The key is that the "unwanted" children are unwanted by rich men like Bill Clinton - not by their mothers.

Did Bill make sure Sandra Fluck was covered?

Yep, this is such important news. Another democrat more concerned with having his name in the news than facing the truly huge issues facing our country.

Like this stuff wasn't available or that it will even matter if our country is overtaken by Islam, or the economy falls off a cliff. At least Bill will be assured he won't find himself being a daddy again.

I think a wise more cost-effective solution would be vasectomies for the men in "developing countries."

An averge woman can only have one child every nine months. One man can father hundreds of chidren every month.

Uh #4 You may want to check your math. Very few men have the time, the opportunity, and the ability to have sex over 3 times a day every day, with different women.

#5 ... but it is possible.

How do you get women in the developing world to embrace this program? Children are capital to them. Mandatory implants?

i feel like such a fool. when i saw a headline that paired the words "bill clinton" and "contraception" in the same headline, i thought he was swearing off sex for a minute.

Bills just looking to limit his own "potential problems" as he travels the globe...hoooooeeee!

The fine print shows that Bill Clinton will be able to propagate his DNA whenever and wherever he chooses. Oh happy day!

I didn't think Bill could get anyone pregnant...

I see his point, a condom would have solved a lot of blue dress problems for the slickster, eh?

The democrat party has a delusional obsession with contraception, abortion and race. How does anyone with an education pull the D lever?

OP needs an anatomy lesson.

#1 is right. Programs like this get rich man-hos in politics off the hook with the bimbos and mistresses they do and have.

30 million, one at a time!!

#8, - that's about all it would be - a minute.

And with every contraception packet the ladies get a free bottle of stain remover.

You mean he's opened the White House sink to everyone?

Why not outright sterilization Slick? You know you want to.

# 7, that's the right start. All you have to do is follow China's lead and put a gun to their head. If that doesn't work, go to plan B and force the abortion.

And leftists adore the way the Chinese government works.

Pathetic.

All it would take is for Ahab and all the wannabees to keep their pants zipped.

The joke here writes itself. Maybe it'll keep Bill out of the country.

Clinton jokes aside, but really: no joke.

Progestin-only contraceptives—mini pills, injections, and implants—have side efects that women in impoverished countries will find it hard to deal with, such as significantly decrease bone mineral density.

Hormonal contraceptives offer no protection against sexually-transmitted infections and diseases (STDs). In the U.S. alone, there are over 19 million new cases of STDs annually (half among those aged 25 and under), and more than 60 million people are currently infected with STDs. The total keeps growing because there is no cure for viral STDs — like HIV/AIDS, genital herpes, and strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) that responsible for 99% of cases of cervical cancer.

Hormonal contraceptives doubled the risk of HIV in one 10-year study.

I suppose that's a plus, though, if your goal is to wipe out reproductive capacity. Nothing wipes out reproductive capacity as efficiently as killng females.

Who unwants these children? Not the women in question, I suspect, whose cultures value children and who depend on their children in old age. More likely western liberals don't want them. Isn't this a form of genocide?

Does this mean the developed markets are agreeing to buy in implant for 30 million people whether they actually want the implant or not? This would be a great deal for the implant manufacturers because they could simply close down the marketing and collection sides of the business.

Promises to keep Little Willie in his pants!!!!!