A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Biden: ‘There’s a moral
price to be paid for
inaction’ on guns
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Biden: ‘There’s a moral
price to be paid for
inaction’ on guns

Washington Times, by David Sherfinski

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/21/2013 11:22:43 PM

Speaking at a university in Connecticut mere miles from where the December Newtown school shootings took place, Vice President Joseph R. Biden urged legislators across the country Thursday to move on gun control, warning that “there’s a moral price to be paid for inaction.” Mr. Biden, who Mr. Obama tapped to head a task force on gun violence after the shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, said politicians must be willing to speak for the fallen, now voiceless, victims of gun violence. “I can imagine how we will

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Starlifter Nav, 2/21/2013 11:26:36 PM     (No. 9189982)

How do you use the words "moral" and "Biden" in the same sentence?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Jonr, 2/22/2013 12:12:06 AM     (No. 9190013)

Biden is certifiable and bat-shite crazy! Moreover, he wants to be your next president. If Hilary does not run, he will be! Wow!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 2/22/2013 12:33:21 AM     (No. 9190025)

There’s a moral price to be paid for inaction on guns.

There also will be a constitutional liberties price for inaction. Don´t let that happen.

I´ve already contributed to the NRA.


Reply 4 - Posted by: bob913, 2/22/2013 12:53:46 AM     (No. 9190036)

Biden!! Ask the families of the hundreds and hundreds of Mexicans murdered by the weapons obama sold to the Mexican drug cartels!


Reply 5 - Posted by: pickle1, 2/22/2013 1:22:03 AM     (No. 9190049)

How would he know?


Reply 6 - Posted by: PChristopher, 2/22/2013 1:28:17 AM     (No. 9190052)

Having no morals, Liberals and Progressives have no right to talk about them.

Fast and Furious
Benghazi
Newtown


Reply 7 - Posted by: LAW428, 2/22/2013 1:33:12 AM     (No. 9190056)

Biden has no sound mental basis to judge what is moral for anyone. He´s looney and by some abnormal quirk of fate just happens to be VP. If he proclaims a judgement, then the opposite is likely the right course of action.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: bighambone, 2/22/2013 3:39:03 AM     (No. 9190099)

Another example of a liberal Democrat attempting to gain political advantage utilizing pure emotion rather then reality.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bumbleshorts, 2/22/2013 4:09:13 AM     (No. 9190113)

Sorry joe, based on judicial decisions, up to and including the supreme court, the second ammendment has a consensus and is settled law...and anyone who does not accept "will not infringe" as ultimate truth is a law denier...and is worse than Hitler.


Reply 10 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 2/22/2013 4:15:51 AM     (No. 9190119)

Syracuse Law has much to be embarrassed about, but this clown has got to be at the top of the list.


Reply 11 - Posted by: ladychatalie, 2/22/2013 4:51:34 AM     (No. 9190136)

Joe, there´s a moral price you and Barack are paying for failing to adhere to your oaths of office.


Reply 12 - Posted by: hamrman, 2/22/2013 5:29:07 AM     (No. 9190152)

Hey Joke, just go away!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 2/22/2013 6:27:53 AM     (No. 9190173)

This from the "free government abortion in every pot!" party...


Reply 14 - Posted by: WhamDBambam, 2/22/2013 6:39:46 AM     (No. 9190184)

This is what you get when you cultivate loons´ sef-esteems.


Reply 15 - Posted by: provide, 2/22/2013 6:51:52 AM     (No. 9190200)

"Joe, when I gave you that job, you weren´t supposed to get distracted like my golf lessons and hand ball with Reggie. Now get back to work."


Reply 16 - Posted by: pineledger, 2/22/2013 6:56:58 AM     (No. 9190206)

Why would we be interested in the moral pronouncements of a plagiarist?


Reply 17 - Posted by: dittohead, 2/22/2013 7:23:40 AM     (No. 9190244)

Joe, there is a moral price we all will pay for electing you and your Commie President!!!


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: rabbit, 2/22/2013 8:15:02 AM     (No. 9190321)

I don´t think the administration will win on the banning of certain models of guns.

I do think that the administration should win on the issue of background checks. And the list of who goes on the ´do not sell´ lists needs to grow. Most people assume that those with severe mental illness are already on the lists. In most cases, that isn´t true. States need to change their rules that make it easier to get the names of those with a repeated history of psychosis or severe disorders on the list.



Post Reply   Close thread 724435




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



A Fifth of Obama
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 11:04:49 PM     Post Reply
You can always rely on the administration of Barack Obama, a former constitutional-law lecturer (or as his résumé-inflating fans put it, “professor”), to do the sleazy thing when it comes to the Constitution the president is sworn to defend. Thus, the performance on Wednesday of Lois Lerner, chief of the Obama IRS’s Conservative Harassment Division, before the House oversight committee. There’s an old scam criminal defendants occasionally pull. They give a bit of exculpatory direct testimony – just enough to gaze plaintively at the jurors and swear, cross-their-hearts, that they are pure as the driven snow. Then

IRS figure who invoked 5th Amendment
may be compelled to testify
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:49:18 PM     Post Reply
The woman at the center of the IRS scandal refused to testify to Congress on Wednesday, but House Republicans said Lois Lerner botched her attempt to invoke her right against self-incrimination and said they likely will force her to come back and explain why the agency targeted conservative political groups. Ms. Lerner’s refusal to testify shifted attention to her onetime boss, former Commissioner Douglas H. Shulman, who apologized to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee but refused to take responsibility, leaving furious lawmakers warning that the Internal Revenue Service could end up facing a special prosecutor.

Appeals court limits
labor board’s lawlessness
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:45:52 PM     Post Reply
Early in an opinion issued recently by a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Judge A. Raymond Randolphsaid: “Although the parties have not raised it, one issue needs to be resolved before we turn to the merits of the case.” The issue he raised but could not resolve — that is up to the Supreme Court — illuminates the Obama administration’s George Wallace-like lawlessness. It also demonstrates the judiciary’s duty to restrain presidents who forget the oath they swear to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.” The appeals court was deciding

   

 



 
The IRS scandal and Obama’s
culture of intimidation
Washington Post, by Mitch McConnell    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:43:54 PM     Post Reply
Revelations about the Internal Revenue Service targeting conservative groups have raised important questions about the Obama administration’s commitment to the First Amendment. Yet there is ample evidence to suggest that the culture of intimidation in which these tactics were allowed to flourish goes well beyond one agency or a few rogue employees. For years, administration officials have used the power of the federal government to isolate their opponents. Meanwhile, the unionized employees who populate the IRS and other agencies across the country routinely take their cues from union bosses, whose political donations and speeches show their support

On IRS issue, senior White
House aides were focused
on shielding Obama
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker and Juliet Eilperin,    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:42:16 PM     Post Reply
As soon as White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler heard about an upcoming inspector general’s report on the Internal Revenue Service, she knew she had a problem. The notice Ruemmler saw on April 24 gave her a thumbnail sketch of a disturbing finding: that the IRS had improperly targeted tea party and other conservative groups. She shared the news with White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and other senior White House aides, who all recognized the danger of the findings. But they agreed that it would be best not to share it with President Obama until

Some business owners
resist providing employees
with contraceptive coverage
Washington Post, by Robert Barnes    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:39:32 PM     Post Reply
CHICAGO — Religiously devout business owners are waging a broad rebellion against providing their employees with contraceptive coverage, bringing dozens of lawsuits that seem certain to land the issue before the Supreme Court. The company owners say their religious beliefs take precedence over a new federal requirement, contained in President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, that they give employees insurance that covers contraceptives. The legal battle took an important step forward Wednesday when an appeals court here heard arguments in two cases brought by business owners who are Catholic. Another challenge is scheduled to be heard Thursday by an appeals court

Man tied to Boston bombing
suspect killed in confrontation
with FBI, other law enforcement
Washington Post, by Sari Horwitz and Jenna Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/22/2013 10:36:41 PM     Post Reply
A Chechen man linked to one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects was fatally shot early Wednesday in an unusual encounter with the FBI and other law enforcement officers in his apartment in Orlando. According to federal law enforcement officials, the man was being interviewed about whether he and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the bombing suspects, were connected to a two-year-old triple slaying when he attacked an FBI agent. There were conflicting accounts of what happened in the moments before the man was shot. One federal law enforcement official said the man, a professional martial-arts fighter, was shot



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 724435





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~