A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Pentagon awash in pink slips,
preparing 800,000 civilian furloughs
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pentagon awash in pink slips,
preparing 800,000 civilian furloughs

Washington Times, by Kristina Wong

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/20/2013 10:07:25 PM

The Defense Department on Wednesday officially notified Congress that it plans to begin furloughing its 800,000 civilian employees across the country if automatic spending cuts begin March 1, estimating the states would lose a total of $4.86 billion in workers’ wages this year. According to Pentagon estimates, among the hardest-hit states would be Virginia, which would have about 88,000 affected workers and salary losses of $660.9 million; California, with 62,600 workers and $419.7 million in lost wages; and Maryland, with 45,700 workers and $359.3 million in lost earnings.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: TXknitter, 2/20/2013 10:12:03 PM     (No. 9187963)

They´ll live!


Reply 2 - Posted by: thewarden, 2/20/2013 10:15:11 PM     (No. 9187970)

Shut down the IRS.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: TheMom, 2/20/2013 10:23:03 PM     (No. 9187980)

So they´ll ´work´ 4 days a week instead of 5. Big deal.


Reply 4 - Posted by: noproblems, 2/20/2013 10:42:00 PM     (No. 9188006)

you have to understand that the washington times and the washington post have a vested commercial interest in keeping the federal government from shrinking.

dont expect any real unbiased news from these papers on this subject


Reply 5 - Posted by: god of irony, 2/20/2013 10:42:57 PM     (No. 9188008)

It´s a big deal to their creditors. How would you like it if your boss took one day´s pay a week from you for 22 weeks just because of his mismanagement and no fault of yours.

All of this class warfare by so called conservatives is really disappointing. This is not the government workers fault.

BTW whomever wrote this headline is moron if he thinks a furlough is the same as getting a "pink slip".


Reply 6 - Posted by: KTWO, 2/20/2013 10:43:10 PM     (No. 9188009)

Declare all federal workers to be part-time employees limited to working 29 hours per week. Then drop their health insurance coverage and tell them to get insurance at the Exchange.

That should save billions of $$$.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pigop, 2/20/2013 10:45:44 PM     (No. 9188012)

Let´s start with AMTRAK and USPS. There should be a few billions worth of savings there.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: dirtyjersey, 2/20/2013 10:53:36 PM     (No. 9188022)

So the biggest layoffs are in:
Maryland - - voted for Obama
Virginia - - voted for Obama
California - voted for Obama

And the rest of us are supposed to do what, dig deeper into our savings to pay for the extra taxes? No, it´s time to restructure the economy away from government employment. If feel for the individuals that voted for Romney, but the rest? Meh.


Reply 9 - Posted by: MamaElephant, 2/20/2013 10:57:53 PM     (No. 9188030)

Not every government worker is a lazy so-and-so. Some are, but not all. The DOD civilians I know take great pride in making a difference for the service members on our front lines. Many of them are former military.

Let´s remember that they and their families will be experiencing a 20% pay cut. They will survive, but that doesn´t mean they aren´t sacrificing. I know that many of the regular L-Dotters here can empathize with job loss or downsizing, as they´ve dealt with it themselves.

I´m not saying that anything said here about the need for cuts or Obama´s responsibility for this sequester is off base. I´m just saying that being callous about a significant financial setback for 800,000 real families doesn´t add anything to the conversation.


Reply 10 - Posted by: bluefindad, 2/20/2013 11:17:30 PM     (No. 9188048)

I´m seriously disappointed with many of the callous posters here. The DoD workers I know are motivated and hard-working. None of them fit into your convenient stereotypes. Our scientists and engineers produce the advanced weaponry that defeats our enemies and saves our soldiers.

The people I know are taking this in stride. They are tightening their belts and understand that the decision to cut their pay to fuel our ships and aircraft is a tough decision, but they are OK with it.

Most of these DoD folks are conservatives. The only thing that puzzles them is that the Constitution mandates that the federal government provide for the common defense, yet that is the first thing cut...


Reply 11 - Posted by: Baskerville, 2/20/2013 11:21:09 PM     (No. 9188051)

I know of at least one defense contractor that uses furloughs instead of layoffs to manage the bottom line. The furloughs are scheduled around holidays so the employees get an extra day off, unpaid. Since this is before-tax money, the ones I know enjoy the long holiday and hardly miss the shortage in the paycheck.


Reply 12 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 2/20/2013 11:21:47 PM     (No. 9188052)

We could eliminate Zippy and ValJar plus the Wookie and her staff, and no one would notice.

How about the EPA ? Airport screeners ?

Why stop at the Pentagon ?


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: smcchk, 2/20/2013 11:38:28 PM     (No. 9188075)

I sympathize with these workers but welcome to the club, friends. And I do wonder, even in the DofD, how many voted for Obama?


Reply 14 - Posted by: engrpat, 2/20/2013 11:40:22 PM     (No. 9188077)

We currently have 1,422,000 people serving in the various armed US forces. DOD is preparing to lay off 800,000 civilian employees, that is one civilian for about 2 active duty military. Somehow that seems to be way out of line. Would suggest not laying off but firing about half.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 2/20/2013 11:45:09 PM     (No. 9188080)

Live off the taxpayers for your pay and die by the taxpayers who can no longer afford to hire you.


Reply 16 - Posted by: mackrand, 2/21/2013 1:44:44 AM     (No. 9188142)

As #6 says, this would seem to be a way for the Administration/Democrats to cut the pay and the need to pay for health insurance for these DOD employees. There is nothing too sneaky that you can imagine that they will not do.

The smart move would be to defund the hundreds of Gov entities whose purpose is not clearly understood by anyone. I´m looking at the EPA, Homeland Security, Education, Energy, Interior, Transportation and myriad others.


Reply 17 - Posted by: TXknitter, 2/21/2013 2:41:01 AM     (No. 9188165)

Excuse second post but I fail to see how a temporary furlough NOT permanent layoff which is what private sector professionals have been experiencing is some unrecoverable financial disaster! Of course, if you are a government employee you like the situation like it is. We are broke. It´s time to share the pain, that´s all.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mws50, 2/21/2013 5:18:27 AM     (No. 9188208)

The 800,000 "pink slips" are nothing but a show. They have no real meaning. It is obama making one of his ridiculous points about how his sequester will affect people. It is another in a long string of obama lies.

Pink slips are cheap, and they provide a good visual for the inept, inexperienced, incompetent, anti-American, socialistic, muslim-leaning, ex-lawyer doofus.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/21/2013 6:10:02 AM     (No. 9188251)

These cuts wouldn´t even be on the table if Obama lost the election. Most of these people voted for Obama and get what they deserve. I don´t like seeing anybody lose their jobs but you can´t have endless spending to buy votes without more revenue coming in from economic growth.

What happens if you raise taxes to stall this off.How many more times can you come back and ask for more and more taxes? The liberals always do this,spend their brains out and come back later crying broke and having to lay off government workers,Nobody sheds a tear when regular people lose their jobs.These people can cash out of retirement money to get by on.


Reply 20 - Posted by: MattMusson, 2/21/2013 8:56:51 AM     (No. 9188529)

I support Furloughs for Washington, DC!


Reply 21 - Posted by: littleshell, 2/21/2013 7:20:49 PM     (No. 9189753)

I just wonder how they´ll blame it on Bush.



Post Reply   Close thread 724268




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Tea party looks to take
advantage of moment
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM     Post Reply
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.

America Waiting on Big
Decisions from SCOTUS
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ken Klukowski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:49:58 PM     Post Reply
Several major cases will be decided by the Supreme Court over the next six weeks, including historic issues such as gay marriage and affirmative action. These cases make the remainder of the Court’s term—which ends in June—one of the most carefully watched terms by millions of Americans. In addition to several significant cases that have already been decided this year, the justices of the High Court have at least ten important issues to decide before adjourning for the summer. Two headline cases involve race relations

The Emerging Scandal Narrative:
To Make Obama Pay, GOP
Blasts ´Culture of Intimidation´
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:47:42 PM     Post Reply
Since his emergence as a national political figure, Barack Obama has managed to deflect accusations of wrongdoing and impropriety with ease. Republicans on Capitol Hill are determined to put that to an end by making him pay for the unfolding scandal at the Internal Revenue Service. “Ultimately responsibility lies with the president. Obama has spent the better part of the last five years doing non-stop campaigning,” says a senior Republican Senate aide who points to the administration’s larger pattern of “using political offices to intimidate and harrass” its opponents. “When bureaucrats see the leader

Obama’s turn inward poses
risk for U.S. interests abroad
Washington Post, by Fred Hiatt    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:41:20 PM     Post Reply
“And the war will end by the end of next year .?.?. ” In the elusive search for an Obama Doctrine, that struck me as a telling phrase when I heard the president deliver it last week as he and British Prime Minister David Cameron took a couple of questions from reporters. Obama was speaking about the withdrawal of U.S. and allied combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. “Our troops will continue to come home, and the war will end,” he said. In fact, the war is unlikely to end. It may well accelerate as the Taliban

A rare peek into a Justice
Department leak probe
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:39:22 PM     Post Reply
When the Justice Department began investigating possible leaks of classified information about North Korea in 2009, investigators did more than obtain telephone records of a working journalist suspected of receiving the secret material. They used security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a newly obtained court affidavit. They traced the timing of his calls with a State Department security adviser suspected of sharing the classified report. They obtained a search warrant for the reporter’s personal e-mails. The case

How the IRS seeded the
clouds in 2010 for a political
deluge three years later
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Kimberly Kindy    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:35:11 PM     Post Reply
In early 2010, an Internal Revenue Service team in Cincinnati began noticing a stream of applications from groups with ­political-sounding names, setting in motion a dragnet aimed at ­separating legitimate tax-exempt groups from those working to get candidates elected. The IRS officials decided to single out one type of political group for particular scrutiny. “These cases involve various local organizations in the Tea Party movement,” read one internal IRS e-mail sent at the time. A few hours north in Fremont, Ohio, the owners of a drainage supply shop, Tom and Marion Bower, were wondering why it was taking so long

Obama´s Counsel Told of IRS
Audit Findings Weeks Ago
Wall Street Journal, by Peter Nicholas    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 9:04:45 PM     Post Reply
The White House´s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys that an inspector general´s report was nearing completion, the White House official said. In that conversation, Ms. Ruemmler learned that "a small



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

43 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:


Post Reply   Close thread 724268





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~