|
|
| |
Topic: Hillary Clinton to charge ´$200,000 a speech´... which is more than her whole YEAR´S salary as Secretary of State and the same fee that Bill charges |
Hillary Clinton to charge ´$200,000 a speech´... which is more than her whole YEAR´S salary as Secretary of State and the same fee that Bill charges
Daily Mail (UK), by Meghan Keneally
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:JoniTx, 2/20/2013 3:06:06 PM
|
| Hillary Clinton has wasted no time cashing in on the lecture circuit as it was revealed today that she will be charging $200,000 per speech. The massive fee means that she will be making more from a two-hour lecture than she did in a year as Secretary of State. The announcement that Mrs Clinton has hired a top talent agency to represent her as she begins to give paid speeches following her departure from the State Department came earlier this week, but her $200,000 asking price was only reported on Wednesday.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
schnapps, 2/20/2013 3:08:17 PM (No. 9187209)
Beats investing in cattle futures.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
crimea river, 2/20/2013 3:10:16 PM (No. 9187215)
It takes a pillage...
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
dittohead, 2/20/2013 3:11:54 PM (No. 9187218)
I hate these people!!
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 2/20/2013 3:14:40 PM (No. 9187222)
A lot of favors she did for people are about to repaid.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
HalfNorsk, 2/20/2013 3:23:19 PM (No. 9187242)
"Here´s $200,000. Now, please, just go away."
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sternben, 2/20/2013 3:24:10 PM (No. 9187243)
She´s worth every RIAL.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
SheikYerBooty, 2/20/2013 3:25:00 PM (No. 9187245)
Hillary Doctrine: What Difference Does It Make????!!!!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
billp, 2/20/2013 3:25:31 PM (No. 9187247)
But it´s the Republicans who are greedy!
/s
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet, 2/20/2013 3:35:27 PM (No. 9187268)
Another hypocritical democRAT. It´s all about money and power, that´s it. Hillary does not care about the USA any more than our terrorist enemies. We are weaker throughout the world and it´s because of her and zippy. True scum, all of them.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
provide, 2/20/2013 3:35:53 PM (No. 9187271)
Just a money laundering for presidential campaign contributions. Don´t forget those Buddhist nuns.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 2/20/2013 3:36:58 PM (No. 9187275)
One wonders whether she´ll wash her hair before making an appearance.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 2/20/2013 3:47:22 PM (No. 9187297)
Mooing pays well.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
NYBruin, 2/20/2013 3:48:06 PM (No. 9187299)
Another public servant cashes in. Apalling. . .
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
shepsmum, 2/20/2013 3:48:07 PM (No. 9187300)
And she´ll get the $200K lots and lots of times.
Amazing.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
alloysteel, 2/20/2013 3:48:44 PM (No. 9187302)
I would not give fifty cents to have Herself come speak. The Cold and Joyless One said it all, with the phrase, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
richwill, 2/20/2013 3:52:58 PM (No. 9187313)
A typical liberal that refuses to go gently into that good night. She will have an armed security detail.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 2/20/2013 3:54:54 PM (No. 9187317)
Not one peso from me.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Boneshaker, 2/20/2013 3:57:50 PM (No. 9187324)
Another scam to evade limits on political contributions.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 2/20/2013 3:58:37 PM (No. 9187325)
For $200,000, will Mizzuz Clinton tell us what really happened at Benghazi? She´s still a pig in a pantsuit, by the way.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Philipsonh, 2/20/2013 4:01:48 PM (No. 9187336)
It does not matter to me what she charges, just as long as no organization I belong to or am a shareholder in pays for her time. and that no tax money is used. Otherwise she can charge 2 cents or $2M - what´s the difference! Only person I would pay to go see speak is Dr B. Carson, period.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
blunderbuss, 2/20/2013 4:03:24 PM (No. 9187342)
I have 5 scents. Thats more than she deserves.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
veritas, 2/20/2013 4:05:35 PM (No. 9187349)
Well, that´s a lot more than you an steal with just a mask and a gun.
[How much are Vince Foster´s speaking fees? Anybody know? Ron Brown´s?]
#3: Are you sure? Or do you simply see them for what they really are?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 2/20/2013 4:08:40 PM (No. 9187356)
If Madame Clinton ever gives a lecture on how to play The Chicago Mercantile Exchange´s "Live Cattle" and "Feeder Cattle" future´s market, I might just consider attending.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
fritzilou, 2/20/2013 4:17:53 PM (No. 9187375)
AND THE FOOLS WILL PAY IT.....like lemmings they follow to their own doom. Since she doesn´t tell the total truth about things, why bother with her?
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Halfvast Conspirator, 2/20/2013 4:21:56 PM (No. 9187387)
I think that will propel her into the onepercenters. I hope she donates her "fair share" to some worthy gummint programs.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 2/20/2013 4:24:12 PM (No. 9187393)
Has Playboy asked her pose yet?
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
VAfreedomluver, 2/20/2013 4:34:07 PM (No. 9187429)
Please, #26, I just ate.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
chillijilli, 2/20/2013 4:35:33 PM (No. 9187435)
Tell every lib you know how evil it is for Hillary to accept this much money when she clearly doesn´t "need" it.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
veritas, 2/20/2013 4:37:05 PM (No. 9187441)
#1, #23: Too late. The "rules" under which Hillary! "profited" from her trades [thanks to crooked assigning of trades after-the-fact] were changed.
#23, see #18: it is indeed just legal money-laundering.
#25: Good idea. There´s a "Foundation" that some ex-President set up that could use a nice contribution, IIRC.
#26: That is one sick suggestion. I wouldn´t even use those photos on Gitmo prisoners!
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
JimS, 2/20/2013 4:39:19 PM (No. 9187449)
I guess this now officially makes her one of the greedy 1%
How much you wanna bet that all speaking payments will be paid to an offshore tax-exempt campaign fund?
Real question should be what % tax will she pay on those fat speaking fees.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
ocjim, 2/20/2013 4:39:41 PM (No. 9187451)
And what manner of invaluable insights will this cuckoldess Lefty grifter dispense for 200 large? Perhaps that working real hard (or appearing to) and non-stop traveling are a substitute for actual SofSt success? Or that the ignorance and incompetence of the Russian Reset debacle makes for a humorous anecdote? But fools will nevertheless flock.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
ualslosar, 2/20/2013 4:41:03 PM (No. 9187454)
How much do you charge not to talk? ...You couldn´t afford it!
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 2/20/2013 4:47:17 PM (No. 9187466)
Bill & Hill charge so much for speeches because they want to assure Chelsea has a roof over her head and food to eat when they pass away - as Chelsea has no marketable talents and no visible means of support.....
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
vesicant, 2/20/2013 4:47:50 PM (No. 9187467)
Proof of the bigger idiot theory.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Jonr, 2/20/2013 4:48:48 PM (No. 9187470)
All that money just to hear this liar talk? Just goes to show that a fool and his or her money are soon parted.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
BadgerBill, 2/20/2013 4:53:35 PM (No. 9187483)
She and Huma will reveal America´s secrets on foreign policy speaking to our enemies.
For that, 200k is chump change.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
anonymous, 2/20/2013 5:02:13 PM (No. 9187501)
Liberalism is simply a money-making scheme.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Reality, 2/20/2013 5:28:20 PM (No. 9187543)
Let no one call it graft or bribery. The two trailer park dropouts have become very rich selling the United States to those who would like to see us go away.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 2/20/2013 5:32:37 PM (No. 9187552)
It´s all about influence peddling. She has a Rolledex, it´s for sale.
Public servant my butt.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
GoodGrief, 2/20/2013 5:37:31 PM (No. 9187561)
#22, I don´t believe Ron Brown and Vince Foster belong on the same page, much less the same sentence
The Air Force crew that died trying to squeeze a MD-80 into Corfu; or wherever it was, a far, far, greater loss than the political hack, and FOB.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
andyboy, 2/20/2013 5:38:55 PM (No. 9187566)
If the Supreme Court rules that there should be no limit on individual campaign contributions, the price of a Hillary speech will drop to $800 overnight.
Nobody wants to hear her speak, but a lot of people want to fund her Presidential campaign. Don´t call it "campaign contributions" -- call it "speaker fees".
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Screwgun, 2/20/2013 5:42:53 PM (No. 9187573)
I´ll scratch my nails across a blackboard for $50. That will sound more pleasant.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
mshorselover, 2/20/2013 5:43:12 PM (No. 9187574)
They would have to pay me $200,000 to listen to her. Remember when she testified during Whitewater, her answer was "I don´t recall". Must be hard to keep all those lies straight.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
uno, 2/20/2013 5:44:08 PM (No. 9187576)
Just today´s version of Influence Pedalling...
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
texascunning, 2/20/2013 5:44:30 PM (No. 9187577)
Post #2 - excellent!
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
uno, 2/20/2013 5:47:54 PM (No. 9187584)
#26 - Ya might wanna run that one past Pfizer Inc. as a cure for the "four hour erection"...
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
killerbee, 2/20/2013 5:55:25 PM (No. 9187602)
If she can get that much, fine. As long as the taxpayers are not still paying her.
Thing is, you know one of her prime targets will be universities and the tax payers will indeed be footing at least part of that bill.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
yorkiemom, 2/20/2013 6:10:49 PM (No. 9187619)
LOL, #26, #27, and #46.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
tmcavl1, 2/20/2013 6:14:12 PM (No. 9187626)
And for an extra $50 grand, she´ll do the speech in one of the many dialects she picked up while on the campaign trail in 2008. E.g.: "I ain´t in no ways tarred"
For only $100K more, she´ll "screech the speech" like her rant "I´m sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration..."
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
snewb098, 2/20/2013 6:18:20 PM (No. 9187633)
No problem,. She´ll spread the wealth to the less informed aka (morons/idiots) = liberal indoctrinated riff-raff 99´rs
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 2/20/2013 6:40:08 PM (No. 9187656)
$200,000 for a voice that can crack glass delivering content right out of Das Kapital and Mao´s Little Red Book...Fools and their money...
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
franq, 2/20/2013 6:43:06 PM (No. 9187658)
Who is ´Bill´?
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Penney, 2/20/2013 7:25:17 PM (No. 9187701)
Save your money. ...Everyone already knows what she has to say in her, ´fingernails-across-the-chalkboard,´ voice! -Eek!
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
hopeandglory, 2/20/2013 7:53:05 PM (No. 9187750)
WooHoo! . . . that´s brilliant #2
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
artman1746, 2/20/2013 8:25:08 PM (No. 9187790)
But according to Obama, " isn´t there a time when you´ve made enough money?"
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
pacman333, 2/20/2013 8:26:00 PM (No. 9187791)
Will she have a scotch in hand a-la Ron White?
After all, her speeches will be no different than Blue Collar Comedy.
Just Sayin´.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
veritas, 2/20/2013 8:50:02 PM (No. 9187820)
#40: Thanks for the post.
#22 in no way slighted, questioned, or denigrated the USAF crew. The admittedly-implied point re Bill and Hillary is that there certainly are/were suspicions about the immediate cause of Brown´s death, which has been linked to bullet-hole-type damage to his skull. I don´t know that enough clean evidence is in the hands of honest men to know what happened. Thanks for the chance to expand that reference.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 2/20/2013 9:37:46 PM (No. 9187889)
Frankly, I think she should charge five or six times that amount. And the fools that pay it deserve it.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
ironchefw, 2/21/2013 6:46:39 AM (No. 9188294)
How much are they paying the audience to sit there and listen?
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
TexasRed, 2/21/2013 5:31:39 PM (No. 9189598)
Viable truth that an idiot can raze a village! How sick is the United States?
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
Momma Walton, 2/21/2013 5:41:11 PM (No. 9189618)
Wonder what the "price" is for truth?
Hillary will one day realize the reality of her lies and then face the judgment that will be meted out by God Himself.
Gaining the whole world is not worth suffering the loss of her soul! That goes for Bill too.
Pray for America!
We need someone to stand up for righteousness and a country that would agree that God alone is our source and He alone is our salvation, here and hereafter! Amen
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
Hagel approves plan allowing women to join Navy SEALS, Army Rangers
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Carlo Munoz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Women will have the chance to join the Navy SEALS, Army Rangers and other specialized combat outfits beginning in 2016 under plans approved Tuesday by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. Female candidates will also be able to join front-line Army and Marine Corps infantry units as part of the department’s decision. “The days of the ‘Rambo’ are over,” Maj. Gen. Bennet Sacolick, head of force development for Special Operations Command, said Tuesday during a briefing announcing the changes. Tuesday’s announcement builds on former Pentagon chief Leon Panetta’s decision in January to end the military’s long-standing ban
|
|
Michael Hastings
|
|
Washington Post, by Max Fisher
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/18/2013 9:59:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michael Hastings, a contributor to Rolling Stone and BuzzFeed, died on Tuesday morning in a car crash in Los Angeles at the unforgivably young age of 33.He is best known, rightly, for his 2010 Rolling Stone profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who as commander of the U.S.-led force in Afghanistan was the face of the war that Hastings saw as misguided and poorly managed. His profile, “The Runaway General,” portrayed McChrystal as a loose cannon so sure of himself and his strategy for the war that he and his staff openly derided their civilian overseers,
|
|
Senate rejects border fence
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/18/2013 4:18:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senators on Tuesday rejected building the 700 miles of double-tier border fencing Congress authorized just seven years ago, with a majority of the Senate saying they didn’t want to delay granting illegal immigrants legal status while the fence was being built. The 54-39 vote to reject the fence shows the core of the immigration deal is holding. The vote broke mostly along party lines, though five Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio and the rest of the bill’s authors, voted against the fence, and two Democrats voted for it. Republicans had offered the fence as a way to
|
Elbert Guillory: Why I Chose To Become A Republican
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Tim Hains
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/18/2013 3:25:49 PM
Post Reply
|
|
[Video] Louisiana State Senator Elbert Guillory (R-Opelousas) explains why he recently switched from the Democrat Party to the Republican Party. He discusses the history of the Republican Party, founded as an Abolitionist Movement in 1854. Guillory talks about how the welfare state is only a mechanism for politicians to control the black community. Hello, my name is Elbert Lee Guillory, and I’m the senator for the twenty-fourth district right here in beautiful Louisiana. Recently I made what many are referring to as a ‘bold decision’ to switch my party affiliation to the Republican Party.
|
Say cheese! G8 leaders pose for awkward family photo as they plot a crackdown on tax dodgers hiding profits around the globe
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Matt Chorley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/18/2013 2:19:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Tough global rules to stop mega-rich firms and individuals from dodging tax were unveiled at the G8 summit today. David Cameron demanded the world’s most powerful countries act to stop countries shifting profits to low-cost tax havens instead of paying they dues where there are earned. The Lough Erne Declaration - signed by the UK, US, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, Japan and Russia - vows to ´fight the scourge of tax evasion´ by ensuring automatic exchange of tax information and changing the rules to stop multinational companies shifting profits across borders to avoid paying their fair share.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.
|
Obama assassination bid fears - aircraft carriers on standby off Irish coast during G8 summit
|
|
Belfast Telegraph [Ireland], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 6/17/2013 11:39:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is understood that a contingency plan is in place for the unlikely event that an attempt would be made on the President’s life. The Secret Service also have diplomatic immunity which will allow them to shoot to kill a would-be assassin without fear of prosecution. As part of the “evacuation route” plan, they would be able to spirit the President by chopper to one of the carriers where a jet is on standby to take him back to the United States.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|