Sue them.

´My first thought was, "Isn´t anything sacred any more?".´

If they had wanted their son´s last words to be "sacred" they should have kept them to themselves. Making them "public record" puts those very personal moments out in the world.

It´s like people who willingly leave their cats or dogs out without restraints and are mortified that their beloved pet gets run over by a car.

I know that if my wife and I wanted to keep our son´s last words private, we would have KEPT them private.

Does this sound harsh? I don´t know. All I know is that my private, "sacred" moments are kept private.

Mary Fetchet was on every cable TV station blamng President Bush for 9/11.

She never once blamed the terrorists,it was always Bush´s fault.

Evidently she´s been coached by the O cabal to make this attack.

Pity, that she exploits her son´s death for political gain.

He didn´t deserve this.

In both cases the producer could have hired actors to go into a studio and record their own versions of the clips.

There was no need for them to use the actual recordings except that they were just too darned busy and wanted to save a few bucks.

Maybe I missed something, but is this woman wanting money? Maybe she should sue the mooslims that hit the towers. Never will forget that day and the hatred and horror I felt for the miserable wretches that flew the planes.

Take every dime they and all their relatives have or will have for one hundred years. Harsh? Nothing is too harsh for Hollywood scum.


Girl´s Hubby

I do not know the specific facts surrounding the publications of these tapes, but if these tapes were used in a public fourm/situation...shared with news report(ers), with the consent or support of the families or survivors - the tapes are apart of the public domain.

And, if such tapes were used as evidence in a public trial of which was not sealed...again, public domain.

However, I do agree with the distaste of the creators, directors and producers of incorporating the actual voices in a commercial production (as opposed to a real documentary).

Unfortunately, legal recourse is highly unlikely. However, a substantial and public monetary donation to a charity RE: 9/11 would create enormous good will.

At the same time, a growing number of the population in the US is growing weary of the constant financial hand outs sought by the families that have been paid and keep getting paid for something that occurred 13 years ago by people that have nothing to do with the US and by no fault of the US.

If anything, the film keeps alive the very serious threat of terrorism that still threatens all of us daily. The film actually resurrected memories of those specific people who died that day and should be remembered so that it does not occur again.

I don´t sympathize with the family, yet the producers were sloppy if they didn´t run all this down and fix it ahead of time. They could have gotten an OK or used an alternate sound snippet from a more willing family.

It was a necessary beginning of the movie. It reminded everyone what it is all about. 3000 innocent Americans murdered by Islamic terrorists. The actual voices of people just like you and me, caught by circumstance in an unimaginable horror. These parents and relatives are pursuing a political agenda for publicity purposes. It´s a noble movie made with noble intentions. Would that many in Congress and the media would listen to those voices, or watch the videos of people leaping to their deaths to remember why we fight and who we fight.