|
|
| |
Topic: Assault on For-Profit Medicine Begins |
Assault on For-Profit Medicine Begins
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Desert Fox, 2/26/2013 4:46:36 PM
|
| RUSH: There´s an interesting cover story at TIME Magazine. "TIME´s long investigation of American health care prices missed one thing: We pay our doctors way too much." In the current issue of TIME there´s a huge cover story by Steve Brill. It´s 24,000 words, and do you know what he concludes? He concludes that health care is very expensive, the prices are very high, and hospitals charge those high prices for the same reason that any other business would. It´s because they can, and Brill concludes in 24,000 words that Obamacare is not only gonna not help,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bamapreacher, 2/26/2013 4:58:25 PM (No. 9197672)
And of course there seems to be no mention in the Time article that doctors pay half of what they make to insurance companies so when the ambulance chasers sue them they are covered. The same is true for hospitals, drug manufacturers and the people who make hip replacement equipment, etc. I´m surprised Rush didn;t point this out.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
oldvlc, 2/26/2013 5:22:27 PM (No. 9197714)
How would you like to spend a quarter of a million bucks getting trained only to make $25K a year? OFCOURSE Doctors make money, they earn it, they save LIVES every day and they practically killed themselves learning their trade. Oh, I wish society would see doctors as a nobles and lawyers as pond scum.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 2/26/2013 5:22:58 PM (No. 9197715)
Patient heal thyself....
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
grambo, 2/26/2013 5:44:12 PM (No. 9197758)
Canadians escape socialized Canadian medicine by coming to America. Where do Americans go to escape Obamacare? Answer: to floating hospitals three miles offshore.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 2/26/2013 5:49:39 PM (No. 9197776)
Many lawyers get paid way too much too. Why not put a flat rate on them, or come up with Obamalegal to cap their rates and make every lawyer a government employee? Jes sayin.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MrYules, 2/26/2013 6:09:46 PM (No. 9197814)
Divide and conquer. Scapegoating. Socialism/soft dictatorship. The attacks of the envious against the producers of useful goods and services is in high gear. All but the "elites" will become poorer and have less freedom and material wealth.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
lazlototh, 2/26/2013 6:56:16 PM (No. 9197886)
Doctors who don´t work for corporations work the hours of the self-employed - 16-18 hour days, little time off. As for why they should make money - with that logic, why should I have to pay for food? It´s not my fault I get hungry.
Of course, we pay money for most products based on a combination of how much they benefit us and how rare they are (water benefits us but it isn´t rare so it costs little; brain surgery skills are rare and benefit us if we need them so we pay a lot).
And if I have a malignancy I will be happy to pay a lot if it is successfully treated.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jerseygal, 2/26/2013 7:06:47 PM (No. 9197905)
In early January I relapsed from the flu and got bronchial pneumonia. I went to see a doctor. The office visit and two injections were billed to medicare at $711.00. I don´t know exactly what, but there is something seriously wrong with this situation. I don´t believe ObamaCare is the answer, but hell, neither is $711.00 for an office visit.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
JHHolliday, 2/26/2013 7:06:55 PM (No. 9197906)
You could see this coming four years ago. They want to drive all private entities out of healthcare entirely. Every procedure, every device, every health professional will be told what will be paid by the all wise, all knowing state.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jersey devil, 2/26/2013 8:23:30 PM (No. 9198023)
We in the health care profession are already bound to a fee schedule prepared by the feds. Each individual insurance company contracts us based on a percentage (reduction) we will accept based on the Medicare or Medicaid fee schedules. We have been paid this way since the early 90´s (based on Hillarycare). We can charge $710.00 but we are still only paid the fee the feds allow. Your doctor was paid exactly what every other doctor is paid for an office visit and exactly the same amount for the two shots, no more no less. You are all free to negotiate a cash fee with any provider of your choice if we don´t like the fees the feds allow providers to be paid.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 2/26/2013 8:41:56 PM (No. 9198050)
I receive as an average between commercial insurance and Medicare about $1900 to perform a hip replacement and $1700 for a knee replacement.
After 50% to overhead and 50% to taxes I put in my pocket about $450.
You can´t call your plumber over to unclog your toilet for much less than that.
If you think that is too much, there is something very wrong with you.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Wendybird, 2/26/2013 8:59:58 PM (No. 9198060)
#8, as mentioned above, look at your papers and see how much your physician was awarded by Medicare. He could have billed one million dollars, and would have received the same, maybe $60 if he was lucky. I haven´t raised my rates for 25 years. (in family practice). Why bother? Medicare and insurance companies pay whatever they wish, and only then if you badger them long enough. Go to the ER next time. They will create a ten page electronic "medical record", given you a spiral CT scan and billed Medicare 5,000 or so. We expect to hear back from you.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jdwill, 2/26/2013 11:00:49 PM (No. 9198159)
American citizens are free to do their business in the best way they know how, obeying existing laws as such laws are understood -- which has become difficult as time has passed, and the commie-oriented groups have introduced more and more laws to control free enterprise! The American citizen is no longer free to chose his doctor or hospital, it seems -- altho´ I´m a bit out of touch as to the actual and present alternatives available for health care -- laws change too quickly! hussein´s cadres seem to have, more and more, stifled free enterprise, and the honest, hard-working citizen suffers! Freeing our dear America from the grasp of these demented and so ignorant communists has become priority number one! Get a good government in Washington next time around, me hearties! Restore free enterprise!
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jerseygal, 2/27/2013 5:59:19 AM (No. 9198343)
The responses to my post (#8) were exactly my point. I wasn´t trying to say that the doctor was paid too much. I´m just wondering where all the rest of that $711.00 dollars went. Medicare shortfalls? I only see the situation getting worse. I´m going to have my uninsured daughter call and ask how much it would be for a self-pay visit.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 2/27/2013 7:24:36 AM (No. 9198455)
Yeah, Obamacare is going to help alright. It´ll put us $7 trillion more in debt by 2021.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
|
Bill Clinton: No alternative to two-state solution
|
|
Times of Israel, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 9:08:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former US president Bill Clinton on Monday night urged Israel to work toward a two-state solution with the Palestinians, saying that he had never heard a credible alternative that would enable Israel to remain a Jewish and a democratic state. “No matter how many settlers you put out there [in the West Bank], the Palestinians are having more babies than the Israelis as a whole,” Clinton said, and thus demographics were working against Israel. Clinton was answering questions after a speech at the Peres Academic Center in Rehovot in honor of President Shimon Peres’s 90th birthday celebrations, which
|
| |
|
Clinton: Israel Must Make Peace or Disappear
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Ben Shapiro
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 9:06:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In a speech that will no doubt incentivize Palestinians to continue their campaign of terror and warfare against Israel, former President Bill Clinton told Israel that it would have to make peace with the Palestinians if it wanted to remain Jewish and democratic. He said that thanks to demographic changes, Israel will have to separate from the Palestinian population in order to maintain its majority. This theory has been proved false repeatedly. Israel’s demographic majority in Israel will remain strong for decades upon decades. But the goal of the left is to
|
|
America´s Assimilating Hispanics
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 8:06:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As immigration reform moves through Congress, one claim by opponents is that this time immigration is different because the country´s latest arrivals aren´t assimilating. On the contrary, however, the evidence overwhelmingly shows that today´s immigrants are acculturating and moving up the economic ladder like previous generations. The media´s tendency to report "averages" in educational attainment, English-language skills, income and other traditional measures of assimilation can make it difficult to determine whether immigrants are making gains. Since Latino immigration continues, averaging together the poverty rates or homeownership
|
Growth Of Chinese Navy Means U.S. Must Compete For Maritime Supremacy
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by James Holmes & Toshi Yoshihara
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 7:23:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
U.S. Navy Must Compete for Maritime Supremacy Writing recently in the Los Angeles Times, Gordon Chang and retired Adm. James Lyons pointed with alarm to China´s naval expansion. That sea power represents the path to national greatness is now axiomatic for the Chinese state and society. China is bolting together a great navy with aplomb, and the United States had better take notice. Beijing is thinking hard about how to use this new implement to advance national power and purposes. This poses a challenge of the first order. America and its allies must brace themselves for a permanent Chinese
|
Obama´s Move: Arming Syrian Rebels Is Arming Al-Qaida
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 7:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Mideast: The president opposed arming the Syrian rebels last year on the grounds the arms could find their way into Islamist hands. This year he´s changed his mind — but the rebels haven´t changed their Islamist spots. One would have thought that the decision to intervene in the Syrian civil war, a conflict in which the U.S. has no clear strategic interest, would have been announced by President Obama, sans golf garb, sitting behind his desk in the Oval Office, and not by Ben Rhodes, the White House deputy national security adviser for strategic communications
|
Supreme Court Sides Against Voting System´s Integrity
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 7:07:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Supreme Court: A 7-2 high court majority blocks states from displacing the status quo that makes voter fraud easier than credit card fraud. Federal law is helping noncitizens unconstitutionally vote liberals into power. Unfettered immigration for decades now has been the left´s not-so-secret weapon for getting millions of more votes, an obvious recipe for the political transformation of America. The Supreme Court on Monday effectively told the states that the best they can expect are whatever crumbs they beg from the federal government. Arizona´s Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act, passed into law by referendum in 2004, enacted reasonable
|
| |
|
|
Obama: I’m not Dick Cheney
|
|
Politico, by Josh Gerstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/17/2013 5:07:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Barack Obama used a television interview set to air Monday night to defend his administration’s use of far-reaching surveillance programs as carefully supervised and controlled. Obama also appeared to reject comparisons between himself and Vice President Dick Cheney, who strongly backed similar surveillance efforts in the George W. Bush administration and has defended Obama’s continuation of national security-related programs similar in many respects to those pursued by the previous administration. “Some people say, ‘Well, you know, Obama was this raving liberal before. Now he’s, you know, Dick Cheney.’ Dick Cheney sometimes says, “Yeah, you know?
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
New State Department scandal: Whistleblower accuses consul general of trysts with subordinates and hookers
|
|
New York Post, by KATE BRIQUELET
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 10:53:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the latest black eye for the scandal-ridden State Department, a whistleblower claims she was run out of the foreign service after complaining about a consul general’s alleged office trysts with subordinates and hookers.Kerry Howard says she was bullied, harassed and forced to resign after she exposed US Consul General Donald Moore’s alleged security-threatening shenanigans in the Naples, Italy, office. As the post’s community-liaison officer, Howard was charged with keeping workplace peace and advising higher-ups on the state of morale, but when she revealed allegations about her boss, State Department officials swept it under the rug,
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Melendez warns without legal status ´there will never be road to White House for GOP´
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/16/2013 2:41:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gang of Eight member Bob Menendez advised Republicans to accept legalization status for current illegal immigrants if they ever want to see another president from their party. “I would tell my Republican colleagues — both in the House and the Senate — that the road to the White House comes through a road with a pathway to legalization,” the New Jersey senator said on State of the Union this morning. “Without it, there’ll never be a road to the White House for the Republican party.” Menendez also warned of triggers on border security
|
Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American Workers Who, For Lack of a Better Term, Can’t Cut It’
|
|
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:
|
Threats made to figures at center of IRS controversy: sources
|
|
Reuters, by Patrick Temple-West and Karl Plume
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 6:48:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A current and a former top tax official have been physically threatened in recent weeks as the scandal over Internal Revenue Service targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups has gathered steam, people familiar with their situation say.Ousted IRS acting commissioner, Steven Miller, has received such threats, according to a source familiar with his situation. The source declined to elaborate on the nature or the source of the threats.
|
| | |
|
|