|
|
Caligula’s Horse
National Review Online, by Peter Kirsanow
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/22/2013 10:54:22 PM
|
| Chuck Hagel easily proved himself unfit to be secretary of defense during his nomination hearing. Not only was he ignorant of fundamental aspects of the job, but his positions on some of the critical defense issues of the day are preposterous if not dangerous. No one disputes that his performance at the hearing was the worst and most embarrassing of any nominee for any prominent position in memory. Yet by all reports he will be our next secretary of defense. Why? The explanation heard most frequently from senators and pundits alike is a robotic “the president is entitled
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 2/22/2013 11:19:24 PM (No. 9191804)
What part of "Advise and Consent" do these buffoons not understand? Senate and House Republic Leaders actually do have some power, but they lay supine in the shadow of Jug Ears. Elections have consequences, sure they do, and YOU were elected SENATOR by YOUR constituents too, Republicans.
Rand Paul and Ted Cruz seem to be the only two Republican Senators who have a pair...
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
wilarrbie, 2/22/2013 11:47:56 PM (No. 9191832)
Excellent headline! Should be a moniker that sticks with Hagel through the rest of his miserable career. Not to mention the implied reference to his boss.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
veritas, 2/23/2013 12:09:27 AM (No. 9191841)
Kirsanow is quite correct. This pResident, or any [legal] President, is only entitled to the nominee of his choice.
The Senate´s advise and consent responsibility isn´t just a "well, this one´s s-o-o-o bad we may have to vote ´no´" burden. Senators of both parties are obligated by oath, by the Constitution, and morally to vote "no" on every nominee who can´t reasonably be described as fully qualified and among the best available candidates for the position.
The Senators have it exactly backward. The process isn´t "vote yes -- unless." The process, the very reason why the Founders wanted the [snort alert for today´s Senate members] collective wisdom of the Senate´s members, was to set the bar for the President. That is, "We vote ´no´ -- unless the nominee fully qualified and among the best available candidates."
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 2/23/2013 5:07:15 AM (No. 9191954)
You don´t have to be too cynical to conclude that Hagel will get the consent he needs from his fellow Debate Club colleagues- no matter which side of the aisle. It is no more complicated than that. When you see a John Effin Carry get -what?-97 votes . Luckily the importance of US Sec of State hasn´t been worth a pitcher of warm pi.. er spit since Geo Schultz held it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
loosecannon1, 2/23/2013 9:38:46 AM (No. 9192289)
I think Tea Party people everywhere should burn this headline into their brains and let it fester, a continuous reminder of why the old horses of the GOP have to be defeated in the 2014 and 2016 elections.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
privateer, 2/23/2013 8:55:09 PM (No. 9192921)
Yes, they must be DEFE(nestr)ATED.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
|
Three Cheers for Tesla
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 6:26:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I have always been skeptical of electric vehicles, mostly because of my perception that electric car makers are more interested in subsisting on government subsidies than in competing on a level playing field for my business. So I was intrigued when I got an email this morning from Jeff Evanson, Tesla Motors’ Vice-President of investor relations. Evanson, a long-time Power Line reader, pointed out that the company raised over $1 billion last week, and will use a portion of those proceeds to pay off its loan with the Department of Energy ahead of schedule. This will make Tesla
|
|
This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
|
|
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist
|
GOP eager to link IRS scandal to
‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm
|
What If the Obama Scandals
Had Surfaced Last Fall?
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi
|
|
A Breach of Trust
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair
|
| |
|
Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman
to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative
501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
|
|
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent
|
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
| |
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|
