A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


The Eyes Have It: Obama
Blinks 1,000 Times More
than Romney During 1st Debate

Smart Politics [University of Minnesota], by Eric Ostermeier

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 10/6/2012 6:38:28 AM

The president blinked at a rate of 71 times per minute while speaking during Wednesday's debate - 1,000 times more than Romney (53 per minute). Mitt Romney almost universally received the nod as the winner of the first presidential debate - not simply for scoring the most political points, but also in terms of style. For while Romney seemed in his element, Barack Obama was criticized for appearing uncomfortable, grim, and dour - and was often caught looking down at his notes, particularly during split-screen shots. But there was another facet of the president's non-verbal communication

Comments:
Posted with staff permission.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: plumnellie, 10/6/2012 6:49:05 AM     (No. 8913613)

Very interesting. The blinking contrasts with the lackluster demeanor. Hillbuzz thinks Jarrett has him on beta blockers and other drugs to get him off coke. Shocking claim to some but not so much to me. Obama has always seemed to be on something to me even though I personally have not been around many druggies. Will we ever know with the propaganda media behind, before and all around him?


Reply 2 - Posted by: franq, 10/6/2012 6:51:05 AM     (No. 8913616)

I thought that was a common body language trait for a liar.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: taterboy, 10/6/2012 6:51:32 AM     (No. 8913617)

Go to Hillbuzz.com. Scroll down(as of now on p.2)to the article"10 things to know about the Denver debate". Interesting take on why Obama was blinking and acting manic at the beginning. Traffic gets heavy there so you may have to try a few times to get in.


Reply 4 - Posted by: uno, 10/6/2012 6:57:48 AM     (No. 8913629)

A perfectly understandable nervous twitch. The Obamboozler just isn't used to being in the presence of truth and brightness...


Reply 5 - Posted by: NYMom, 10/6/2012 7:05:27 AM     (No. 8913642)

#3...It's Hillbuzz.org


Reply 6 - Posted by: taterboy, 10/6/2012 7:21:20 AM     (No. 8913672)

#5 You're right, My bad.


Reply 7 - Posted by: revdeppisch316, 10/6/2012 7:28:56 AM     (No. 8913679)

He was blinking at about the same rate as he was lying!


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Robinsolana, 10/6/2012 7:29:20 AM     (No. 8913681)

When the voters realize that Obama is lying, Obama is done.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bpl40, 10/6/2012 7:33:37 AM     (No. 8913684)

There could be another reason for the rapid blinking - a chemical one. A certain white powder when snorted through the nose does that to you.


Reply 10 - Posted by: faith_and_reason, 10/6/2012 7:54:23 AM     (No. 8913706)

My advice to the non-math types who try to write articles involving the count of something:

"Who blinked more times during the debate? Obama did - by a margin of a thousand additional blinks..."

Awkward, but far clearer.


Reply 11 - Posted by: country boy, 10/6/2012 7:54:28 AM     (No. 8913707)

http://hillbuzz.org/page/2


Reply 12 - Posted by: Fledrmaus, 10/6/2012 7:54:59 AM     (No. 8913708)

Confusing headline - I even got out paper and pen to work out the math, and came up with Obama blinking 1.3 times more often than Romney. Until I figured out that they they meant that they COUNTED 1,000 more blinks on Obama's part than Romney's. Still, Obama blinked about 30% more than Romney, which is a lot.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: locarno, 10/6/2012 8:04:49 AM     (No. 8913727)

But the article doesn't really state the significance of the excess blinking. Many moons ago, I took some acting classes and the teachers frowned on blinking as a distraction for other actors in the scene that are feeding off of your lines. If you watch some of the more classical actors, they blink very little or none at all on stage. Does it indicate the person is being less than truthful? Possibly, but more likely a case of nerves is the real reason.


Reply 14 - Posted by: FenwayFrank, 10/6/2012 8:22:50 AM     (No. 8913760)

I wonder if there is a timeline of blinks by candidate? I saw the blinking by both, but IIRC, Romney's blinks may have slowed as the debate progressed.


Reply 15 - Posted by: rugerman2242, 10/6/2012 8:26:25 AM     (No. 8913766)

Good Morning site friends. Wife and I watched the debate very closely together. Though my sweetheart is a disabled Air Force Veteran, she is also a mental health counselor and human behavorial specialist with more years experience than we like to admit, serving and assisting our local law enforcement and court system with individual assessment and clinical treatment of criminals being processed through the system. This is what she saw. Obama is very uncomfortable, angry that his authority and position is being challenged, does not want to be where he is, intimidated by a one on one challenger unafraid to look him in the eye, hiding his inner feelings, issuing responses best suited for the moment, (whether true or false) repetative comments indicating signs of talking points or planned responses, uncomfortable with the subject matter, looking for an exit to a comfort zone, unsure of himself, and generally misrepredenting the facts (spelled lying) not knowing what is actually fact and what is fiction. Overall assessment would be to deny him parole pending further evaluation.
Straight from a pro folks, just wanted to share this with you. Looking forward to November 6th.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Lala, 10/6/2012 8:42:06 AM     (No. 8913799)

I was watching wishing I knew Morse code, thinking that surely with all the distracting blinking he was trying to send a secret message to his Muslim Brotherhood buddies or something. "Achmed, do not dispair. Our cause is great. Allah be praised."


Reply 17 - Posted by: SoCalGal, 10/6/2012 9:28:41 AM     (No. 8913902)

Not getting bogged down in the headline, it seems that Obie was nervous, flustered, caught flatfooted by Romney's informed onslaught. And Romney was relentless, not giving an inch. Obie is not used to that.

He and his minions seriously underestimated the opponent.

With that blinking, you can almost hear him muttering "But, but, but...." as the quicksand engulfs him.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: rambo77, 10/6/2012 9:51:01 AM     (No. 8913947)

These comments, especially #15, have placed a very scary scenario on these events. What will be his response? Will it cause him be better prepared and more able to respond? Or will he just bow up and start with his Exec. orders and clear the room? We may not really understand the depth and breadth of his fear of blowing it. I'd hate to see him pitch a fit and make a glass parking lot out of Boston.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Fledrmaus, 10/6/2012 10:22:26 AM     (No. 8914009)

#18's description of Romney is a good sketch of the Western style of combat: focussed, planned, organized and relentless. As opposed to Obama's natural style, which is also the traditional Muslims style: quick, opportunistic bandit hits on a weak target, then melting away before the surprised target can hit back. Take away the element of surprise, and you see what you saw at the debate: hopelessly outgunned amateurs stumbling and being ground up by a disciplined fighting force. If only we could consistently apply those tactics to actual wars with Muslims, we'd never lose.


Reply 20 - Posted by: janylou, 10/6/2012 11:37:17 AM     (No. 8914161)

He didn't appear to be blinking so much when he was looking down so wonder if it was a tactic to throw Romney off his game. Given how low down and dirty he is, it wouldn't surprise me. You could tell he was pretty irritated at times when you saw his jaw clinch. He laughed at I inappropriate times as well like when Romney said he only picked losers. More than likely he was given the questions and only knew how to respond to them not everything that Romney brought up. All in all, very bizarre!


Reply 21 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/6/2012 12:42:57 PM     (No. 8914294)

Morse code:

. . . — — — . . .

S-O-S


Reply 22 - Posted by: geoguy, 10/6/2012 12:51:32 PM     (No. 8914312)

What I have noticed is that you can tell when Zippy is lying every time he draws-out the word "and" when he is explaining something as in "aaand". It is so apparent he is pulling the answer out of his butt.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: mseegal, 10/6/2012 2:33:47 PM     (No. 8914483)

I noticed an odd and disconcerting habit of Obama nodding at Romney whenever Romney took Obama to task. It was like saying "You're right. I'm an idiot!"

Also, Obama's face is very long, like John Kerrey's face. Debate night, his jaw was clenched so much, his face was round. Very odd. Then his eyes were bugging out and didn't even look like Obama's eyes. Again, very odd.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Smaj, 10/6/2012 6:43:10 PM     (No. 8914840)

Well, when you're high on various sorts of narcotics, these things tend to happen.


Reply 25 - Posted by: MickTurn, 10/6/2012 7:03:54 PM     (No. 8914875)

Blinking excessively indicates nervous lying...read up on body language!


Reply 26 - Posted by: carolina blue, 10/7/2012 6:02:28 AM     (No. 8915327)

.. -- --. --- .. -. --. -- --- ... .-.. . . .--. --- -. - .... . -.-. --- ..- -.-. .... - --- -. .. --. .... -

Im going to sleep on the couch tonight



Post Reply   Close thread 705297




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



How America Lost
Its Four Great Generals
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 3:01:19 PM     Post Reply
The quasi-official ideology of the U.S. armed forces holds that generals are virtually interchangeable, that individual personalities don’t matter much, that ordinary grunts are in any case more important than their leaders, and that what really counts are larger systems that make a complex bureaucracy function. There is some truth to all of this. But for all of the bureaucratic heft of the services and the heroism of ordinary soldiers, it is hard to imagine the Civil War having been won without Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan—or World War II without Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Arnold, LeMay, Nimitz, Halsey,

King of Fearmongers
Weekly Standard, by Charlotte Allen    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 2:56:23 PM     Post Reply
Last August a 28-year-old gay-rights volunteer named Floyd Corkins entered the office lobby of the Family Research Council (FRC), a Christian traditional-values group headquartered in Washington that condemns homosexual conduct and opposes same-sex marriage. Corkins took a gun from his backpack and fired three shots at building manager Leo Johnson, one of them wounding the unarmed Johnson in the arm before he wrested the gun from Corkins. On February 6 Corkins pleaded guilty to three felonies: committing an act of terrorism while armed, interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition

Grapevine man went to great
lengths to cover up dual marriages
Star-Telegram [Ft. Worth, TX], by Deanna Boyd    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 1:36:14 PM     Post Reply
FORT WORTH -- For 21/2 years, Germain Gardea kept his wives in the dark. The 38-year-old flight instructor spent weekdays in Arlington with his first wife, Jennifer Saldivar, and their young son. On weekends, he left town for his job as an instructor at a flight school, residing in Grapevine with his second wife, Leslie Gardea, who traveled during the week. To keep the women from finding out about each other, he created fake divorce documents on the Internet and filed his first wife´s taxes, marking her as single without her knowledge. But the deception came crashing down in May after Leslie Gardea

Is the U.S. becoming
a sham democracy?
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:04:56 AM     Post Reply
Eliana Johnson reports that four Republican members of the Senate Judiciary — Jeff Sessions, Chuck Grassley, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz — are calling for transparency from their GOP colleagues in the “Gang of Eight” that is drafting immigration reform legislation. In a letter to John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio, and Jeff Flake, the four Judiciary Committee members express concern that an immigration reform bill will be rushed through Congress without proper oversight in the form of hearings and robust debate. They note that the Gang has “secretly met for months” without consulting

Fight for the right
to grow raisins
USA Today, by James Bovard    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 6:00:51 AM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court could soon end one of the federal government´s most archaic practices. Since the 1930s, the Agriculture Department has turned California raisin growers into pawns of its Raisin Administrative Committee, which can commandeer up to half of the farmer´s crop and then pay them little or nothing for the product. Marvin Horne, a 67-year-old raisin farmer in Fresno, Calif., was fined almost $700,000 for refusing to surrender control of much of his harvest to the government committee in 2002. Horne, who has been growing raisins for more than 40 years,

Dirty pols sink Andy
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:55:50 AM     Post Reply
There are many who scoff at Andrew Cuomo’s chances in a presidential primary campaign, but I am not among them. His name is an iconic Democratic brand, he’s forceful on the stump and a prodigious fund-raiser. Besides, somebody has to win the nomination. Of course, there are hurdles. Saint Hillary is gearing up to run, and there will be a scrum among contenders, probably including Vice President Joe Biden, competing just to be Clinton’s top rival. The scenario, then, is daunting but doable — or at least it was,

Discovery Of A 17th Century Spanish
Shipwreck Yields Awesome Treasure
LiveScience, by Marc Lallinilla    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:40:58 AM     Post Reply
A great superpower, weakened by economic calamity at home and staggering under the debt from years of war in the Middle East, finally collapses. A new political best-seller, or an apocalyptic Hollywood blockbuster? Neither — it´s the story told by a 1622 shipwreck whose treasures were desperately needed to shore up the finances of the struggling Spanish Empire. The galleon Buen Jesus y Nuestra Senora del Rosario was one of 28 ships in the Tierra Firme fleet; all were sailing from the New World back to Spain, laden with colonial treasures,

How the ´indispensable man´ became
America´s only six-star general
Washington Examiner, by Joseph Dooley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:35:55 AM     Post Reply
Historian James Thomas Flexner referred to George Washington as "the indispensable man." Americans all know he was a general, but have you ever wondered what grade of general? How many stars did Gen. Washington have? In today´s Army, a one-star general is a brigadier; two stars is a major general; three stars is a lieutenant general; four stars is just plain general. During World War II, Congress created the five-star general, the modern rank of general of the Army. There had been an earlier grade that was called general of the Army,

South Korea has already won
Washington Post, by Max Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:26:19 AM     Post Reply
On March 30, three days after North Korea severed a military hotline with the South and announced that South Korean President Park Geun-hye “will meet a miserable ruin,” the country declared a state of war. “The time has come to stage a do-or-die final battle,” an official statement said. Meanwhile, many of South Korea’s youth were worried about something else. A 25-year-old pop star named Seo In-guk had appeared on a popular reality TV show the night before and, in a misstep that quickly dominated online conversations, had washed his strawberries incorrectly. Ilbe, a conservative Web forum —

The Rutgers Scandal Now Has
an F.B.I. Extortion Investigation
Atlantic, by Connor Simpson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:18:30 AM     Post Reply
If you had an extortion investigation in your "what twists the Rutgers basketball scandal will take next" pool, well, collect your winnings. Also, buy a lottery ticket because you may be telepathic. Because the F.B.I. is investigating Eric Murdock, the whistleblowing former assistant coach, for extortion. University officials let it slip to The New York Times´ Steve Eder that Federal Bureau of Investigation officers recently visited the campus and met with athletic director Tim Pernetti sometime before Pernetti was fired on Friday. They´re trying to determine whether or not Murdock, the former director of player development,

Hollywood’s Come to Jesus Moment?
American Spectator, by Marta H. Mossberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:07:42 AM     Post Reply
Imagine the pitch to a History Channel executive for the smash hit The Bible. Here’s one scenario: Producers Roma Downey and Mark Burnett: “Hi, we want to produce a story that appeals to all age groups. It’s has everything: love, lust, greed, war, self-sacrifice and redemption. It’s called ‘The Bible.’” Executive: “Could you repeat that? You said ‘The Bible’?” RD and MB: “Yes – we want to retell the Bible for this generation. And we think we can make money doing it. We’ve done a lot of market research —there is no competition out there.”

Rolling Out
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:04:35 AM     Post Reply
Since the Shermans of General Patton´s Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany. No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports. The U.S. Army’s 69-year history of basing main battle tanks on German soil quietly ended last month when 22 Abrams tanks, a main feature of armored combat units throughout the Cold War, embarked for the U.S. The departure of the last M-1 Abrams tanks coincides with the inactivation of two of the Army’s Germany-based heavy brigades.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
73 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

48 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

47 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Is going gluten-free
healthier for everybody?

33 replie(s)
The Week, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/7/2013 11:28:27 AM     Post Reply
Gluten-free diets are all the rage, but they can be dangerous if not done right. What is gluten? It´s the spongy complex of proteins, found naturally in wheat, rye, and barley, that gives elasticity to dough and allows it to rise. When flour is moistened and either kneaded or mixed into dough, gluten molecules form an elastic, microscopic latticework that traps the carbon dioxide produced when yeast ferments, causing dough to inflate like a hot air balloon. Baking hardens the gluten, which helps the finished product keep its shape. Wheat — and gluten — is ubiquitous in the American diet.


Post Reply   Close thread 705297





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS