A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Growing Tyranny
of the Political Elite
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Growing Tyranny
of the Political Elite

American Thinker, by Jeffrey Folks

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 2/27/2013 9:07:30 AM

Recently, the White House released a photo of the president shooting skeet. But where´s the snap of him fishing for bass? Apparently the White House felt compelled to portray Obama as a marksman in light of the widespread pushback over the administration´s gun control agenda but felt no urgency to defend the prospect of the EPA´s potential regulation of lead in fishing weights. Yet the agency seriously entertained just such a ban last year. What´s next? The lead in barbells?

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 2/27/2013 9:11:51 AM     (No. 9198641)

It´s time for a Constitutional Convention to be called to neuter the Federal government.


Reply 2 - Posted by: bubby, 2/27/2013 9:20:49 AM     (No. 9198663)

#1 I´m not in favor of that because the leftists would take over that convention and would make all the changes they would like and the Republicans would once again just roll over. How about we just enforce the Constitution as it currently exists? I would like to see a balanced budget amendment and an amendment that would require all legislation passed by Congress be applicable to members of Congress. No more special treatment for retirement or healthcare or anything else they get what they give us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: WAN2, 2/27/2013 9:27:52 AM     (No. 9198678)

Although correct, Mr. Folks is too optimistic. Our Ship of Fools has sailed. Ah, all free (prosperous) people turn lazy and end up preferring "safety" to freedom.....and getting tyranny.


Reply 4 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 2/27/2013 10:58:35 AM     (No. 9198887)

I do not know what a political elite is.
There has been no evidence that an elite (the best of the best) exists in politics. There are nothing other than hacks governing in the government. At the very least a true elite in government would be trained in the principles
of ruling from childhood. There is no such person in the U.S.A.
At least not in government.


Reply 5 - Posted by: mickturn, 2/27/2013 11:18:17 AM     (No. 9198955)

The ´Let them eat cake´ crowd will face the same fate as the French Elites...wait for it...wait for it.............


Reply 6 - Posted by: pickle1, 2/27/2013 11:23:30 AM     (No. 9198976)

It will backfire on them.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Aubreyesque, 2/27/2013 1:51:09 PM     (No. 9199279)

#4 I think thats a good question. I suspect that the real answer is kept in confusion because once its determined who or what actually directs the power that overrules an otherwise egalitarian society, they will become the targets for reprisal or retirement. Is Pelosi part of that elite? Are Hollywood starlets? Is it the mainstream media? Defining what makes the elite who or what they are will be very useful.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Susannah, 2/27/2013 2:25:13 PM     (No. 9199344)

#5, why would you want someone "trained in the principles of ruling since childhood"? Ruling is what kings do, and they are in fact trained from childhood to rule. But this isn´t supposed to be a monarchy.


Reply 9 - Posted by: KTWO, 2/27/2013 2:42:11 PM     (No. 9199370)

"elite" should not be confused with "privileged" or ´rulers´, etc.

To me an "Elite" would be someone, in or out of government, who has personal influence or access to politicians and authorities.

As such the "Elite" might not win every time but he/she has an excellent chance to avoid any serious setbacks.

The Kennedys would be my example. They seem to have escaped consequences for dozens of nasty acts.

The key is influence. You might not win but you have a much better chance. Much, much better.


Reply 10 - Posted by: goose, 2/28/2013 4:27:57 PM     (No. 9201436)

Last night on "Triggers" there was an episode about combat shotguns. I must have watched more than 100 rounds fired. And, gee whiz, not one of them made a muzzle blast like the one in the photo of Obama "skeet shooting." Imagine that!



Post Reply   Close thread 725145




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



Obama thinks
liberals are stupid
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 9:08:19 AM     Post Reply
Hey, liberals! Obama thinks you are stupid. Yeah, he really does. He knew Benghazi was terrorism before he didn´t know it was terrorism. Addressing a question about Benghazi in his press conference Monday, May 13, 2013, Obama´s "logic" really made an impression: "The Day after it happened I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism." (snip) Leaving behind Obama´s initial certitude about Benghazi having been a terror attack, not only did he not know what had happened because it wasn´t clear

   

 



 
Benghazi: Murder and
Treachery Most Foul?
American Thinker, by Fay Voshell    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 8:29:37 AM     Post Reply
What person ever says what he really knows at a funeral? Eulogies bearing little or no resemblance to the deceased or to the facts are trotted out by people who are often bad actors, who though they know better, lie anyway. It´s almost acceptable behavior. But any truth about the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christ Stevens and three other Americans appears to have been put six feet under as far as our current administration is concerned. (snip)Did they love Chris Stevens the way Brutus loved Caesar?

Media discovering Obama
doesn´t return the love
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 8:23:22 AM     Post Reply
Somewhere, Andrew Breitbart is smiling. You can almost see the metaphorical light bulbs going on in bubbles over the heads of liberal media figures. Obama loyalists are expressing outrage at the subpoenaing of the phone records of 20 lines serving over a hundred AP reporters. The timing could not be better.(snip) the AP scandal´s significance entirely lies with its effect on the media´s mindset on Obama. They have been cheerleading for him for six years,

Murdered Thousands,
Convicted for Three:
The Kermit Gosnell Verdict
American Thinker, by Drew Belsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 7:46:57 AM     Post Reply
Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell was convicted yesterday on three counts of first-degree murder, not to mention a slew of other charges, including involuntary manslaughter (for the death of 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar), infanticide, and abortions past Pennsylvania´s legal limit. (snip)in a culture dominated by the 24-hour news cycle, it will be easy for Americans to consider the abortion issue closed with the Gosnell verdict. The pro-life movement´s challenge, as [Lila] Rose says, is to keep the American people focused on how common Gosnell-like practices are in the abortion industry, and on all the unsung victims abortion

Benghazi and Obama´s Legitimacy
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 11:02:50 AM     Post Reply
Did Barack Obama in effect steal the election in 2012? It is impossible to know, of course, how matters would have played it if Americans had been told the truth about Benghazi. And what if the IRS had not hobbled conservative nonprofits (and therefore the movement) with extra scrutiny and consequent delay and expenses? But there can be no doubt that Obama helped himself by being able to claim that Al Qaeda was "on the run" and with an assist from Candy Crowley make Mitt Romney look bad on when he criticized Obama´s anti-terror policies.

Barack Obama and
the End of an Era
American Thinker, by Steve McCann    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 9:55:44 AM     Post Reply
The re-election of Barack Obama is the high water mark and the end of an era. The period 1960 to 2014 will go down in American history as the era of never-ending crusades leading to the decline and potential downfall of the United States. During this time frame America has been inundated with one cause after another. The essential civil rights movement and the tragically successful Viet Nam protests spawned numerous causes, among them: feminism, environmentalism, global warming, and gay rights. For each generation born after 1940 it has been a rite of passage

   

 

  


 
The Bloody Hands
of Barack Obama
American Thinker, by Stella Paul    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/13/2013 9:29:16 AM     Post Reply
The Three Whistleblowers at the Benghazi hearing spoke softly, but with the emotional wallop of The Three Tenors. They told the truth, and it blasted like thunder through Obama´s tissue palace of lies. Listening to these strong, solemn men, I heard the sound of old America: a place of hardworking people who love their country and believe in something bigger than their own power. (snip) But today, their America is forced to serve a different god: a cold, smiling man with a hollow heart and hands that get bloodier by the day.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
65 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

   

 



 
Camelot Is Burning
46 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

   

Post Reply   Close thread 725145





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~