A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Gingrich: Why Rove and Stevens
are plain wrong
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gingrich: Why Rove and Stevens
are plain wrong

Human Events, by Newt Gingrich

Original Article

Posted By:mikkins2, 2/20/2013 9:45:21 AM

I am writing this newsletter in a very direct, no baloney, effort to get across how much trouble we Republicans are in and how real the internal party fight is going to be. I strongly support RNC Chairman Reince Priebus’ effort to think through the lessons of 2012 and develop a better path for the Republican Party. However there are going to be some very powerful opponents to any serious rethinking of Republican doctrines and strategies. It is appalling how little some Republican consultants have learned from the 2012 defeat. It is even more disturbing how arrogant their plans for the future are.

Comments:
Clear, unedited, unadulterated truth.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: zzen01, 2/20/2013 9:58:45 AM     (No. 9186566)

It seems to me that ALL the "Problems/Issues" w/in the past 4 or so Election Cycles can be traced back to One Man "Karl Rove". Either we rid the GOP of him and his ilk or the GOP is finished.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 2/20/2013 9:59:24 AM     (No. 9186570)

FTA: Of course these consultants have made an amazing amount of money asserting an expertise they clearly don’t have.

I´ve been saying this since 1992. Show me a losing campaign with dumbed-down messaging and you can bet there has been an army of overpaid K street consultants running the show. Far too many of these hired guns care more for their reputations with the national press corps than they do with winning elections.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: tishimself, 2/20/2013 10:00:21 AM     (No. 9186575)

Newt. As thoughtful as ever. Must read.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 2/20/2013 10:01:44 AM     (No. 9186576)

Newtie can be a brilliant man - - but - - I was really disappointed by this article.

There isn´t a thing in it about moon colonies.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 2/20/2013 10:01:57 AM     (No. 9186578)

I say get rid of the entire GOP leadership. I wager that any 10 L-Dotters can right the GOP ship and make it a conservative party before the next election.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Wilko, 2/20/2013 10:06:18 AM     (No. 9186592)

The problem is the democrats have rocked us back on our heels trying to counter the outright lies they keep spreading. Faster than we can even digest the BS, they come at us from all angles with more. Until someone can quickly and efficiently expose the lefts utter disregard for the truth, we´re left fighting amongst ourselves. It´s not a winning formula.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 2/20/2013 10:11:48 AM     (No. 9186607)

I see the regular Newt bashers are making the usual fools of themselves.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: JerseyDotter, 2/20/2013 10:13:29 AM     (No. 9186613)

Newt makes good points, but unless and until the Republican Party recognizes the enormity of election fraud which took place, it will be even worse in subsequent elections. I am still distraught over their lack of recognition of it and their lack of the fury I feel over it. Do not think for one minute the democrats are not already working on 2014 and 2016! And the Republicans are sitting around sucking their thumbs.


Reply 9 - Posted by: dman, 2/20/2013 10:20:18 AM     (No. 9186630)

Brilliant - typical Newt. The apologists try to marginalize him due to his "baggage", but when he´s right - he´s right. The consultants live in a bubble. Candidates must be vetted - but who does the vetting is the issue. Technology is effective when properly applied: garbage in is still garbage out. Ignore the baggage and listen to this man.


Reply 10 - Posted by: mikkins2, 2/20/2013 10:25:04 AM     (No. 9186641)

The problem is #6 that those that want to fight the liberal slander and their corrupting of the Conservative message are being blocked by the Republican Establishment who only purpose and goal is to retain power and make money.

If you exercise game theory, you see that the Republican Establishment wins, even when they lose. The spending will not be cut, the promises they made to large corporate contributors will be kept, and they as a result remain in control of the money and continue to profit trying to win elections.

If the Republican Establishment does win, they have to do so with candidates that they can rely on not to threaten their positions, their promises, nor the money being spent by the government.

This is ultimately the reason why Tea Party candidates are being targeted by the Republican Establishment. "Purity" is a false flag dredged up to cloud the issue. The Tea Party´s main concern is taxation and spending. All other issues are bolted on to its frame by those trying to carry their agenda forward.


Reply 11 - Posted by: redink, 2/20/2013 10:36:24 AM     (No. 9186663)

Well said, Speaker.

FTA: "Republicans need to drop the consultant-centric model and go back to a system in which candidates have to think and consultants are adviser and implementers but understand that the elected official is the one who has to represent the voters and make the key decisions."

Newt understands the machinations of the gop establishment...and he´s been fighting it his entire career.
He knows the power that the people have and when he was able to tell them, they listened.
We don´t need no stinkin´ consultants telling us what we like about their candidates.
Kudos Newt.


Reply 12 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 2/20/2013 10:40:01 AM     (No. 9186668)

Newt can be very good and he can be very bad. Today he is very, very good. The "consultants" have been dreadful for several election cycles. Karl Rove manufactured G.W.´s "compassionate conservatism" which we all knew was a fraud from the jump. I do look around and wonder where the Republican politician may be who actually believes in something. Honestly, I can´t identify even one.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: RightShoe, 2/20/2013 10:40:25 AM     (No. 9186669)

Handing millions to Washington based consultants to destroy the candidates they dislike . . .

For me, this sums up the Romney campaign and his surrogates, Coulter, Rubin and Sununu.

Romney drew a lot - a whole lot!! - of conservative blood to win that primary. And he did not emerge stronger than when he went in. That must never ever happen again.

We had some very good people running for President. And we did most of the dirty for Obama.

I´m grateful for Newt´s courage.


Reply 14 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 2/20/2013 10:52:44 AM     (No. 9186695)

He lost me when he brought up Calista. Calista, Calista, Calista. Someone other than the consultants he is criticizing also failed to learn from past failed campaigns, Newt himself. Admittedly a very smart man but very self-absorbed and "whipped".

Here´s a suggestion, Newt. You do the writing and let someone else put their name in the byline.


Reply 15 - Posted by: MDMuskrat, 2/20/2013 10:55:50 AM     (No. 9186707)

OP: Thanx for posting this article. And special thanx for your very incisive post #10. I can see why you admire and respect Newt Gingrich, as I do.

Newt offers us a scathing critique of a clown ("MC Rove") who is trying to engineer future GOP failures, and the arrogantly ignorant (but rich from our donations) buffoon who oversaw our last disaster in a classically Newtonian read.

And one of our people sees fit to offer the Dem/media talking point about moon colonies?! Sheesh!


Reply 16 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 2/20/2013 11:05:35 AM     (No. 9186729)

Nice article, full of good arguments, but the LoFos won´t read it.


Reply 17 - Posted by: heartlandconservative, 2/20/2013 11:25:46 AM     (No. 9186761)

Until such time as we seize control of the classrooms,city hall and the courtrooms, all this tech nonsense is nothing more than blowing smoke to obscure the real problem. That problem is that we and our children have been brainwashed and are doing exactly what our enemies want us to do by focusing on DC.
RR said it best,"DC ain´t the solution, it´s the problem."


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: 45_Auto, 2/20/2013 11:31:07 AM     (No. 9186770)

Newt, just another Carl Rove! It´s beyond belief that you guys still pay any attention to this Man. Multiple times he´s proven he doesn´t practice what he preaches,is full of hot air, and just out for Newt and you guys still listen to him. Newt is a waste of time just like Rove, McCain, Dick Morris, and some of the other "Washington Elite". Newt serves up the same Coolaid he always does, and you guys expect a different outcome from the last time. You guys never learn.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Gallo3, 2/20/2013 11:33:11 AM     (No. 9186773)

Romney snatched Defeat from the Jaws Of Victory at the beginning of the second debate when he did not pin Curly´s ears back with Benghazi.
Instead his consultants like Stevens counseled him to stall.

This is hidebound, and Rove et al have one real goal in mind in all this and it is not winning elections, and it is not high and lofty:

merely lining their greasy pockets and stuffing their fat little ´white hands full of cash.
Newt is right.


Reply 20 - Posted by: agility, 2/20/2013 11:52:07 AM     (No. 9186812)

Romney and surogates destroyed the other republicans, but refused to do the same with Obama.

They have got to understand how to compaign in this age. Its apparent new blood is needed.

The Replubicans need to understand the strategy of the Democrats. Quit crying about the media and start communicating effectively. There was no answer to all of the lies from Obama yesterday.

And they need to devise a strategy to take back the schools. The kids are being brainwashed. Its sickening.


Reply 21 - Posted by: 901AtTheRiver, 2/20/2013 12:18:25 PM     (No. 9186860)

Early on my advice to all I know was ignore Newt at your peril. Look what happened. My advice is still, ignore Newt at your peril. He is the only Republican I would trust to have the facts right and the right advice and the right strategy. Ignore Newt at your peril.


Reply 22 - Posted by: master sergeant, 2/20/2013 12:24:00 PM     (No. 9186866)

Nina Easton´s (Fortune Magazine writer) husband was part of the Romney problem. Stupid RINOs were afraid to smash Obama´s head against the pavement for fear of being called racist by the lame stream media. The RINO consultant class should have their collective heads beaten with baseball bats. We fail because of inept cowardly party leadership.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: stablemoney, 2/20/2013 1:48:08 PM     (No. 9187015)

Since all the efforts and largesse appear planned for latinoes and blacks, can whites just opt out and quit paying taxes. I really see nothing in the new American for them but pulling the wagon and paying for it.


Reply 24 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 2/20/2013 10:24:51 PM     (No. 9187985)

Say what you want, but Newt gets it, as does Sarah... both were attacked by Dems and GOP elite... What did Sarah call them... Crony Corporate Capitalists... and their $400MM that was wasted last year... Led by the opportunist Snake, Rove... Remember how the press was following Sarah and her family on her I Love America East Coast Tour... They were eating out of her hands on her terms... Newt has the DC experience, knows the ropes, and speaks the truth here... He needs to convince RNC to disband and rebrand so voter fraud can be fought, have fewer debates with no press, just the candidates, and implement his plan of candidate-centered leadership in local, state, primary and general elections... GOP already has 30 governors!

As above poster said, "Ignore Newt at your peril"!



Post Reply   Close thread 724149




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"



Time to Secede…
From the GOP
Canada Free Press, by Chip McLean    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/24/2013 9:51:55 AM     Post Reply
Is there anyone remaining with an IQ above room temperature who actually believes that the Republican Party believes in limited government, as defined by the U.S. constitution? If so, they have either been hibernating or have been in complete self-denial. Every election cycle the Republican Party counts on its “conservative base” to dutifully turn out and mark their ballot for whatever candidate has been selected by the GOP leadership. We are told ad infinitum that doing so will keep the Democrat liberal demons from furthering their agenda. The inside-the-beltway establishment has been chanting this mantra for years

Former Bush Adviser Continues
Crusade Against Palin, Conservatives
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/9/2013 6:44:54 AM     Post Reply
Former George W. Bush chief political strategist Matt Dowd continued to try to diminish Sarah Palin and conservatives by once again making false claims about the former Alaska governor. On Sunday´s "ABC´s This Week," Dowd assailed CPAC for, in his mind, lessening its credibility by inviting conservatives like Palin and not liberal Republicans favored by the northeastern elite like New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. “CPAC, to me, has totally diminished its credibility as an organization,” Dowd said

The Unofficial Merger of the GOP
and Democrat Party!
Canada Free Press, by A.J. Cameron    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 3/4/2013 8:46:39 PM     Post Reply
People continually complain that with the different faces who have disgraced the Offices of the President and Vice President, the one hundred (100) seats within the Senate and the four hundred thirty-five (435) seats within the House of Representatives, nothing improves for the masses, only for those who are elected and special interests. This is frustrating and we need to assess why, so we can change this ‘continuing resolution’. It appears that the GOP and the Democrat Party have merged.

Republicans are losing
the spending argument
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:36:33 PM     Post Reply
For the past several years, congressional Republicans have focused relentlessly on a single message: Washington — led by President Obama — is spending too much money, and it needs to stop. But according to new Washington Post-ABC News polling, that laser-like focus isn’t helping Republicans win the argument over federal spending — with 67 percent of those tested disapproving of the “way Republicans in Congress are handling federal spending.”

Why Sarah Palin? Why Ted Cruz?:
´Nationalists´ and ´Federalists´
The Hill (Washington, DC), by Bernie Quigley    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 3:09:40 PM     Post Reply
Demographics are destiny. Nothing else makes history. When the changes ahead are shipped into denial is when chaos and disaster ensue. And the potential disasters America faces today do not come from global warming, nuclear weapons, the Russians, the hippies or the rednecks. They come from the economic division of America between the red states, which are rising in capital and prosperity, and the left and right coasts, which are receding in economic power. Demographer Joel Kotkin well outlines the transition in a Wall Street Journal essay yesterday title, “America’s Red State Growth Corridors.”


Congressman Takes No
[Bleep] From Obama
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/27/2013 2:55:06 PM     Post Reply
Sophomore U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, graduated first in his class at West Point, graduated from Harvard Law School, had a hugely successful career in the aerospace industry, and also has a think-tank background. He may be a seriously rising star. Anyway, he put out a self-explanatory press release that is a beauty to behold. Take that, Mr. Obama! Today, White House Spokesman Jay Carney asked during a press briefing what Congressman Mike Pompeo, R-Kansas, would say to defense workers facing furlough because of the President’s sequester plan. The following is his statement:

Spending kudzu
Human Events, by John Hayward    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 2/26/2013 9:29:04 PM     Post Reply
Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has been front and center during the latter days of the sequestration showdown, which is good, because he literally wrote the book on government waste. He produces a new edition of his “Wastebook” every year, chronicling the most absurd abuses of taxpayer money. It is wise for Republicans to bring up these horror stories when Obama is racing around the country and insisting that a 2.3 percent reduction in the rate of government growth means we can’t have firefighters or border security. Coburn’s Wastebook should be every American’s indispensable manual



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

38 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.


Post Reply   Close thread 724149





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~