A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Feinstein: Gun Owners Should
Decide Between ‘Personal Pleasure’
and ‘General Welfare’
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Feinstein: Gun Owners Should
Decide Between ‘Personal Pleasure’
and ‘General Welfare’

PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/25/2013 10:35:57 PM

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she believes a Wednesday Judiciary Committee hearing will “make the case” that her assault weapons ban is constitutional. The witness list for the hearing is United States Attorney for Colorado John Walsh, Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, and two lawyers. Also at the witness table will be Neil Heslin, father of a Newtown, Conn., shooting victim, and a Newtown EMS medical director. Former GOP Rep. Sandy Adams (Fla.), a onetime police officer, rounds out the witnesses. “I think we will make the case

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 2/25/2013 10:41:35 PM     (No. 9196236)

Having a gun for personal pleasure is the general welfare of a US citizen.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Italiano, 2/25/2013 10:50:12 PM     (No. 9196241)

I´ve decided on both.

Period.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Bearman43, 2/25/2013 10:59:30 PM     (No. 9196251)

I don´t give a d**n what she thinks. My guns are none of her business!!!


Reply 4 - Posted by: Axeman, 2/25/2013 11:05:44 PM     (No. 9196255)

How about "the security of a free state"?
That, to me, is a specific welfare.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Griller1, 2/25/2013 11:10:28 PM     (No. 9196262)

Isn´t it great that this leftist anti liberty crook thinks she can dictate how we protect ourselves. This is just plain wrong.


Reply 6 - Posted by: veritas, 2/25/2013 11:11:13 PM     (No. 9196263)

Oh, the poor Senatrix. Her committee meeting is a couple hundred years too late.

A bunch of guys meeting in Philadelphia already decided the Constitutionality of the issue.


Reply 7 - Posted by: 4Justice, 2/25/2013 11:15:25 PM     (No. 9196267)

They are the same. One does not preclude the other, you old crone.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: dvc, 2/25/2013 11:17:35 PM     (No. 9196269)

"...shall not be infringed."

Not ´infringed a bit because we really think we are smarter than Jefferson, Madison, Hancock, et all.´

Idiots. Dangerous, unthinking, dimwitted fools that think they are of the same mental caliber as the founding fathers.


Reply 9 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 2/25/2013 11:21:37 PM     (No. 9196274)

That´s quite the lineup of "witnesses" they have there:

John Walsh - US Attorney, Obama appointee.
Ed Flynn - Milwaukee Chief of Police, a political appointee (Democrat, of course)
Philadelphia Mayor Nutter (nothing more needs to be said there)
"And two lawyers".

/heavy sarcasm on/

Gee, I wonder what their collective testimony will be like?

/heavy sarcasm off/


Reply 10 - Posted by: stablemoney, 2/25/2013 11:32:57 PM     (No. 9196283)

Feinstein has her stage stooges. Why no NRA members, hunters, home owners, victims of crime, ranchers, border residents, Branch Davidian members (oh, not possible, all murdered by the ATF divison of the government), or conservatives (not possible, democrats would prefer islamic law).


Reply 11 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 2/25/2013 11:35:36 PM     (No. 9196287)

Easy for Feinstein to complain about the citizenry having guns when she herself is protected by a team of bodyguards. Hypocrite.

It´s a sad commentary on the political climate of California when the ´sensible´ one of the 2 Senators carries on like this. Disgraceful!


Reply 12 - Posted by: Jonr, 2/25/2013 11:40:34 PM     (No. 9196293)

Feinstein, we will decide between tyranny or freedom! Give me liberty or give me death you treasonous wretch!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: tusker, 2/25/2013 11:43:26 PM     (No. 9196296)

And exactly why is it so important to disarm law-abiding gun owners?

What, exactly, is the threat from law-abiding gun owners?

And exactly what is Feinstein, and Blumberg et al getting out of this?

And exactly how does this disarming of law-abiding citizens make us all safer?


Reply 14 - Posted by: iamtinman, 2/25/2013 11:45:19 PM     (No. 9196300)

I think Senator Feinstein will make the case that she has stacked the deck! Nobody except the antigun nuts are going to pay any attention to a hearing whose outcome is predestined.


Reply 15 - Posted by: ccyr, 2/25/2013 11:53:21 PM     (No. 9196305)

The headline makes the exact point. It is up to gun owners to make their own decisions. Not the government. It´s not the government´s right to give or retract. It´s the peoples´ right.


Reply 16 - Posted by: CDR, 2/25/2013 11:56:56 PM     (No. 9196311)

It is my personal pleasure to care for my and my families general welfare. The fact that the Senator doesn´t see the enjoinder leads me to believe she is being truthful to her motives.


Reply 17 - Posted by: RedWhiteBlue, 2/25/2013 11:59:40 PM     (No. 9196314)

Maybe it´s none of her business! SHEEEEESH!


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: jl80863, 2/26/2013 12:09:28 AM     (No. 9196321)

A highly pampered politician attempting to give us a guilt trip for exercising or rights?
Typical liberal. Molon labe!


Reply 19 - Posted by: xcenturion, 2/26/2013 1:07:48 AM     (No. 9196350)

The minute the politicians give up their armed security details is the day I give up my weapons.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Pinchem, 2/26/2013 1:16:41 AM     (No. 9196354)

Someone should dare to ask her to explain "shall not be infringed" means. If she can´t or won´t then she should be declared an Anti-Constitutionalist and an Anti-American and demand her resignation.

She should also be on her knees thanking her Allah that, this being a Republic with Law Abiding Gun Owners, she can resign instead of being shot out of office.


Reply 21 - Posted by: rtwngprof, 2/26/2013 1:21:18 AM     (No. 9196357)

No, she does not have "all the police." She has the big city politician-chiefs, who are mouthpieces for the mayors that control their employment. The working cops are overwhelmingly opposed to criminalizing citizen gun owners.


Reply 22 - Posted by: LAW428, 2/26/2013 1:26:14 AM     (No. 9196360)

"...shall not be infringed" you twit! Go peddle your Communist agenda somewhere other than the United States of America.

If you come for my guns, you will leave in a body bag.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: FenwayFrank, 2/26/2013 2:52:02 AM     (No. 9196386)

These two choices are made every day by food stamp and social security disability abusers.


Reply 24 - Posted by: flatwater, 2/26/2013 3:07:51 AM     (No. 9196394)

Dianne Feinstein can go straight to hell, and take all of her fellow CommieCrats with her....


Reply 25 - Posted by: lewis1940, 2/26/2013 3:09:42 AM     (No. 9196395)

Ms. Feinstein"s "Let them eat cake" comment.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Pinons, 2/26/2013 3:14:45 AM     (No. 9196397)

She´s nasty.


Reply 27 - Posted by: reilly, 2/26/2013 3:34:41 AM     (No. 9196401)


If Dan White hadn´t gunned down Harvey Milk and George Moscone, Diane Feinstein would never have been heard of. She owes her career to a gun. Check it out.


Reply 28 - Posted by: provide, 2/26/2013 6:24:02 AM     (No. 9196461)

Does that apply to Medical Marijuana?


Reply 29 - Posted by: rod reese, 2/26/2013 7:32:52 AM     (No. 9196547)

These idiots can´t disarm criminals so they choose to disarm law abiding citizens. Leftist thinking, its a twisted contradiction. Have any of them ever read the Constitution? or thought about what it means? I guess only "clingers" have done that, not politicians.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Trigger2, 2/26/2013 8:11:00 AM     (No. 9196624)

Now we get to read the names of her faked group for testimony. What´s wrong with CA that they keep voting for this brain challenged moron?


Reply 31 - Posted by: god of irony, 2/26/2013 8:11:50 AM     (No. 9196625)

Just where in the Constitution does it say I have to make a choice?


Reply 32 - Posted by: yo-yo, 2/26/2013 10:04:28 AM     (No. 9196871)

Is she talking about rampant sex, which produces her voter base?


Reply 33 - Posted by: mickturn, 2/26/2013 1:08:31 PM     (No. 9197270)

I still want to know what part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" this witch doesn´t understand?



Post Reply   Close thread 724926




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Perry’s first veto strikes down
dark money disclosure bill
Houston Chronicle, by David Rauf    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 7:05:01 PM     Post Reply
UPDATE: Perry responds to SB 346 veto: “Freedom of association and freedom of speech are two of our most important rights enshrined in the Constitution. My fear is that SB 346 would have a chilling effect on both of those rights in our democratic political process. While regulation is necessary in the administration of Texas political finance laws, no regulation is tolerable that puts anyone’s participation at risk or that can be used by any government, organization or individual to intimidate those who choose to participate in our process through financial means. At a time when our federal government

In the matter of James Rosen
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 9:50:14 AM     Post Reply
The latest reporting in the matter of Fox News Channel’s James Rosen indicates the Obama administration fought to keep the search warrant for Rosen’s private email account secret, arguing that the government might need to monitor the account for a lengthy period of time. Thank you, Ryan Lizza. And one more thing. Despite Eric Holder’s his protestations of ignorance regarding the Rosen matter, NBC reports that Holder himself authorized the warrant application. Hmmm. Does that mean he might not have been entirely forthcoming about the matter in his testimony

Journalist and author Haynes
Johnson dies at 81
Associated Press, by Barry Schweid    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:57:50 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Haynes Johnson, a pioneering Washington journalist who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the civil rights movement and migrated from newspapers to television, books and teaching, died Friday. He was 81. The Washington Post reported he died at Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Md. In a statement to the Post newsroom, Managing Editor Kevin Merida said Johnson died of a heart attack. Johnson was awarded a Pulitzer in 1966 for national reporting on the civil rights struggle in Selma, Ala., while with The Evening Star in Washington. He spent

Alleged member of
Hezbollah arrested here
San Antonio Express-News [TX], by Guillermo Contreras,    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:37:05 AM     Post Reply
The FBI has arrested a San Antonio man on charges he lied to get into the United States and tried to get a sensitive Defense Department position. Wissam Allouche, 44, appeared for an initial hearing Friday afternoon, and shook his head when U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry Bemporad read the charges leveled in a federal indictment. The judge ordered him held pending a bail hearing and his arraignment Tuesday. “He allegedly tried to cover up his affiliation with Hezbollah,” said special agent Erik Vasys, spokesman for the FBI in San Antonio. “It is believed

The press must have
the ability to ask questions
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:31:00 AM     Post Reply
A FREE press in a democracy demands a delicate balance. The First Amendment means the media must have the right to inquire without hindrance. The government has a legitimate interest in keeping some national security information secret. When these come into conflict, the balance often has been struck this way: The media are free to pursue secrets, but it is up to those in government to keep them. When the media come into possession of information that, if disclosed, could be damaging, the government can plead the case for secrecy — and the media generally are open to persuasion.

The Inevitable Decline
of Great Britain (Cont.)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 11:54:00 PM     Post Reply
The brutal murder of an off-duty soldier by two Muslim activists continues to dominate the news in Great Britain. The scene was utterly bizarre: in broad daylight, in a busy section of London, the two Muslims apparently ran the soldier down with a car, within a block or two of his barracks, and then attacked him with knives and a meat cleaver. They attempted to behead him, apparently not quite successfully, as hundreds of passers-by looked on. No one stopped them–private ownership of firearms being illegal in the U.K.–but three random women

GOP widening Sebelius
shakedown probe
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 8:41:11 PM     Post Reply
A day after insurers complained that Kathleen Sebelius and the Obama administration had pressured them to fund Enroll America, a House committee sent them a request for more information on the matter. The Energy and Commerce Committee had already begun looking into whether Sebelius had broken any laws by attempting to get donations from an industry that will be heavily regulated by her under ObamaCare, and now The Hill reports this new request as a widening of that probe (via Rare): House Republicans have widened their probe of Health and Human Services



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Benghazi and Obama´s
Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen

52 replie(s)
American Thinker, by James Lewis    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:20:44 AM     Post Reply
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General. There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it´s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama´s oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up. But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat-
Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew
Nothing About IRS Targeting

51 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM     Post Reply
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”

Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

51 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping

Anthony Weiner says Houston
psychiatric facility made
him ‘a new man’

51 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM     Post Reply
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose

Bystanders in their own fate
50 replie(s)
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:32:34 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed "Allahu Akbar!" as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill. As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling

Mark Levin: "RINO" Issa Didn´t
Investigate IRS Before Because
He "Despises The Tea Party"

45 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/24/2013 5:38:38 PM     Post Reply
MARK LEVIN: So why didn´t Chairman Issa hold an investigative hearing a year ago? Why didn´t Chairman Camp, all Republicans, hold an investigative hearing a year ago, and all the other tripping over themselves right now? I´ll tell you why. Because the establishment Republicans, the RINO Republicans, despise the Tea Party. They despise the conservative movement. We exist to be managed, to be shuttled to the polling place, to vote for their candidates. The Karl Roves of the world, and all the rest of them. They fight us in the primaries, they fight us at the grassroots.

Fox News’s Roger Ailes responds
to Justice Dept. investigation

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Erik Wemple    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:00:19 PM     Post Reply
Fox News chief Roger Ailes has sent a memo to his subordinates at the leading cable news network. He sent this memo to his staff today in connection with the federal investigation into an alleged leak to Fox News reporter James Rosen, a story that the Washington Post’s Ann E. Marimow broke earlier this week. The memo’s a masterpiece, too. For all those who wonder what it is about Ailes that endears his people to him — and that makes him such a good interviewee for any media reporter lucky enough to get an audience


Post Reply   Close thread 724926





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~