A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Lincoln’s Lost Opportunities
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Lincoln’s Lost Opportunities
National Review Online, by Mark Joseph

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/22/2013 5:09:29 PM

By Hollywood standards, Lincoln has done respectable business at the box office and Daniel Day-Lewis’s performance as America’s 16th president is stunning, but a botched marketing campaign and a lack of ideological diversity among those who made the film have left tens, perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars on the table — money that could have lined the coffers of legendary director Steven Spielberg and his partners, Disney and 20th Century Fox. First, there was the team that brought forth this film about the president who founded the Republican party, a team led by the blue-state heroes Steven Spielberg,

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Starlady, 2/22/2013 5:22:24 PM     (No. 9191477)

On the plus side this might appeal to LIVs who may not even know we had a President Lincoln. Hopefully there is some intellectual benefit to seeing the movie.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Balogreene, 2/22/2013 5:34:19 PM     (No. 9191491)

I did see Lincoln. I did not pay much attention to who reviewed it, I took the word of friends I trust. I don´t watch tv, so didn´t see the publicity tours. None of that would have made a difference, I would have gone.

I don´t like the language, don´t use it, but if I didn´t go to movies with foul language, I wouldn´t go to many movies. And I just don´t think my taking a stand would make a difference to Spieberg.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: bison65, 2/22/2013 5:37:43 PM     (No. 9191494)

Except to take the grandson to a family friendly movie, we rarely go. We also do not watch any network TV.
The agenda driven by Hollywood and the rest of the MSM is something we can avoid and do.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 2/22/2013 5:41:45 PM     (No. 9191500)

I don´t think the writer is looking in the right direction. Those responsible for this film have all the money they will ever need. They are engaged in political propaganda and historical revisionism. The goal is to keep racial divisions alive, capture Abraham Lincoln for the Left, and to advance the Obama cult of personality. Obama, we remember, actually sees himself as another Lincoln. (The ideological agenda also explains the otherwise odd anachronism of juvenile potty mouth in the dialogue. Public obscenity, vulgarity and blasphemy are the mating calls of the sophomoric Left.)

I cannot imagine why anyone would even think of exposing themselves or their family to such material, much less paying through the nose for the privilege of doing so.


Reply 5 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 2/22/2013 5:57:18 PM     (No. 9191523)

Fact: Lincoln and his family were suicidal. Read: A First-Rate Madness: Uncovering the Links Between Leadership and Mental Illness, by Ghaemi.

And you were wondering how the US got into a civil war?!


Reply 6 - Posted by: msjena, 2/22/2013 6:15:15 PM     (No. 9191550)

I decided not to see it after I read that Tony Kushner wrote the script. He is a gay playwright who wrote Angels in America (about the AIDs crisis, gay Mormons and people like Roy Cohn who were dead and no longer around to defend themselves), a truly bad play that, of course, got rave reviews from the New York Times, etc.


Reply 7 - Posted by: msjena, 2/22/2013 6:19:00 PM     (No. 9191559)

And there is a movie out now that is suitable for pre-teens and up--Les Miserables. The libs from the New Yorker, etc., panned it, probably because it mentioned God too many times. The Academy is snubbing it in the Oscar voting (and snubbed the director, not even nominating him), despite it being a huge box office hit and the fans´ favorite.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Namma, 2/22/2013 6:23:10 PM     (No. 9191567)

Wont be seeing the movie. and why would anyone think obama is like Lincoln. does everyone forget that the civil war was about States Rights...abolishing slavery was a "by product"


Reply 9 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 2/22/2013 6:39:22 PM     (No. 9191583)

After a week marked by intense partisan bickering, LaHood again put the pressure on Republicans to find a way out of the impasse -- even going so far as to compare President Obama to Abraham Lincoln.
"Go see the movie ´Lincoln´," LaHood said, in a message to congressional Republicans. He said Lincoln brought people together in "the way I believe President Obama is doing."


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/22/administration-ramps-up-budget-cut-warnings/#ixzz2LfrzgPrW


Reply 10 - Posted by: pickle1, 2/22/2013 7:29:22 PM     (No. 9191636)

If Hollywood once tell the truth, I might go to see their movies.


Reply 11 - Posted by: octrojan, 2/22/2013 8:06:04 PM     (No. 9191664)

You should go see the movie. It´s pretty good. I´m guessing the low attendance is do more to it being very talky and not having much action. Yes, it´s annoying to have to listen to that dolt Doris Goodwin preening in the media, but it´s worth seeing. Shows what pygmies we have running the country today.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Husker Infidel, 2/22/2013 8:51:39 PM     (No. 9191704)

I decided not to see the movie because of Spielberg´s snide remark about Republicans and because that Marxist Tony Kushner wrote the screenplay. Those people have enough money. They don´t need any money from me. I did see Les Miserables and I thought it was great.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: texaspast, 2/22/2013 11:14:38 PM     (No. 9191800)

#7, the problem with movie Les Miz is the same as movie Phantom of the Opera - putting lousy-singing actors in to parts written for great singers. Hugh Jackman acted the part fantastically - singing, fingernails on the chalkboard. OWWW! He was BAD! OK, the Thenardiers (Sascha Baron Cohen & Helen Bonham Carter) did a good job, but they were comic relief and didn´t have to sing well! Russell Crowe gravelling through ´Stars´ - good job unless you know what the song COULD sound like performed by a good singer. Ann Hathaway was the only surprise with ´I Dreamed a Dream´ - she should receive an Oscar nomination just for the song itself.



Post Reply   Close thread 724558




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

   

 

  


 
Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

   

 



 
Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
44 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
43 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 724558





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~