can never delegate "responsibility".
|
Reply 76 - Posted by:
kennedylaw, 10/16/2012 11:25:24 AM (No. 8936971)
It is still Bush's fault.
|
Reply 77 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh, 10/16/2012 11:26:24 AM (No. 8936976)
Fog of war? We are at war with Libya? When was the declaration signed? Fog of incompetence is more accurate.
And a couple of notes. As president, BO is ultimately responsible for his administration. If HRC holds the direct responsibility, then she should immediately resign for her incompetency that contributed to the death of four Americans.
I have long felt that HRC made a singularly ineffective SoS. I was surprised because I thought she made a decent Senator. But it's time for her to get off the stage.
And we should be quite aware of WHO put her on that stage. BO is in charge. This is yet another failure of his administration. AND it shows that terrorists are NOT defeated as BO has tried to lead us to believe.
|
Reply 78 - Posted by:
chicodon, 10/16/2012 11:32:11 AM (No. 8936995)
Nothing, I repeat nothing, is more important than continuing the Socialist takeover of our country. Ms. Hillarycare would walk on hot coals if necessary.
Their wagons will continue to circle around Barry. I just hope our Indians can overwhelm them.
|
Reply 79 - Posted by:
Leftcoast, 10/16/2012 11:38:56 AM (No. 8937020)
So what's the quid pro quo?
|
Reply 80 - Posted by:
broken01, 10/16/2012 11:45:47 AM (No. 8937038)
I'm sure that you fellow L-Dotter have known that since the 90s this "woman" does NOTHING like this unless it benefits her. So her throwing her sizable keister under the Obus is nothing but for show. You can't tell me with all of the evidence to the contrary that both Odumbo and J Biden, BfD didn't know what went down in Benghazi. The level of stupidity in this administration is startling. The only "fog of war" is the fog between PIAPS', Obungler's, and definitely Bite Me's ears.
|
Reply 81 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/16/2012 12:18:07 PM (No. 8937140)
Who started the video story? Why did Barack Hussein Soetoro apologize multiple times for the imprisoned Coptic-American two weeks after the al-Quaeda victory? Who will Obama bomb the Thursday before the election?
|
Reply 82 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 10/16/2012 12:23:21 PM (No. 8937162)
Time for Operation Chaos, Part II. Barry is back to treating ms. Clinton as a doormat. We need to defend her!
|
Reply 83 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack, 10/16/2012 12:40:04 PM (No. 8937223)
If the fog of war confuses you --- get your butt out of there and let a professional take over.
|
Reply 84 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/16/2012 12:44:12 PM (No. 8937243)
The debate should be about 23 million unemployed, 1% growth, food stamps, Obamacare, Obamaphones, Amnesty, Drilling in Anwar. Obama has a differenT agenda than US because he does not share in the American experience. His formative years were in Indonesia as a cute Muslim child.
|
Reply 85 - Posted by:
bighambone, 10/16/2012 12:54:51 PM (No. 8937277)
Hillary Clinton claims all this coming out of the Benghazi attack was caused by "the fog of war" but then she says that the attackers should be caught and brought to justice in a court, either in Libya where there are no courts, or perhaps in New York city. Something here does not add up!
|
Reply 86 - Posted by:
lazyman, 10/16/2012 1:05:58 PM (No. 8937312)
She should understand about fog of war she was pinned down once and under fire. A real war hero.
|
Reply 87 - Posted by:
jt26, 10/16/2012 1:08:56 PM (No. 8937319)
Now that is a bunch of malarkey!
|
Reply 88 - Posted by:
wexfordcounty, 10/16/2012 1:15:30 PM (No. 8937340)
Gee, right before the Big Debate. What a coincidence.
|
Reply 89 - Posted by:
janjan, 10/16/2012 1:26:20 PM (No. 8937376)
Sorry to post twice but never trust anything a Clinton says or does. They only do what is their own perceived best interest.
|
Reply 90 - Posted by:
wlit22z, 10/16/2012 2:00:59 PM (No. 8937483)
S-u-u-r-r-e she does. She was forced into it to protect the Mulatto Kid until after the election when their "internal" investigation will exonerate her too.
What a bunch of baloney. They all are trying to CYA before the lawsuites start for the deaths of those four men.
|
Reply 91 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 10/16/2012 3:26:29 PM (No. 8937753)
With Biden labeled the fool and Obe under pressure apt to mentally melt just before the election Hillary thinks by taking responsibility she will become the October surprise heir to the campaign. Time to re up her drunken persona in pictures from Columbia this spring.
|
Reply 92 - Posted by:
Dems R Dumm, 10/16/2012 3:40:08 PM (No. 8937792)
Obama had to pin the blame on someone besides himself before tonight's debate. Wouldn't want to have that empty suit trying to pass the buck live on-the-air with some direct questioning from Romney.
|
Reply 93 - Posted by:
LINGILLEN, 10/16/2012 3:52:21 PM (No. 8937815)
#17 - it was reported earlier, I believe in the Brit press, that the two Navy Seals that were killed along with Stevens, had picked up a distress call on their radios and had come to assist. Heroes indeed.
|
Reply 94 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 10/16/2012 4:21:44 PM (No. 8937885)
Impeach Billary. It's a start. Fire her immediately whether or not the buck stops at that low level of incompetency. Dreck. Oh, and watch out for a hearing aid implant in the man who does not know his job, cannot talk about it sensibly. Keep your eye on his mouthpiece Valerie Jaret. If nobody knows where she is tonight, she's backstage like the wizard of Oz behind a little curtain TELLING the disabled debater exactly what to say. Maybe a young hacker genius will produce screeching sounds making the O wince in pain. Who could be so lucky? At least watch with observant suspicion for the worst. He probably IS getting offstage hearing aid help. Let's face it, he's DISABLED without his habit forming teleprompter crutches.
|
Reply 95 - Posted by:
rc1776, 10/16/2012 4:28:42 PM (No. 8937906)
Kindly rephrase that she said “but”. It has a large butt, but no it is without honor.
This was approved by Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick
|
Reply 96 - Posted by:
DebiAnn, 10/16/2012 4:44:36 PM (No. 8937942)
What worries me is the idea being thrown out about an attack on Lybia. Could be our October Surprise. These villians aren't going down easy. It'll be scorched earth. Poor Mitt.
|
Reply 97 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 10/16/2012 4:53:25 PM (No. 8937964)
Doesn't she work for someone? I guess if you couldn't figure out where your husband was, what he was doing, and who he doing it with this might be believable. Naw. That last comment was just the Fog of the Internet.
|
Reply 98 - Posted by:
InThePines, 10/16/2012 5:12:42 PM (No. 8937994)
|
Reply 99 - Posted by:
InThePines, 10/16/2012 5:13:33 PM (No. 8937996)
Methinks she's been promised a Supreme Court appointment by the Messiah. Frank
|
Reply 100 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/16/2012 5:20:07 PM (No. 8938011)
A word to the wise: Fort Marcy Park is just a short cab-ride away.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"
|
MA Senate: Elizabeth Warren Defeats Scott Brown
|
|
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.
|
Republicans lose ground in bid to take over Senate
|
|
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican
|
CNN Reports Romney Internal Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.
|
Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting until 2 a.m.' in Florida
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.
|
No surprises for Obama, Romney in early projections
|
|
CNN, by Tom Cohen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political
|
Exit polls 2012: Hurricane Sandy not a factor
|
|
Politico, by Emily Schultheis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.
|
Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney winning independents
|
|
Politico, by Emily Schultheis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by
|
Obama, Romney locked in tight race with battlegrounds too close to call
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:24:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mitt Romney and President Obama each racked up early and expected victories Tuesday night in relatively safe territory, while some of the biggest battlegrounds that will decide the election remained too close to call. All the big swing states where polls have closed -- Florida, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and North Carolina -- were too close to call, Fox News projects. (Snip) Obama will also win three of Maine's four electoral votes, Fox News projects. It is unclear where the state's fourth electoral vote will fall. The latest batch of poll closings, and results, has allowed Obama to take
|
|
Romney wins South Carolina
|
|
Market Watch, by Robert Schroeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:53:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mitt Romney was projected the winner in South Carolina on Tuesday night, taking home the state’s nine electoral votes. So far Tuesday the former Massachusetts governor has taken other reliably red states including Kentucky and West Virginia. Romney leads in the Electoral College with 24 electoral votes to President Obama’s three.
|
Ohio exit poll: More Democrats vote, but independents back Romney
|
|
CBS News, by Brian Montopoli
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:45:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As expected, the presidential race is tight in Ohio, where the polls just closed: President Obama is winning women 55 percent to 44 percent in the early CBS News exit poll, while Mitt Romney is leading 52 percent to 46 percent among men. Women made up 51 percent of the electorate, compared to 49 percent among women. Thirty-nine percent of voters so far identified themselves as Democrats, compared to 30 percent calling themselves Republican. Thirty-one percent identified as independent or something else, and Romney has a big edge among this group - 56 percent to 40 percent for Mr. Obama.
|
Romney Projected To Win West Virginia
|
|
MetroNews [W. Virginia], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:35:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As expected, Republican candidate for President, Mitt Romney, won West Virginia’s five electoral votes in Tuesday’s General Election over President Barack Obama. National media outlets called the race in West Virginia shortly after polls closed at 7:30 p.m. President Obama’s fate in West Virginia has never been in question, as he garnered just 60 percent of the democratic vote in the May primary. The other 40 percent of that vote went to Texas federal inmate Keith Judd, who was placed on the ballot in West Virginia. President Obama has been hugely unpopular in the Mountain State since he first ran
|
Exit poll show voters lean toward GOP compared to 2008
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:18:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Early exit polls show Election Day voters are slightly more Republican than in 2008 and broadly concerned about the state of the U.S. economy. Six in 10 voters said the economy is their top issue according to the poll, which was released by The Associated Press and conducted on behalf of a consortium of media companies. Less than a quarter of voters said their families were better off than four years ago — a point seized on by many Republicans as the results leaked out.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
We Are Living in a Dying Country
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning back for women in America
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.
|
White House Blames Jobs Numbers on Sequester
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Trayvon Martin´s parents settle wrongful death claim
|
|
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
Obama Budget to Cap Retirement Accounts at $3 Million
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|