A Message From Lucianne  


S-CR-TEO

S-G1-LC







        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
  Topic: Hillary caves in and says she WILL give
Weinstein´s campaign donations to charity,
six days after the scandal first broke
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Hillary caves in and says she WILL give
Weinstein´s campaign donations to charity,
six days after the scandal first broke

Daily Mail [UK], by Jessica Finn

Original Article

Posted By:Attercliffe, 10/11/2017 10:20:22 PM

Hillary Clinton says she is giving the Democratic donations Harvey Weinstein gave her to charity. Clinton, who remained silent for six days after the Weinstein scandal broke, told CNN Wednesday ´There´s no one to give it back to. What other people are saying, what my former colleagues are saying, is that they´re going to donate it to charity, and of course I will do that.´ Clinton added ´I give 10 per cent of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that. There´s no doubt about it.´ einstein raised and donated hundreds of thousands of dollars for Clinton, going back

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: bamapreacher, 10/11/2017 10:36:02 PM     (No. 11414022)

Her charity if choice is, of course, the Clinton Foundation.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    97 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: saguni, 10/11/2017 10:41:27 PM     (No. 11414029)

FTA: Clinton added ´I give 10 per cent of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that. There´s no doubt about it.´

So, is she "giving back" Weinstein´s campaign donations (to charity)??

Or will she add Weinstein´s campaign donations to her "normal" 10% of income for charity to deduct from her taxes??

Or will she just count it as part of her "10% for charity" tax deduction and spend a like sum of her "other" monies??

That´s as far as I read, but I vote for option number 3.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    71 persons like this.


   

 

R-G6-LC
  
R-LU-C1


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 10/11/2017 10:46:03 PM     (No. 11414032)

These people are repulsive. I am surprised Chels didn´t name one of the kids Charity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: littleorby, 10/11/2017 11:10:23 PM     (No. 11414044)

I think I´ll wait for the headline:

Clinton DONATED Her Weinstein Campaign . . ."

I would wager she doesn´t even bother to laundry the money through a sham charity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/11/2017 11:10:30 PM     (No. 11414045)

Lady Lucifer´s tax returns, filed jointly with Dollar Bill Clinton, showed that their charity of choice was the Clinton Foundation.
So her gesture is meaningless. Dollars are fungible.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    61 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Babsathome, 10/11/2017 11:10:59 PM     (No. 11414049)

Ah, but which charity? Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Planned Parenthood, Bill´s Bimbo Relief, another of th lefty causes?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    42 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: jkcinsalem, 10/11/2017 11:15:28 PM     (No. 11414053)

This will happen when he’ll freezes over.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    330 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: AGGW, 10/11/2017 11:35:04 PM     (No. 11414064)

FTA: "Clinton added ´I give 10 per cent of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that "
So she is keeping it and using it as part of her 10% which means she is personally giving less than 10%. She would have to give it over and above her normal 10% for it to be honest. But then, honesty was never her strong suit, was it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: heartsurgeon, 10/11/2017 11:39:21 PM     (No. 11414067)

FAKE NEWS ALERT:

parse every word she uttered:

I give 10 per cent of my income[taxable income? gross income?] to charity [Clinton Foundation?] every year, this [legally ambigous] will be part of that [legally ambigous]. There´s no doubt about it [legally ambigous].

Basically she has stated that she gives 10% of something to someone every year.

what is definition of "Democratic donation". Unlikely that includes Clinton Foundation, PACS, maybe even her own personal campaign. Maybe only donations to the Democratic National Party..hard to know what it refers to.

Remember these are the people that recently refilled years of Clinton Foundation Tax returns.

She´s laughing at all the rubes that think a single penny she controls that came from Weinstein, will every be relenquished.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 10/11/2017 11:59:00 PM     (No. 11414072)

All of the earlier posters are on to her fakery and insatiable greed.

What this also tells me is that she´s planning another run. Why else would she go through these motions?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: DustDevil31, 10/12/2017 12:08:24 AM     (No. 11414075)

Please run, we need the laughs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Cousair, 10/12/2017 12:25:21 AM     (No. 11414082)

If you believe what that woman says, I’ve got a bridge in NYC I’d like to sell.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1-LC


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: snakeoil, 10/12/2017 12:38:25 AM     (No. 11414084)

When The Beast donates money it´s just being laundered. Notice Harvey never inappropriate relationshiped The Vile Witch. Thank goodness I´ve never paid money to watch anything Weinstein was involved in.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Trigger2, 10/12/2017 12:40:24 AM     (No. 11414085)

The operative word here is "says". She lies like a rug and when it comes to money all bets are off.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 10/12/2017 12:47:08 AM     (No. 11414091)

Said the lying Witch of Chappaqua.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 10/12/2017 1:14:48 AM     (No. 11414105)

So, it will be part of her 10%? And she´ll take a deduction for it? To give to the Clinton Foundation?

Hahahahahahahaha.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: pchristopher, 10/12/2017 1:19:05 AM     (No. 11414108)

Is she going to give back all of the contributions they received when her rapist husband was running for office?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: MainelySane, 10/12/2017 6:39:48 AM     (No. 11414207)

...yes, of course she will.. to the Clinton Foundation. It goes without saying.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: uno, 10/12/2017 6:46:01 AM     (No. 11414214)

Sure... just like Hugh Rodham payed back all that money he took for soliciting for pardons!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 10/12/2017 7:04:06 AM     (No. 11414233)

So his vile, filthy money isn´t worthy of her so she dumps it on ´charity´. That is just so elitist. Let me guess, BLM? Planned Butcherhood?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: JimBob, 10/12/2017 7:15:22 AM     (No. 11414241)

The L-Dotters are on to the HildeBeast.
It speaks to the corruption of the ´news media´ that so many people are not.

The Beast MAY take a few bucks and ´donate to charity´- the Clinton Crime Foundation (taking the money from one pocket and putting it in the other.... most likely scenario) or there is a slight chance she may give a few nickels to PP, AKA ´The Black Baby Killers´.

My feeling is that, as is the usual case when her lips are moving, that she is simply lying, and that she is KEEPING THE CA$H.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Mobyclik, 10/12/2017 7:27:02 AM     (No. 11414260)

A Clinton actually giving up some cash that´s already stuffed into their pockets???? That´s a laugh that only their sycophants and the Useless Media would pretend to believe. I say ´´pretend´´ because even those morons KNOW the Clintons are crooks she´s lying again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1-LC2


 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Clinger, 10/12/2017 8:17:37 AM     (No. 11414324)

She was very clear in what she said, she intends to do nothing but sustain her ongoing 10% plan so there is absolutely no difference in what she intends to do.

Simply double speak meaning: I won’t give back one thin dime of it.

And we are supposed to be so stupid we can´t see through her.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: stryker714, 10/12/2017 8:19:41 AM     (No. 11414327)

Ah, so Weinstein´s Clinton campaign contributions are unspent? So why is Hillary allowed to hang on to campaign donations? We know she must have it in an interest bearing account. Campaign funds are not for personal enrichment, by law.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Bubby, 10/12/2017 8:47:13 AM     (No. 11414375)

Yeah right. I guess she ran out of Bill´s underwear to donate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: TCloud, 10/12/2017 9:01:29 AM     (No. 11414394)

Career slick carpetbagger says what?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: fed-up, 10/12/2017 9:18:29 AM     (No. 11414414)

Who´s she kidding? They are going to be in serious financial squeeze now that the clinton influence is history. The foundation is toast. No country will donate a penny, since she won´t be in the WH. These people are despicable. For the first time in their lives, they are going to find out what it means to work for their money. And writing soul searching books ain´t gonna do it.

buh-bye

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: fairplay, 10/12/2017 9:25:12 AM     (No. 11414425)

Hillary says there is nobody to give the money back to! But I always give 10% to charity! Yeah, 10% 0f Weinstein money!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 10/12/2017 10:06:24 AM     (No. 11414482)

Translation: "I claim to give 10% of my income to charity every year. That fictitious amount should cover any donations from Harvey Weinstein which I actually spent long ago during my failed presidential campaign."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: moonlightflip, 10/12/2017 10:08:54 AM     (No. 11414486)

Is there any follow-up on whether those who SAY they will donate to charity actually DO it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Lana720, 10/12/2017 10:23:13 AM     (No. 11414496)

Show of hands...how many of you believe this?
The Clinton Crime Foundation only gives 5% to charity. Has PIAPS used Common Core math and counted out five more boxes?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: justavoter, 10/12/2017 10:52:55 AM     (No. 11414529)

I don´t get the logic that this poisoned money should go to another charity. It is still poisoned money. Give it back to the giver. I know that sounds strange but passing ill gotten money along just ingratiates another in the line of passing bad money. Send the money back to the source and be done with it.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 10/12/2017 12:16:24 PM     (No. 11414621)

"I give 10 per cent of my income to charity every year"

Has this been fact-checked? Has any reporter asked for proof? Can it be verified? Is it in her income tax returns? Are we just supposed to accept that she tithes without question?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: dvc, 10/12/2017 12:26:06 PM     (No. 11414640)

Lies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Heraclitus, 10/12/2017 4:36:47 PM     (No. 11414909)

My questions, too, #2, and conclusions.

The next question ought to have been, "But will you deduct the ´donation´ from your taxes as ´charitable contributions´?"

Her "disgust" at Weinstein was over-the-top disgusting. Reeks of fake outrage. She´s lived with this and excused this and attacked female victims of this for her whole lifetime with Bill.

ugh

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Udanja99, 10/12/2017 6:34:02 PM     (No. 11415014)

Yeah. She’ll give it to charity just like 0bama gave his million dollar Nobel Peace Prize check to charity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 925076




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"



Lindsey Graham says the Trump White House
has ´a blind spot on Russia´ and Moscow will
monkey-wrench future U.S. elections
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/22/2017 2:42:48 PM     Post Reply
A Republican senator criticized the Trump administration on Sunday for having a ´blind spot´ when it comes to protecting the United States from Russia. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told NBC´s ´Meet the Press´ that he doesn´t understand why the White House ignored an October 1 deadline for imposing new sanctions on Moscow´s defense and intelligence sectors. ´I think that the Trump administration is slow when it comes to Russia. They have a blind spot on Russia I still can´t figure out,´ Graham said. He also strongly suggested that Russian election meddling in 2016 won´t be the last of its kind. In ´16,

Church of Scientology unveils £4.2m
Birmingham base amid angry protests
Daily Mail [UK], by Charlie Bayliss    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/22/2017 12:29:56 PM     Post Reply
Birmingham´s Church of Scientology has opened it doors this weekend - ten years after the building was first bought. Former members of the church gathered near the cordon to protest against the opening of the £4.2million building, claiming that the church is simply focused on taking money from people. Despite nearby roads being shut, former members and protesters gathered near the cordon the express their anger at the opening of the church. One former member, William Drummond, told the Birmingham Mail: ´People don´t understand what´s going on in their local area and that´s very frightening. ´The main motivation for them is money, property

Kerry rips Trump on
Iran and North Korea
Arutz Sheva [Israel], by Elad Benari    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/21/2017 6:50:05 AM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State John Kerry on Thursday criticized President Donald Trump´s policies, warning that he risks driving Iran towards nuclear proliferation and worsening a standoff with North Korea if he ends the nuclear deal with Iran. “If you want to negotiate with (North Korean leader) Kim Jong Un, and your goal is to avoid war and try to be able to have a diplomatic resolution, the worst thing you can do is first threaten to destroy his country in the United Nations,” Kerry said in a private lecture delivered at Geneva’s Graduate Institute, according to Reuters. “And secondly, screw around with

Kelly might not be like Trump, but
he seems like many Trump voters
Los Angeles Times, by Noah Bierman    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/21/2017 6:41:49 AM     Post Reply
In the roughly three months since President Trump chose John F. Kelly as his second chief of staff, observers have puzzled over the retired Marine general’s occasional scowls and downcast gazes, wondering whether he and Trump, with such different styles and backgrounds, perhaps weren’t working well together. Kelly, the military man trained to respect sharp lines of authority and tradition, uses terms like “information flow” to describe the discipline he tries to bring to a chaotic White House. Trump, the impulsive businessman and reality-show veteran, delights in flouting authority and upending norms of the presidency. But Kelly’s extraordinary remarks on Thursday from

Man arrested by special forces after Munich
knife attacker injures five in stabbing spree
Daily Express [UK], by Simon Osborne    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/21/2017 6:32:29 AM     Post Reply
GERMAN special forces have arrested a suspect after a knifeman went on the rampage in the German city of Munich and injured at least five people. Police officer Markus da Gloria Martins said: "We have a suspicious person. We do not know if it is the offender yet but he fits the description.” “Until now we know nothing about the motivation.” They described the attacker as a man in his 40s who fled the scene on a black bicycle. People had been warned to stay indoors after the attack at around 8.15am local time at the Rosenheimer Platz S-Bahn underground station. Police tweeted:

Patriot outraged as Facebook ´BANS´
him from calling himself English
Daily Express[UK], by Paul Jeeves    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/21/2017 6:20:57 AM     Post Reply
A PROUD patriot has slated social media giant Facebook after it banned him from using the word "English" in his profile. Electrician Tim Cox, 54, was given the nickname "English" at school and has been using it on his profile since he signed up to the site nine years ago. But it has now been removed by Facebook chiefs after a complaint from a fellow user. The site says the word "English" represents a violation of its policies on fake names, despite other profiles using the names of mass murderers like Peter Sutcliffe or Osama Bin Laden. Yesterday, many of Mr Cox´s friends

Breaking: Man is shot by ´three men in
balaclavas´ near mosque in Bradford
Daily Mail [UK] Charlie Moore, by Charlie Moore    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 10/20/2017 12:54:26 PM     Post Reply
A man has been shot 100 yards from mosque during Friday prayers. Gunshots panicked worshipers at the Jamia Abu Hanifa Mosque in Bradford at 2pm today. Witnesses said three men in balaclavas pulled up in a car and shot a man who has been taken to hospital with a minor leg wound. One man praying in the mosque told the Bradford Telegraph: ´I saw lots of police and a man laying on the floor who had been shot. We heard the gunshot while we were inside praying. ´There was an ambulance and about five police vehicles including two riot vans on the scene´.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Bowe Bergdahl: The US treated
me worse than the Taliban

51 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Hechtman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 10/21/2017 10:12:14 PM     Post Reply
Bowe Bergdahl, the Army deserter who walked off his base in Afghanistan, is whining that the US treated him worse than the Taliban. The 31-year-old sergeant told British TV journalist Sean Langan in an interview reported in The Sunday Times of London: “At least the Taliban were honest enough to say, ‘I’m the guy who’s gonna cut your throat.’ ” That got him less upset than the “administrative duties” the Army assigned him while awaiting trial, he said. “Here, it could be the guy I pass in the corridor who’s going to sign the paper that sends me away for

Trump´s call to soldier´s family
´one of the biggest c**k-ups
on the planet Earth´

50 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Brandon Carter    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/22/2017 9:28:02 AM     Post Reply
Actor Tom Hanks is blasting President Trump for his handling of a phone call to the widow of a fallen U.S. soldier, calling it “one of the biggest c**k-ups on the planet Earth.” "I´m only knowing what I read in the newspapers and what have you, and it just seems like it´s one of the biggest c**k-ups on the planet Earth, if you ask me," Hanks said in an interview with CNN. "This is a tragedy of the utmost consequence and it goes much longer beyond who´s going to come out on top of the news story. I think it´s

Hillary Clinton Using Forearm Crutches
After Breaking Toe On UK Book Tour (Photos)

39 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Joshua Caplan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 10/22/2017 2:13:03 PM     Post Reply
Freelance reporter and political consultant Michael J. Hout tweeted a photo of Hillary Clinton using forearm crutches during a visit to Yale Law School Saturday. Clinton’s use of the walking aide comes after breaking her toe during a UK book tour to promote “What Happened.” Clinton visited her alma mater on the same day she held a book signing event at the Wesleyan R.J. Julia Bookstore in Middletown, CT. The bookstore had strict guidelines for book signing attendees — “She will sign a maximum of two books for each attendee and will not personalize books,” posted Wesleyan R.J. Julia Bookstore

Widow of Sgt. La David Johnson Slams
Trump Over Call: ‘I Was Very Angry’

33 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Aidan McLaughlin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/23/2017 11:58:26 AM     Post Reply
The widow of fallen American soldier Sgt. La David T. Johnson appeared on Good Morning America Monday to discuss the death of her husband as well as the now-notorious call she received from President Donald Trump. Myeshia Johnson first told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that she has yet to receive full details about the death of her husband — — a soldier who was killed in an ambush in Niger by ISIS-affiliated militants — and has a number of questions over what led to his death. The consolation call Myeshia received from Trump has become a point of controversy this week,

NFL Week #7 – More Empty Seats Seed
Doubt for Future of Commissioner…

31 replie(s)
Conservative Treehouse, by Sundance    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 10/23/2017 7:28:17 AM     Post Reply
The business decision of the NFL to isolate and ridicule well over half of their fan (customer) base will easily, very easily, go down in history as the most stunningly stupid decision in the history of any American business enterprise. The vast majority of NFL fans held a middle-class, center-right, common sense, and patriotic outlook toward sports and entertainment overall. In essence most of the NFL fan base are/were positively MAGA-minded. It reflects the profound disconnect between the corporation and their customer base that the NFL didn’t recognize the danger in making social justice causes part of their business enterprise. That blame

McCain slams Americans who dodged
Vietnam draft with ´bone spur´

31 replie(s)
Fox News, by Edmund DeMarche    Original Article
Posted By: viola- 10/23/2017 10:15:13 AM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain appeared to take a swipe at President Trump in an interview that aired Sunday when he called out the “highest income” Americans at the time who found a doctor to say they had a “bone spur” so they could avoid the Vietnam draft. McCain was interviewed on C-CPAN3, American TV and talked about the war. The interview was wide ranging, but he mentioned the draft. “We drafted the lowest income level of America and the highest income level found a doctor that would say that they had a bone spur,” McCain said “That is wrong.

The Obama Administration’s
Uranium One Scandal

29 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 10/22/2017 5:34:14 AM     Post Reply
Let’s put the Uranium One scandal in perspective: The cool half-million bucks the Putin regime funneled to Bill Clinton was five times the amount it spent on those Facebook ads — the ones the media-Democrat complex ludicrously suggests swung the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump. The Facebook-ad buy, which started in June 2015 — before Donald Trump entered the race — was more left-wing agitprop (ads pushing hysteria on racism, immigration, guns, etc.) than electioneering. The Clintons’ own long-time political strategist Mark Penn estimates that just $6,500 went to actual electioneering. (You read that right: 65 hundred dollars.) By


Post Reply   Close thread 925076



ST-GC


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~