A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: The White House Joins the Cash Grab
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The White House Joins the Cash Grab
New York Times, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 3/3/2013 6:45:14 AM

It is tempting to applaud the nonprofit group now spending nearly $100,000 on ads to pressure Republican lawmakers to accept gun-control measures. The group is fighting a well-financed and powerful corporate gun lobby that has never hesitated to spend millions to get its way in Congress. But a closer look at this group shows how disturbing its work really is. Its name is Organizing for Action, and if its initials seem familiar, that’s because the group is the direct descendant of Obama for America, the president’s campaign organization in 2008 and 2012.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Crosscut, 3/3/2013 7:02:36 AM     (No. 9205517)

The Democrat Party better look out. Obama appears to be building a political organization all his own. This ain´t good. With his desire to build up and use the DHS to oppress citizens he views as enemies, this makes him a threat and danger to all Americans.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: fljack, 3/3/2013 7:40:06 AM     (No. 9205544)

Looking eagerly to see him fulfill his campaign promise to form a group "as well armed and as well funded as the US military".

Nothing to see here...move along...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: guybee, 3/3/2013 7:41:06 AM     (No. 9205546)

It is only a matter of time before his true agenda emerges for the lo-fos to see. Then it will be too late. DHS is buying all this ammo for one of two reasons - to get it out of the hands of guns owners or to be prepared to attack US citizens when the rebellion begins.

It is either one or both. O has an insidious plan in the back of his mind to maintain control after 2016 - we have to stop voter fraud NOW!!

Start recruiting others to see what is really happening. Otherwise we are going to be like Germany - cheering our own demise.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 3/3/2013 7:42:39 AM     (No. 9205548)

Why did I even bother reading this when there was no doubt the times would eventuly blame conservatives in the conclusion? Of course, this is the same leftist mouthpiece that never made a squeak about obama´s $billion war chest that included uncounted millions in dirty, illegal, untraceable foreign contributions. Not to mention creepy criminal bundlers like corzine who kicked in cash to organizing for the overthrow of America.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: cgood, 3/3/2013 7:50:16 AM     (No. 9205560)

Naturally, the NYT declares that republicans started it all and Obama is merely taking an ´if you can´t beat them, join them´ approach. The NYT refers to social welfare groups that republicans used to raise cash, but doesn´t name names. Does anyone know what groups they are referring to? No doubt the Koch brothers are involved...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: uno, 3/3/2013 7:58:01 AM     (No. 9205565)

For years the networks have made hay while the sun shines during election years. Now the Obamboozler has found a way to stay in campaign mode and fund the networks (who are suffering from ratings that drop every year) and other media to keep them in his back pocket. Legalized money laundering, bribery, kick-backs and influence-pedaling all rolled up into one big blunt from the the guy who never met a dictator he didn´t like.
Now all they need is Ben Bailey from Cash Cab to ask "You in?"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: M2, 3/3/2013 8:20:03 AM     (No. 9205596)

...Mr. Obama denounced the practice. “You can’t stand by and let the special interests drown out the voices of the American people,”...

Obama´s followers and his Administration are all about "drowning out the voices of the American peopl." They did it with ObamaCare, with TARP, with failed energy endeavors, with expensive luxurious vacations on our dime and now with the gun grab.

This is a move decidedly geared to disarm legal gun-owners so that they cannot defend themselves when Obama´s Storm Troopers come knocking at your door claiming you´re using too much electricity or water.

Worse, don´t forget Obama´s vow to form a "civilian police force as well armed as the military." Yes, he did say that.

So, do we turn our backs hoping that others will handle it? Does the NRA have enough power to squash this? Or is the revolution at our doorstep?

Hitler did it because the country couldn´t believe he would. Plus he had a willing populace who believed in racial supremacy because Hitler told them they were the Master Race.

How much real difference do we have here? Sure, it´s not getting much coverage in the media but the real agenda is a smokescreen for the larger one -- dictatorship or worse.

America MUST pay attention. It´s no longer a conspiracy theory. It´s a real conspiracy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Judy W., 3/3/2013 8:22:11 AM     (No. 9205597)

The important thing isn´t that the NYT criticizes Republicans. That´s as startling as saying their its editors breathe. This is a big slam on Obama and it´s very significant that the NYT is taking notice of his sleazy ways.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: lana720, 3/3/2013 8:28:43 AM     (No. 9205609)

#2, Organizing for Action IS his "well armed and as well funded" entity.

It has morphed into this to ensure threats to citizens until fraud takes place in future elections, and it´s tax free. He will use them to overturn the House´s current Republican majority in 2014 so his lame duck years will be those of rule and not governance.

God help us!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: enuf8, 3/3/2013 8:44:38 AM     (No. 9205620)

Could this be his ultimate goal? A scary, hair raising scenario:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzT6X3_Bg9o

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: LZK, 3/3/2013 8:54:00 AM     (No. 9205638)

I´m shocked to discover gambling with America´s future going on in the White House.....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Pros7767, 3/3/2013 8:55:11 AM     (No. 9205640)

These groups should not be tax exempt. Period. That would stop half the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: JAN, 3/3/2013 8:58:50 AM     (No. 9205646)

NYSlmes..........it´s fighting to PROTECT THE SECOND AMENDMENT

not...to get it´s way.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: nonsense, 3/3/2013 9:12:11 AM     (No. 9205662)

Of course it is corrupt, amazing that the NY Slimes sees a glimmer of the criminality in the O. Organizing to Change America into a communist state.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 3/3/2013 9:13:50 AM     (No. 9205666)

Reading the New York Times is an addiction. Some of you people still need an intervention.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 3/3/2013 9:23:33 AM     (No. 9205674)

In re #10, I took a look at the video.

If the contents of the gentleman´s claims can be substantiated, "a scary hair raising scenario" understates Obie´s ultimate and horribly evil aim to control American citizens that may include formation of his own political party. To think that a sitting president is currently and openly replacing his military brass with those Generals who would be willing to order their men to fire upon non-conforming American citizens, if ordered to do so, tells me that pushing Obie out now and putting him behind bars can´t happen soon enough. What on earth are we waiting for?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: stryker714, 3/3/2013 9:38:44 AM     (No. 9205692)

Lenin quote:

"One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the
arming of the workers (Communist) and the disarming of the bourgeoisie
(the middle class)."


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Arby, 3/3/2013 10:00:54 AM     (No. 9205717)

Always in campaign mode.

When the true histories of his administration are written, it will be said that there was no there, there.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: cinwasp, 3/3/2013 10:07:04 AM     (No. 9205725)

The comments posted after the original article scare me more than the article.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Namma, 3/3/2013 10:15:23 AM     (No. 9205735)

if hussien is making his own army.the first ot go will be the dems..but the dems are to stupid to realize that

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: chicodon, 3/3/2013 10:40:52 AM     (No. 9205791)

Will someone do a Google map of his major donors like they did with gun owners? Kidding aside, his donor list must be made public. Everything about this smacks of illegal so we need to know who´s involved. If Obama cooked it up it has to be suspect.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: strike3, 3/3/2013 10:53:32 AM     (No. 9205813)

It no longer matters what the republicans agree to, are bribed into or talked into.

We the People have the guns, they don´t. The line is in the sand.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: jfodoch, 3/3/2013 11:22:48 AM     (No. 9205865)

congress doesn´t have to allow, or even encourage by continuing to allow, king urkel to do what he continues to do.

This is why our nation is toast! I´m convinced we´re living in an alternate universe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Janjan, 3/3/2013 11:50:01 AM     (No. 9205917)

The NYT doesn´t sound that disturbed to me. They start out being tempted to applaud for Obama selling access to the WH and end up with the ´everybody does it´ excuse.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Analyn, 3/3/2013 11:52:05 AM     (No. 9205922)

#3 And yesterday on this site there was a link to an article about the DHS customizing Predator drones to be able to identify Americans carrying weapons. ... That´s just an odd and scary thing for any government to do to its citizens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Butch59, 3/3/2013 12:36:26 PM     (No. 9206001)

As I have said many times here, I´m waiting for someone or several someones to come forward and start organizing the comming revolution. We know it´s comming, so now is the time to start preparing. And as long as it´s done on private land, the governmnet really has no excuse to step in and try to stop it. Especially if we are all armed to the teeth. Remember, citizens outnumber those in government including the police forces and the military. And a lot of them are NOT going to fire on the citizens of this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: LanieLou, 3/3/2013 1:10:44 PM     (No. 9206037)

In the latest ObamaCare document drop, are details excluding unions and community organizers like ACORN from biding by te law. They actually spell out ACORN!

OFA is the hub for OWS, MoveOn.org, CodePinko, LaRaza, the MSM & other radical, anarchist groups to organize & attack.

OFA IS Obama´s civilian army.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: LanieLou, 3/3/2013 1:13:43 PM     (No. 9206042)

Also, dimwit Maxine Waters bragged o her constituents recently that OFA has a database that will insure dems will win all future elections. That database is th US SS database & they cast votes for us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: pineledger, 3/3/2013 1:34:13 PM     (No. 9206076)

He´s a genius with money, except for that in the US Treasury. Amazing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: flatwater, 3/3/2013 1:51:37 PM     (No. 9206117)

If you have $500,000 to spare, Obama will be happy to sell you personal access for face-to-face meetings four times a year!

Wise King Barky is for sale, and, oh, what a bargain!

Good thing he´s not influenced by special interests!

All hail Wise King Barky!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Th-Gr-Sil-Majority, 3/3/2013 2:27:28 PM     (No. 9206182)

...#10 posts a link to a video on a subject I have heard about but have never seen. It should be a "must watch" piece. Best 21 minutes I have spent in some time...

...it´s time to WAKE UP AMERICA! We can´t have history write the story of how we just slept our way into the destruction of our country...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: TruthAndJustice, 3/3/2013 2:32:56 PM     (No. 9206192)

#1, 3 and 10... I share your opinion and believe you´re correct..so now what....We darn well better burn up those lines to DC and scream our FRACKING heads off to stop Brennan and demand this traitor be stopped

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 3/3/2013 4:13:15 PM     (No. 9206314)

No No.8, theNYT knows what he and the rich commies are up to and they have known this all long because they have abd are helping to take over our country and end our constution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: ArtieC, 3/3/2013 6:37:29 PM     (No. 9206462)

" And a lot of them are NOT going to fire on the citizens of this country."
Don´t you bet your life on that. Every cop and every general that appears in an obama or democrat photo opp pushing the gun grab will be at your door. Count on it. Don´t be stupid people. We have no friends.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Mother of AL, 3/3/2013 8:12:23 PM     (No. 9206545)

#10 & #16 Several points concerning video

1)I have been afraid of this very thing for some time now. I asked my cousin several years ago, retired military, if the military would fire on citizens. His answer was no.

2)In my job as RN for an immunization company, we recently put on a clinic at a local military base. I had some NCO´s come thro my station(an aside;I gave fewer shots than some other nurses as I was questioning the guys along these very lines) and I asked them, after getting into discussions indicating they had same thoughts as I did..sorry for run on sentence......I asked if they thought US military would fire on citizens, both, after consideration, said some would, yes. So....video is correct.


PEOPLE WATCH VIDEO AT # 10.....PLEASE

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: veritas, 3/3/2013 8:24:07 PM     (No. 9206556)

FTA: It is tempting to applaud the nonprofit group now spending nearly $100,000 on ads to pressure Republican lawmakers to accept gun-control measures.

Why?

Stop to think [not that it ever happens at Pinchy´s]. Why "gun control"? How many of the at least two hundred million American-owned firearms are ever used in crimes? And of those, how many are used in crimes committed by the legal owner? The tiniest, tiniest number, as we all know and have known forever.

What could possibly be the reason?

And we haven´t gotten to the five vital words: "shall not be infringed."

Do you know "The Battle of Athens, Tennessee"? You should. You should.

We are Leonidas.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 3/3/2013 9:36:47 PM     (No. 9206638)

Amen, #37.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: artlover, 3/4/2013 4:38:57 AM     (No. 9206824)

Every time I read something like this, I see how much closer we are coming to being another Hitler led Germany, I don´t think it is far off. I think all our guns will be confiscated, our freedoms taken away and we will be told what to eat, say, do and every other aspect of our lives AND I think it is closer than you think. People will still have their head in the sand when it happens. Its already too late to change.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 725717




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

38 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 725717





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~