A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Pentagon informs Congress of
plans to furlough 800K civilians
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pentagon informs Congress of
plans to furlough 800K civilians

The Hill [Washington, DC], by Jeremy Herb

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/20/2013 1:33:27 PM

The Pentagon notified Congress on Wednesday it will be furloughing its civilian workforce of 800,000 employees if sequestration goes into effect March 1. Defense officials have warned lawmakers that sequestration will devastate the military and lead to a hollow force, but the civilian furloughs will be one of the first major impacts felt by the across-the-board cuts. The Pentagon furloughs will affect civilians across the country. Pentagon officials have said that civilians could face up to 22 days of furloughs, one per week, through the end of the fiscal year in September.

Comments:
The media is right on cue to spread the hysteria and the Republicans will be blamed for all of this.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Poca Dot, 2/20/2013 1:35:18 PM     (No. 9186983)

OK. Cut then. I doubt the government has to lay off 800,000 people to make a 2 percent cut in its budget, and I refuse to be bullied by this regime.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Jonr, 2/20/2013 1:38:45 PM     (No. 9186990)

The White House will be threatening to lay off kindergarten workers next! Let it be done!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: twculver, 2/20/2013 1:42:20 PM     (No. 9186999)

How in the heck can there be 800,000 civilian defense workers? That´s more than the whole Army! Sounds like we need to cut 300k or that are just in the way of the warfighters.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: RIsailor, 2/20/2013 1:43:14 PM     (No. 9187001)

Based on the 800k number, looks like every employee will work a four day week until September.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Safari Man, 2/20/2013 1:46:19 PM     (No. 9187010)

Maybe they could just lay off 400,000 and give the other half a 50% cut in pay. Government workers get 2x pay to start with, so this is a move in the right direction. I am really looking forward to this sequester... first good thing to happen in DC in a long time.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: dixieboy1, 2/20/2013 1:48:52 PM     (No. 9187020)

It´s a start. Perhaps the parasites could find honest work.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: brianod1, 2/20/2013 1:50:25 PM     (No. 9187024)

Many local governments had to institute unpaid furlough days for their employees several years ago. Those cities survived, and the nation will survive this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: realrep, 2/20/2013 2:03:20 PM     (No. 9187053)

please, please, please furlough my liberal sister. She plans to retire at 70% pay (70G) next year. Private sector doesn´t make that kind of retirement.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Scrubber, 2/20/2013 2:04:40 PM     (No. 9187062)

This 800,000 number is preposterous. There are some 24,000 people working at the Pentagon. I´m assuming half are civilians. That´s some, generously, 15,000 non-military people. This would be the highest concentration by far. So where´s the other 785,000 people? That´s ridiculous! And where´s our press to question that number?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: JAN, 2/20/2013 2:07:02 PM     (No. 9187072)

A good start.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 2/20/2013 2:07:28 PM     (No. 9187073)

Be still my beating heart.

Lucianne fans may recall that BJ Clinton got (or tried to get) Monica a cushy civilian job at the Pentagon as part of a payoff.

Must be really important jobs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: god of irony, 2/20/2013 2:07:47 PM     (No. 9187074)

Some the comments here are ignorant. The reason there is so many employees is because there are that many rules and regulations that have to be followed.

Take my job for example I manage over $50 million in grants to ensure the readiness of my state´s National Guard. I am the only one that does this. Would your prefer some high school dropout making minimum wage do this job or would you prefer your tax dollars be protected by a college degreed person with years of experience?

This problem is not our fault and the furlough won´t fix the budget problem (the only way save real money is to eliminate useless programs). All that is going to happen is hurting Americans trying to make a living.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: octrojan, 2/20/2013 2:17:56 PM     (No. 9187106)

I guess Obama´s point is that he wants a bigger military, but those mean Republicans are forcing cuts he doesn´t want. Got it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: kanphil, 2/20/2013 2:33:37 PM     (No. 9187137)

#12, how about we get rid of some of the rules and regulations, too and make the furloughs permanent? You´re not arguing that all those rules and regulations are necessary, are you? Don´t we all want to reduce the size of government, or does it depend on whose ox is being gored?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: RUReadyY3K, 2/20/2013 2:50:04 PM     (No. 9187176)

Besides the 800,000 number being more than a little suspect, this is simply proposing to furlough people 1 day a week without pay. This doesn´t sound like the tragedy people oare making it out to be. Drudge´s headline is way off base.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: RedLegLeader68, 2/20/2013 3:09:57 PM     (No. 9187214)

I´m with most everyone else.

Where in the world did this 800K number come from? Makes absolutely no sense.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: TheMom, 2/20/2013 3:11:19 PM     (No. 9187217)

So they might have to ´work´ 4 days instead of 5. Big deal. Things are tough all over.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: dittohead, 2/20/2013 3:16:52 PM     (No. 9187229)

How can a 2% cut to an INCREASE (not the existing budget that´s paying these people) to the budget cause 800,000 employees to be laid off??? How are they paying them now?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: MattMusson, 2/20/2013 3:34:38 PM     (No. 9187264)

Obviously the Pentagon is not cutting their PSYOPS corp.

Cause this is a complete BS screen.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: keekng, 2/20/2013 3:51:07 PM     (No. 9187310)

Bam Bams minions are doing their darnedest to frighten all the lofo voters.
Go ahead and surplus them Panetta. Sounds like a great idea.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 2/20/2013 4:04:42 PM     (No. 9187347)

Elections really do have consequences - who knew?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: oh-heck, 2/20/2013 4:08:53 PM     (No. 9187358)

How many of the 800K didn´t have a government job in December of 2008? If you´ve added 800,000 employees while the economy is in the toilet, I don´t have much sympathy when some of them get reduced hours. The reason for the furloughs is to harm the largest number of people to blame the GOP.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: KTWO, 2/20/2013 4:31:34 PM     (No. 9187419)

I read elsewhere that sequestration will only cut 1% of the spending before September. That figure is dubious but so are all numbers about politics now.

But whatever the exact number it isn´t a massive overall cut. It will only have a big impact if it is all taken from one department such as Defence.

Now is the time for the GOP House to pass a Budget for the remainder of 2013 fiscal year and rush it to the Senate. Make Reid and the Democratstake it or leave it.

That shouldn´t be too much work, I suspect it could clear the House in 24 hours.

The new Budget should eliminate two or three entire departments but make a small increase in the debt ceiling with a provision that the ceiling will revert to the previous level after September if a 2014 Budget has not passed by then.

I really don´t care much anymore. Washington has erased any admiration I ever had for our government.





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: GoodGrief, 2/20/2013 5:50:36 PM     (No. 9187588)

Good, can I pick one?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: GoodGrief, 2/20/2013 5:54:48 PM     (No. 9187600)

If this can result in a real cut, it will at least be a cut. Then cut a 1% next year, it a few years some progress might be noted.

Do It!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: TXknitter, 2/20/2013 7:52:57 PM     (No. 9187749)

Thank you #14.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 724200




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Facebook removes my post about
Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy
Fox News, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 9:45:44 PM     Post Reply
Your friendly neighborhood columnist has once again run afoul of Facebook’s elusive community standards. Now before you call up the preacher and put me on the church prayer list – let me assure the posting was neither unseemly nor ungentlemanly. This time I was censored for writing something about Rancher Cliven Bundy. I realized I had landed in the Facebook gulag when I tried to post our daily Bible verse. However, I was unable to post anything because Facebook had taken great offense to something I had written. “We removed something your page posted,” Facebook told me in a rather unpleasant message.

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Democrat: Voters ´Frustrated
and Embarrassed´ by Obamacare
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:51:55 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Colleen Hanabusa (D-HI) says her constituents are "frustrated and embarrassed" by Hawaii´s failed Obamacare exchange, which cost taxpayers $204 million and signed up only 8,000 people. On Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) announced it will launch an investigation into Hawaii´s busted Obamacare program. "This is not a partisan issue, this is an economic issue," said state Sen. Sam Slom. Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie previously predicted "hundreds of thousand of people" would sign up for Obamacare in the President´s home state. On Thursday, President Barack Obama tried to rally Democrats to

Fox News Poll: 49 percent think White
House had IRS target conservatives
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:47:35 PM     Post Reply
Nearly half of American voters think the IRS targeted conservative groups at the request of the White House, and most want Congress to keep investigating the matter. The latest Fox News poll also finds 69 percent don’t feel President Obama has followed through on his vow to “find out exactly what happened on this.” By a 49-41 percent margin, voters believe the Obama administration “intentionally had the IRS target conservative political groups.” That includes 26 percent of Democrats, 52 percent of independents and 71 percent of Republicans. Meanwhile, 67 percent of voters want Congress to keep investigating the IRS until

Lawmakers Call for Examination of Hate
Speech in Media Bill introduced in wake
of Kansas City shooting
Adweek, by Katy Bachman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:22:11 PM     Post Reply
Reacting to Sunday´s hate crime at two Jewish centers in Kansas City, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) introduced today a bill to update the government´s 20-year-old report on hate speech in the media. The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 would examine the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, and would provide recommendations to address such crimes. On Sunday, the eve of the Jewish Passover, a 73-year-old man shot and killed three people at the Jewish Community Center

Report: Obama Considering Bond
Hearings for Detained Illegal Immigrants
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 7:53:38 PM     Post Reply
Even though the number of illegal immigrants who have been deported through the courts has dropped by 43% since President Barack Obama took office, the Obama administration may enact administrative changes to allow bond hearings for detained illegal immigrants. According to the Los Angeles Times, this could result in "several thousand" illegal immigrants being released from jails and "could slow the pace of deportations" even more. The Times notes that the White House is scrambling to "ease the concerns of Latino groups and other traditional allies that have turned on President Obama in recent weeks" by trying to brand him

Eric Cantor: Obama and I totally
had an angry conversation about
immigration yesterday
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 7:41:24 PM     Post Reply
It’s pitiful that we’ve reached this point, but Obama’s account of this chat really is more credible than Cantor’s. O’s position on immigration is straightforward: He wants amnesty badly, partly for legacy reasons and partly because he’s understandably keen to legalize a few million future Democratic voters, and he’s hoping the GOP will go along so that he doesn’t have to do something risky like an executive moratorium on deportations. The GOP leadership’s position is anything but straightforward. They’re convinced that they need to pass some sort of immigration bill before 2016 or else Latinos will hand the White House



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

40 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

38 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
35 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to


Post Reply   Close thread 724200





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~