|
|
| |
Topic: Republicans are losing
the spending argument |
Republicans are losing
the spending argument
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:mikkins2, 2/27/2013 3:36:33 PM
|
| For the past several years, congressional Republicans have focused relentlessly on a single message: Washington — led by President Obama — is spending too much money, and it needs to stop. But according to new Washington Post-ABC News polling, that laser-like focus isn’t helping Republicans win the argument over federal spending — with 67 percent of those tested disapproving of the “way Republicans in Congress are handling federal spending.”
|
Comments:
Of course both the Republican Establishment and the Washington Post want you to believe this assessment of these results. Its purposely misleading.
The entire dynamic of the poll would be changed if one more question was added.
Do you disapprove of the way federal spending is being handled because:
a)Not enough is being spent.
b)Not enough is being cut.
Do the math.
Got Tea?
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw, 2/27/2013 4:12:42 PM (No. 9199520)
Its a FACT, not an argument. One always knows the truth from the WP because its the opposite to the WP story. If this was true WP wouldn´t feel the need to "report" it. The only reason for the WP or any of the LSM to do a report is to mislead and lie about the subject.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
plex, 2/27/2013 4:13:55 PM (No. 9199522)
Well, yeh, I disapprove of the way Republicans are handling spending. They aren´t standing their ground on not spending.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 2/27/2013 4:16:26 PM (No. 9199527)
Boehner is inept and incompetent as Speaker. He never should have been re-elected to the post. The House needs someone who knows how to fight these socialist and leftist terds.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Whamdbambam, 2/27/2013 4:33:49 PM (No. 9199560)
No, WaPo presstitutes, they´re not, except in your echo chamber.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Father of Internet, 2/27/2013 4:54:22 PM (No. 9199592)
According to a poll of readers (which have been slipping in numbers for years), a large majority don´t believe the Washington Post or approve of their bias. That´s a real POLL you can believe in.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
edgar, 2/27/2013 5:04:58 PM (No. 9199599)
Look at Greece and Italy. Once you give "the people" free stuff, they get angry if you try to take it away. Especially when all you hear from Dear Leader is that the rich will pay for it.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
4Justice, 2/27/2013 5:26:27 PM (No. 9199625)
Says who? WaPoo??
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
nimby, 2/27/2013 6:20:26 PM (No. 9199689)
Never understood why the republicans re-elected Boehner and McConnell? They should have been fired from their positions.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 2/27/2013 6:58:10 PM (No. 9199737)
Yeah right, #8; the fools can´t even successfully oppose the full weight of the Federal government...
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"
|
Time to Secede…
From the GOP
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Chip McLean
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/24/2013 9:51:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is there anyone remaining with an IQ above room temperature who actually believes that the Republican Party believes in limited government, as defined by the U.S. constitution? If so, they have either been hibernating or have been in complete self-denial. Every election cycle the Republican Party counts on its “conservative base” to dutifully turn out and mark their ballot for whatever candidate has been selected by the GOP leadership. We are told ad infinitum that doing so will keep the Democrat liberal demons from furthering their agenda. The inside-the-beltway establishment has been chanting this mantra for years
|
Former Bush Adviser Continues
Crusade Against Palin, Conservatives
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/9/2013 6:44:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former George W. Bush chief political strategist Matt Dowd continued to try to diminish Sarah Palin and conservatives by once again making false claims about the former Alaska governor. On Sunday´s "ABC´s This Week," Dowd assailed CPAC for, in his mind, lessening its credibility by inviting conservatives like Palin and not liberal Republicans favored by the northeastern elite like New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. “CPAC, to me, has totally diminished its credibility as an organization,” Dowd said
|
| |
|
The Unofficial Merger of the GOP
and Democrat Party!
|
|
Canada Free Press, by A.J. Cameron
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/4/2013 8:46:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
People continually complain that with the different faces who have disgraced the Offices of the President and Vice President, the one hundred (100) seats within the Senate and the four hundred thirty-five (435) seats within the House of Representatives, nothing improves for the masses, only for those who are elected and special interests. This is frustrating and we need to assess why, so we can change this ‘continuing resolution’. It appears that the GOP and the Democrat Party have merged.
|
Republicans are losing
the spending argument
|
|
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:36:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
For the past several years, congressional Republicans have focused relentlessly on a single message: Washington — led by President Obama — is spending too much money, and it needs to stop. But according to new Washington Post-ABC News polling, that laser-like focus isn’t helping Republicans win the argument over federal spending — with 67 percent of those tested disapproving of the “way Republicans in Congress are handling federal spending.”
|
Why Sarah Palin? Why Ted Cruz?:
´Nationalists´ and ´Federalists´
|
|
The Hill (Washington, DC), by Bernie Quigley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:09:40 PM
Post Reply
|
Demographics are destiny. Nothing else makes history. When the changes ahead are shipped into denial is when chaos and disaster ensue. And the potential disasters America faces today do not come from global warming, nuclear weapons, the Russians, the hippies or the rednecks. They come from the economic division of America between the red states, which are rising in capital and prosperity, and the left and right coasts, which are receding in economic power. Demographer Joel Kotkin well outlines the transition in a Wall Street Journal essay yesterday title, “America’s Red State Growth Corridors.”
|
Congressman Takes No
[Bleep] From Obama
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 2:55:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sophomore U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, graduated first in his class at West Point, graduated from Harvard Law School, had a hugely successful career in the aerospace industry, and also has a think-tank background. He may be a seriously rising star. Anyway, he put out a self-explanatory press release that is a beauty to behold. Take that, Mr. Obama! Today, White House Spokesman Jay Carney asked during a press briefing what Congressman Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, would say to defense workers facing furlough because of the President’s sequester plan. The following is his statement:
|
|
Spending kudzu
|
|
Human Events, by John Hayward
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/26/2013 9:29:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has been front and center during the latter days of the sequestration showdown, which is good, because he literally wrote the book on government waste. He produces a new edition of his “Wastebook” every year, chronicling the most absurd abuses of taxpayer money. It is wise for Republicans to bring up these horror stories when Obama is racing around the country and insisting that a 2.3 percent reduction in the rate of government growth means we can’t have firefighters or border security. Coburn’s Wastebook should be every American’s indispensable manual
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
| |
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
| | |
|
|
