|
|
| |
Topic: Ann Coulter Battles Stossel, Calls Libertarians ‘Pussies,’ And Gets Booed By Room Full Of Students |
Ann Coulter Battles Stossel, Calls Libertarians ‘Pussies,’ And Gets Booed By Room Full Of Students
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 2/22/2013 4:55:18 PM
|
| What do you get when you invite outspoken conservative firebrand Ann Coulter to debate outspoken libertarian John Stossel in front of an audience of 1,000+ libertarian students? Fireworks, that’s what. On tonight’s episode of Fox Business Network’s Stossel, Coulter got into a heated debate with Stossel and the students over a variety of social issues, in the process calling libertarians “pussies” and receiving lots of jeering for her remarks. Once a year, Stossel (full disclosure: my former boss) tapes a show at the International Students for Liberty Conference in Washington, D.C. He typically brings on friendly libertarian guests,
|
Comments: I liked Ann Coulter better when she was sharp and funny. Now, she´s just bitter and crude.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
thethirdruffian, 2/22/2013 4:58:35 PM (No. 9191437)
I liked Ann Coulter when she was a conservative.
I am not a Libertarian, but I acknowledge that government is inherantly liberal. Hence, the best method to achieve conservative goals are to use libertarian methods.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 2/22/2013 5:00:55 PM (No. 9191442)
Wrong enemy, Ann.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Lefticide, 2/22/2013 5:06:06 PM (No. 9191451)
She violated Ronald Reagan´s(God bless him) cardinal rule. Never say anything bad about another fellow republican.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino, 2/22/2013 5:09:15 PM (No. 9191458)
Hey, Stossel - - watch out!
Ann may get her good buddy Cannoli Christie to sit on you!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Ribicon, 2/22/2013 5:14:46 PM (No. 9191465)
Coulter. She´s the broad who lost all credibility with me when she said we need to get behind Electable Moderate Chris Christie.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Ken M., 2/22/2013 5:25:58 PM (No. 9191482)
Agree with OP´s comment. It used to be fun to listen to her. But she´s like many of us here (me-self included) -- we age and we tend to complain more.
Personally, when discussing stuff, or the urge strikes to urp out some remark, I usually don´t say anything ... just stop and think, and then let someone else offer a comment.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 2/22/2013 5:45:43 PM (No. 9191506)
Yes OP. She was really crude here. What happened to her?
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
otronome, 2/22/2013 5:48:00 PM (No. 9191510)
The problem with libertarians is that they are not in the foxhole when things get bad. Fair weather friends. Unfortunately, the world has nasty people, doing nasty things to nice people.
If you watch the interchange, Stossel is good. The students, many of whom sopported and are unable to criticize the flawed Ron Paul, need to hear the truth and respond with an argument.
Paul was right on spending and limited government but fed at the public trough for 3 decades, published rascist tracts and stands shoulder to shoulder with some of the worst "Blame America, Firsters."
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
redink, 2/22/2013 5:51:13 PM (No. 9191516)
I was annoyed with National Review years ago when they ousted Ann. Of course back then she sounded like a nun compared to today. I think I understand their decision better now.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 2/22/2013 6:01:50 PM (No. 9191531)
and just how do Conservatives treat Libertarians on the issue of foreign policy? At the end of a sharp bayonet of course. It´s not only Libertarians that have been orphaned, but also conservative working class people. Their standard of living has steady eroded to the point that they´ve been forced on to Dear Leader´s food stamp rolls. If conservatives wish to save the country and the Constitution, they must do more than engage in racial and biographical fetishism, they must be willing to accommodate and/or thoughtfully respond to unorthodox political positions. Ideas still matter.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Grant Hodges, 2/22/2013 6:11:40 PM (No. 9191544)
The bitterness is an issue, and although I don´t read her works, I like to know what her summation is on various issues, because she is usually right when everyone else says she is wrong. Ahem, Christie being an exception.
Stossel needs to quit smoking pot. Then he might understand that Gay Marriage is a vile perversion that undermines society and I don´t want my grandkids to even have to look at them. Disgusting. Run them out of town.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 2/22/2013 6:13:45 PM (No. 9191547)
I still enjoy it when Ann skewers liberals, but she really lost me on her support of Chris Christie for president.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 2/22/2013 6:44:30 PM (No. 9191588)
Inappropriate language removed by Taste Police.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JAN, 2/22/2013 6:45:57 PM (No. 9191590)
The harpie must have a new book on the horizon.
Blech.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
tangles, 2/22/2013 7:27:03 PM (No. 9191633)
I like what she said. It is our business when we have to pay!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
dman, 2/22/2013 7:31:24 PM (No. 9191638)
She pushed Christie for POTUS.
She was wrong.
She won´t admit it.
Now she calls names.
Not a conservative, in my book.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 2/22/2013 7:42:24 PM (No. 9191650)
I´m gonna agree with #12. I saw her on the show. I liked the way she handled herself and she was right about them being pu-----.
Please, someone, just tell me why pot is so damn important and please, someone, just tell me why we have to have it.
If you have to use a mind-altering drug to enjoy yourself, you´re doing something wrong.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 2/22/2013 7:46:42 PM (No. 9191654)
Ann is 100% correct. Thank you potheads for making it drug test a requiremen for employment. Thank you libertarian potheads for making drug addiction an expensive and "treatable DISEASE". And thanks especially for helping to re-elect the Jackass to a second term.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
chumley, 2/22/2013 7:59:13 PM (No. 9191658)
Between the two I fall farther into the Stossel camp. I hate druggies and I dont take gay marriages seriously, but the government has its claws into way too much. The vast majority of government business is none of the government´s business. I really think, in the balance, we would be far better off if they were out of most of it.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
tomanderson61, 2/22/2013 9:22:50 PM (No. 9191728)
Stossel makes alot of sense in some areas, and so does Coulter.
I don´t just stop at Libertarians being pussies, it´s men in general who have become pussies. Sorry, but the guys from my generation and part of the previous generation only seem to get passionate when it´s the "game", whatever freaking game at the moment it is, the MPG of their car, and to be truthful, their POT. Libertarians at their best are small government, and their worst, its no rules and no policy, and the idea of "as long as it doesn´t hurt anyone else" is applied to everything, even when that is not a possibility.
Anyone over 35 reading this....go back and imagine YOUR dad being up in arms about his precious pot being legal. Imagine him campaigning to make sure that women can have late term abortions. Imagine your dad, instead of going out and working hard, worked instead to see how long he can stay on unemployment and "get what is owed him". Imagine having a dad who looks at the rich guy down the block with disdain and claims he only has that big house because he screwed over some other guy.
None of us could imagine having dads like that. Filtering it through the entertainment industry, men used to be like Jimmy Stewart and Clint Eastwood. Now they´re like Jason Sudeikis and Jon Stewart.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
absalom, 2/22/2013 9:52:44 PM (No. 9191743)
In an earlier article, Angel Codevilla referred to our shallow meritocracy, obsessed first and last w/credentials. Coulter is an exhibit A; a Cornell Grad of no discernible achievement; other than running her mouth and penning ´Dick, Jane & Spot´ level harangues, masquerading as "conservative thought". Embarrassingly but predictably, her fans have never noticed.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
TunnelRat, 2/22/2013 10:53:42 PM (No. 9191790)
It´s easy to attack Ann because you think she´s "bitter". The nancy-boys attacked Sarah Palin because she was too "shrill" -- Remember?
It´s easy to find something you don´t like then harp on it. It´s a lot harder to respond to the arguments that Ann made. The crowd there was quick to boo (the crowd here, as well), but few are able to answer the points she made.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 2/23/2013 12:24:46 AM (No. 9191857)
Ann Coulter wouldn´t be one of my friends, and I cringe when she purports to be Christian because I don´t know any Christians who always seem on the point of gouging someone´s eyes out, but there´s not one word attributed to her in this article that I disagree with. OK, maybe one. I´d´ve prolly said eunuchs so MrsTucky wouldn´t get mad at.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 2/23/2013 12:25:33 AM (No. 9191858)
me.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 2/23/2013 7:42:24 AM (No. 9192069)
Her objection to weed is that because taxpayers are paying for health care, we are picking up the tab for unhealthy behaviors. Well, last time I checked, Ann Coulter smokes cigarettes. The point is where do you draw the line? Tobacco? Alcohol? Chicken-fried steak?
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
tank, 2/23/2013 9:26:11 AM (No. 9192264)
You can have my chicken-fried steak when you pull it from my cold, dead, hands.
I didn´t watch the video, but got the sense that this was just a rollicking good time. Ann likes to mix it up and likely enjoyed being booed. I don´t always agree with her, and she is somewhat strident at times, but she´s right more often than not.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s nurses admit it’s hard not to call him ‘hon’
|
|
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:08:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Nurses treating Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev say their natural inclination toward compassion makes it difficult to see the 19-year-old as a possible terrorist. And they have to make concerted effort — and buddy-system pacts — to keep from referring to him with terms of endearment such as “hon.” One 29-year-old nurse said on Gawker: “When you’re in the room, it’s just a patient. You’re here to … make sure they’re feeling better. When you step away, you take it in. I am compassionate, that’s what we do. But should I be? The rest of the world hates him right now.”
|
Fox News Reporter May Face Criminal Charges for Reporting on the CIA
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:03:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The government will use any and all information at its disposal to find journalist sources, as shown in The Washington Post´s report this morning on a Department of Justice investigation into Fox News chief correspondent James Rosen, who may face criminal charges for reporting government secrets. In June 2009, Rosen reported on CIA analysis suggesting that North Korea might respond to new UN sanctions with renewed nuclear tests. In order to determine how Rosen learned of the analysis, which had been issued by the CIA only a few hours prior, FBI investigators used every tool at their disposal: analyzing
|
|
It’s.The.Law
|
|
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports
|
Tooth and Nail: Fluoride Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM
Post Reply
|
|
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.
|
What Angelina Jolie forgot to mention
|
|
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:
|
|
Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours
|
Deval as Holder’s fill-in? That just wouldn’t be just
|
|
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|