A Message From Lucianne  


S-CR-TEO

S-G1-LC







        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
  Topic: Nobody Works in One
in Five U.S. Families
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Nobody Works in One
in Five U.S. Families

Washington Free Beacon, by Ali Meyer

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 4/21/2017 4:57:35 AM

No family member was employed in 16,069,000 U.S. families in 2016, or 19.6 percent of families, according to newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of families with nobody employed increased by roughly 19,000 from 2015 to 2016, although the percentage slightly declined from 19.7 percent to 19.6 percent. For the purpose of the study, the bureau counts a family as households headed by a married couple or by unmarried women or men. The definition includes households with children under 18 years old and households without children. There were 82,092,000 families in the United States in 2016, according

Comments:
"lack of job skills"? Well, no. A larger cause is the abundance of entitlement checks.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: TXknitter, 4/21/2017 5:33:37 AM     (No. 11228751)

OP took the words out of my mouth. Even in our rather prosperous Texas town, there are more healthy-looking people on "disability" than you can shake a stick at!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: F15 Gork, 4/21/2017 5:51:45 AM     (No. 11228758)

Put another way - 16,069,000 Democrat families had no one being productive....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    64 persons like this.


   

 

R-G6-LC
  
R-LU-C1


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: strike3, 4/21/2017 7:06:06 AM     (No. 11228794)

Before LBJ´s Great Society giveaway, the unemployed had to stand in line for a block of cheese and a can of peanut butter. That made it much easier to find a job.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    128 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: planetgeo, 4/21/2017 7:08:14 AM     (No. 11228795)

Umm...is there any other common trait among those families in which not a single person works? Why yes, yes there is, as noted in the statistics farther down in the article. Looks like the federal government is now running the biggest plantation in the world.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    68 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: greggojo, 4/21/2017 7:13:41 AM     (No. 11228800)

Unsurprisingly, between the Democrats destroying our economy (after they took over both Houses in 2007) and Obama´s assuming office in 2009, the highest recent percentage was in 2011. Also, what is the age distribution? Couldn´t a healthy chunk of the families where no member is employed be retirees, a group which as the boomers retire would seem likely to expand? The statistics presented would be more meaningful if it were considering more typically working age Americans. Another question is what percentage of families are entirely comprised of people who have either never had a job or have no history of regular employment. btw, Hispanics are walking right into the welfare trap that has destroyed many millions of Black families since the War on Poverty first began.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    61 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: flybynight, 4/21/2017 7:27:21 AM     (No. 11228811)

And while y´all are indignantly riding your "entitlement" hobby horses around the conservative corral, don´t forget that rather many of us are 70-something year-old baby boomers. We are finally retired, or at least semi-retired, living the good life, wallowing in Social Security luxury. Enjoying the generosity of the dole, lazily drinking our malt liquors, waiting on the front porch for our next free! check. Thanks, y´all! (Don´t believe all the numbers you read. Remember what they say about liars, damned liars, and statistics?)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: MoBeef4u, 4/21/2017 7:47:43 AM     (No. 11228825)

While I don´t agree with your characterization, #6, the article leaves unclear whether the depressing statistic includes retirees who are enjoying themselves after 40+ years of work and contributing to their current affluence. A more honest assessment would be to know the percentage of under 65s who aren´t working. That number, I suspect, would still be depressing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    82 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: lakerman1, 4/21/2017 7:48:56 AM     (No. 11228827)

I may have missed it, but the statistics don´t seem to break out retirees.
In addition, the statistics do not including working off the books, drug dealing, prostitution, other criminal activities.
(Up until the Dollar Bill Clinton presidency, the IRS was allowed to do lifestyle audits - that´s how Al Capone went to jail. Those audits were killed by the Clintons)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Socio, 4/21/2017 8:02:54 AM     (No. 11228841)

No the fact that 20 Percent of families do not have anyone working is government welfare programs have made to easy to not have to.

Policymakers do not need to address the "skills gap that is preventing these unemployed families from seizing these available good jobs," they need to drastically cut welfare programs to force them to seek training and enter the workforce.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Clinger, 4/21/2017 8:33:30 AM     (No. 11228860)

So boys and girls here´s what we really need to get our arms around:

20% or so (as pointed out undefined contribution from retirees) with no worker likely to vote for more free stuff

20% or close to it (16.7%) of all people who are employed work in government jobs from local to federal. Likely to vote for more government, it´s their trade.

Many others in neither above category do work but are net beneficiaries of wealth redistribution. Without a means of eliminating intersection with the above that´s 47%. Not likely to vote for you and I to keep more of our income.

We have passed a tipping point. The only thing saving us at this juncture is that there´s a reason those of us who pay for all the rest of them have the means to do so and they do not: We get up in the morning and work, and when that´s not enough we work harder. When we hit a bump in the road and are out of work we pick ourselves up go back to school, take a lesser position, do whatever it takes to get back to work.

Those on the dole lack the ambition to do otherwise so we can just barely beat their numbers at the poles. So of course they import more gimmedats.

Apologies to the genuinely needy for whom it is our honor to assist. You are being used as cover for the thieves.

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." ---George Bernard Shaw


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    84 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 4/21/2017 8:51:20 AM     (No. 11228876)

When Hurricane Ike devastated much of East Texas some years ago....I received a letter from the state which confirmed that as small business owner in this area I was entitled to compensation $ because my business could not operate due to the unavailability of lights, gas and all the things needed to run a business. I took this letter down to the local welfare office, as instructed, where I was met with a dozen Black office workers who looked me up and down and told me to take sorry white azz back home cuz they didn´t no nuffin´ ´bout no money for no honkies like me.

I´m no White Supremacist.....but I´m becoming open to the idea.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    73 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: flybynight, 4/21/2017 8:57:11 AM     (No. 11228883)

One more point: many of us "unemployed" contribute by volunteer efforts, working for free in clinics, schools, and museums, building Habitat houses, maintaining historic properties, teaching ESL and GED prep, running summer programs for kids. Some of us work part-time, doing yard work, accounting, baby sitting, housekeeping, free-lance writing and photography, editing, tutoring. We don´t make that enviable list of worthily employed folk. But our efforts add considerably to the weal of the community. Stick that in your statistical pipe and smoke it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1-LC


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: bpl40, 4/21/2017 9:42:42 AM     (No. 11228925)

Doesn´t say if this includes retired couples. My wife and I put in a little over sixty years between us before calling it a day. We are probably included in the number.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: bobn.t, 4/21/2017 10:23:08 AM     (No. 11228963)

Nobody Works in One in Five U.S. Families.
An embarrassing statistic resulting from city, state, and federal handout programs - being paid for by me and millions of other working families.

Hey, is this a great country or what?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: MDConservative, 4/21/2017 10:57:56 AM     (No. 11229008)

According to the technical notes linked to the article:

"Family
A family is a group of two or more persons residing together who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption."

That would apparently include retirees.

"Unemployed
The unemployed are persons who had no
employment during the reference week, were available for work at that time, and HAD MADE SPECIFIC EFFORTS to find employment
sometime during the 4 week period ending with the reference week."

Many retirees have small businesses or part-time jobs. Employment is any paying job with no minimum number of hours, and any small business.

Make of it what you will.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Arby, 4/21/2017 11:17:14 AM     (No. 11229027)

If you reinforce it you´ll get more of it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: grounded, 4/21/2017 11:47:58 AM     (No. 11229053)

My wife is retired and I haven´t received a W-2 in 15 years. Kids out of the house for 20 years. I have a six figure income while being technically unemployed as I was laid off from my last "real" job even though I never applied for benefits. It would be wise to assess these employment figure with a whole shaker full of salt.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: saguni, 4/21/2017 12:15:33 PM     (No. 11229082)

FTA: The presence of children made parents in the family more likely to be active in the labor force. In 2016, 80.4 percent of families with children under 18 years participated in the labor force by holding a job or looking for one, compared with 56.7 percent of families with no child under 18 years.

That´s where they hid the retirees..."households without children," 43.3% not working. I´d hazard to guess not all of that sector are of "working age" (young adults before building a family and career) but are included to make the statistic look worse because we now have a Republican administration.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: tennman, 4/21/2017 12:17:17 PM     (No. 11229084)

Valid point from 17. Do the figures take retired households into consideration? We, as a whole, are aging.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua, 4/21/2017 1:48:48 PM     (No. 11229205)

This is like the study that found 95 million able bodied people not working where ´able bodied´ was defined as anyone over the age of 16.

That would be people in school, stay at home spouses, the disabled, and the retired.

Not really sure what to make of studies like this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: GardenGal, 4/21/2017 3:13:13 PM     (No. 11229300)

I am not older than 65 but I am retired from homeschooling my three children through high school. My youngest isn´t employed either. She is a full time student and due to other medical issues and our ability to support her in school, she doesn´t work but attends college all year long. If my husband were to die tomorrow, we would be one of these families since I have medical issues that prevent me from working but don´t receive any governmental assistance. Therefore, they may consider me an able-bodied person, but I am not. Also, since my dh can support us, why does our family employment statistics matter to anyone? Phony stats.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 4/21/2017 4:28:10 PM     (No. 11229407)

Anyone trust figures from the government ?

Many of those on welfare are there because it´s more lucrative. We have trained people to think if you are broke, others keep giving you things and the more kids you have the more refunds you will receive. Do better and lose it all. Worse yet, a lot of food handouts are not healthy, so I see why they develop diabetes and high blood pressure.

Unfortunately, whatever is done to correct the problem will throw the disabled and elderly under the bus too. A refugee will receive more SS and benefits (plus money to start a business) than most retirees.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 910026




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"



Climate of Complete Certainty
New York Times, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/29/2017 4:37:58 AM     Post Reply
When someone is honestly 55 percent right, that’s very good and there’s no use wrangling. And if someone is 60 percent right, it’s wonderful, it’s great luck, and let him thank God. But what’s to be said about 75 percent right? Wise people say this is suspicious. Well, and what about 100 percent right? Whoever says he’s 100 percent right is a fanatic, a thug, and the worst kind of rascal. — An old Jew of Galicia In the final stretch of last year’s presidential race, Hillary Clinton and her team thought they were, if not 100 percent right, then very close.

Barack Obama seemed different, but he´s
just another money-grubbing politician
Sydney Morning Herald [AU], by Anne Summers    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/29/2017 4:30:20 AM     Post Reply
Et tu, Barack? That was my reaction when I heard the news that former US President Barack Obama has agreed to a speaking gig on Wall Street for which he will be paid $US400,000 ($535,000). Not bad coin in anyone´s language. It´s twice what Bill Clinton commanded when he went on the post-presidential speaking circuit. It´s in addition to the $US200,000 annual pension, plus lifetime free healthcare Obama gets for having been President. It´s on top of the $US65 million he and wife Michelle are reported to have negotiated for their book deal with Penguin Random House. And it´s not

Correspondents’ dinner organizers
ask host not to make fun of Trump
New York Post, by Mara Siegler    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/29/2017 4:25:04 AM     Post Reply
“The Daily Show’s” Hasan Minhaj, who is hosting the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in DC, was asked by organizers not to make fun of President Donald Trump, who will not be in attendance, says a source who saw the comic at the Village Underground on Thursday. “It was a polite request because Trump is so thin-skinned,” the source said. Reuters’ Jeff Mason, who is president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, insists he never said Trump was “thin-skinned,” but added that he wanted a balanced event. “I was not looking for someone to roast the president in absentia,” he told us

Dan Rather, Fake Newsman
National Review Online, by Kyle Smith    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/28/2017 4:59:23 AM     Post Reply
It’s fitting that Dan Rather is best known for bringing to the world a piece of fake news about George W. Bush’s Air National Guard service in Texas, because that’s where he began his career in shoddy journalism. The bungling goes all the way back to 1963 Dallas. His presence there on the day President Kennedy was assassinated helped create the legend of Dan, but he actually blew the story that made his name. Rather had heard from a priest that the president was dead, but knew that wasn’t a strong enough source to back up such a huge story,

What Makes America Great?
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Krauthammer    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/28/2017 4:55:28 AM     Post Reply
The rise of Donald Trump began a debate about the proper place of nationalism in American politics. A growing chorus on the political right, including even many who opposed his candidacy, has been praising the president’s "America First" agenda as a healthy restoration of nationalism and fleshing out an intellectual framework to fit his worldview. It is right to give his ideas serious and thoughtful examination, as it is to consider any ideas that seek to protect our country and unite its people. But there are good ways and bad ways to pursue these goals, ways that stay true to

The squalid sanctimony of the United Nations
New York Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/28/2017 4:37:09 AM     Post Reply
Hand it to the United Nations: It manages to be both sanctimonious and squalid. It turns out the Office of the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights has cautioned President Trump that repeal of ObamaCare would put the United States “at odds with its international obligations.” The five-page “urgent appeal” from the UNHCR office in Geneva warned that taking away health coverage would violate “the right to social security of the people in the United States.” Meanwhile, the world body just showed its own contempt for human rights by electing Saudi Arabia to serve on the UN Commission on the Status of

IRS Agents Raid The Offices Of
Posh-Living Televangelist Benny Hinn
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/28/2017 4:34:16 AM     Post Reply
Criminal investigators from the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Postal Service raided the Grapevine, Texas offices of televangelist Benny Hinn on Wednesday afternoon. Hinn is famous for his stadium-filling “Miracle Crusades.” At these revival-style events, held worldwide, Hinn claims to use special, supernatural power to heal people suffering from terminal diseases and various handicaps. Several IRS and Postal Service agents participated in the Wednesday raid. The investigators entered Hinn’s offices, then left with boxes — and boxes, and boxes — of documents. The investigators then placed the boxes on trucks at the scene.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Vacation agrees with her! Smiling and
relaxed Michelle Obama makes her first
public appearance at a Florida conference

36 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Hannah Parry    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/27/2017 5:57:12 PM     Post Reply
After a leisurely three month vacation, Michelle Obama has made her first public appearance since the inauguration. Looking refreshed and relaxed after her three-month vacation, the former first lady greeted the audience with a smile and a wave at the AIA Conference on Architecture 2017 in Florida on Thursday. Obama was the keynote speaker at the event, organized by the American Institute of Architects, where she spoke about her time as Chicago´s assistant commissioner of planning and development. The former first lady wore a long black, white and beige dress which showed off her toned arms at the event as she also

Trump Admits He Thought Being
President ‘Would Be Easier’

33 replie(s)
New York Magazine, by Margaret Hartman    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 4/28/2017 6:53:28 AM     Post Reply
Saturday marks President Trump’s 100th day in office, and to celebrate the occasion he got a bit too candid in an Oval Office interview with Reuters. Obviously certain elements of being president are pretty fun, but President Trump has discovered that it isn’t all playing with trucks and pressing a button that makes Cokes appear. Sometimes there’s work to be done, and as it turns out being leader of the free world is a lot harder than running a fake university and playing a caricature of a rich person on TV.“I loved my previous life. I had so many things

Obama lied – and now the truth
33 replie(s)
Arutz Sheva [Israel], by Jack Engelhard    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/28/2017 7:18:17 AM     Post Reply
So how much of our money did Obama ship to the terrorist regime in Iran? We hear $150 billion. We are not sure. Could be a dollar less, a dollar more. We’ll never know for sure. That’s because his entire administration operated in the dark. That’s how he governed and that’s how he got himself elected, in lies and in stealth, and the news media did the rest. They covered for him. They let him get away with murder – and in this case, that is not a cliché, it’s fact. Today, in eye-popping news, we learn, from the New York Post via

Could Trump open the Kennedy files?
President must decide within weeks
on releasing the last secret CIA
and FBI assassination files

33 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Geoff Earle    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/29/2017 4:52:39 AM     Post Reply
He has floated some conspiracy theories for years, but now President Donald Trump will get to play a crucial role in the long-running saga over the government´s Kennedy assassination records. The 1992 JFK Assassination Records Collection Act, signed by President George H.W. Bush, set a 25-year timetable for declassification of assassination records dealing with President Kennedy. The law set up a single collection of records at the National Archives, and set up a process for declassification. The law required the release of all government records dealing with the assassination within 25 years – with the exception of those the president certifies for

Baltimore Is Begging Feds To Step
In To Restore Law And Order

30 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Amber Randall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/28/2017 2:00:00 PM     Post Reply
Baltimore’s mayor asked the FBI to send in reinforcements Wednesday to help the city get its murders under control. Mayor Catherine Pugh, speaking at a news conference, explained she went to the FBI’s Baltimore office for extra agents to join with police officers in combating a skyrocketing murder count, reports CNN. “Murder is out of control. There are too many guns on the streets. We’re looking for all the help we can get,” Pugh said. The city already has 101 murders for the year, a number not seen in almost 20 years. The mayor’s spokesperson warned the violence could rise

Can Islam ever be reformed?
30 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Nonie Darwish    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/29/2017 9:09:35 AM     Post Reply
Muslim reformer Zuhdi Jasser has recently attacked leaders of the anti-Jihad movement in America. He equated them with jihadists when he called them the derogatory word, alt-jihadists, meaning that Americans who speak and write against the evils of Islamic jihad and sharia are just as bad as jihadists. (snip)I have always respected what Zuhdi Jasser was trying to do and avoided contradicting him in public, even though I do not believe that Islam is reformable. I have kept my opinion to myself regarding the false hope Muslim reformers are giving to the Americans regarding Islam. But when Jasser attacked leaders

Caitlyn Jenner: I’ve Got No
‘Loyalty’ To Trump, and I May
Run For Office

27 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Lloyd Grove    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/28/2017 12:38:01 PM     Post Reply
The many versions of Caitlyn Jenner, chronicled in her new book, The Secrets of My Life, have passed through a dizzying series of variations, from a Wheaties box-ready, gold medal-winning Olympian in her former identity as Bruce, to the henpecked husband and paterfamilias of the Kardashian clan and featured player in their reality-television juggernaut, to—at age 65, when she announced her biggest secret to the world—the planet’s most famous transgender woman. (Video)The now 67-year-old Jenner, who has been a celebrity for most of her time on earth and spent the past two years as the nation’s highest-profile activist for LGBTQ

   

Post Reply   Close thread 910026



ST-GC


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~