A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: DHS re-designs Predator
drones to spy on Americans
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
DHS re-designs Predator
drones to spy on Americans

American Thinker, by Rick Moran

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 3/3/2013 10:24:10 AM

I´m no civil libertarian absolutist, but this disturbing report by Declan McCullagh at C-Net makes the hair on the back of my neck stand on end: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has customized its Predator drones, originally built for overseas military operations, to carry out at-home surveillance tasks that have civil libertarians worried: identifying civilians carrying guns and tracking their cell phones, government documents show. The documents provide more details about the surveillance capabilities

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: alpha91c, 3/3/2013 10:26:00 AM     (No. 9205752)

1984 is here and big sis is watching.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 3/3/2013 10:32:26 AM     (No. 9205766)

Most major cities already have rotor-wing platforms in the air 24/7. These could just as easily become assault ships. Just as with the gun control issue, the hardware is not the issue. Criminal intent is the issue. The government will always have the citizens outgunned. The answer is to elect defenders of liberty instead of Mooslim Marxist Dictators.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: blackops, 3/3/2013 10:34:51 AM     (No. 9205771)

Rise of the machines. Maybe Obama and Rahm can test the drones out over the south and west sides of Chicago to keep their buddies in check?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 3/3/2013 10:38:28 AM     (No. 9205782)

People have to get active about this, or forget the Constitution.


Reply 5 - Posted by: MattMusson, 3/3/2013 10:42:50 AM     (No. 9205795)

If Thomas Payne were alive today - he would be wondering why he bothered.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Cardsfan, 3/3/2013 10:48:08 AM     (No. 9205803)

They may end up with multiple pictures of me giving them the one-finger salute.


Reply 7 - Posted by: rael, 3/3/2013 10:58:00 AM     (No. 9205822)

Think this has anything to do with DHS buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammo?

Nah, couldn´t be...


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: youngtexan, 3/3/2013 11:00:25 AM     (No. 9205826)

Pretty soon, shooting drones will become a sports favorite.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Keekng, 3/3/2013 11:29:33 AM     (No. 9205875)

If Big Sis hires Rachel Maddow and Rosie ODonnell as her deputies, I am leaving the country!


Reply 10 - Posted by: Barkingkangaroo, 3/3/2013 11:39:17 AM     (No. 9205896)

Does this mean that DHS will be sending hellfire missles into the Chrysler 300´s of drug dealers on the streets of our major citys to keep citizens safe? What does the ACLU have to say about that?

Why do I think it only applies to white people who don´t vote Democrat?

If young black men are the ones committing most of the crimes, why do white non-criminals have to register their sporting arms?


Reply 11 - Posted by: owl, 3/3/2013 12:04:14 PM     (No. 9205941)

Been shouting to any who´ll listen #7 . A drone was used against a rancher last year , by a SHERIFF ( crickets ). DHS has supplied local law enforcement with military grade weapons , including real tanks . GWB built a monster , and now it´s unleashed - on us .


Reply 12 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 3/3/2013 12:45:00 PM     (No. 9206008)

From the President the Left loves...our Nobel Peace Prize Prez.

Good grief.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: chicodon, 3/3/2013 12:57:22 PM     (No. 9206019)

Well, we can wave goodbye to the Fourth Amendment now too. How is this not an illegal search? Mark my words, the random dots are beginning to spell trouble. They say there will be no facial recognition capability but don´t count on it.
http://tinyurl.com/67g67ys

This is just another example of a federal government gone wild. 9-11-2001... never let a crisis go to waste.


Reply 14 - Posted by: chumley, 3/3/2013 1:35:54 PM     (No. 9206083)

They have to park them somewhere.


Reply 15 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 3/3/2013 1:39:42 PM     (No. 9206089)

I think they park them right next to the squad car with the non stop camera mounted in the rear window.


Reply 16 - Posted by: mollyb0122, 3/3/2013 2:04:57 PM     (No. 9206146)

Obama is not leaving in 2016. I fear this is building into a coup.



Post Reply   Close thread 725740




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



GOP eager to link IRS scandal to
‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM     Post Reply
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm

What If the Obama Scandals
Had Surfaced Last Fall?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM     Post Reply
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi

A Breach of Trust
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM     Post Reply
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair

Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman
to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative
501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM     Post Reply
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

   

 



 
IRS Actions Show High-
Level, Political Coordination
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 9:13:13 PM     Post Reply
In today’s hearing before the House Ways and Means Committee, outgoing not-really-fired commissioner Steven Miller admitted that a high-ranking member of the Internal Revenue Service planted the question that led to the agency’s apology for targeting conservatives. [IRS official] Lerner disclosed the information last Friday while speaking at a tax conference organized by the American Bar Association. Asked about the incident, she said only that she answered honestly a question that was posed to her. The question, however, was posed to Lerner by Celia Roady, a Washington, D.C. tax lawyer who sits

An Agency after Obama’s Own Heart
Tribune Media Services Inc., by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 7:23:49 AM     Post Reply
Of course the president deserves some of the blame. Yes, it’s extremely unlikely he ordered the IRS to discriminate against tea-party, pro-life, or Jewish groups opposed to his agenda (though why anyone should take his word for it is beyond me). And his outrage now — however convenient — is appreciated. But when people he views as his “enemies” complained about a politicized IRS, what did he do? Nothing. Imagine for a moment if black civil-rights organizations, gay groups, or teachers’ unions loudly complained to members of Congress and the press that the IRS was discriminating against them.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

39 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´

36 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Obama 47 minutes late for his press
conference; leaves reporters in the rain

34 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM     Post Reply
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 725740





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~