Why would a couple risk so much — respect and even their freedom — for furs, furniture and a fedora? This was the question that came to my mind when I read the federal charges against Jesse L. Jackson Jr., the former congressman from Illinois. He’s charged with conspiracy, making false statements and mail and wire fraud. In all, he’s accused of misusing about $750,000 in private campaign funds. Jackson’s wife, Sandra Stevens Jackson, who resigned her seat on the Chicago City Council, reached an agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to plead guilty to one count of tax fraud.
He is a disgrace to the family name. His father is a preacher and shake-down grifter that sired a child out of wedlock and Junior is an under-achiever in this circle. I am beginning to think there is a dishonesty flaw in the entire family.
There is an easy answer. He watched his daddy get away with all kinds of thievery, without penalty, including personal expenditures from foundation money, paying off an employee that the rev knocked up, and junior thought he could do the same. But trying to buy the senate seat got his people caught up on the telephone taps on Blago (which were shut off quickly when the kenyan klown´s operatives showed up) and federal attorneys had no choice but to investigate the congressman.
Link does not work - but the question in the header is worth examining.
The writer´s moral confusion is apparent in the question itself, which, instead of dealing with right and wrong or even obedience to law and order, proceeds directly to a risk-benefit analysis. Not "Why did they do something that was wrong, i.e. misappropriate campaign funds for personal use," but "why did they not give more consideration to the consequences if they were caught?"
The latter question might be asked of anyone who commits a criminal act. The answer, in most if not all cases, is self-evident: the criminal does not expect to be caught. Precautions of various kinds are inevitably taken to escape apprehension.
In the case of a Federally and politically and journalistically protected personage like Junior Jackson, of course, an additional consideration undoubtedly applied. Jackson and his wife surely figured that even if their illegal use of funds was noticed, no really severe consequences would befall them because of who they were.
Thus it is no mystery why they thought they could get away with it. It is a mark of the columnist´s naivete that such a question would arise. The more important question is, why were their ethical and moral values such that they would engage in such behavior in the first place - even if they could be quite certain they would not be caught or suffer consequences if they were?
If you are going to pretend to be wealthy, it is important to know that a platinum Rolex is easily identified by those "who know" as an expensive piece of jewelry. I am fascinated by the gold-plated Rolex. It truly is a case of gilding the lily.
The Post ends their article asking why we should not have compassion for the Jackson´s. Don´t we have the same faults and problems as the Jackson´s in our spending? they ask. As if to condone their actions. The Post still trying to cover for their ilk. We have problems with credit cards and mortgage and car payments. But we don´t break the law doing it. So Ms. Singletary, don´t try to bring the rest of us down to their level. Just report the facts and forgive us the moral story. That is why we go to church.
The money Corzine stole (keeping a nice % for himself) went to paying for early Obama campaign ads. To this day, not a dime has been repaid. And Corzine is living the good life. This is the signal event that convinced me that the country is likely done for.
JJ Jr. and Sandi lived like most of the other black people in their district, it´s all for show. My in-laws lived in a very poor and mostly African American suburb in the 2nd Congressional District. The houses in their town were tiny, cheap and rundown but the cars the driveways were big, flashy and expensive. On Sundays we´d see their neighbors coming home from church and based on the way they dressed you´d think they lived on the Gold Coast and not the one of the poorest southern suburbs. Living within your means appeared to be a foreign concept in that town.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 2/21/2013 8:52:44 AM (No. 9188520)
Great responses all, and excellent analysis by the esteemed #12.
But I can summarize #12 in three words: No moral center.
Perhaps just ´no morals´ would suffice. Despite his heritage, or quite likely BECAUSE of it, he may truly not know right from wrong.
I´m beginning to wonder if all liberals hear ´right´ and don´t connect it to its opposite of ´wrong´ or something morally desired and achieved, but rather equate it to ´entitlement´ or perhaps even ´evil Republicans´.... ??? Could they be that far gone?
I learned a long time ago that common sense, brains & class have nothing to do with what kind of "bling" you wear. I knew a highly successful lawyer who bought his watches at Walmart, because he was always losing them. I know another woman who with her husband own a very successful business. She shops at thrift stores for clothes & household items - but they pay cash for cars & bought a huge house & land with CASH. She says they do not like to make payments to credit card or mortgage companies. I suspect that JJ Jr. doesn´t think about anything but instant gratification - a sign of a small mind.
Why should anyone feel sorry for them? JJJ lived a life of privilege. He attended the same private school in DC that algore attended--St. Albans. JJSr had plenty of money from his shakedowns and Operation Push donations. Maybe he taught Jr. how to skim a little for himself. The only time JJJ has been in the ghetto is when he has been trolling for votes. Why did they do it? Because they could.
If the named sum total was $700,000.00, you can bet you last dollar it was at least 10 times that amount. Maybe he can run a big bank when he get his sentence reduced at the next hearing. You know, steal $2 Billion, pay $10,000.00 fine.
"We´re going to take the only thing Chicago cares about--its money." Tom Hanks as Mike Sullivan in "The Road to Perdition." This was Three J´s mistake. Those campaign donations were supposed to be spent on bribes--to voters, to judges, to union goons, to aldermans, to election committees. He was supposed to buy bumper stickers and yard signs from union print shops. He was supposed to spread the wealth around. Instead, he bought bling and Michael Jackson memorabilia. The Chicago machine could not look away--not this time.
The writer is confused about her objective with this piece. She pretends "not to make excuses" for this criminal couple -- then, she proceeds to insinuate excuses.
And what a weird little sermonette Ms Singletary delivers at the end of this embarrassing piece: "Before you pass judgment on the Jacksons, think about the mess you might have made of your finances..."
Dear Ms. Singletary, many of us in America have not made a "mess" of our finances. We live within our means --while we pay through the nose for legions of liars and chiselers, and their enablers ... like you.
A growing clutch of lawmakers from both sides of the aisle is publicly countering the Obama administration’s portrayal of al Qaeda as an organization on the run, saying that an evolving network of the terrorist group’s affiliates now may pose as grave a threat to the U.S. as its predecessor did a decade ago. While some have outright accused President Obama of pushing a “false narrative” to protect his reputation as the man who got Osama bin Laden, others focus on fears that a new breed of decentralized al Qaeda-style groups may control more safe haven territories in the Middle East
"I will be pleased to have you visit," read the email that landed in my inbox this spring. It was signed, " Bernard Madoff. "That exchange led to a two-hour meeting in May with the most notorious fraudster on Wall Street, during which Mr. Madoff pointed fingers at others and said his decadeslong Ponzi scheme wasn´t really his fault. He was dismissive of regulators and whistleblowers, calling Harry Markopolos —a fraud investigator who warned the Securities and Exchange Commission about Mr. Madoff—an "idiot." The federal prison in Butner, N.C., looks more like a small college campus than a penitentiary.
LONDON — Scores of flights were delayed or canceled at Britain´s busiest airports Saturday because of a technical problem at a main air traffic control center. National Air Traffic Service, which controls the crowded airspace over England, said it was having a problem switching between nighttime and busier daytime operations at its control center in Swanwick, southern England. Spokeswoman Juliet Kennedy said the glitch was preventing staff opening new control positions to deal with busier daytime traffic, meaning the service was struggling to handle the volume of flights. "At the moment we don´t know when we will be able to
Big Brother may be watching you. But Glenn Greenwald is watching Big Brother. That´s not a bad take on how the 46-year-old constitutional-law attorney turned crusading journalist turned thorn in the side of the NSA might describe his mission. At least in part. Greenwald is doing more than just watching. By combing through the tens of thousands of classified NSA documents leaked to him by Edward Snowden -- and publishing in newspapers around the globe report after report on the secretive agency´s mass-spying activities -- he´s got the whole world watching too.
The Maryland official who directly oversaw the rollout of Maryland’s health insurance exchange resigned Friday amid continuing technical problems that have hampered the state’s online enrollment efforts.After an emergency session Friday night, the board of the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange accepted the resignation of Rebecca Pearce, its executive director, and thanked her in a statement for working “tirelessly and with tremendous dedication” for more than two years. In recent weeks, the lagging enrollment and online glitches have embarrassed the administration of Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) and become a political liability
Earlier this week, Onyango "Omar" Obama, uncle to Barack, said in a deportation hearing that he stayed with his nephew in Cambridge in the 1980s. The White House had to that point said that the president had never actually met Omar, who was arrested for drunk driving in 2011. Now, two years after the arrest brought denials of any sort of relationship from the White House, the president is admitting that, yes, he briefly lived with his uncle Omar before heading to Harvard Law School in the ´80s. "The president first met Omar Obama when he moved to Cambridge for law
Technicians in the Washington area raced up to a month-end deadline set by the Obama administration to make the troubled federal insurance website work for a majority of users, but officials acknowledged they still faced a raft of problems that could take weeks or more to fix. By Saturday evening, technicians completed a major hardware upgrade, adding computing, storage and database capacity to their data center, said one person familiar with the situation. "There was a big install and it worked," the person said. Contractors believe the upgrades will improve the system´s performance and let it handle more visitors, but the person
The question all week long was this: Who are you going to believe, an illegal alien or the president of the United States of America? Obviously, if it’s a president who once went by an alias, Barry Soetoro, you go with Uncle Omar, 100 percent, no questions asked. And so it was that the White House finally admitted to another, uh, misstatement — despite previous denials, Barack/Barry did sleep on his beloved Uncle Omar’s couch in Cambridge when he first moved here to attend Harvard Law School (speaking of which, we’re still waiting to see the president’s grades and his LSAT scores). But the
How do you get your arms around the catastrophe known as Obamacare? Is it even possible? At this point, I’m not sure it is. The list of individual disasters which threaten to ruin one-sixth of the U.S. economy and what has been, up until now, the best healthcare system in the world is exhaustive, and exhausting. The examples I will identify here barely scratch the surface. First but by no means foremost, we have the supposedly new and improved HealthCare.gov. Except it’s not, even the visible part. Stories still abound of people still failing to get in or to get through the enrollment
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced a new five-year strategic plan to improve safety for elderly drivers and passengers. Although they are statistically among the safest on the road, the number of older drivers is increasing dramatically — and with it, that group´s numbers of injuries and deaths. Since 2003, the population of older adults, defined as age 65 and older, has increased by 20% and the number of licensed older drivers increased by 21% to 35 million in 2012, according to NHTSA. Last year, NHTSA reported that 5,560 people older than 65 died and 214,000 were injured
A veteran Washington adviser who has worked for four Presidents on both sides of the political aisle said that the stunning Government Accountability Report report that found President Barack Obama has not had a one-on-one meeting with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius since the passage of Obamacare over three years ago is an indictment of the entire White House operation and shows that the Obama administration has bordered on "malfeasance." "I have no doubt the White House is right, that Secretary Sebelius was in several group meetings with the president about health care," Gergen caveated, "but the whole
President Barack Obama’s Facebook page on Saturday posted a message honoring the dead from Pearl Harbor—accompanied by a picture of Obama descending the stairs next to the Pearl Harbor Memorial. The picture barely fits the name of the Arizona Memorial so it can frame Obama in the foreground. The post´s statement reads: Today, with solemn pride and reverence, let us remember those who fought and died at Pearl Harbor, acknowledge everyone who carried their legacy forward, and reaffirm our commitment to upholding the ideals for which they served. President Obama The Obama Administration´s current shipbuilding plan shrinks the size of
Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack,
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the hapless, goalpost-shifting so-called "architect" of Obamacare, told Fox News´ Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday that President Barack Obama´s promise "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" was absolutely true--with one important caveat: if you like your doctor, "you can pay for it." Wallace grilled Dr. Emanuel, challenging his false claims that California´s enrollment was keeping pace with the percentage of the young population necessary to keep the system afloat, and pointing out that the president´s promise on doctors would collapse once people lost their insurance or their