A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


I Was Right About That
Strange Jobs Report

Wall Street Journal, by Jack Welch

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/9/2012 11:32:57 PM

Imagine a country where challenging the ruling authorities—questioning, say, a piece of data released by central headquarters—would result in mobs of administration sympathizers claiming you should feel "embarrassed" and labeling you a fool, or worse. Soviet Russia perhaps? Communist China? Nope, that would be the United States right now, when a person (like me, for instance) suggests that a certain government datum (like the September unemployment rate of 7.8%) doesn't make sense. Unfortunately for those who would like me to pipe down, the 7.8% unemployment figure released by the

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Robinsolana, 10/9/2012 11:54:58 PM     (No. 8921961)

Jack Welch takes you through his thinking on Obama's strange unemployment number.

One take away is that there are 3 million less workers working or looking since Obama took office. This tends to artificially tweak the unemployment number. These people no longer count.
Also the number of people on disability has been leaping upward. Sometimes the increase is more than the increase in employment.
That can twist the unemployment number.
Another thing to notice is that this a poll.
They call people.
I have gotten wary of polls for some reason.
And lastly Jack Welch says that there is no sign of sudden economic activity to produce a .3% drop in unemployment.

The kindest thing that can be said is that this was a statistical fluke.


Reply 2 - Posted by: devnull, 10/9/2012 11:56:05 PM     (No. 8921963)

Just take the 'L' out and be done with it.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Photoonist, 10/10/2012 12:28:42 AM     (No. 8921997)

We knew it was phony as soon as they announced a new jobs figure of less than 200,000. Below that number you can't have a genuine decrease in the unemployment percentage.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Veritas2009, 10/10/2012 12:31:46 AM     (No. 8921998)

Seems to me more definative numbers could be obtained by summing the SS TAX$ REPORTED to the IRS and dividing by the number of unique SSN numbers it is being credited to.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Davids918, 10/10/2012 1:03:29 AM     (No. 8922028)

Knowing how many will lose their unemployment benefits, and then tweaking the household survey by an amount that is the largest number in 29 years in this economy is VERY suspect to say the least.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Clark Kent, 10/10/2012 1:05:33 AM     (No. 8922033)

interesting that Austan Goolsbee, who defended these numbers, accused the Bush administration of cooking the the same numbers back in 2003.


Reply 7 - Posted by: dman, 10/10/2012 1:28:47 AM     (No. 8922050)

You're not alone, Mr. Welch.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: NMPatriot, 10/10/2012 1:47:59 AM     (No. 8922061)

The DNC propaganda machine assumes everyone is as stupid as they are! It would be laughable it it weren't so dangerous.


Reply 9 - Posted by: rexhandsom, 10/10/2012 6:52:33 AM     (No. 8922213)

Close to a year ago RUSH LIMBAUGH predicted this..........


Reply 10 - Posted by: pineledger, 10/10/2012 7:19:56 AM     (No. 8922264)

If anything, they managed to get to this number on the backs of part-time workers -- people forced to take low-paying jobs with no benefits just to have something.

FOX last night was quite clear on this: employers are not going to hire full-time people with benefits in this climate, where you don't know what the government is going to hit you with next...a mandate, a tax, an OSHA requirement, etc.


Reply 11 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 10/10/2012 7:21:50 AM     (No. 8922268)

"A relentless Jack Welch gives the pot of cooked
numbers another dash of Tabasco."

Brilliant, Miss Lucianne and Team! Well done!


Reply 12 - Posted by: Judith, 10/10/2012 7:28:24 AM     (No. 8922289)

Now, now Jack, Gov. Romney has told everyone that those figures are 100% accurate and to stop this nonsense.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: msctex1, 10/10/2012 7:52:07 AM     (No. 8922337)

Outright lies are all they have left. Imagine what it is going to be like if the second debate mirrors the first, if not worse for BHO.

On the other hand, Foreign Policy is his strong suit.

s///


Reply 14 - Posted by: Mermaid1, 10/10/2012 7:52:37 AM     (No. 8922340)

It's about time someone opened a can of whoop@ss on these liars.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Freeloader, 10/10/2012 7:54:30 AM     (No. 8922347)

Mr. Welch has performed a great public service by exposing this latest gibberish from the Obama Administration. In the words of William W. Watt, "Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully considered what they do not say."


Reply 16 - Posted by: LZK, 10/10/2012 8:39:25 AM     (No. 8922441)

Thank you Mr. Welch for validating most of US here on Lucianne...

WE knew obama would scramble the jobs' report.

WE don't believe anything this administration says. When their mouths move -- they are lying.

LZK


Reply 17 - Posted by: Maybeth, 10/10/2012 8:47:24 AM     (No. 8922462)

Jack Welch is not running for any office, does not have to kiss DNC or GOP butts and is, therefore, free to state the facts. That freedom of speech hasn't been ripped away from us yet, but it is definitely on Obama's Marxist Menu.
.... I even heard some scolding from the GOP regarding Jack's article, but those reprimands come from the usual 'turn the other cheek' crowd.

Why would ANYbody believe the 7.8% story from the same president who reported that because some unknown person created some unknown video which 'hurt the feelings' of Muslims, our U.S. Lybian embassy was attacked and the ambassador murdered .... along with 3 other Americans?

Not only is the I-Won emperor naked, but he has called wolf one too many times.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 10/10/2012 9:11:48 AM     (No. 8922526)

Jack Welch's final reason for the Big Lie is absolutely right on. There isn't enough economic activity to support a .3 drop. No growth. Not even a glimmer of growth. Not a long glimmer of growth. It's going to take Romeny some time to get that unemployment number down. It will start as soon as Nov. 7, but until Obamacare is repealed no one is going to be satisfied. That albatross is a job killer.


Reply 19 - Posted by: planetgeo, 10/10/2012 9:35:51 AM     (No. 8922593)

This isn't some schlub saying this. Jack Welch was one of America's most competent CEOs. He knows numbers, and he knows when they don't smell right. These numbers stink.

And for me the real scandal here isn't just that this corrupt regime tried to cook the books, since many of us predicted this would happen. No, it's that the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses a friggin SURVEY (!!!) to confirm the state of the world's largest economy. Jeez, they might as well use darts or a Oujah Board or Magic 8-Ball. Even if the survey questions and questioners were legit, this method seems absurdly inexact. How about using, you know, actual company-filed personnel action reports?


Reply 20 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 10/10/2012 9:53:25 AM     (No. 8922640)

Ever since Mitt kept hammering away at 8%+, they had to find a way to get to 7. The problem is, .3 of a percentage point is feeble growth.


Reply 21 - Posted by: kwddave, 10/10/2012 9:56:24 AM     (No. 8922656)

So is Chris Matthews gonna invite him back to re-discuss this subject?


Reply 22 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 10/10/2012 10:10:05 AM     (No. 8922700)

I’ve been observing Jack Welch from afar for many years. He’s one tough, smart cookie. He doesn’t mince words, suffer fools gladly, tell it like it isn’t or enter, much less win, any Mr. Congeniality contests. Compare his pragmatic words with the bilge water that oozes constantly from Obama and his power-at-ANY-cost cohorts; Axelrod, Gibbs, Jarrett et al. Need I say more? Nope!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: joew9, 10/10/2012 10:11:32 AM     (No. 8922705)

#6 Yes the Dems accused the same thing about Republicans. But you see here's how it works. The Dems make an accusation that they know is just a political lie. They keep saying it over and over. Over time many of the Democrats forget that it was a just a lie in the first place. Then the Democrats start to justify their own behavior against the way they believe the Republicans are and not take into account that their perceived characterization of Republicans was a made up lie. Now the Dems cheat at something and say to themselves that well it's cheating but not as bad as the Republicans cheat. But they have compared their action against a lie they created. And the end result is their cheating is much worse than anything the Republicans ever even thought of doing.

Example: Nixon thought of using the IRS to investigate some political opponents in a private rant one day. His subordinates knew it was just a rant. They didn't do it. A few days later he told them it was correct not to do it. But the Dems characterize the action as if he actually followed through on that notion. So the Dems regularly use the IRS to investigate their opponents and justify it in their mind that at least it is not as bad as Nixon.


Reply 24 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 10/10/2012 10:25:10 AM     (No. 8922750)

Some of the ComicRat comments following the article in the WSJ are breathtaking in their twisted view of reality. Liberalism really is a mental disorder.


Reply 25 - Posted by: BeatleJeff, 10/10/2012 10:27:57 AM     (No. 8922764)

Notice how the very people who marched around chanting "challenge autority" no longer approve of challenging authority now that they're the authority being challenged.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 10/10/2012 10:41:52 AM     (No. 8922806)

When this bogus jobs report floated by the administration's bureaucratic puppets made it to FOX News, I watched Mrs. Tree's reaction. At first her brow furrowed and eyes narrowed... then she started laughing.

It occurred right then that Axelrod had made another of his stupid mistakes. Cheating comes so naturally to him he seems to start doing it before the game begins. And if Mrs. Tree is laughing at his clumsy manipulation, so are a million other women.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Layne's Soapbox, 10/10/2012 10:44:00 AM     (No. 8922815)

#21: because that makes too much sense. If it makes sense the government does the opposite.

This explains how they are able to make the numbers say what they want. I actually thought it was a little more, I don't know, statistical, than a poll. Shows what I know.


Reply 28 - Posted by: distorted, 10/10/2012 10:44:05 AM     (No. 8922816)

Of the low level government clerks charged with checking a box on their forms after an interview, what percentage do you think are avid Obama supporters? 90%...95%? Do you think they know and/or have been informed that decreasing unemployment numbers at this critical stage of the election process accrue to zer'O's benefit? What checks are in place to guard against such jiggling of the numbers in a collusive workforce "adjustment?"


Reply 29 - Posted by: weejun, 10/10/2012 10:58:12 AM     (No. 8922845)

This job report and the Libyan run-around are exactly what you get when a bunch of socialists are put in power. I hope and pray we clean house (along with the aiding and abetting education system and the lamestream media) before it's too late.


Reply 30 - Posted by: RancherJack, 10/10/2012 11:23:36 AM     (No. 8922911)

How quickly we forget what a Turncoat Welch proved himself to be during the GW years.

The numbers were cooked, yes.

Jack Welch is no American.


Reply 31 - Posted by: GLS2, 10/10/2012 11:27:50 AM     (No. 8922933)

#9 The October jobs report of 3.2% will be released on Nov. 3 just in time for elections.


Reply 32 - Posted by: NotaBene, 10/10/2012 11:37:15 AM     (No. 8922976)

Obama corrupted the Federal Government for campaign purposes.

If you want statistics look at the boarded up storefronts near you and today's price of gasoline.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Speedypetey, 10/10/2012 11:41:06 AM     (No. 8922991)

What is really scary is when the next President is decided in November by December the "adjusted" unemployment rate will skyrocket to 11%+ and the new "adjusted" Cost of Living Index will also be double digits. Rick Santelli will blow another gasket because at the same time the stock market will be heading south.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Franz, 10/10/2012 11:56:28 AM     (No. 8923048)

Just think how many working age people had to leave the work force (reduce the Participation Rate) to produce this drop in the Unemployment Rate. The last time we saw this great a reduction in a work force in so short a time is when the "Black Death" was ravaging Europe during the Middle Ages.

This BLS Unemployment Rate only proves Mark Twain's observation that, "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics."


Reply 35 - Posted by: ilovedogs, 10/10/2012 12:07:16 PM     (No. 8923076)

It all sounded bogus to me since I'm STILL looking for work myself.


Reply 36 - Posted by: HDGalley, 10/10/2012 2:29:46 PM     (No. 8923453)

Has any one noticed that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is run by an appointed Obama political hack from California who just happens to be a socialist and a good party member... how could she "cook" the books and why? /s


Reply 37 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 10/10/2012 4:49:50 PM     (No. 8923820)

Let's take the B.S. out of the BLS!


Reply 38 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 10/10/2012 7:58:58 PM     (No. 8924228)

I thought only Romney got inside Obie's head., Looks like Welch did, too. Atta boy, Jack.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 10/10/2012 10:48:14 PM     (No. 8924500)

I'm glad he didn't back down. The report isn't strange, it's bogus. Someone who collects cans and bottles from the roadside for a couple of hours would be counted as employed.



Post Reply   Close thread 705937




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Democrats push problem
solvers in House contests
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging

Texas prosecutors’ slayings
unnerve rural Kaufman County
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM     Post Reply
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

A Reporter Explains Why
Gun Coverage Is So Biased
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM     Post Reply
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it

Report: Carbon Emissions
in US Lowest Since 1994
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM     Post Reply
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994

Video: Parents Turn on Fossil-
Fuel Protesters at Tufts
National Review Online, by Stanley Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:33:04 PM     Post Reply
When I tell campus horror-stories like “What’s the Matter With Vassar?” people ask if parents know what’s going on at these schools. I don’t think they want to know. But guess what happens when protesters step on others’ rights in full view of parents? Tufts has one of the most active campus fossil-fuel divestment groups. Lately these protesters have been infiltrating orientation sessions and campus tours for prospective students, mostly high school juniors traveling with their parents. Climate protesters interrupt these recruitment activities with questions

Behind the Dismal Jobs Numbers:
The ‘New’ Economy Takes Shape
PJ Media, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:27:24 PM     Post Reply
It is amazing just how wrong economists were in their predictions for the number of jobs that were to be created in March. The “consensus” figure was 200,000 — a far cry from the actual number created which was 88,000. Totally “unexpected,” as usual. In one way, you can’t blame them. After a better than average gain in February of 236,000 (revised upward this month to 268,000), along with some positive numbers in housing and consumer spending, there were no doubt many analysts who began breathing a sigh of relief and believing that the long-awaited jobs recovery was upon us.

The New Climate Deniers?
American Thinker, by David Lawrence    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:33:09 AM     Post Reply
Rich Lowery in the New York Post (4-02-2013) accuses the liberals of being the new climate deniers, considering that they don´t recognize that there´s been no global warming for the last fifteen years. This shouldn´t surprise Lowery. When the liberals hang onto the neck of a cause, they don´t let go. They have ignored murders, rapes, wars, nuclear proliferation, and everything wrong with the world to focus in on their little area -- the horror of carbon emissions. You´d think liberals would have learned from their earlier panic about overpopulation

Obama’s feeble salary ‘sacrifice’
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:13:50 PM     Post Reply
“President Obama plans to give up 5 percent of his salary this year to draw attention to the financial sacrifice of more than 1 million federal employees who will be furloughed.” — The Washington Post, April 4 “Here’s the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for 1 MILLION DOLLARS !” — Dr. Evil in “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery” At the annual White House Easter Egg Roll this week, President Obama decided to shoot some hoops with the kids. He wound up going 2 for 22. The abysmal field-goal percentage — 9 percent

Johns Hopkins’s and Planned
Parenthood’s troubling extremism
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:05:52 PM     Post Reply
We know Johns Hopkins University is devoted to diversity, because it says so. Its “Diversity and Inclusion Statement,” a classic of the genre, says the university is “committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion .?.?. by recruiting and retaining a diverse group of students.” Hopkins has an Office of Institutional Equity and a “Diversity Leadership Council” that defines “inclusion” as “active, thoughtful and ongoing engagement with each other.” Unless you are a member of Voice for Life (VFL), an antiabortion group. Hopkins’s Student Government Association has denied VFL status

Obama budget would cut entitlements
in exchange for tax increases
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:02:41 PM     Post Reply
President Obama will propose a budget next week that embraces a risky strategy of courting Republicans for a grand bargain on the debt while angering Democratic allies with cuts to the nation’s entitlement programs. White House officials said Friday that Obama’s budget would cut Medicare and Social Security and ask for less tax revenue than he has previously sought. The budget, to be released Wednesday, will fully incorporate the offer Obama made to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) during December’s “fiscal cliff” talks — which included $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction through spending cuts and tax increases.

NRA tactics erode post-Newtown
support for gun-control measures
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:00:22 PM     Post Reply
Sen Mark Begich declared a “sea change” in the politics of gun control immediately after the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., telling his local newspaper that he would not hesitate to buck the powerful National Rifle Association. But in the months since, the gun rights group has made itself impossible for the Alaska Democrat, and many other lawmakers, to resist. Begich has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill, drafted in consultation with the NRA, that would change the way mental illness is reported in the background check system — a measure that critics say



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
69 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

63 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

42 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

41 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

41 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

The Secrets of Princeton
39 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for


Post Reply   Close thread 705937





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS