|
|
| |
Topic: Chuck Hagel confirmed as US defence secretary by Senate |
Chuck Hagel confirmed as US defence secretary by Senate
BBC News [UK], by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 2/26/2013 5:26:32 PM
|
| The US Senate has confirmed former Senator Chuck Hagel as the new Pentagon chief, after a bloc of Republicans dropped their opposition to him. The former Republican Nebraska senator was confirmed by 58-41 in a simple majority vote.[Snip] The Senate move comes 12 days after Republicans delayed a vote, questioning his past positions on Israel and Iran and his qualifications for the post. But critics dropped the manoeuvre, the first for a defence secretary confirmation, after a week-long recess. Mr Obama´s Democratic Party holds a 55-45 edge in the chamber, and Mr Hagel ultimately only needed 51 votes to be confirmed.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 2/26/2013 5:33:20 PM (No. 9197733)
The stupid party found a way to have one of its supidest members ever receive confirmation.
A delay meant nothing and has accomplished nothing. Imbeciles!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 2/26/2013 5:37:11 PM (No. 9197741)
Take a deep breath. This is not a loss, unless you have subjected yourself to countless hours of droning by Mark Levin on this. Going to war over one a president´s choice for his cabinet would have been a massive mistake: like Lee at Antitum or Napolean at Waterloo. Hagel is a decent man, a Republican, and he will do a fine job. Stop listening to the blithering idiots of talk radio because all they do is lose. They have declared war on Karl Rove. To the political right of Karl Rove is noman´s land. Stop living in these guys´ fantasy land. You and your country deserve better!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
nimby, 2/26/2013 5:37:24 PM (No. 9197742)
Down goes the country, once again!!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lostinmassachusetts, 2/26/2013 5:40:28 PM (No. 9197749)
So who are the four Republicans who voted for him (or abstained). And did any Democrats vote against him. The numbers imply that some may have.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 2/26/2013 5:44:25 PM (No. 9197760)
Democrats always find a purpose for their GOP useful idiots.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Aubreyesque, 2/26/2013 5:44:32 PM (No. 9197761)
#2 should review the French Revolution - taking a deep breath is what you do before the blade comes down. But it cures the cold, I´m sure.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
tusker, 2/26/2013 5:46:12 PM (No. 9197763)
RHINO Hagel is an idiot, a tool of Bow-Boy and the Marxists infecting our government, a gross insult to our armed forces, and an enemy of Israel to say nothing of democracy and the Republic.
The only bigger insult to the armed forces is Bow-Boy.
"Things" are not all right and are not going to work out just fine Pollyanna.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
loosecannon1, 2/26/2013 5:47:19 PM (No. 9197767)
To steal a headline from a few days ago, that captured perfectly what this is akin to:
Caligula´s horse.
If there were ever a need for a very, very energized Tea Party, it is now.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
horacer, 2/26/2013 5:50:40 PM (No. 9197778)
Shelby, Cochran, Johanns and Rand Paul voted to confirm. Hagel set a record for most no votes for a confirmed Secretary of Defense. Previous high was 11.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
kono, 2/26/2013 5:51:22 PM (No. 9197780)
Wow. Next thing you know, Somalia will be given a seat on the Human Rights Council, Bernie Madoff will be named Secretary of the Treasury, and Barbara Boxer will chair the Senate Intelligence Committee.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
lostinmassachusetts, 2/26/2013 5:53:47 PM (No. 9197783)
As usual, the troll king offers bad advice to LDotters. What do the Republicans gain by consenting to a truly bad candidate such as Hagel? I´m not suggesting that they should oppose everyone Obama nominates (because, in truth, he will never nominate a worthy person, and opposing all his nominees will appear inflexibly partisan). But you have to push back when it´s appropriate. Voting against Hagel would have been good practice for the Senate Republicans before Obama attempts to stack the SCOTUS with more leftists. A better strategy would be to make a clear, convincing case before the American people for why you oppose a nominee.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
trackman999, 2/26/2013 5:59:30 PM (No. 9197796)
What´s up with rand Paul voting for this guy?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
IdSpud, 2/26/2013 6:03:34 PM (No. 9197805)
At the risk of starting some here #10, I believe that Sheila Jackson Lee is probably a better choice for the Intelligence Committee.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
dragonlearner, 2/26/2013 6:06:18 PM (No. 9197808)
The media no longer hides their bias, the Democrats no longer hide their Marxism and the trolls no longer hide their agenda.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 2/26/2013 6:10:23 PM (No. 9197818)
It´s like they all figure we´re past the tipping point...
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 2/26/2013 6:10:36 PM (No. 9197819)
We have once again reached a new low. Affirmative action for ex-senators.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 2/26/2013 6:20:04 PM (No. 9197838)
The country has a mental disease. Hagel and Al Franken -- I don´t understand this country. I want Texas to secede. To h--- with this craziness.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Lefticide, 2/26/2013 6:29:05 PM (No. 9197848)
America is being judged, and is getting what she deserves. Sad.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Penney, 2/26/2013 6:29:09 PM (No. 9197849)
´Tis a sad day when someone as flaky as this, (-check Hagel´s voting record & comments through the decades!), is confirmed by this beltway Boomtown Senate. mm mmm mmm
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 2/26/2013 6:43:55 PM (No. 9197867)
The troll listens to Mark Levin and learns nothing.
I have nothing to learn from the troll.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Coy860, 2/26/2013 6:44:50 PM (No. 9197868)
#2. Hagel is unfit. Nothing Levin said could prove that, Hagel proved it to all. His hearing removed all doubt.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
PI65, 2/26/2013 6:46:40 PM (No. 9197872)
#9 I think I told you so about ten days ago. This was a stupid fight at best. Just made us look bad again. We need to pick those battles we can win.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bob913, 2/26/2013 6:49:05 PM (No. 9197876)
Chuck Hagel defence secretary - Jew hater Determined to see Israel attack by Iran with nuclear weapons.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
geoguy, 2/26/2013 6:52:01 PM (No. 9197881)
Poster #2, I want to believe your post is sarcasm. But I know it isn´t.
A massive mistake? How? Why? I don´t see that AT ALL. Who is the blithering idiot here? I´m glad you posted so we on this blog can see what is wrong with this country, front and center.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
CentralFLMom, 2/26/2013 6:57:20 PM (No. 9197890)
I will bless those who Bless you (Israel) and curse those who curse you. (Genesis 12:3) Hamas now runs our military. Its only a matter of time before Obamawannajihad gives Iran a nuclear bomb to begin the end of days. Rand Paul is a fool, along with everyone else who voted to confirm that godless, motherless Muslim lover.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Janjan, 2/26/2013 6:59:25 PM (No. 9197895)
#2 Listening to Mark Levin, who is a patriot and Constitutional lawyer, might provide you with a few much needed brain cells. You should try it.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
coldoc, 2/26/2013 7:03:21 PM (No. 9197901)
Thank you mccain and graham, two of the biggest losers in the Loser Party.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
udanja99, 2/26/2013 7:11:10 PM (No. 9197914)
Rand Paul did NOT vote to confirm.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
nonsense, 2/26/2013 7:45:01 PM (No. 9197971)
Another America hater becomes a cabinet member. Sigh.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 2/26/2013 7:46:56 PM (No. 9197974)
You are both right.
It should matter.
But....in Obama world it doesn´t.
Hagel is another Biden.
White and Stupid.
Since they are not allowed to make any decisions anyway they can serve to reinforce the popular stereotype of stupid white guys. This is of no small value to the left.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
PI65, 2/26/2013 7:48:04 PM (No. 9197975)
#28 Sorry, but he did. Said something about it was because the Won had won the election.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
trapper, 2/26/2013 8:01:39 PM (No. 9197993)
According to the WaPo article here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hagel-clears-filibuster-hurdle-is-set-for-confirmation/2013/02/26/589b3fa6-8030-11e2-a350-49866afab584_story.html
"The four Republican senators voting in favor were Thad Cochran (Miss.), Mike Johanns (Neb.), Richard C. Shelby (Ala.) and Rand Paul (Ky.). All 41 no votes came from Republicans."
If you do the math you get one Dem not voting.
Rand Paul voted "yes." Let that sink in and brew a while. Rand Paul. "Yes" for Hagel. McCain, Rubio, Graham as "no´s."
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 2/26/2013 8:07:51 PM (No. 9197999)
Pubbie wimps do it again. Wonder what the payolla will be from the Obeimeister.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
reddfroge, 2/26/2013 9:37:39 PM (No. 9198095)
America, as a free country, is done...finished...we are done folks...get used to major gov. rule....brace for impacct
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 2/27/2013 7:09:51 AM (No. 9198432)
Here comes the total destruction of the U.S. military might. Each state should start working hard on a citizen militia.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
US drops demand Taliban renounce al-Qaeda to allow talks to progress
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Rob Crilly
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/18/2013 2:59:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The US will engage in its first formal direct talks with the Taliban on Thursday, according to officials, in a milestone on the road to peace after more than a decade of war. The first meeting will take place in Doha, the Qatari capital, after the Taliban opened their first official overseas office and Washington dropped its long-standing demand that the movement renounce ties with al-Qaeda. "The US will have its first formal meeting with the Taliban, and indeed first meeting with the Taliban for several years, in a couple of days in Doha," a senior official with
|
Boeing nets orders for 102 stretch 787s
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/18/2013 2:42:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
LE BOURGET, France—Boeing Co. won major orders from five customers for a stretched-out version of its popular 787 Dreamliner jet at the Paris Air Show Tuesday, further evidence of a strengthening market for more expensive long-haul jets. Boeing announced the formal launch of its 787-10 program at the Paris Air Show on Tuesday and says it already has commitments for 102 jets from five customers: Air Lease Corp., Singapore Airlines, United Airlines, International Airlines Group and GE Capital Aviation Services. The new 787-10 lists at $290 million, making the deal worth nearly $30 billion at full price, although customers often
|
Afghans take nationwide security lead from Nato
|
|
BBC News [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/18/2013 2:00:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Nato has handed over security for the whole of Afghanistan for the first time since the Taliban were ousted in 2001. At a ceremony in Kabul, President Hamid Karzai said that from Wednesday "our own security and military forces will lead all the security activities". Observers say the best soldiers in the Afghan army are up to the task but there are lingering doubts about some. International troops will remain in Afghanistan until the end of 2014, providing military back-up when needed. The ceremony came shortly after a suicide bomb attack in western Kabul killed three employees of the Afghanistan
|
Hidden camera catches wireless company employees passing out ´Obama phones´ to people who say they´ll SELL them for drugs, shoes, handbags
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/18/2013 7:53:10 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Undercover video shot in May by a conservative activist shows two corporate distributors of free cell phones handing out the mobile devices to people who have promised to sell them for drug money, to buy shoes and handbags, to pay off their bills, or just for extra spending cash. The ´Obama phone,´ which made its ignominious YouTube debut outside a Cleveland, Ohio presidential campaign event last September, is a project of the Federal Communications Commission´s ´Lifeline´ program, which makes land line and mobile phones available to Americans who meet low-income requirements. Lifeline was a $2.19 billion program in 2012.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American Workers Who, For Lack of a Better Term, Can’t Cut It’
|
|
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:
|
Iran to send 4,000 troops to support President Assad in Syria as British Armed Forces play war games on border
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/16/2013 11:08:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Iran is preparing to send 4,000 troops in to Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the wake of America´s announcement it will be providing ´military aid´ to the country´s Muslim rebels. President Barack Obama made the pledge earlier this week after the U.S. claimed it found ´conclusive evidence´ Assad´s regime has used chemical weapons against the rebel forces--which includes the most extreme Sunni Islamists--and has called for Britain and France to back the move. While Britain hasn´t made a guarantee either way as yet, more than 350 Royal Marines are being sent to Jordan
|
Marco Rubio doesn´t know if ´he´s getting played´ by Democrats
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|