A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Texting: Can we pull the
plug on our obsession?

CBS News, by Susan Spencer

Original Article

Posted By:Photoonist, 9/30/2012 3:32:28 PM

Once upon a time, in what seems a far-off land, if you saw someone walking down the street talking to himself, you'd think he was, well, crazy. Not any more. Ninety percent of American adults own cell phones and, whether talking or texting, it seems that 90 percent of the time, they are using them. "These days, the minute that people are alone, at a stop sign, at the checkout line in a supermarket, they panic, they reach for a phone," said MIT psychologist Sherry Turkle. She says high-speed connections have left us more disconnected than ever. "I studied families who are having breakfast together, and every

Comments:
3200 text messages a month? What is this doing to our society, our families and even our brains? I'm beginning to think that it is affecting our ability to think. No one has time for self-reflection anymore or even plain old thinking. And the ''hive-mind'' doesn't seem to be what it's cracked up to be. Though I've a cellphone that can do most things; internet, full text functions etc.; I refuse to walk down the street/store aisle with it permanently connected at my ear (or with a Bluetooth headset).

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Shimp, 9/30/2012 3:50:08 PM     (No. 8900560)

c-BS...........is this the most important news ever? I cancelled your broadcast long ago....you are scum.


Reply 2 - Posted by: balogreene, 9/30/2012 3:53:04 PM     (No. 8900570)

When you see me in a store with my headphones in one ear, I am probably listening to a book. I have precious little time to read, and when I am alone, doing an errand, it is a good time. Must admit I don't text much, a couple of times a month, and hate to talk on the thing.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: jalo1951, 9/30/2012 4:05:29 PM     (No. 8900588)

I do not like to talk on the phone. Cell or land line so I spend almost no time chatting with anyone. I also only text my son when necessary. That might mean 5 times a week, maybe. I cannot imagine hours and hours talking and 3200 text messages. I have followed people through the grocery store for 40 mins to an hour and they haven't stopped talking to someone on the phone. I do not do the social network either. I work in a school library and see approximately 600 students a day. That is enough human contact for me.


Reply 4 - Posted by: thelmalou, 9/30/2012 4:07:47 PM     (No. 8900592)

I'm with you, #3. I like my solitude when I can get it. I wonder of today's society would be able to handle life with a lot of silence. I suspect it would be a dreadfully hard adjustment (say if electricity was out for any length of time).


Reply 5 - Posted by: doublesharp, 9/30/2012 4:16:38 PM     (No. 8900611)

Too many people need watching in public. I'm a big fan of situational awareness.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Tygerlily, 9/30/2012 4:37:00 PM     (No. 8900642)

Self absorbed. Sorry state of humanity when you cannot sit down as a family without electronic devices for the time it takes to eat a meal.




Reply 7 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 9/30/2012 5:14:53 PM     (No. 8900695)

You cannot uninvent something that has been invented....


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: supersid, 9/30/2012 5:20:31 PM     (No. 8900709)

3200 text messages a month?

That's about 100 a day. Like speaking 100 sentences. Nobody would consider speaking 100 sentences in a day 'abnormal'.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Rather Read, 9/30/2012 5:23:39 PM     (No. 8900716)

I like my cell phone, but I don't text. I talk, and that only when I need to.


Reply 10 - Posted by: 2dogs, 9/30/2012 6:05:15 PM     (No. 8900782)

Families need no-tech rules for mealtime, car-time, shopping, and family gatherings. Enforce it! When I was growing up (50's) there were times we weren't allowed to bing comic books or games or cards. Same principle: teach kids how not to be RUDE to one another! Simple!
I've told my adult kids this and they are trying, with their kids.


Reply 11 - Posted by: killerbee, 9/30/2012 6:19:35 PM     (No. 8900803)

I like text. I don't like to talk on the phone and I like to have a record I can go back to. I'm not an idiot who texts walking down a street or while driving, nor do I sit around texting to people all day long instead of having verbal interactions.

Surely there can be a happy medium.


Reply 12 - Posted by: coldoc, 9/30/2012 6:22:08 PM     (No. 8900806)

The text while driving types are slowly eliminating themselves from the gene pool.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: leonardo, 9/30/2012 7:01:55 PM     (No. 8900853)

Some Americans have developed an obsession for "connectedness". The drive for continual approval and assurance from others via Facebook, Twitter, etc. may be
another facet of this "life-sharing" activity. Did Americans' grandparents DIE simply because they could not be "in the loop" on a real-time basis? ... not quite.
Some might even argue argue that their lives were richer for not being "chatterboxes" and not voicing their every trivial thought. The above will garner knee-jerk negative reaction from some ... likely they are the worst afflicted.


Reply 14 - Posted by: belwhatter, 9/30/2012 7:08:32 PM     (No. 8900863)

What a pitiful state humanity has come to, lives dominated by triviality.As poster#7 has said you can't uninvent what has been invented. The remaining option with regard to cell phones is self control and politeness.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 9/30/2012 9:12:07 PM     (No. 8901023)

#10, I agree. We never watched TV during dinner when I was growing up (unless there was some major event the whole family should see, like a moon landing), and that rule was enforced with our own children.

Interestingly, the Wall Street Journal had an article this week about a sharp increase in the rate of injuries to toddlers and young children, in the last few years. There is speculation that perhaps too many parents are engaged with their phones, and taking their eyes off their little ones. Cited was a woman who claimed that she was only on the phone texting for 20 seconds when a toddler she was watching drowned in a hotel pool, but was resuscitated. But when surveillance tapes were checked, she had been oblivious to the child for over three minutes.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Aunt Agnes, 9/30/2012 10:59:38 PM     (No. 8901154)

I don't drink anymore, but I kind of miss the old days where you could go into a fern bar, light a cigarette, order a scotch and water & actually have a conversation with friends over drinks. Now the trend is "sports bars" & there is a TV screen everywhere you look! People don't seem to talk anymore and even if they do, conversation is constantly interrupted by cell phones going off. I spend a little time on FB because I have relatives who live far enough away that is really the only way that we "see" each other. I've gotten to know some cousins that I never even met before FB. That said, I've heard from many people I went to high school with & I cannot believe the amount of triviality they post, some of it personal & potentially embarrassing. One woman wrote recently about her "gas problems" after eating certain foods. Don't people know that these posts live forever in cyberspace?


Reply 17 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 10/1/2012 12:09:37 AM     (No. 8901235)

Personal electronics are an adult pacifier for the insecure.

What percent is actually important conversation ? Dribble ? What are you teaching your children ?


   

 

  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 704259




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"



MA Senate: Elizabeth
Warren Defeats Scott Brown
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM     Post Reply
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.

Republicans lose ground
in bid to take over Senate
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM     Post Reply
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican

CNN Reports Romney Internal
Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM     Post Reply
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting
until 2 a.m.' in Florida
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM     Post Reply
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.

   

 



 
No surprises for Obama,
Romney in early projections
CNN, by Tom Cohen    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political

Exit polls 2012: Hurricane
Sandy not a factor
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM     Post Reply
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.

Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney
winning independents
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by

Obama, Romney locked in tight race
with battlegrounds too close to call
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:24:14 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney and President Obama each racked up early and expected victories Tuesday night in relatively safe territory, while some of the biggest battlegrounds that will decide the election remained too close to call. All the big swing states where polls have closed -- Florida, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and North Carolina -- were too close to call, Fox News projects. (Snip) Obama will also win three of Maine's four electoral votes, Fox News projects. It is unclear where the state's fourth electoral vote will fall. The latest batch of poll closings, and results, has allowed Obama to take

Romney wins South Carolina
Market Watch, by Robert Schroeder    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:53:12 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney was projected the winner in South Carolina on Tuesday night, taking home the state’s nine electoral votes. So far Tuesday the former Massachusetts governor has taken other reliably red states including Kentucky and West Virginia. Romney leads in the Electoral College with 24 electoral votes to President Obama’s three.

Ohio exit poll: More Democrats vote,
but independents back Romney
CBS News, by Brian Montopoli    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:45:37 PM     Post Reply
As expected, the presidential race is tight in Ohio, where the polls just closed: President Obama is winning women 55 percent to 44 percent in the early CBS News exit poll, while Mitt Romney is leading 52 percent to 46 percent among men. Women made up 51 percent of the electorate, compared to 49 percent among women. Thirty-nine percent of voters so far identified themselves as Democrats, compared to 30 percent calling themselves Republican. Thirty-one percent identified as independent or something else, and Romney has a big edge among this group - 56 percent to 40 percent for Mr. Obama.

Romney Projected To
Win West Virginia
MetroNews [W. Virginia], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:35:52 PM     Post Reply
As expected, Republican candidate for President, Mitt Romney, won West Virginia’s five electoral votes in Tuesday’s General Election over President Barack Obama. National media outlets called the race in West Virginia shortly after polls closed at 7:30 p.m. President Obama’s fate in West Virginia has never been in question, as he garnered just 60 percent of the democratic vote in the May primary. The other 40 percent of that vote went to Texas federal inmate Keith Judd, who was placed on the ballot in West Virginia. President Obama has been hugely unpopular in the Mountain State since he first ran

Exit poll show voters lean
toward GOP compared to 2008
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 7:18:08 PM     Post Reply
Early exit polls show Election Day voters are slightly more Republican than in 2008 and broadly concerned about the state of the U.S. economy. Six in 10 voters said the economy is their top issue according to the poll, which was released by The Associated Press and conducted on behalf of a consortium of media companies. Less than a quarter of voters said their families were better off than four years ago — a point seized on by many Republicans as the results leaked out.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Barack Obama can´t pass gun control
despite 90 per cent support. Truly,
he is a lame-duck president

77 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Tim Stanley    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/18/2013 6:42:40 AM     Post Reply
Yesterday, the most modest of gun control proposals died in the Senate. It would have expanded background checks to people purchasing weapons at gun shows and online sales, enjoyed 90 per cent support among the public and came on the back of the tragedy at Newtown. Yet, despite all that it had going for it, the Toomey-Manchin bill raised just 54 votes--six short of the number necessary for passage. “This is a pretty shameful day for Washington,” said Obama afterwards. It wasn’t exactly a red letter day for him, either. Why did the no-brainer bill fail? Four reasons:

Obama angrily denounces
gun-rights groups as willful liars

66 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/17/2013 6:37:42 PM     Post Reply
President Obama angrily blamed the defeat Wednesday of his centerpiece gun-control proposal on lies spread by the National Rifle Association, calling it “a pretty shameful day for Washington.” “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill,” Mr. Obama said in the White House rose garden about 90 minutes after the vote. “It came down to politics.” As he spoke, Mr. Obama was surrounded by family members of victims of the Newtown, Conn., school shooting. Also with him was former Rep. Gabby Giffords of Arizona, wounded in an assassination attempt.

Boston Marathon bombings
present new test for Obama

50 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/17/2013 6:01:37 AM     Post Reply
Authorities on Tuesday revealed little new information about the terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon, the most high-profile bombing on U.S. soil in more than a decade and a tragedy that presents a new test for President Obama. Obama, like all Americans, is standing by, waiting for answers as to who planted two bombs improvised from pressure cookers at the finish line of the storied race, and why. Three Americans were killed in Monday´s attack and more than 170 others were injured. "Anytime bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror," Obama said,

Senate rejects background checks
on gun purchases in 54-46 vote

45 replie(s)
Hill [Washington,DC], by Alexander Bolton    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 4/17/2013 4:41:19 PM     Post Reply
The Senate delivered a devastating blow to President Obama’s agenda to regulate guns Wednesday by defeating a bipartisan proposal to expand background checks. It failed by a vote of 54 to 46, with 5 Democrats voting against it. Only 4 Republicans supported it. Democratic Sens. Mark Pryor (Ark.), Max Baucus (Mont.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), Mark Begich (Alaska) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) voted against it. Reid supported the measure but voted against it to preserve his ability to bring the measure up again. GOP Sens. John McCain (Ariz.), Susan Collins (Maine), Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Mark Kirk

A growing sense that we´re not
getting the truth about Boston bombing

43 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 4/18/2013 10:48:34 AM     Post Reply
While the media are bearing the brunt of public skepticism over the handling of the Boston bombing, the behavior of government is also eroding public trust. Yesterday´s promised but cancelled news briefing is just one symptom. Andrew McCarthy of PJM notes that "Misinformation rather than enlightenment has been the order of the day in the investigation of Monday´s terrorist bombing of the Boston Marathon," and that part of it is the natural outgrowth of the desire of investigators to keep the details of their investigations secret, so as not to alert suspects.

Mark Kelly says senators voted
down gun legislation ‘out of fear’

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: toledo- 4/18/2013 11:50:49 AM     Post Reply
Mark Kelly, the astronaut husband of former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, on Thursday upbraided senators who voted against gun legislation by saying they voted “out of fear.” ”If that vote had been a secret ballot, I bet you it would have passed with 80 votes,” Kelly told reporters. He was referencing the compromise authored by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to expand background checks for gun buyers. It failed to advance in the Senate, with a vote Wednesday afternoon of 54 to 46.

CNN: Pressure Cooker Bomb
´Right Wing´ Signature

39 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Lee Stranahan    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/17/2013 8:56:39 AM     Post Reply
An article published on CNN´s website makes an unproven claim that pressure cooker bombs like the ones used at the Boston Marathon terror attack are a ´signature´ of ´right-wing extremists.´ The article was co-written by Jennifer Roland and Peter Bergen. Bergen is the CNN ananlyst made the claim that right-wing extremists could be behind the bombing less than two hours after it took place. The article says (emphasis added) :A senior U.S. counterterrorism investigator told CNN that pressure cooker bombs have also been a signature of extreme right-wing individuals in the

Let’s hope the Boston Marathon
bomber is a white American

38 replie(s)
SALON, by David Sirota    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/17/2013 7:38:32 AM     Post Reply
As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

Obama: Gun lobby ´lied´ about
background check bill

38 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 4/17/2013 6:09:57 PM     Post Reply
Washington — President Barack Obama says the Senate’s opposition to a bill that would have expanded background checks for gun buyers marks a “shameful day” in Washington. He says a minority of senators decided “it wasn’t worth it” to protect the nation’s children. Obama spoke in the Rose Garden shortly after the Senate vote rejecting a bipartisan effort to expand federal background checks to more firearms buyers. (Snip) The president pinned the blame for the measures failure, though five Democrats also opposed the plan. He also said the gun lobby and its allies “willfully lied” about background check bill.

A Stirring Send-Off For
the Iron Lady – And No
One Missed the Obamas

38 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Mike McNally    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/17/2013 11:39:38 PM     Post Reply
After all the controversy – it was too much, and too expensive; it would be marred by protests – this morning’s funeral for Lady Thatcher in London was a splendid and memorable affair, which did her memory, and her country, proud. It was a moving, dignified and pitch-perfect occasion: unmistakably British, and a fitting send-off for the country’s greatest post-war prime minister. Big Ben fell silent – for the first time since the funeral of wartime leader Winston Churchill – and tens of thousands of admirers lined the streets to applaud Lady Thatcher’s coffin

Misinformation and Anxiety in
Boston Terrorism Investigation

37 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/17/2013 10:38:32 PM     Post Reply
Misinformation rather than enlightenment has been the order of the day in the investigation of Monday’s terrorist bombing of the Boston Marathon. The anxiety stemming from the attack and the stream of inaccurate news about it is further freighted, moreover, by the FBI’s confirmation that two letters addressed to top political officials — President Obama and Senator Richard Wicker (R., MS) — tested positive for ricin, a deadly poison. As noted below, a man identified as Kenneth Curtis of Tupelo, Mississippi, has reportedly been arrested in connection with the mailings. Early this afternoon, massive confusion

Top Dem sees ´train wreck´
for Obama health law

36 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/17/2013 4:11:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- A senior Democratic senator who helped write President Barack Obama´s health care law stunned administration officials Wednesday, saying openly he thinks it´s headed for a "train wreck" because of bumbling implementation. "I just see a huge train wreck coming down," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., told Obama´s health care chief during a routine budget hearing that suddenly turned tense. Baucus is the first top Democrat to publicly voice fears about the rollout of the new health care law, designed to bring coverage to some 30 million uninsured Americans through a mix

   

Post Reply   Close thread 704259





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS