A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Republicans May Have Found A
Brilliant Way To Win The Sequester
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Republicans May Have Found A
Brilliant Way To Win The Sequester

Business Insider, by Grace Wyler

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 2/23/2013 5:46:25 AM

Senate aides confirmed Friday that Republicans are coalescing around an alternative to the sequester that would keep the lower spending levels in place, but give federal agencies greater flexibility to determine where the cuts are implemented. The exact details of the Republican proposals are unclear. A GOP Senate aide told Business Insider that Republicans are considering a plan that would fund the government at the levels dictated by the sequestration — which amounts to about $85 billion in spending cuts for fiscal year 2013 — while giving the Obama administration the flexibility to reprogram the cuts at their discretion,

Comments:
Krauthammer has been talking this idea up for weeks. A win/win.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Trigger2, 2/23/2013 6:01:24 AM     (No. 9191968)

Cuts at Barry´s discretion? My prediction is that the entire cut will come out of the military.


Reply 2 - Posted by: StormCnter, 2/23/2013 6:17:32 AM     (No. 9191981)

If you read the article, the cuts must retain the balance, but can be distributed differently.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 2/23/2013 7:18:32 AM     (No. 9192037)

I´m not prepared in the least to allow Obama ´flexibility´ in this anymore than I am comforted by his unilateral reduction in our nuclear defense capabilities. MacDaddy has too much power now to decide who wins and who loses as he doles what would just be more of his ´stash´.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Kerryman, 2/23/2013 7:21:17 AM     (No. 9192041)

My congressman is the Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee between the House and the Senate. He advises that the President already has that power but denies it. They are ready to formalize it by Bill on an hour´s notice.

I think that the truth is that the White House doesn´t want to effect the baseline for future budgets.

Semper Fi


Reply 5 - Posted by: OhMy, 2/23/2013 7:23:55 AM     (No. 9192043)

This is the foolish idea that if Barry makes the decision he will get the blame. If they give Barry this decision he will cut from all the most critical places to make the pain immediate and widely experienced by the whole population and the blame will be on the republicans. These cuts are not even real cuts but only lower increases than the left wants and they could be made without anyone noticing but that is not what Barry will do. He is in permanent campaign mode.


Reply 6 - Posted by: afherkdriver, 2/23/2013 7:32:11 AM     (No. 9192051)

What if they cut and no one noticed?


Reply 7 - Posted by: chicken thief, 2/23/2013 7:36:04 AM     (No. 9192058)

These people are idiots. Barry is now being shown by his media for what he really is and Team Rino throws him a life preserver.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: mikkins2, 2/23/2013 7:41:17 AM     (No. 9192067)

Amazing. Does anyone else see the absurdity of this? The Republican Establishment is trying to pass off the responsibility for cutting spending. Forget that in reality its not cutting a thing, but think of the stupidity of the message it conveys.


The very people who campaign and claim to be all about lowering the growth of government and its spending are now trying to hide behind the skirt of the president when they get the chance to pretend to do so.

I don´t think it possible that a better example of why the Republican Party is imploding can be found.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Keekng, 2/23/2013 7:48:15 AM     (No. 9192081)

Wonderful idea, then we will know exactly who to give credit to for each cut.


Reply 10 - Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth, 2/23/2013 8:23:00 AM     (No. 9192146)

These cuts in the rate of growth are so miniscule it´s all just kabuki theater which, given the hysterical reactions of the press, is a game Republicans need to play.

Fine, let Teleprompter Jesus choose what to cut.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Bur Oak, 2/23/2013 8:58:18 AM     (No. 9192210)

I agree with a previous post. We do not need to give President Obama any more flexibility. Congress needs to grow a spine use the budgetary powers that the Constitution gives them.


Reply 12 - Posted by: strike3, 2/23/2013 9:20:07 AM     (No. 9192249)

Barry Soetoro is an evil, vindictive child. If given discretion, he will cut funding in the way that hurts America first. He would happily throw grandma off the cliff and give support to NPR and the NEA to keep the propaganda flowing.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: JimS, 2/23/2013 10:03:51 AM     (No. 9192327)

This is all kabuki for the lo-fo voter.
All agencies and branches of the government already have the ability to manage where they make the sequestration cuts without massive furloughing of employees, shutdown of programs, etc. Very simply, they can defer filling employment vacancies and the award of new contracts.
But Obama and Pals want to inflict the maximum pain on the American public in order to blame the Repubs. And so, they will abrogate the proper administration of their offices and seek highly visible, highly contentious cuts.
This bill has ZERO CHANCE of passing through the Senate.
But the Repubs can always claim that sequestration was Obama´s idea, and they passed a bill to allow intelligent decisions to made on where/how to apply those cuts, but the Dems killed the bill.
The Repubs then get to say that the reason that flights are being delayed because of TSA security cut backs, or 400,000 civilian DOD employees got notices of potential furloughs, or why the USS Truman didn´t deploy IS BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATS INTENTIONALLY MADE THAT CHOICE FOR POLITICAL GAMESMANSHIP.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/23/2013 10:53:03 AM     (No. 9192397)

If the authority is given to the president, he will make it worse for the people that will get the most news coverage; and then blame the Republicans...it is getting tiresome.


Reply 15 - Posted by: F16 guy, 2/23/2013 11:14:04 AM     (No. 9192429)

1. This admin has still refused to publish a budget

2. Overall spending this year will be MORE than last year.

3. All these "cuts" are simply reductions in proposed increases.

4. Let´s keep our eye on the ball, and not be distracted with false premises.


Reply 16 - Posted by: navybrat, 2/23/2013 11:36:42 AM     (No. 9192454)

The words republican and brilliant do not belong in the same sentence. If there is a way to cave or backdown the republicans will find it.


Reply 17 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 2/23/2013 12:38:53 PM     (No. 9192520)

I agree #17. There is no evidence anyone can point to that shows the GOP ever did the right thing at the right time. They are democrats in training. They want to appear to be opposing the dems but they really don`t care one way or the other. The GOP has battered woman syndrome.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: god of irony, 2/23/2013 1:08:03 PM     (No. 9192553)

I am sure some RINO will screw it up.


Reply 19 - Posted by: LanieLou, 2/23/2013 10:25:51 PM     (No. 9192975)

Call me crazy but isn´t it simplest to assign a 5% cut to 2012 spending levels at all gov´t dept.´s?



Post Reply   Close thread 724613




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



CIA Honored Benghazi
Chief in Secret Ceremony
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 6:28:18 AM     Post Reply
At a secret February ceremony at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., the chief of the CIA’s base in Benghazi the night of the 9/11 anniversary attacks there was awarded one of the agency’s highest intelligence medals, according to U.S. military and intelligence officials.The honor given behind closed doors to “Bob,” the officer who was in charge of the Benghazi intelligence annex and CIA base that was attacked in the early morning of September 12, 2012 and then abandoned for nearly three weeks, illustrates the murky lines of command that preceded the attack, and helped make it a politically volatile issue.

Congress likely to reduce food
stamp funding in new farm bill
Washington Examiner, by Susan Ferrechio    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:53:57 AM     Post Reply
The Senate on Monday opened debate on a $955 billion farm bill that would reduce federal spending by as much as $23 billion over the next 10 years by cutting funding for food stamps and eliminating some farm-support programs. "This legislation will create jobs, cut taxpayer subsidies and reduce the deficit," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday. The White House offered only conditional support for the bill, an indication that lawmakers will need to make changes to win the president´s signature. The Obama administration in April called for a 3 percent reduction in the nation´s crop insurance program,

   

 



 
The Most Chilling Details From
The Kafkaesque Search Warrant
That Went After A Fox News Reporter
Business Insider, by Grace Wyler    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:43:48 AM     Post Reply
Journalists are understandably alarmed by the revelation that President Barack Obama´s Justice Department targeted Fox News reporter James Rosen during a leak investigation of a State Department employee. The news, reported by the Washington Post late Sunday night, reveals that the Obama administration will apparently stop at nothing to track down whistle-blowers who leak classified information. In Rosen´s case, that included implicating him as a "criminal co-conspirator" whose actions were punishable with up to 10 years in prison. While it is not uncommon for the government to investigate leaks, it is unprecedented for a journalist

How the Obama Administration
Talks to Black America
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/21/2013 5:25:05 AM     Post Reply
The first lady went to Bowie State and addressed the graduating class. Her speech was a mix of black history and a salute to the graduates. (Snip) It takes a man of particular vision to know, as Obama did, that the country really was ready to send an African American to the White House. But I also think that some day historians will pore over his many speeches to black audiences. They will see a president who sought to hold black people accountable for their communities, but was disdainful of those who looked at him and sought the same.

There’s no way Obama is
telling the truth about when
he learned of the IRS scandal
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 11:17:14 AM     Post Reply
And yes, I realize that headline is eight words too long. Peter Nicholas at the WSJ: The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys

Washington bureaucrats use
force to suffocate liberty
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM     Post Reply
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,

Reactionaries in New York
Time, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
73 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
54 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 724613





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~