A Message From Lucianne  


S-CR-TEO

S-ADI-01






ST-GC


        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
  Topic: Rand Paul: ´We don´t have money to
spend´ for Trump´s border wall
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Rand Paul: ´We don´t have money to
spend´ for Trump´s border wall

The Hill, by Brett Samuels

Original Article

Posted By:zoidberg, 1/11/2018 9:14:15 AM

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that while he supports additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, he believes some of the estimated costs for President Trump’s border wall are too high to justify. "I remain a fiscal conservative, even on the wall, so I’m not excited about spending $20, $30, $40 billion on a wall. I’m still a believer that we don’t have money to spend. We’re $700 billion in the hole,” Paul said on CNN.  “And while I will vote for money for barriers, I’m not voting for $40 billion for barriers,” Paul added.  A report last week detailed Trump’s

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/11/2018 9:29:20 AM     (No. 11506690)

I don’t really care about whether little Rand finds it exciting or not. We need the wall. The expense has been justified. And there are still ways to get Mexico and any country to which remittances are wired by their citizens living here to pay for the wall.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    61 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: OBX Pete, 1/11/2018 9:31:29 AM     (No. 11506694)

Somebody please tell Rand that perhaps they could take the money being spent to take care of the illegals to build the wall.

It is insane that our tax money is being spent for medical care, food and God knows what else to make sure they are comfortable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    73 persons like this.


   

 

    
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Thos Weatherby, 1/11/2018 9:31:37 AM     (No. 11506695)

By keeping out 1/2 of the people the savings from medical and education alone would pay for the wall in 2 years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jinx, 1/11/2018 9:32:28 AM     (No. 11506697)

How about getting rid of ALL the slush funds the government uses!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: slab, 1/11/2018 9:33:51 AM     (No. 11506699)

A user fee on international Western Union transfers will pay for it as it´s built.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    38 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: joew9, 1/11/2018 9:41:48 AM     (No. 11506706)

Rand Paul doesn´t want it. He couldn´t "find" enough money to buy a shovel.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: mc squared, 1/11/2018 9:47:27 AM     (No. 11506710)

Pay it now or pay it forever.

I thought Congress approved a wall in ´86 under Reagan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: JansGraphix, 1/11/2018 9:48:48 AM     (No. 11506711)

Which is cheaper Paul? $40B for a wall? Or $4T for illegals? And these guys are supposed to be so smart??

Apparently ´smart´ needs to be redefined. Doesn´t it, Paul?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Clinger, 1/11/2018 9:50:36 AM     (No. 11506712)

So Rand let me tell you how we little people decide what we have money to pay for and what we do not.

First we start with priorities, shelter, water, food, transportation to a job. Then we decide what to do with the left overs, more shelter than essential survival needs, better food, a car vs taking the bus, then we look at even lower priorities, like entertainment.

This shouldn´t come as a shock to you sir but your job is to do the same. The constitution will prove helpful in removing any confusion regarding the priorities. Defense and border security are in that top tier. For example all the federal government has accomplished with the department of education is to make education worse so don´t tell me we can´t afford top priority when we spend billions on things not in the constitutional purview of the federal government.

Here´s a little tidbit to consider; what is one third of the cost of the federal prison system? One third of the inmates are illegal intruders. What´s cheaper a wall or all of the associates costs of not having a wall?

Mr. Paul, I have at times thought of you as a true representative of the people. Perhaps I was wrong, way wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    62 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: save America, 1/11/2018 9:54:59 AM     (No. 11506720)

If a bridge falls down or another storm like Sandy hits,18 billion would appear out of nowhere.Overnight,probably with him leading the charge of we have to do something.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: citizen, 1/11/2018 9:55:19 AM     (No. 11506721)

Stop bringing "migrants" here to leech off our systems..stop generational welfare.
Those two items alone would pay for the wall, actually many walls.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 1/11/2018 10:01:13 AM     (No. 11506733)

Take it from Department of Education, Arts, and Federal welfare.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


   

 

Lock-17


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/11/2018 10:19:19 AM     (No. 11506764)

Yes we do, besides Mexico is going to pay for it. Shut up, Paul. Quit being a wrench in everything. No wonder your neighbor got tired of you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: dvc, 1/11/2018 10:20:56 AM     (No. 11506770)

Bullhockey. Pocket change, and very important.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 1/11/2018 10:31:48 AM     (No. 11506780)

Senator Paul can solve this problem by proposing legislation to pay for the wall by eliminating foreign aid to our enemies, e.g., the Palestinian Authority.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/11/2018 10:33:30 AM     (No. 11506783)

If you add up all the decentralized government benefits at all levels being paid out, the government law enforcement costs to deal with the massive illegal alien population, and all the illicit drugs that illegal aliens in the employ of the international cartels are smuggling into and are transporting across the country, the total clearly exceeds $40 billion every year. So even if an effective borderline barrier will look to be expensive at the front end, once completed, the country will no longer have to pay out tens of billions of dollars each year to millions of illegal aliens and for all levels of government to deal with them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: curious1, 1/11/2018 10:40:45 AM     (No. 11506795)

And even Trump has said it shouldn´t take anywhere near 7 years and it shouldn´t ermotely cost as much as they´re estimating - since he´s ´been in the business´ for decades, I´d trust his gut-check estimates over federal bureaucrat ´experts´ any day of the week.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


   

 

R-LJ
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: rochow, 1/11/2018 11:05:00 AM     (No. 11506823)

Memo to Paul: it costs more to take care of these illegals than building a wall!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Cor-Vet, 1/11/2018 11:09:50 AM     (No. 11506830)

But you congress-critters think you can find enough money to return earmarks? Pork, especially government pork, is very expensive!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: dman, 1/11/2018 11:36:36 AM     (No. 11506858)

We "didn´t have the money" for the Manhattan Project, either.

Sell "Wall Bonds" and make this a similar effort. Count me in.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 1/11/2018 11:47:51 AM     (No. 11506871)

More Jheri Curl logic from R. Paul.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: stencil, 1/11/2018 12:33:30 PM     (No. 11506923)

Paul is correct and there will be no "Wall", never was going to be. POTUS himself yesterday admitted as much: "...I´ll take the blame...". He used the imagery to get elected.

We don´t need an literal, continuous, impractical "Wall" (see China). What we do need are sections of barriers, with surveillance, and armed reinforcements to handle the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Shucky, 1/11/2018 1:48:01 PM     (No. 11507005)

It´s either that, or billions and billions more for the ever increasing demand for social services. The nation can´t afford NOT to build a wall and ship all illegals out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Penney, 1/11/2018 2:15:12 PM     (No. 11507038)

The cost for the wall is but a small amount of the total national budget funding for its countless projects, -in fact it is hardly noticeable, but it is vital to national & America´s unique cultural security. Rand Paul is wrong on this!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: danvillebill, 1/11/2018 2:21:19 PM     (No. 11507043)

quixotic (adj)

= idealistic but impractical

= Rand Paul


With thanks to Cervantes who predicted this loon back in 1605.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/11/2018 2:22:34 PM     (No. 11507045)

Re #22,

Paul is correct and there will be no "Wall", never was going to be. POTUS himself yesterday admitted as much: "...I´ll take the blame...". He used the imagery to get elected.

Link to original source, please. This sounds like a wee bit taken out of a larger whole. Context.

Conventional wisdom re tidbits of Trump utterances: "If it doesn’t fit, something is usually missing…"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/11/2018 2:45:04 PM     (No. 11507068)

If memory serves, it was funded way back in 1986 but democrats would not follow through. Then there are all the other many ideas that come to mind for funding, like cutting back on spending, cutting foreign aid to Mexico, installing serious fees for all wire transfers to locations south of our border, etc.

Plenty of ways to fund the border Sparky Paul, and you just better get used to the fact that you aren´t going to get your amnesty. The nation´s voters have spoken when they elected Trump, not YOU.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: nimby, 1/11/2018 2:57:26 PM     (No. 11507079)

Neither do we have money to support these illegals Rand!! And stop giving these people free education, healthcare, social security and child credit!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: jerseytomato, 1/11/2018 2:59:50 PM     (No. 11507082)

WELFARE REFORM.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: P51dmustang, 1/11/2018 3:16:26 PM     (No. 11507091)

You do not need brick and mortar along the border. You need 24/7 drone surveillance and clamor mines.

Illegals stepping into a live mine field is a death on them. Stay out of the US and be safe.

Lets start thinking out of the box Senator Paul.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: steph_gray, 1/11/2018 6:21:49 PM     (No. 11507263)

Tsk, tsk Rand. You are falling into your personal purist trap again. Try to get it right this time, please. Remember your libertarian economics. The tax cuts will end up in more revenue. JFK knew it. Milton Friedman knew it. You certainly ought to know it. Unintended consequences of statist nonsense will decrease and liberty/prosperity/revenue will increase under Trump.

Besides we need you more than ever to fight against the FISA surveillance issue and the danger to all of our liberty. I mean that sincerely. Please look over there and stop with the line-item squirrel stuff. Trump’s got this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/11/2018 7:36:26 PM     (No. 11507327)

BS, it is an investment that will pay us back a million to 1, get over it Rand!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 932538




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"



Comey to teach course on ethical
leadership for College of
William & Mary
Washington Post, by Nick Anderson    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/19/2018 8:10:19 AM     Post Reply
Former FBI director James B. Comey is joining the faculty of his alma mater, the College of William & Mary, and plans to teach a course on ethical leadership at the school’s Washington center starting in the fall. Comey, whom President Trump fired last year, will have a nontenured position as an executive professor in education, the school announced Friday. His course will be offered through the W&M Washington Center to students of the public college based in Williamsburg, Va. Comey will teach the course in fall 2018, spring 2019 and summer 2019 with executive assistant professor Drew Stelljes.

Does the California Model
Really Work?
Tribune Content Agency, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/19/2018 7:54:36 AM     Post Reply
The alleged success of the California model is one of the more intense controversies in the nerdier corners of public-policy debate. For many progressives, California’s metastasizing liberalism proves you can have Scandinavian-style social policies and tax rates and still have robust economic growth. For conservatives, California is like a bumblebee. On paper, the damn thing shouldn’t be able to fly — and yet it does. Thus the cottage industry on the right of prophesizing California’s inevitable demise. What’s always bothered me about the whole argument is how it leaves out important factors. For me, the biggest one was always geography

Rand Paul: ´We don´t have money to
spend´ for Trump´s border wall
The Hill, by Brett Samuels    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/11/2018 9:14:15 AM     Post Reply
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that while he supports additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, he believes some of the estimated costs for President Trump’s border wall are too high to justify. "I remain a fiscal conservative, even on the wall, so I’m not excited about spending $20, $30, $40 billion on a wall. I’m still a believer that we don’t have money to spend. We’re $700 billion in the hole,” Paul said on CNN.  “And while I will vote for money for barriers, I’m not voting for $40 billion for barriers,” Paul added.  A report last week detailed Trump’s

America´s Whiniest Ex-Sheriff
Announces Senate Run
Reason, by C.J. Ciaramella    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/9/2018 2:13:43 PM     Post Reply
A bit more than a year after voters booted him out of office, former Maricopa County sheriff Joe Arpaio has announced he´s running for the U.S. Senate. The 85-year-old Arizonan—an unrepentant birther, nativist, and whiny baby—told the Washington Examiner that he will run on a platform of supporting the agenda of President Donald Trump, who pardoned Arpaio last year after a federal judge held the ex-sheriff in criminal contempt. "I have a lot to offer. I´m a big supporter of President Trump," Arpaio told the paper. "I´m going to have to work hard; you don´t take anything for granted.

Rebellious Jurors Make the World
a Better Place
Reason, by J.D. Tuccille    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/12/2017 10:20:32 AM     Post Reply
After criticism by some local officials of a new program that refers people caught with four ounces or less of marijuana for fines and community service, El Paso, Texas, Police Chief Greg Allen turned out to be a surprise defender of bypassing the usual criminal justice rigmarole of booking, mug shots, and jails. While careful to emphasize that he´s no fan of drug legalization, Allen says it´s a waste of his officers´ time to put hours into an "an arrest that has no end result of a conviction because of jury nullification."

Trump Puts Fact Ahead of
Fiction in Israel
Tribune Content Agency, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/8/2017 9:11:29 AM     Post Reply
The most exhausting thing about the Middle East — except for the bloodshed, poverty, tyranny, etc. — is that it refuses to conform to how it’s described in the West. It’s like journalists, diplomats, and politicians want to announce a football game, but the players keep insisting on playing rugby. The field looks similar. The scoring isn’t all that different. It’s just a different game. But don’t tell the gang in the booth. (Snip)Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The Knesset, Israel’s parliament, convenes there. Israelis call it their capital for the same reason they claim two plus two equals

Global Temperature Increases Are
Lower and Slower, Says New Study
Reason, by Ronald Bailey    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/5/2017 10:55:05 AM     Post Reply
A new study using more than 38 years satellite and weather balloon temperature data hypothesizes that global temperatures are going up more slowly than projected by most climate models. And right on time, these results were challenged by other researchers who defend the scientific climate consensus as embodied in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. The new study done by University of Alabama in Huntsville climatologists John Christy and Richard McNider published in the Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Science argues consensus models may not have accurately captured how storms in the tropics expel excess heat back into space and/or that they have failed to



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´Piece of Garbage´: Michael Dukakis
Rips Tax Law, Blasts Wall Proposal

65 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/20/2018 1:53:19 PM     Post Reply
1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis ripped President Trump´s new tax law and offered optimism for Democrats ahead of the midterm elections. Dukakis, a former governor of the Bay State during the so-called economic "Massachusetts Miracle," said Republicans have lost their way when it comes to supporting fiscal responsibility. He questioned why they would champion a tax plan that may have costly ramifications for the national deficit. (Snip) "We just passed a tax bill, which I think is a piece of garbage," Dukakis, who lost his presidential bid to then-Vice President George Bush, said. "Look at these companies, though, that are

Romney 2020? Republicans speculate
that Romney´s likely Senate run is
the start of something much bigger

39 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Allan Smith and Eliza Relman    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 1/21/2018 2:16:43 PM     Post Reply
It´s no secret that Mitt Romney is, in all likelihood, going to run for a Senate seat in Utah. What´s less clear, however, is why the man who was the 2012 Republican presidential nominee and is now retired and occupying an elder-statesman role in a party torn into warring factions would want to serve as a junior senator. Once elected, Romney would find himself embroiled in day-to-day congressional fights and less free to voice his criticisms of the White House, while losing some of the deference he´s been shown by members of his own party. But listen to any number of Republicans and

Schumer: ´Next to Impossible´ to Negotiate
With the WH or ´Hard Right´

36 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/20/2018 9:33:24 PM     Post Reply
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York pinned the government shutdown on President Donald Trump, saying it has become "next to impossible" to negotiate with the White House.In a press availability, Schumer said he and Trump have been close to a deal to fund the government at least once.But, he said the "hard right" in the Republican Party later convinces Trump not to strike a deal with him."[Trump] won´t take yes for an answer," Schumer said. (Tweet) Schumer said that he does not know whether Trump´s apparent waffling on a deal is the work of adviser Stephen Miller, a

Paul Ryan on Trump Ad Attacking Dems:
‘I Don’t Know If That’s Necessarily Productive’

36 replie(s)
Breitbart Video, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/21/2018 8:10:13 PM     Post Reply
Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) questioned President Donald Trump’s new campaign ad saying Democrats “will be complicit in every murder committed by illegal immigrants” if they continued the shutdown. Ryan said, “They are certainly not helping us keep the government open. They are certainly not helping us get to a solution on immigration. When you shut down the government you stop negotiating on immigration reform. They’re complicity with not getting things done.” He added, “I’m not going to comment. I just saw that. I don’t know if that’s necessarily productive. It’s no

FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months
of Text Messages Between Peter
Strzok and Lisa Page…

35 replie(s)
Conservative Treehouse, by Sundance    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 1/21/2018 5:42:49 PM     Post Reply
The Daily Caller journalist Chuck Ross has some extremely interesting information released today surrounding former top FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ/FBI liaison attorney Lisa Page which includes a disclosure by top FBI officials that text messages between Strzok and Page have gone missing. (Snip) According to information relayed to Senator Ron Johnson, the period of time the FBI has “lost” is from December 14th, 2016 to May 17th, 2017, the exact day that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to lead the Russia collusion probe. As CTH has previously outlined the same “small group” inside the DOJ and FBI,

Hillary Lost, but the Future Is Hers
31 replie(s)
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 1/21/2018 5:00:14 AM     Post Reply
Question: Do you think Donald Trump spends more time thinking about Hillary Clinton than Hillary Clinton spends thinking about Donald Trump? Sure does seem like it. The other day, President Trump was discussing Russia at a press conference with the prime minister of Norway, when he suddenly announced that Clinton “was not for a strong military and Hillary, my opponent, was for windmills, and she was for other types of energy that don’t have the same capacities at this moment certainly.” Yeah, it didn’t make any sense. But he really can’t seem to get past her. Recently while promoting tax

House Intelligence Committee Will Vote
To Release FISA Corruption Memo…

30 replie(s)
Conservative Tree House, by Sundance    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/21/2018 1:21:29 AM     Post Reply
According to Representative Dave Joyce (R-OH14) the House Intelligence Committee will hold a vote on the release of the four-page Nunes memo that reveals systemic corruption within the DOJ and FBI; including the unlawful use of FISA-702(16)(17) data searches which were part of an elaborate DOJ-FBI surveillance program on the political campaign of Donald Trump. (Tweet) Additionally, Chad Pergram reported that Chairman Devin Nunes met with Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte to discuss the best process to release the memo. There are generally two ways it could be done, the HPSCI vote is the most likely.As more people have become aware


Post Reply   Close thread 932538





Recommended Trending videos


Sek-Float


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~