A licensed, trained bodyguard having a gun is different from a psychotic person with schizophrenia having a gun. Those supporting gun rights need to suggest solutions to keep guns out of the hands of people who are delusional/psychotic.

This from a person who thinks it´s a breakthrough to get Maggie Smith to use the F word in his movie. Scheesh!

suggestion to keep guns out of psychopaths hands: how about following current laws?

but this presupposes that innocent people deserve to have their rights violated because someone else causes problems. Should we ban all cars because some people drive drunk? Should we have the government monitor all peoples internet use because some people use it for illegal things like child pornography?

although the Gun Control advocates are probably just fine with All State Control, All The Time.

A trained permit holding citizens is different from a psychotic person with schizophrenia. So why does the Kneepad Media and Democrat party treat them the same? Or is the difference permit holders are protecting their knuckle-dragging selves and loved ones while bodyguards are protecting a major source of Democrat funding? And the real issue isn’t scary looking weapons in the hands of a nutcase, but any weapon in the hands of a gang, drug dealer or scorned lover/spouse. Keep the guns out of a nut jobs hands and mass murder is prevented once a decade or so. That still leaves the 99%ers out there killing.

.....then he left with his armed bodyguard.

#1, every LEGAL NY handgun owner undergoes a months long vetting process, so what? Does that make NY state safer than Vermont? No. Did the rigorous NY process stop Colin Ferguson or the Webster hammer murderer? No. Ferguson went out of state, lied, broke the law there, then traveled back to NY, broke more laws, then shot up a L.I. commuter train. The Webster killer traded drugs for some guns, breaking multiple laws, but since he beat his relative to death with a hammer, laws didn´t really bother him.

Try shifting your focus from the NRA which has tried in vain to get Democrat mayors to enforce Project Exile, to the ACLU and some parole boards which changed the laws to allow maniacs like Ferguson and the Webster murderer to walk among us.

Dustin Hoffman is just another sheeple from NYC. He has somehow many a fortune by pretending to be someone else, so understandably he thinks he is better than gun owners who he thinks are evil. He tried to mimic Buckley when playing Captain Hook, because William F. Buckley was the ´most evil person he could think of.´ Straw Dogs, Dusty.

A supposed “artiste” i.e. he reads scripts well, whose views on any subject are no more valuable than anyone else’s and--given his one year at Santa Monica College--very probably less, wailing about the guns and violence that Hollywood glorifies and presents 24/7, and which, along with sex, forms their chief product line and money maker, and then leaves, likely trailed by an armed bodyguard or two.

#1, I can´t believe you are saying liberals shouldn´t be allowed to have guns. Is that fair? Is that sensitive?

#1 my proposal is to hang or electrocute or beat to death any criminal committing a crime in which a knife, club, GUN or Katherine Hepburn´s voice is used.

#1, until you can suggest a solution to keep cars out of the hands of people who drive under the influence and kill innocent people, you are not allowed to drive a car.

See how that works?

Law abiding citizens of the United States do NOT have to suggest ANYthing in order to justify our Constitutional right to bear arms. We have that right regardless of what criminals or the insane do.

Hoffman is such a Little Big Man- Idiot

Didn´t Dustin Hoffman live next door to a bunch of Weathermen who blow themselves while trying to make a bomb, in NYC, 1960s-ish?

Yep, gun control would have stopped THOSE guys!

These days, we know what being close to a blast will do to your brain.

Dustin, just keep to acting, you know nothing about anything else...

Especially ironic when one considers California´s already draconian firearms laws, and the widely reported fact that the area around the Academy Awards was essentially an armed camp, manned by paid bodyguards and taxpayer-funded law enforcement.

If only the commoners had the means and/or were "entitled" to such protection. . .

Anyway one can get Hollywood to donate funding to pay for armed guards for families in South Central or Crenshaw?

Imagine that a big nosed Hollywood guy who wants throw out the constitution, who´d a thought.Next you´ll be tellin´ me he´s a hypocrite.

Dustbin Hoffman

Name says it all