|
|
| |
Topic: Alec Baldwin being investigated for possible hate crime |
Alec Baldwin being investigated for possible hate crime
Fox News, by Leora Arnowitz
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/20/2013 2:51:07 PM
|
| NEW YORK – Alec Baldwin’s latest squabble with the media may have him in some serious hot water. An NYPD rep told FOX 411 the 54-year-old actor is being investigated following an altercation he allegedly got into with a New York Post photographer. “Our hate crimes task force is reviewing the case,” the rep said. The Post reported the incident on Monday, in an article that detailed their staff’s side of the story. The story claims reporter Tara Palmeri and photographer G.N. Miller approached Baldwin outside of his East Village residence
|
Comments: Nothing will ever happen to him. If he was a conservative you know it would be a different story.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
larry_bud_melman, 2/20/2013 2:56:56 PM (No. 9187187)
Every time Mr. Baldwin leaves his house is a hate crime.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
sw penn, 2/20/2013 3:00:12 PM (No. 9187197)
And what happens when your "hate crimes" are declared a violation of the First Amendment?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
JimJr, 2/20/2013 3:05:09 PM (No. 9187205)
"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."
- If you´re a white, conservative, straight, christian male, otherwise it´s a hate crime.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
horacer, 2/20/2013 3:06:05 PM (No. 9187206)
Why should anything happen to him. A pair of fools harass him on the street and he lets loose with a few choice words. So what. How can this even be considered a crime. I´ve seen no mention of assault.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
SheikYerBooty, 2/20/2013 3:12:11 PM (No. 9187220)
At least he wasn´t drinking water.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 2/20/2013 3:18:32 PM (No. 9187231)
After claiming he´d self-deport if Bush was reelected, it would be really embarrassing if he had to flee to avoid hate crimes prosecution under Obama.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
HalfNorsk, 2/20/2013 3:27:37 PM (No. 9187251)
Boo-hoo. To consider the possibility that this uber-liberal will hoist with his own petard is utterly delicious.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 2/20/2013 3:31:01 PM (No. 9187257)
"Hate crims task force"--sheesh. The only good thing in all this is it´s happening to a particlarly smugly arrogant liberal.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
coyote, 2/20/2013 3:35:58 PM (No. 9187272)
no crime here.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 2/20/2013 3:43:47 PM (No. 9187283)
Ah yes, the tolerant left. It´s only a hate crime if it´s linked to a conservative.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 2/20/2013 3:46:20 PM (No. 9187294)
He´s a giant jerk and an idiot but the whole idea of ´hate crimes´ is never applied equally and is bogus.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
lancelink1, 2/20/2013 3:59:08 PM (No. 9187327)
Who is Alec Baldwin?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
4Justice, 2/20/2013 4:01:04 PM (No. 9187332)
Hey, it may have been hate, but where is the darn crime? Is there now a law against telling someone off or calling them names? If that were so, every leftist would be guilty of hate crimes. Come on... we are turning into a nation of thought police and making criminals out of ordinary citizens. This has to stop!!! I don´t like Baldwin, but I will not go along with these thought crimes either. This is unConstitutional.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
aindyin, 2/20/2013 4:03:45 PM (No. 9187344)
I say hang the bast@rd
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
alloysteel, 2/20/2013 4:06:49 PM (No. 9187352)
Could this mean that "hate crimes" are no longer such a serious sort of illegal activity, or is this law going to be selectively enforced, only upon people who are unpopular and/or "not politically correct"?
Alec Baldwin is certainly deserving of all the censure that would be heaped upon the head of some poor unsuspecting fool who happened to be overheard by a hostile witness, but it just is not going to happen.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
ocho reales, 2/20/2013 4:08:10 PM (No. 9187355)
Capital One is engaged in slow suicide by keeping this piece of trash in their advertisements. I wouldn´t take a Capital One card if they paid me to do so. Talk about poor judgement!!!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
STLstudent, 2/20/2013 4:17:58 PM (No. 9187376)
Only white CONSERVATIVE males can be found guilty of a hate crime. Liberals are immune from prosecution of most laws. They can hold an illegal gun magazine in their hand on national television in Washington, DC and be immune from prosecution. They can confess to perjury on national TV ("I didn´t have sex with that woman, Monica...") and not suffer a penalty.
Liberals are immune from prosecution.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 2/20/2013 4:18:30 PM (No. 9187377)
Mr. Baldwin, of Gotham City´s East Village and Studio 54´s most famous former busboy, may have a legitimate excuse here. He was recently quoted as noting that..."There are people who would rather choke than go see my movies. They write me letters all the time."
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
dixieboy1, 2/20/2013 4:19:07 PM (No. 9187380)
Mr. Baldwin verbally abused his daughter. Shouldn´t that be a hate crime?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
BlueSkies, 2/20/2013 4:25:36 PM (No. 9187401)
Speech is now a crime?
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
horacer, 2/20/2013 4:28:51 PM (No. 9187409)
So what if he called the guy coon and crackhead. So what if he said to the reporter I hope you choke. He could have tossed in the N word, flipped them off, added a few four letter words and there´s still no CRIME. How can you have a hate crime if there´s no crime.
What law did he break. Do you want him prosecuted for bad language, honestly? So he´s a jerk, so what. Is that the new criminal standard. Sorry sir you didn´t break the law but you´re a jerk so we´re taking you to jail.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
vesicant, 2/20/2013 4:54:38 PM (No. 9187485)
Just like the Old Bolsheviks, lefties are finding out that the revolution eats its own. You don´t have to read Orwell on Koestler to know that.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Feebie, 2/20/2013 4:55:02 PM (No. 9187486)
There was no crime. This is a really bad law, however, considering Baldwin is such a staunch liberal - i would say enforcing a bad law as strictly as possible might do some good.
Perhaps then it might be reconsidered or reppealed. When these things happen to us common folk, it won´t get nearly the attention it deserves.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
KTWO, 2/20/2013 5:16:02 PM (No. 9187520)
First mistake: Alec forgot he isn´t a Kennedy.
So now we have a Liberal v. Minority fight. And the NYPD won´t want either to lose. What to do?
My guess - the NYPD will try to hand off to the DOJ for review and possible federal action.
Hate Speech laws will almost always lead to only political prosecutions.
I hope juries will refuse to convict people for disagreeable language and a listener´s hurt feelings. I expect otherwise.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
woodsman, 2/20/2013 5:17:37 PM (No. 9187524)
I thought he moved to France
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
DADOFBOYS, 2/20/2013 5:30:41 PM (No. 9187549)
As much as I despise him, this is certainly no crime and I welcome the court challenge that would come from his prosecution.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
killerbee, 2/20/2013 5:56:53 PM (No. 9187604)
And this illustrates just exactly how unconstitutional hate crimes are.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
connor, 2/20/2013 6:24:39 PM (No. 9187643)
To tell someone "I want you to choke to death," is a threat.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
CNY, 2/20/2013 6:41:32 PM (No. 9187657)
I wonder how his studies for his master´s degree in political science are going? Ha, ha, ha. Dreadful buffoon and detestable dunce though he is, that wasn´t a crime. I suppose it´s too much to hope that the left sees how wrong establishing the ´hate crime´ designation was.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 2/20/2013 9:41:52 PM (No. 9187895)
That´s some real first-class reporting there, FoxNews.
The "rep"? Not once, but TWICE that idiotic and lazy term is used.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet, 2/21/2013 9:39:05 AM (No. 9188618)
Baldwin is an idiot, however, no crime was committed here. If you are not allowed to speak on a public street then where are you allowed to speak? Alex needs to learn to control his moronic behavior in public. His speech, however, is protected.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
National Review Hammers Gang of Eight for Promoting Amnesty
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:40:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In a new editorial, the folks at National Review came out strongly against the immigration plan being sponsored by the "Gang of Eight," a group of Senators that includes Marco Rubio (R-FL), calling the bill "Rubio´s Folly." National Review urges Senator Rubio to vote against the bill he has helped craft. It slams the proposed legislation as, "an amnesty-first, enforcement-maybe program drawn up mainly to reflect the priorities of 11 million citizens of other countries rather than the concerns of more than 300 million citizens of the United States." The editors point out that many of the
|
Bipartisan bill would soften ObamaCare mandate
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Sam Baker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:35:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A pair of centrist senators introduced a bill Wednesday to soften the employer mandate in President Obama´s healthcare law. The healthcare law requires employers to offer coverage to employees who work more than 30 hours per week. Some employers have said they will reduce workers´ hours to avoid the mandate. Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) proposed a bill to move the threshold to 40 hours per week, saying the employer mandate should match the traditional definition of a full-time worker. "What we´ve tried to do is be reflective of the businesses we work with,"
|
|
Another likely Rubio whopper
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:22:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio made another one of his seemingly endless appearances on Sean Hannity’s program to advocate amnesty legislation. Rubio told Hannity that he has opposed amendments by Republican Senators to improve the legislation’s enforcement provisions because a new enforcement provision will be proposed tomorrow that is tougher and more effective than what has been proposed so far. Rand Paul’s amendment, which Rubio voted against, would have given Congress, not the Department of Homeland Security, the ultimate authority to determine if the border is effectively secure. It would also have included enhanced security measures, such as requiring a
|
How Obamacare Is Being Used to Create a Permanent Democratic Majority
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:16:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
To a remarkable degree, liberalism has been institutionalized as an official ideology, funded by your tax dollars. This editorial in Investors Business Daily explains, in shocking detail, how Obamacare is being used to fund Democratic Party operatives and drive Democratic Party enrollment: The Obama administration granted a whopping $910 million to California to set up its insurance exchange. That money is not for bandages, surgery, nurses and doctors to care for the sick. …Shockingly, the $910 million is slated for bureaucracy, including rich compensation packages for exchange employees ($360,000 a year for the executive director) and contracts for
|
Kaiser: Faith in Obamacare plummets to just 35%
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:02:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The popularity of Obamacare has crashed to its lowest level in nearly two years, according to a new Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Kaiser´s monthly tracking poll found that just 35 percent have a favorable view of the health reform being put into place Jan. 1 while 43 percent view it unfavorably. The favorability rating of Obamacare has been worse only once, in October 2011, when it fell to 34 percent. Not only is the June poll bad news for the president as his administration struggles to have the health reform program ready for people to begin signing up
|
We´re all potential suspects and should be treated as such, apparently
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Ashe Schow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:49:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Americans are already wary of the federal government having collected their phone records, but now we have Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., setting up a slippery slope of more and more data collection. Earlier today, a Washington Examiner editorial warned that "if phone records are useful now in stopping terrorist attacks, how long before politicians and bureaucrats decide archiving the entire phone call would be even more useful? How long before the limitations and safeguards now in place are set aside?" Within a few hours, King provided an illustration of precisely what the Examiner editors fear. Responding to a
|
Right rips Rubio as Republican immigration votes slip away
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Alexander Bolton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:42:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is feeling the heat as potential GOP allies are now turning against his immigration reform bill. Republican colleagues who were previously viewed as possible “yes” votes are keeping their distance from the 1,075-page measure. On Wednesday, conservative activists ripped Rubio and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) — both sponsors of the bipartisan immigration measure — at a Capitol Hill rally. The crowd, which was protesting the bill’s effort to put millions of illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship, booed at the mention of Rubio’s name during the six-hour event.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have Their Schools and Buildings and Protestants Have Theirs ... That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
|
|
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|