Just have the Newt Gingrich tactics at the ready.

We all know,don't we, that the Obama concern is phony. The letter is simply an attempt to pretend that Candy Crowley would apply bi-fairness.

When I picture Candy Crowley, I think of that scottish character in the Austin Powers movies, Fat Bast*rd! "I want you in my belly!"

Too bad, though, that the VP debate moderator didn't do a follow up with old joe bidet when he said that 'we wer'nt asked about security.'

This time audience members must submit their questions in advance and Crowley will decide which questions she will allow - and, of course, she intends to follow-up with her own questions - completely unbiased naturally.

Why did the GOP and the Romney campaign agree to these 0bama puppets as moderators? Not one moderate or fair one among them. And "Candy" Crowley choosing the questions, absurd.

What is Zero worried about, that she isn't liberal enough to carry his water.

I'm confident that Romney has fired people who are a lot more talented and capable than Candy Crowley. I have a hunch that Mitt Romney can handle this woman.

The only concern that Obama could have with Crowley as a moderator is that there will be a shortage of pre-debate donuts.

This is the same woman who asked when Romney chose Ryan "Did he have a ticket death wish."Yeah she's non-partisan...

Think about this though, 4 debates and not one of them hosted by a conservative or someone for fair and balanced. Fox has more viewership than any of these outlets and yet again they are cut off. No more. We have to let our people know that we are tired of them capitulating to the left!

I predict that Mitt Romney is smarter than Candy Crowley and is anticipating her conduct as moderator. He will not be blindsided.

I want to know who at the RNC approved a liberal moderator for all FOUR debates! This is preposterous. Stand up and demand some fairness, or there are no debates! Geez, when are they going to learn?

#5 You deserve a big pat on the back. Why indeed would they agree to any of those moderators? Candy Crowley is just crissy matthews in drag.

Obama Camp concerned?...So what do we have?

Thanks to the "wisdom" of the "Einsteins" at the RNC and the "Benedict Arnold/Republican" members of The Commission on Presidential Debates, the future of America and The Free World now hangs in the balance, to be determined by the whims of an overweight left wing CNN commentator armed with a stack of 3 x 5 index cards listing DNC "talking points" and a large box of Whitman's Assorted Chocolates!

Regarding the 'follow up' comment at post #3, Martha only injected herself into the debate when she could assist Joe with his interrupt-Ryan act.

It's beyond stupid, absurd that every four years the GOP bends over for the same treatment. Cleverly, another well-known LIB female moderator will be reigning over the debate. I expect to again endure compliments for Candy from the FOX anchors no matter what happens. Anything we see Tuesday night is because we do not demand better.

Setting the table to blame the moderator should Obama do another debate face plant.

I wonder if the rumor is true: Crowley will be carrying a Taser and Bear Spray in case one of the candidates becomes "racist?"

She's still fat!

The standard seems to be that the moderator must have exceptionally low ratings, and hate conservatives. She's well qualified.

Romney will do well, despite the efforts of against him. Gallup, under threat of legal action by 0, selected the 'undecided' voters who will ask the questions. CNN, in the tank for 0 since day one, will 'screen' the questions. Scowley, who hates Mitt Romney, will assist 0 during the debate. All of the fossil-media is preparing excuses. Leftard pundits will spin like cyclones. 0 insiders will claim victory.

All that's left is the action. Can handlers convert a total fraud back into the image of a pResident? Will Romney's win be as dramatic as the last one?

This is why.....you have two moderators. One Liberal and One Conservative and they both get to ask equal questions of each candidate.

She should be removed , she in no unsterain terms is there to help Obama and the democrats , just watch her on TV present and past.

Another case where the moderator makes herself larger (literally) than the candidates. It's all about me, doncha' know!

FTA: The Time report notes Crowley was not party to the agreement reached by the campaigns.

She is the employee or agent of the debate commission. She is a party and the above statement is the pre-excuse.

The RNC should decline to participate in the debates if the moderators aren't selected on a more neutral basis.

Crowley is on her knees for the Mulatto Kid and his ilk and is a very poor choice as a moderator. Why should a moderator even be able to ask his or her own questions. Let the voters decide!

I predict that she will slant the questions in favor of the Democraps and will try to rip up Romney into saying something that will reflect badly on him.

I would think this has Obama wetting himself. He can't handle press conferences. If Candy asks follow up questions or nails him on false points he'll be lost again. Obama wants to give his pre rehearsed canned response to the questions then attack Romney on Bain without any interference.