|
|
| |
Topic: Hikes in health insurance premiums fall; administration credits healthcare law |
Hikes in health insurance premiums fall; administration credits healthcare law
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Sam Baker
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/22/2013 11:40:54 AM
|
| The number of double-digit hikes to health insurance premiums has fallen dramatically because of President Obama´s healthcare law, the Health and Human Services Department said Friday. The average increase in health insurance premiums has fallen significantly since the healthcare law — and its provisions allowing the health department to review certain rates — took effect in 2010. The agency said rate review has contributed to those declines. The average premium increase in 2012 was 30 percent lower than in 2010, according to a report
|
Comments: This is the biggest bunch of horse manure I have ever seen. Really Mr. Baker?? What rock has he been hiding under. Of course the vile, corrupt, lying jerks of the HHS are going to feed him that propaganda. He should be completely ashamed of himself. Joseph Goebbels would be so proud of Baker.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Attila DiMedici, 2/22/2013 11:47:00 AM (No. 9190821)
How about comparing premium increases to BEFORE it was clear that the law was going to allow the government to restrict premium increases at some not too distant future date? In 2010, insurers were increasing their rates for the costs they could see coming, before the government started restricting their ability to do so. Going forward, insurers will just stop writing policies when they cannot recoup their costs.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
hotcorner, 2/22/2013 11:50:00 AM (No. 9190826)
My health insurance insurance increased 20% this year.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Ret.TxLeo, 2/22/2013 11:50:11 AM (No. 9190828)
As someone who has paid for their own health insurance for 19 years...um I call b/s. Since zippycare has been signed off on the premium has increased 4 times. You Baker, are a liar and go wipe your face...your behind kissing is showing.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Subal, 2/22/2013 11:50:11 AM (No. 9190827)
More Washington smoke. I live in Orange County, CA and just got a notice for an 85% increase in long term insurance. Thanks a lot you jug eared goat lover!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
LudicrousSextus, 2/22/2013 11:54:06 AM (No. 9190839)
Seriously...do these people actually read any news?
We realize the MSM is shilling for the admin as hard as it can, but in the real world - every objective, reliable news source out there says this is the health-care-law-from-hell - particularly in it´s burgeoning effect on *prices*.
Another thing we learn from actual news? There´s pretty well *nothing* this administration *won´t* lie about...
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Emmajustin, 2/22/2013 11:57:59 AM (No. 9190850)
Our insurance premiums went up dramatically, and just to be nice so did our deductible (up 100%). So now we pay more, get less and must be thankful to the kenyan idiot. How I yearn for the 60s when God was allowed, people were polite and gay meant happy.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
leftcoastmom, 2/22/2013 12:02:22 PM (No. 9190861)
Hey Sam Baker, what planet are you living on?
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
antiquegolf, 2/22/2013 12:03:23 PM (No. 9190867)
We live with a pathetic political climate because the majority of Americans are low information voters who allow the media and the democrats (I repeat myself) to tell them what to think. democrats are on the emotional side of every issue which appeals to the low information voter. That’s why the democrats demagogue every issue, and can get away with it.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
turninggrey, 2/22/2013 12:11:00 PM (No. 9190910)
From "Animal Farm": "About this time there occurred a strange incident which hardly anyone was able to understand. One night at about twelve o´clock there was a loud crash in the yard, and the animals rushed out of their stalls. It was a moonlight night. At the foot of the end wall of the big barn, where the Seven Commandments were written, there lay a ladder broken in two pieces. Squealer, temporarily stunned, was sprawling beside it, and near at hand there lay a lantern, a paint-brush, and an overturned pot of white paint. The dogs immediately made a ring round Squealer, and escorted him back to the farmhouse as soon as he was able to walk. None of the animals could form any idea as to what this meant, except old Benjamin, who nodded his muzzle with a knowing air, and seemed to understand, but would say nothing."
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Dataman, 2/22/2013 12:14:33 PM (No. 9190916)
Post hoc ergo proctor hoc?
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bugger, 2/22/2013 12:52:49 PM (No. 9191005)
Twilight zone? Alternate universe? We live in a new and bizarre world where if you just say something (and are a liberal democrat) then it is true.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Quaestio, 2/22/2013 2:13:58 PM (No. 9191159)
The administation knows it can now lie openly, with impunity, and not only will the media remain silent they will aid in the cover up - see the article on Chuck Todd using his news show to tell people Republicans thought up sequestration. It doesn´t matter what the truth is. They just need to keep feeding lies to the 50% who will believe anything they are told. These people are ignorant, they know they are ignorant, but they cannot admit it, so we can never convince them to listen to the truth. Very dark days are ahead, because when things turn bad, they will lash out at those who have become ´unacceptable.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
otronome, 2/22/2013 2:34:32 PM (No. 9191201)
Back on planet earth...CA Healthnet, Family HSA, $10k deductible, 2009 $591/mo, 2013 $1201/mo - deductible went from $7500 to $10k..but we (late 50´s) have pregnancy coverage, birth control and "free" services we don´t use and would not contract if we were free to spend our own after tax money
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 2/22/2013 3:20:06 PM (No. 9191285)
This is just like Obama´s definition of budget cuts. He increases spending by more than billion a year then claims massive cuts when the rate of increase falls to 2% from 8%.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
judy, 2/22/2013 3:55:37 PM (No. 9191326)
They must be talking about congress, everyone I know had an increase in premiums....
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
kctiger, 2/22/2013 4:48:11 PM (No. 9191412)
I don´t know a single person (NOT ONE!) who is not paying more now than before Obamacare. See this is the type of lies that are killing you and you don´t even know it´s happening to you.
Anyone that would try to feed you this line should be committed! They have to be completely out of their damn minds. Should be fired if not something worse!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 2/22/2013 5:06:58 PM (No. 9191454)
My premiums went from $132 a paycheck to $400 a paycheck. I had to drop my coverage. Thanks you a hole.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
fritzilou, 2/22/2013 8:25:25 PM (No. 9191687)
The rise in rates has fallen or the rates are still rising, but not as fast...what gobblygook.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 2/23/2013 2:38:36 AM (No. 9191917)
Name someplace where the rates decreased.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
| |
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
IRS sued for seizing 60 million medical records
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 9:29:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A healthcare provider has sued the Internal Revenue Service and 15 of its agents, charging they wrongfully seized 60 million medical records from 10 million Americans. The name of the provider is not yet known, United Press International said. But Courthouse News Service said the suit claims the agency violated the Fourth Amendment in 2011, when agents executed a search warrant for financial data on one employee – and that led to the seizure of information on 10 million, including state judges. The search warrant did not specify that the IRS could take medical information, UPI said.
|
| | |
|
|