fake indian fake lawyer. now if she would just get drunk and kill someone she'd be totally worth of the "ted kennedy" seat.

Maybe her Ma told her they were 1/32nd licensed in Massachusetts...

So this makes her an undocumented lawyer?
I guess she’s was just doing a job American’s wouldn’t do.

She is a fraud. Shame on people for supporting her.

To think this unlicensed fraud held so much respect with the lefties that she contributed to ObamaCare and a host of other legislation - it boggles the mind. Lefties accept people like her even though they lie to the point where one would question their sanity. They accept them even though they commit any number of crimes against the groups lefties purport to protect - women and minorities.

Some general ideas in the Democrat party actually seem good, but after any degree of examination, they fall apart. I could never be a Democrat. I just don't understand them, and I never will.

She doesn't recognize the white man's law.

The other moccasin has finally dropped. All the evidence indicates that Granny Warren practiced law and represented clients in MA without a license. She broke the law. Period.

Stick a fork in her. Losing the election is the least of her worries now.

We'll see if character counts in Mass. Maybe she needs to run around handing out free cellphones.

Now that that is settled, maybe we can get some answers about Obama.

Well, what the heck? She's just emulating The Great Impostor in the White House and the Veep, who was a football star at Delaware (except he wasn't, it turns out).

What do you expect? It's a DemocRAT gene. Besides...What's a license? It's only a piece of paper! I'm surprised Warren didn't photoshop an authentic license and just change the name and date. I hear you can do that with birth certificates.

#5, I agree. I have tried so hard to understand Democrats and how they think. I have done everything humanly possible to figure out how they could possibly believe the Democrat Party line. I can't. Not for the life of me! There is just NO WAY their side makes any sense at all to me. I think one would have to be very, VERY ignorant and very gullible to be a Democrat--especially in this day and age. Either that, or they have to be very evil and manipulative. Either way, I couldn't ever be one.

Does she even have any current law License? She may be coping Mr & Mrs President.

In this state, they will put you in jail for practicing law without a license the same as they will for practicing medicine without a license.

"May have needed a license"?
Don't give her any firewater!

#11, the agenda takes precedence over everything. Everything. It doesn't matter if she's a liar, a crook, and hypocrite. It doesn't even matter that she screwed "the little people." She's a socialist. That's ALL that counts.

She's debating Brown Monday night at UMass/Lowell. Be interesting to see what transpires.

Top prerequisite to be a Democrat is one must know how to LIE with a straight face. #2 is to NEVER admit one has lied. This encompasses all from talking Pundits, journ-O-LIARS on up the rung of the ladder on which "the won" sits on the top rung.

Princess Nanana-nanana-heyheyhey-goodbye is done.

Perhaps her license from Delhi should be sufficient.

There is no such thing as a national licence for anything. Each state requires licensed professionals to have a license from that particular state. A surgeon, lawyer, therapist, nurse, contractor, etc. all must have a license to practice in the state they are going to work. You either take the exams from that state (not the usual practice in most professions) or apply for 'reciprocity' which simply means that state recognizes your previous license from whatever state.

If true, what she did is illegal and is deserving of censure from where she is licensed and should face disbarrment. If I were Scott, I would pursue that angle first. There should be an immediate filing for re-trial of Cadle Company v. Schlichtmann (regardless of case outcome or details). The case was handled by an unlicensed attorney. The repercussions should be vast.

''Does she even have any current law License?''

No, she gave up her NJ licence as she couldn't be bothered with the continuing Ed requirements.

However, being 1/64th Native American, she is not subject to state licencing laws - and can thus practice law any dang place she wishes. In fact, if she chose to, Mizz Lizzie could sell tax-free cigarettes from her back porch.

In order to appear in a U.S. District Court, the lawyer must be admitted by that district. In order to to be admitted, the lawyer must apply to the district court clerk, indicating that he/she is licensed in the state of that district (Massachusetts). A lawyer with a license in New Jersey, however, may appear in a district court in Massachusetts by applying to that court for permission to appear pro hac vice, meaning for that case. The attorney applying for the application must be sponsored by an attorney admitted in the host jurisdiction. If Ms. Warren had been licensed in New Jersey at the time she appeared in Massachusetts, she still needed to apply to appear pro hac vice. If she did not, she violated USDC District of Massachusetts Local Rule 83.5.3.

Good point #21. I think she is a hypocrite and a certified moonbat but as she was licensed in New Jersey (she just gave that up due to, she states "burden of continuing education requirements") I expect she was legal in her standing in Federal Court. Who she was representing might be of greater political impact.

She thought she had a license since she had high cheekbones.

#12...Fauxcahontas had law licenses in Texas and New Jersey. She gave up her Texas license some time ago. But even more interesting to me, on Sept. 11, 2012, she found time in the midst of her busy campaign to give up her New Jersey law license. WHY?

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem/

The high and mighty Princess Lie-a-lot-a, caught in another fraud.

#15 is zoning in on the Truth.

But it's not about an "agenda" - - that's much too broad a concept - - it's simply about abortion.

Any pol who is ardently pro-abortion gets a lifetime free pass from all crimes. Little White Dove cannot be touched - - because she strongly favors everything up to and including infanticide.

Like it or not - - but get it straight - - - Pro-Abortion = Stay Out Of Jail.

A typical Democrat candidate, frauds and liars.

Personally, I think this is finally going to nail Fauxahontas. We all know that Dems don't give a hoot about honor and integrity, and will lie like a rug to protect a fellow Dem. But when it comes to their self-importance and their own money, they will eat their own.

No way will lawyers allow a precedent like having anyone (even a fellow Dem) be allowed to practice law without a license.

Jackson is a reverend, Sharpton is a reverend, Warren is a lawyer. Move on.

Laws, rules, regulations, ethical guidelines, social mores, and common decency... all of the above simply do not apply to dimocrats. In fact, they seem to be rewarded more for breaking all those.

Not sure how this works, but if any of Warren's MA-era clients lost their cases, would they be able to appeal, based on insufficient or improper legal representation?

Return of the Pretendian.

Harvard is going to have to drop her fast. She's messing up their game. They can't have a Professor teach students that you don't need a license to "be a lawyer".