A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Charles Krauthammer vs. Mark
Levin: Is embracing Obamacare
honorable or dishonorable?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Charles Krauthammer vs. Mark
Levin: Is embracing Obamacare
honorable or dishonorable?

Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor

Original Article

Posted By:Donttaxmebro, 2/22/2013 11:14:07 AM

On Thursday’s “Special Report” on the Fox News Channel, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer argued that Florida Republican Gov. Rick Scott decision to expand Medicaid and establish state exchanges as called for by Obamacare can be perceived as an “honorable” endeavor. Scott, a fierce critic of Obamacare, helped lead the charge agains the health care law in the courts. “[I] think as a Republican conservative, who opposed Obamacare, taking it as a governor — I think you can act honorably either way,” Krauthammer said. “You can oppose it and have opposed it all the way

Comments:
Dr. Krauthammer makes a good case for Gov. Scott in taking his position on Obamacare, but he´s missing the point that Scott is doing it for political reasons, which is important.

Mark Levin on the other hand (aside from the screeching rhetoric) is probably right -- that from a principled standpoint, especially with the states´ autonomy perspective, Gov. Scott should have not conceded any ground.

But looks like politics have prevailed.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: MattMusson, 2/22/2013 11:23:18 AM     (No. 9190776)

It really does not matter much. ObamaCare has achieved it´s goal of crashing the healthcare system.

By this time next year - huge sections of the population (including the middle class) will have lost their insurance. The Working Poor will be excluded because regulations are doubleing or tripling the cost of their insurance options.

The system has been crashed. But, like a car that has blown an engine on the highway - it is going to take things a while to finally grind to a halt.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 2/22/2013 11:33:39 AM     (No. 9190791)

Productive Output - -

Levin = Brilliant Creative Thinker
Sauerkraut = Capt. Obvious

Original Ideas - -

Levin = Many per day
Sauerkraut = None ever


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: CleanhouseinDc, 2/22/2013 11:47:22 AM     (No. 9190822)

When Gov. Scott runs for reelection, who´s going to contribute going forward? He´s one more Repub who´ll never see another dime of support from me.

Dems = tell you up front what they are goo to do, but lie about the impact
Repubs- lie up front about what you are going to do, do the opposite, then make excuses why they did it.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Rolfnader, 2/22/2013 11:53:46 AM     (No. 9190836)

I second the second post. Krauthammer embodies the beltway mindset. Whereas Mark Levin makes his argument using the constitution. Krauthammer gently and quietly goes into the political night while I guess that Mark´s ´ screeching rhetoric ´ awakens the reality that many find distasteful.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Quigley, 2/22/2013 11:56:11 AM     (No. 9190847)

#1 I feel the same way.

It is not too difficult to imagine a situation where healthcare professionals simply do not know how the system works- the part that handles payments and reimbursements. Perhaps services will become a pay in advance policy at the point of service (´we haven´t been reimbursed fully for six months´ sort of thing).


Reply 6 - Posted by: bradcro, 2/22/2013 2:34:21 PM     (No. 9191200)

Scott=RINO why the surprise??


Reply 7 - Posted by: rabbit, 2/22/2013 6:17:35 PM     (No. 9191557)

Levin can say what he will. He isn´t responsible for the people of any state; he is merely responsible for his ratings. Scott, on the other hand, has to make the hard decisions: what is best for the people of my state?

I respect Scott for making a hard decision. Things look very different when your opinion actually means something.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/22/2013 6:23:49 PM     (No. 9191568)

If we are expected to receive Temple grad Screaming Levin as our William F. Buckley, it´s dark, dark days ahead. As for Krauthammer, he´s just in it for the perks. VDH deserves a wider audience.


Reply 9 - Posted by: spit the bit, 2/22/2013 6:36:03 PM     (No. 9191581)

Dr K is losing me. This is the second time in a week he´s gone soft on Leftist policy.


Reply 10 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/22/2013 8:28:26 PM     (No. 9191690)

It is not honorable or dishonorable; it is just plain fiscally irresponsible. This will come back to haunt the states later, when the government changes the rules in mid stream.


Reply 11 - Posted by: fritzilou, 2/22/2013 8:38:02 PM     (No. 9191697)

And Levin isn´t screaming Levin; he is a man in love with his country who is desperately trying to save it. His research is impeccable and I don´t miss a one of his shows. He is a one man professor of the United States Constitution from whom the King of all Trolls could learn a lot. Levin´s passion might overwhelm a listener who doesn´t listen to words and reacts negatively to passionate speaking.. If that is the case, what a shame and loss.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Japanorama, 2/23/2013 2:08:37 AM     (No. 9191906)

Krauthammer just lost my respect.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 724503




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Donttaxmebro"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Donttaxmebro"



Flashback: Schumer, Franken urged
IRS to target tea party in 2012
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 5/17/2013 8:53:11 AM     Post Reply
Long before the Internal Revenue Service revealed it had improperly targeted conservative 501(c)(4) groups, a group of Democratic senators led by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer urged the IRS to do just that. The IRS’s admission last Friday that it had singled out tea party and other groups for extra audits and delays has raised concerns that President Barack Obama’s administration quietly attempted to stymy opponents through intimidation. But many prominent Democrats — including Montana Sen. Max Baucus, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the New York Times editorial board — had been

Steyn: ´How empty and dead´
were they to let Chris Stevens
die for ´Obama-Clinton fiction?´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 5/10/2013 11:07:02 AM     Post Reply
On Hugh Hewitt’s Thursday night program, National Review columnist Mark Steyn explained why the Obama administration’s response to last September’s terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was so appalling.“They let him die, and then told lies over his coffin,” he told fill-in host Guy Benson. Steyn said that the late U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens was a true believer of President Barack Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s view of the Arab Spring, that it was a positive movement and was trying to make the best of it. Clinton and senior State Department officials

Inhofe: Obama administration
trying to ´dry up´ ammo supply
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 5/6/2013 4:15:30 PM     Post Reply
On Aaron Klein’s weekend show on New York City’s WABC radio, Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe accused the Obama administration of buying up ammunition at an unprecedented level to bypass the Second Amendment so gun-owners “can’t even buy ammunition because government is purchasing so much.” “Let’s make sure that your audience out there is aware, Aaron, that our president, Obama, has been doing everything he could to stop the private ownership of guns in America,” Inhofe said. “You know that, everyone knows that. And yet he’s been voted down in a big way by a large majority.

James Carville: ´I don´t view
Rachel Maddow as far left´
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 5/3/2013 10:51:29 AM     Post Reply
On Thursday night’s edition of "The O’Reilly Factor" on the Fox News Channel, host Bill Bill O’Reilly and former Clinton campaign adviser James Carville debated whether liberals have been pushed further to left by activists and various media factions. O’Reilly pointed to Wednesday’s May Day protest in Seattle as one piece of evidence. He also pinned the blame on MSNBC, arguing that his employer’s cable news rival is “putting forth” a far left ideology. Carville disagreed and said the hosts on MSNBC network, including Rachel Maddow, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski do not hold views of the far left.

   

 

  


 
Fireworks erupt between
Sessions, Napolitano over morale
of ICE agents during Senate hearing
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 4/23/2013 3:35:41 PM     Post Reply
During a Senate hearing on immigration reform Tuesday, Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano had a testy back-and-forth over the performance of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. Sessions challenged Napolitano on whether she had met with leader of the ICE employees’ union in the wake of reports of low morale among ICE agents. Napolitano replied that she had not. “I think you should have met with them,” Sessions said. “I think there’s a real problem there. We have a very real problem. In December of 2012, a few months ago, a

Greg Gutfeld: Comparing Muslim,
Christian extremism like comparing
Hurricane Katrina to squirt gun
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 4/23/2013 9:23:04 AM     Post Reply
On Monday’s episode of Fox News Channel’s “The Five,” Greg Gutfeld sounded off on those who have made it their primary focus to understand the motivations behind Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s alleged decision to place a bomb at the site of the Boston Marathon. “After every terror attack each motive shall be discussed, but one,” Gutfeld said. “It is the terror that dares not speak its name. Well, actually it does speak. Our media just won’t hear it. Instead we explore the pain of the poor thugs. Which could be why some terrorists get movies made by Robert Redford

MSNBC host blames NRA
for law enforcement inability
to find Boston bombing perp
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: Donttaxmebro- 4/18/2013 9:25:40 AM     Post Reply
The National Rifle Association hasn’t received much in the way of favorable coverage from MSNBC recently. But on Wednesday’s “The Last Word,” host Lawrence O’Donnell took that unfavorable coverage to the next level by blaming the NRA for law enforcement’s inability to track down the perpetrator of Monday’s terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon. O’Donnell made the statement during the opening of his show. He also blamed the gun-rights organization for the failure of legislation in the U.S. Senate that would enhance background checks for gun purchases. “Today the gun lobbyists at the NRA



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

   

 



 
Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

IRS sued for seizing 60
million medical records

36 replie(s)
Washington Times [DC], by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 9:29:25 PM     Post Reply
A healthcare provider has sued the Internal Revenue Service and 15 of its agents, charging they wrongfully seized 60 million medical records from 10 million Americans. The name of the provider is not yet known, United Press International said. But Courthouse News Service said the suit claims the agency violated the Fourth Amendment in 2011, when agents executed a search warrant for financial data on one employee – and that led to the seizure of information on 10 million, including state judges. The search warrant did not specify that the IRS could take medical information, UPI said.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 724503





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~