A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Woodward at war
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Woodward at war
Politico, by Mike Allen & VandeHei

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/27/2013 8:44:01 PM

Bob Woodward called a senior White House official last week to tell him that in a piece in that weekend’s Washington Post, he was going to question President Barack Obama’s account of how sequestration came about - and got a major-league brushback. The Obama aide “yelled at me for about a half hour,” Woodward told us in an hour-long interview yesterday around the Georgetown dining room table where so many generations of Washington’s powerful have spilled their secrets. Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was followed by a page-long email from the aide,

Comments:
There have been many things I have disagreed with Woodward on. However, I am glad he is not backing down from 0bama and his Marxist regime. Maybe the rest of the media will take a lesson from him. Probably not.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: john56, 2/27/2013 8:52:08 PM     (No. 9199859)

I wonder how much of a heads up Woodward gave Nixon´s folks or any Republican he decided to skewer before writing those pieces.

But hey, that´s life.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Grant Hodges, 2/27/2013 8:52:51 PM     (No. 9199860)

I think the rest of the media will ostracize Woodward.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: nonsense, 2/27/2013 8:54:14 PM     (No. 9199865)

I bet it was ValJar who called and screamed, she is after all, the Revenge Queen.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 2/27/2013 8:56:35 PM     (No. 9199869)

The individual who threatened Woodward is a male (per Woodward). Politico just posted this article at 80 this evening.....after Mark Levin talked about it on his show. Politico´s conversation with Woodward too place YESTERDAY.

Have any other reporters been threatened?


Reply 5 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 2/27/2013 8:58:46 PM     (No. 9199871)

Correction: "Politico just posted this article at 80 this evening"


Reply 6 - Posted by: lyndsey, 2/27/2013 8:58:59 PM     (No. 9199872)

Obama made a speech announcing the withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan, and all I heard was Nixon announcing peach in Vietnam. And ever since than...I keep seeing parallels between Obama and Nixon. Both paranoid. Both thin skin. Nixon was pragmatic and believed in the government´s ability to control aspects of our life to make it better. Obama is an egotist who believes in his right to rule...that he knows best an thus all should worship him. Nixon at least intelligent and loved this county. And deep down I think he was a good man. Anyway, it would be interesting to ask Woodward to do a compare and contrast between the two men and their Presidencies. Be interesting see if Woodward has finally figured out what a criminal really looks like...


Reply 7 - Posted by: spincut, 2/27/2013 8:59:26 PM     (No. 9199873)

Just went to WAPO to read their version of this story. Ummmm... search engine must not be working, I couldn´t find it. Certainly WAPO will cover what Saint Woodward is saying.... hahahahahahahahahahahaha


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: schnapps, 2/27/2013 9:13:07 PM     (No. 9199894)

#4 & #5. Point well taken. Politico was going to sit on this story. Kudos to Mark Levin for cracking this rotten egg.
Shame on Politico.


Reply 9 - Posted by: judy, 2/27/2013 9:16:40 PM     (No. 9199902)

Hmmmm maybe Woodward...unlike the non media...loves his country more than the dem party.....


Reply 10 - Posted by: Patchy groundfog, 2/27/2013 9:47:13 PM     (No. 9199952)

No sympathy for the White House cretins except to note that they´ve never lost a game of Blackmail Your Enemies so it must be very strange to have someone fight back.


Reply 11 - Posted by: judy, 2/27/2013 9:56:15 PM     (No. 9199967)

The sad part is the WH is fighting Woodward while the repubs are in a deep sleep.


Reply 12 - Posted by: hamrman, 2/27/2013 9:58:00 PM     (No. 9199971)

You GO Bob, you have hit a very raw nerve and Barry is not very happy...but Barry needs to remember that you helped bring down Nixon, and he was 1000 times more the President than Barry can even dream about being! At least you are doing true reporting that the rest of the Lame Stream News Media is not doing because they are too busy protecting their Messiah and carrying the water for him!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: penelopewaits, 2/27/2013 10:08:22 PM     (No. 9199992)

Color me skeptical.


Reply 14 - Posted by: lala, 2/27/2013 10:22:45 PM     (No. 9200021)

Maybe the old dog has one more "gotcha" fight in him. Woodward is not a stupid man.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Philipsonh, 2/27/2013 11:45:04 PM     (No. 9200124)

Administration policy starts at TOP. The President makes threats in public. No one can criticize this Administration without repercussions. Mr Woodward should take it right to them on EVERY policy that is damaging the Nation.


Reply 16 - Posted by: thewarden, 2/27/2013 11:57:24 PM     (No. 9200134)

You know, it is actually smart for us to sit back and let someone like Woodward lead the fight. He has a lefty pedigree which holds more weight with Dems. There is no way they can paint him as right wing or racist. Let more lefty journos jump on the band wagon as it gathers momentum before we climb aboard and enjoy the ride.


Reply 17 - Posted by: albatross, 2/28/2013 12:31:53 AM     (No. 9200152)

Well, I´m glad that Woodward´s a little revved up over this. Maybe something good will come of it.

Notice, though, the part where he says “I think if Obama himself saw the way they’re dealing with some of this, he would say, ‘Whoa, we don’t tell any reporter ‘you’re going to regret challenging us.’ ”

It reminds me that, in old Imperial Russia, some atrocity would occur in the countryside, and the peasants would say to each other, "If only the Czar knew about this, he would fix it." Later, in the Soviet Union, they would say "If only Stalin knew."


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Italiano, 2/28/2013 1:00:04 AM     (No. 9200162)

The enemy of my enemy...for now anyway.

Nixon was a flawed patriot, Obama an America-hating Marxist. Comparing the two displays an ignorance of history.


Reply 19 - Posted by: steveW, 2/28/2013 1:39:51 AM     (No. 9200189)

So - merely doing your job as a journalist and uttering a single White House-unapproved truth about Dear Leader is to be "at war"?! How far the press has come since Watergate...

It´s the rest of the MSM who, as the dishonest propaganda arm of the malignancy occupying the White House, are at war - with Americans.


Reply 20 - Posted by: mainelysane, 2/28/2013 5:45:34 AM     (No. 9200295)

Woodward will cave.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 2/28/2013 6:04:52 AM     (No. 9200312)

Woodward needs to reread some of Obama´s record if he thinks Obama is not ok with yelling and threatening a reporter. Obama is perfectly ok with all this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 2/28/2013 6:07:48 AM     (No. 9200314)

Happening right now: 67am Joe Scarborough and Mark Halperin are saying "Bush did it too."


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: beca, 2/28/2013 6:10:20 AM     (No. 9200316)

oh looky barrys boys are out defending


Reply 24 - Posted by: M2, 2/28/2013 6:44:34 AM     (No. 9200355)

Woodward, good liberal that he is, will cave like all liberals do. Someone will take him to the woodshed. Someone already threatened him, so don´t count on steadiness or character from Woodward.

What Woodward or someone else should ask this White House: "Do you seriously plan to risk American lives by cutting first responders while letting criminals out of jail around the country? And what are all those hollow-point bullets y´all bought up going to be used for?"


Reply 25 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 2/28/2013 6:45:35 AM     (No. 9200356)

What poster 20 said. Woodward cares most about iaccess to WH sources. Therefore, this story will fizzle because bob cannot risk losing his version of dependence on big government .


Reply 26 - Posted by: Crosscut, 2/28/2013 6:55:00 AM     (No. 9200366)

Could this be the beginning?


Reply 27 - Posted by: OhMy, 2/28/2013 7:12:54 AM     (No. 9200393)

Woodward is credited with bringing down nixon. I am cheering for him to do it again. Obama has dozens of scandals worse than watergate. Woodward was popular the first time around and was made an instant hero. Now he can be a real hero and a real patriot. Now who wants to be "deep throat" in the Obama Admin?


Reply 28 - Posted by: Janjan, 2/28/2013 7:20:12 AM     (No. 9200397)

Woodward is speaking the truth and the WH is telling him he will regret it. Of course it´s a threat. This is falling apart on Obama. He isn´t telling some fibs. He is telling some huge outrageous lies. This is better than a soap opera.


Reply 29 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 2/28/2013 7:44:00 AM     (No. 9200432)

Lately I´ve had an unquenchable curiosity about all things Romanov. I wonder why?

(Someone please attempt to explain to the lo-fo´s who the Romanovs were and what the Marxists did to them. Good luck.)


Reply 30 - Posted by: Jebediah, 2/28/2013 7:49:31 AM     (No. 9200438)

Fascinating to see Mika Brezghenski (squinting, which is what she does when she thinks she is registering "thought") on todays Morning Joe go´s on about this being business as usual, push back from some aid, and never mention that the "aid" threatening was Gene Sperling, one of Obama´s top economic advisors.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Jebediah, 2/28/2013 7:54:24 AM     (No. 9200443)

A bit later Morning Joe (and Joe is such a jerk, even when he is defending!) showed a piece by another of Obama´s top guys saying Woodward MAY have been big time once but his is obviously past his sell by date. Let´s see if they can get away with trashing the man-----I doubt that he will back down. He is a Dem, no doubt, but he also has journalistic ethics that he tries to live by. Go Bob go! It´s about time someone calls to account our own personal Hugo Chavez and his cult of personality, which allows him to bend and break the law.


Reply 32 - Posted by: MamaElephant, 2/28/2013 7:54:43 AM     (No. 9200444)

HuffPoo is already isolating the target. Woodward is their headline right now, and they refer to him as a "drama king". The article reads like it was written by the White House. They admit that Gene Sperling was the one who yelled at him. The article sneeringly implies that Woodward is a whiny baby and even mentions that Mr. Sperling is not "physically threatening", as if reporters were afraid of getting slugged, not losing access. The threatening email is characterized as apologetic, but ol´ drama king Woodward is obviously too dumb to understand the words written in it.

The left now has it´s narrative - White House = voice was raised, but now unthreatening little Gene Sperling is apologizing for his decibel level. Woodward = old, entitled, has-been attention seeker making a mountain out of a molehill because he needs the attention.

Wonder if Mr. Woodward is sorry yet? Will he be by the end of the day? The White House is demonstrating exactly what the threat meant, aren´t they?


Reply 33 - Posted by: planetgeo, 2/28/2013 7:56:21 AM     (No. 9200448)

Note what constitutes "war" to journalists today...merely daring to openly speak the truth. Woodward isn´t attacking Obama. Not is he attacking his policies. He was simply refusing to let a false version of the source of the sequestration go unchallenged. And now that´s "war". Pretty damning commentary on the state of journalism today.

And I don´t agree that Woodward will automatically return to the liberal fold once he feels the wrath of their ostracism. There are plenty of us former liberals now turned genuine conservatives here who understand exactly that this is Woodward´s "lightning bolt moment". You don´t need to get hit twice to understand what just happened.


Reply 34 - Posted by: udanja99, 2/28/2013 8:24:59 AM     (No. 9200508)

I´m currently listening to "Mornings on the Mall" on WMAL talk radio out of DC. Apparently Lanny Davis ( of the Clinton machine ) got this same treatment from the WH over columns he wrote for the Washington Times. The WH also threatened the editor of the Times with loss of WH press credentials if the Times didn´t reign Davis in.

Zippy is shredding the First Amendment. In a sane world the press would turn on him - we´ll see...


Reply 35 - Posted by: happywarrior, 2/28/2013 8:27:31 AM     (No. 9200515)

#29, isn´t Romanov a vodka? Lol


Reply 36 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 2/28/2013 8:46:11 AM     (No. 9200547)

The first thought I had when Woodworm came out with his
concern, was he has now lost his access to the White House.
The next move will probably be a walk back of sorts. In the meantime, in between time, it will be fun.


Reply 37 - Posted by: JimS, 2/28/2013 8:57:02 AM     (No. 9200563)

Obama: "I´ll get you, and your little dog too. Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha"


Reply 38 - Posted by: chicodon, 2/28/2013 8:59:14 AM     (No. 9200571)

If this has legs Woodward will be invited on the Sunday talk shows. If not... Obama ain´t no Nixon. It´s a Teflon thing.


Reply 39 - Posted by: LZK, 2/28/2013 8:59:17 AM     (No. 9200572)

Hey -- maybe God´s trying to tell Woodward something....

Ya think?????

LZK


Reply 40 - Posted by: donnaclaire, 2/28/2013 9:01:22 AM     (No. 9200579)

Yet another good example of how mean and ruthless our little man in the White House is. Birds of a feather flock together, as we see, and his bunch of high-powered thugs are proving it.

How sad and embarrassing to have Obama - a man of this caliber - as our president. It´s fortunate for us they threatened a reporter who is definitely not a right-winger. Surely some of the MSM will believe him.


Reply 41 - Posted by: saucy, 2/28/2013 9:01:47 AM     (No. 9200580)

Woodward started his career with Nixon, perhaps he is ending it with Obama.

Great bookends. s/o


Reply 42 - Posted by: lifelonghuman, 2/28/2013 9:02:52 AM     (No. 9200588)

Woodward will not cave. He also will not get much support from the MSM. They´ve been jealous of him ever since Watergate.


Reply 43 - Posted by: fed-up, 2/28/2013 9:13:04 AM     (No. 9200609)

I don´t know. Seems to me Woodward is not going to compromise all his work to just cave now. He was trying to support his points made in his book, and if Obama Hadn´t been so "chicken little" all week, none of this would even be news.

This gets in the weeds now, because it is obvious we have an incompetent leader, and the WHAT the lie is becomes second to the drama around it. And rest of the LSM are comatose.


Reply 44 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 2/28/2013 9:24:45 AM     (No. 9200643)

I don`t feel the least but sorry for Woodward. He helped create this monster so live with it.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Rinktum, 2/28/2013 9:33:25 AM     (No. 9200671)

If this story has real muscular legs, I´ll be surprised. In the end, Washington is all about accessibility of information. I am sure Mr. Woodward´s reputation is respected but the knives will turn when his exposé is focused on Democrat president. I can´t believe that he wants to be the guy who causes trouble for Obama. He would much rather his legacy be taking down Nixon.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Echohawk, 2/28/2013 9:38:01 AM     (No. 9200681)

Bob Woodward is nothing less than the elder statesman of American journalism and he is speaking out against the Obama administration. This is huge!
Also, he´s made so much money on his books and lecture fees that the WaPo needs him much more than he needs the WaPo. He can enjoy independence of thought and deed.
I think he is trying to right the ship of state that is the American MSM. The 24/7 fawning over Obama is driving away readership. And money.
We´ll see if this is working if and when more journalists start to criticize Obama.
I haven´t watched ´Morning Joe´ since before the election, but if they are sympathizing with Bob Woodward then his strategy is starting to work.
Regardless, this is definitely popcorn worthy.


Reply 47 - Posted by: Farmwife1, 2/28/2013 10:07:09 AM     (No. 9200756)

#22 I noticed that last night with Bob Beckel on O´Reilly. When these dimbos get backed into a corner by the truth, they claim "everybody did it!" Does that make it right? I thought bammy was supposed to be DIFFERENT! Yeah...right.


Reply 48 - Posted by: rplat, 2/28/2013 10:28:33 AM     (No. 9200802)

I hate to be crude but sometimes it´s necessary for emphasis so, let me just say that the main stream media is a puddle of warm puke. Thank you very much.


Reply 49 - Posted by: RancherJack, 2/28/2013 10:35:01 AM     (No. 9200817)

He´ll lose.
This will drift away in the Memory Hole

Never forget Stilson Hutchins FOUNDED the paper for the express purpose of advancing and supporting the Democrat Party agenda.

Woodward is but a passing phenomenon.


Reply 50 - Posted by: geoguy, 2/28/2013 10:42:30 AM     (No. 9200839)

Is this a crack in the dike?


Reply 51 - Posted by: DoktorFranken, 2/28/2013 10:57:13 AM     (No. 9200867)

#1 - Quite a bit, actually. In fact, one time that he called one of the folks in CREEP (I forget just who) mentioned something about Katherine Graham was putting her "breast" in a wringer on "this one". I wish that I had more info, but the fact is that they DID call to get responses BEFORE they placed stories into the Post.


Reply 52 - Posted by: jetsman, 2/28/2013 11:05:43 AM     (No. 9200881)


Reply 53 - Posted by: jetsman, 2/28/2013 11:17:56 AM     (No. 9200906)

The state controlled media will make Bob look like a crazed nut case before they will allow their lord and master, lord messiah o´bama to be seen for what he really is...
A FRICKEN LUNITIC!!!!
Lord messiah o´bama is being prepped to be
New World Order dictator, according to Henry
Kissenger in World Net Daily.
The world´s people better keep an eye on lord
messiah o´bama´s antics here in America because one day soon he may be doing the same
to those countries and then NO ONE will be able to control him.
The state controlled media will allow nothing
to happen to lord messiah o´bama so in a few
days this story will g away or the state controlled media will blame the republicans for what is about to happen and the sad part about this is over seventy-five percent of americans will believe the state controlled media´s fabricated stories.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Butch59, 2/28/2013 11:21:44 AM     (No. 9200913)

I´m not yet ready to sign high praises to Bob woodward. He is and has been a life long liberal Dim and I just don´t think that he has made the transition to conservative. Remember, conservatives will give anyone credit for telling the truth. Especially when it concerns a morass of lies and deceit that the WH currently is.

And as for the WH threatening him, that´s really not even arguable. Of course they did. They do something like that to anyone who crosses their path. I wish Woodward good luck and pray that he doesn´t walk back on his word.


Reply 55 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 2/28/2013 11:41:39 AM     (No. 9200953)

Where has been Woodward the last four plus years ? Nothing from the commie white house and his followersincluding all most all of the media,has changed except for the worse.


Reply 56 - Posted by: ASAvet, 2/28/2013 11:50:03 AM     (No. 9200967)

This will be forgotten in two weeks.....


Reply 57 - Posted by: strike3, 2/28/2013 12:10:15 PM     (No. 9201005)

Woodward was able to bring down a president for simply lying to attempt to cover up a minor burglary. Imagine what he could do with four years of serious criminal acts, treason, election fraud and theft. I assume he knows how to watch his back because the threats WILL be followed up by action.


Reply 58 - Posted by: lencu255, 2/28/2013 12:17:45 PM     (No. 9201018)

Now Americans with half a brain can clearly see the formation of the dictator (Americans with more than half a brain saw it earlier).
Media is self-censoring itself very efficiently, except the "geniuses" with enormous ego, like Woodward. He mistakenly thought that he can say whatever he wants. Woody, it doesn´t work this way - no untouchables in the totalitarian society!


Reply 59 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 2/28/2013 12:44:29 PM     (No. 9201055)

I don´t think that Woodward will back down. He has spent the last four years in a fog watching the current administration pursure every course of action in an opposite manner that he, a devout liberal would propose. I think that the Drone Program and Gitmo´s continued existance are pushing him to a realization that he has been slow to acknowledge.


Reply 60 - Posted by: bob913, 2/28/2013 12:55:57 PM     (No. 9201077)

Where´s his partner Bernstein?
Shouldn´t he be speaking up in support of Woodward?


Reply 61 - Posted by: udanja99, 2/28/2013 1:06:37 PM     (No. 9201099)

I think that Bernstein had a falling out with Woodward. Woodward prevailed and Bernstein disappeared. Bad blood there IIRC.


Reply 62 - Posted by: mollyb0122, 2/28/2013 2:48:29 PM     (No. 9201290)

Woodward has made the mistake of being a "reporter" instead of a stenographer journalist. Bernstein died a year or two ago I think.


Reply 63 - Posted by: lencu255, 2/28/2013 3:11:33 PM     (No. 9201334)

woodward, schmoodward, who cares! He is dedicated lib, who thinks that he can talk freely, while getting his paycheck from the leftist commie/fascists. Woody, you are wrong!
Btw, all this talk: obozo knew, obozo didn´t?
Yeah, stalin also didn´t know, and hitler didn´t know! There were russians and germans who actually believed in that....
I laugh at pundits comparing what is becoming of America with Europe. No, guys, it is not even close to that!


Reply 64 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/28/2013 3:37:18 PM     (No. 9201375)

According to Politico, telling the truth about Obama constitutes being "at war" with Obama.

Wow.

Well, what else would you expect from these leftist cheerleaders?

Our (p)resident is a corrupt, dishonest, powermad lunatic, protected by a corrupt and cowardly press corps that dares not tell the truth about Wise King Barky.


Reply 65 - Posted by: Italiano, 2/28/2013 6:29:49 PM     (No. 9201593)

Bernstein is still alive. He was married to Nora Ephron for a while. She isn´t.


Reply 66 - Posted by: gesundheit, 2/28/2013 6:33:51 PM     (No. 9201599)

An Iron Curtain has descended on the Washington press corps.

The proof that dictatorship is now operating in Washington is the fact that The Washington Post and other members of the liberal MSM are so weak and intimated by the White House´s threats against Bob Woodward that they´re fallen silent, or worse.

Not only are Bob Woodward´s colleagues afraid to speak up on his behalf and on behalf of freedom of the press, but some are even going out of their way to publicly bash Mr. Woodward to gain favor with the Obama dictatorship.

Bob Woodward has the opportunity to write a scathing expose about the Obama administration. He can travel to an undisclosed location to do so, if he feels uncomfortable in Washington. But will he? It´s doubtful that he has any more backbone than his cowering colleagues.


Reply 67 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 2/28/2013 6:36:16 PM     (No. 9201601)

Well said #47 as usual.
Notice the media immediately cut out Woodward´s comment on MSNBC that placed the Obama actions in the same status he did in the Nixon coverup. The first Woodward comment then was over the stupid attempt to shut up and lock up the high official´s wife.
That comment om MSNBC followed his concern about Obama rushing around sounding off about crippling the military. Woodward I quote "This is the kind of madness that I haven´t seen in a long time."
How much more direct can he be? How could he not then put it all on the line to call out Obama for his madness?


Reply 68 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 2/28/2013 8:50:22 PM     (No. 9201761)

#39, if Woodward gets invited to the Sunday am faze the nation and meet the depressed programs, they´ll try to Palinize him, anyway. But, at the same time, I think Woodward would hold his own. Strange, right now, that I feel for the same character who chose to bring Nixon down.



Post Reply   Close thread 725252




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



DOD ignores judge, cuts physical
therapy for soldiers’ disabled children
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 10:19:49 PM     Post Reply
Defense Department (DOD) officials decided to stop covering a certain form of physical therapy for the disable children of military members, despite an administrative judge’s ruling that the treatment is covered under the law. “For my daughter, this therapy means life, death or some horrible surgery, but she’s not alone — there are 27 other military families who use the center where Kaitlyn goes,” Jennifer Samuels told Military Times. DOD decided not to pay for a physical therapy program for

Dennis Miller: ´The American
Media is in an Abusive
Relationship With Obama´
NewsBusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 10:13:21 PM     Post Reply
"Let´s face facts: the American media is in an abusive relationship with Obama." So marvelously said Dennis Miller on Fox New´s the O´Reilly Factor in a discussion about the Internal Revenue Service scandal Wednesday (video follows with transcript and absolutely no need for additional commentary): DENNIS MILLER: Nobody in the press is going to bear in on this. Let´s face facts: the American media is in an abusive relationship with Obama. They don´t quite know what to do. If you take the New York Times, you could refer to it as "Fifty Shades of Grey Lady."

Politico Reporter: IRS Targeting
of Tea Party ´Easily Influenced´
2012 Election
NewsBusters, by Jack Coleman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 10:03:20 PM     Post Reply
The signs keep accumulating that the IRS scandal is worse than liberals are willing to concede. On Bill Press´s radio show yesterday, a reporter with left-leaning Politico told Press that the Internal Revenue Service dragging its feet on applications for tax-exempt status from tea party groups probably affected the outcome of last year´s election. (Video after the jump) Here´s what Politico´s Lauren French told Press (audio) -- PRESS: So, Lauren, you´ve been covering this IRS scandal. How big is it really? How serious is it really, do you think? FRENCH:

Jake Tapper Warns Obama Supporters
To ‘Remember The Precedent’ He’s
Setting When A GOP’er Is In WH
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 9:53:20 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper dug into the controversial way in which members of President Barack Obama’s administration have apparently tried to intimidate whistleblowers in the government and the journalists that would investigate their stories. Tapper said that some, including the New York Times editorial board, have described the administration’s actions as “threatening fundamental freedoms of the press.” He warned Obama’s supporters to remember the precedent his administration is setting when a Republican next occupies the Oval Office. Tapper noted that the scandal surrounding the subpoenaing of Fox News reporter James Rosen’s personal telephone and email

Shulman never looked into IRS
targeting, though 132 congressmen
contacted him [Video]
Daily Caller, by Caroline May    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 9:45:05 PM     Post Reply
Even though 132 members of Congress sent former Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Douglas Shulman letters about the IRS targeting of conservative groups, Shulman reiterated Wednesday that he did not have the full story until the inspector general’s report came out. “In the two years that this targeting was taking place, did any member of Congress contact you? Write you? About this particular subject? Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan asked during a House Oversight hearing. “Did you get letters from Congress?”

Judge apologizes for lack
of transparency in James
Rosen leak probe
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 9:39:02 PM     Post Reply
The chief judge of the District’s federal court issued an unusual order Wednesday, apologizing to the public and the media for not making certain court documents widely available online. The gesture of transparency by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth comes at a time when the Obama administration is under scrutiny for an unprecedented number of leak investigations, including one showing that the Justice Department had secretly probed the news-gathering activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen. The investigation of Rosen was first reported Monday, after The Washington

Prosecutor Going After FOX
News is Big Obama Donor
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/22/2013 9:24:36 PM     Post Reply
In some other universe this would be shocking. In this universe it’s par for the course, and I don’t mean the golf course, but the guy who makes the golf course his second home. The US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Ronald C. Machen – the man responsible for the aggressive surveillance and phone record scrutiny at Fox News – is also a big donor to the Obama Campaigns. At the time of his appointment, the Washington Post wrote a profile on Machen including this tidbit: Over the years, he has donated $4,350 to Obama’s campaigns.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

All of Obama´s Scandals Are
Ultimately About Information Control

39 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM     Post Reply
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s


Post Reply   Close thread 725252





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~