|
|
| |
Topic: Obama warns ´people will lose jobs´ if budget cuts take effect next week as he urges Republicans to accept higher taxes |
Obama warns ´people will lose jobs´ if budget cuts take effect next week as he urges Republicans to accept higher taxes
Daily Mail [UK], by Hayley Peterson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 2/19/2013 4:35:22 PM
|
| President Obama warned on Tuesday that ´people will lose their jobs´ and ´the unemployment rate might tick up again´ if steep budget cuts take effect next week. He urged Republicans to agree to a plan proposed by Senate Democrats that would partially offset $85 billion in ´sequestration´ cuts scheduled to take effect next week through new tax revenues. ´So far at least, the ideas that the Republicans have proposed ask nothing of the wealthiest Americans or the biggest corporations,´ Obama said. ´So the burden is all on the first responders, or seniors or middle class families.´
|
Comments: While the topic itself is of great interest and comment, please look at the photos. In some of them you see Obama with very sleepy, heavy-lidded eyes. I did notice this on photos of him returning from vacation yesterday but put it down to his golf marathon. At best I´d guess a bit of Botox but at worst. . . .
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 2/19/2013 4:37:58 PM (No. 9185420)
Or attribute it to Reggie.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 2/19/2013 4:38:41 PM (No. 9185422)
Obama´s on auto-pilot: "So far at least, the ideas that the Republicans have proposed ask nothing of the wealthiest Americans or the biggest corporations"
This is not substantive. This is usual blather.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Patchy Groundfog, 2/19/2013 4:38:57 PM (No. 9185423)
Rain Man recited ´Who´s On First?´ as his little calming mantra when he got agitated.
Similarly, Obama (and Reid and Pelosi and the filth known as Keith Ellison) can´t talk about any serious subject without invoking firemen, policemen, teachers and any other job commonly found as a Fisher Price toy figure. Kids starve, seniors die, etc. etc. It´s beyond insulting and infantile - it´s laughable. But morons aren´t known for their sense of humor.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
SpeedMaster, 2/19/2013 4:39:20 PM (No. 9185425)
I have read that these are not cuts, only reductions from the "baseline" which assumes an increase. Hope I am wrong and these are real cuts.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
rockymtnhigh, 2/19/2013 4:46:40 PM (No. 9185431)
Didn´t we just have a massive wave of tax increases which will provide more revenue (at least on progressive paper)? Oh, that´s right, he´s already spent that.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
youngtexan, 2/19/2013 4:47:53 PM (No. 9185432)
Lemme guess. The GOP are gonna cave in.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Coy860, 2/19/2013 4:53:47 PM (No. 9185435)
Blame Obama. No one disputes the fact that no one wanted sequestration, or that ultimately a bipartisan vote in Congress led to passage of the Budget Control Act. But the president categorically said that sequestration was “something that Congress has proposed.” Woodward’s detailed account of meetings during the crisis, clearly based on interviews with key participants and contemporaneous notes, make it clear that sequestration was a proposal advanced and promoted by the White House. In sum: Gene Sperling brought up the idea of a sequester, while Jack Lew sold Harry Reid on the idea and then decided to use the Gramm-Hollings-Rudman language (which he knew from his days of working for Tip O’Neill) as a template for sequester. The proposal was so unusual for Republicans that staffers had to work through the night to understand it. Oddly, Lew in Tampa on Thursday, publicly asserted the opposite: “There was an insistence on the part of Republicans in Congress for there to be some automatic trigger…. [It] was very much rooted in the Republican congressional insistence that there be an automatic measure at the end.”
This prompted Woodward to go over his notes and interviews once again, to make sure he had gotten it right.
“After reviewing all the interviews and the extensive material I have on this issue, it looks like President Obama told a whopper,” Woodward said. “Based on what Jack Lew said in Florida today, I have asked the White House to correct the record.” We had been wavering between Three and Four Pinocchios. But in light’s of Lew’s decision to doubledown on Obama’s claim, we agree it’s a whopper. Four Pinocchios
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
farmwife, 2/19/2013 4:53:56 PM (No. 9185436)
The fact is, jobs are going to be lost anyway and that´s why Obama is not even trying to avoid this. He needs it to cover his behind as we go back into recession.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 2/19/2013 4:59:29 PM (No. 9185446)
"Unemployment rate might tick up,again" is code that the unemployment rate is going up no matter what the sequestration does. As rate rises to 8.5% from 7.9%, Obama will blame GOP for this rather than his policies and the economic uncertainty he creates.
As to first responders standing behind the messiah, they will be receiving pensions 2 to 3 times the average annual wages of American workers, with their health care paid by taxpayers. They are confident that Obama will bail out the bankrupt state & muni pension that will be paying them $135,000 per year pensions. As always, the joke is on us.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
RightShoe, 2/19/2013 5:00:05 PM (No. 9185447)
This was Obama´s stupid idea in the first place.
Make sure he owns it.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
uno, 2/19/2013 5:00:14 PM (No. 9185448)
#8 - Bing0!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
alaskaal, 2/19/2013 5:02:21 PM (No. 9185452)
If this group of first responders is so dadgum important, why aren´t they out responding? Where do they get all of this time to pose with professor pin-head?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Whamdbambam, 2/19/2013 5:14:44 PM (No. 9185483)
Same song, 537th verse.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
keekng, 2/19/2013 5:16:06 PM (No. 9185486)
Spoiled brat.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
nimby, 2/19/2013 5:22:57 PM (No. 9185499)
The dude has partied throughout his vacation.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
nimby, 2/19/2013 5:24:16 PM (No. 9185503)
BTW, did he also sign the sequestration into law without reading it??
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
nimby, 2/19/2013 5:24:38 PM (No. 9185504)
He brokered it. He OWNS it now.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
hotrod, 2/19/2013 5:38:54 PM (No. 9185530)
Maybe that shrimp on the treadmill will end up in a cocktail? Maybe the desert toad will have to fend for itself? Maybe some of the ridiculous spending for wacko pursuits will get eliminated.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue, 2/19/2013 6:03:19 PM (No. 9185569)
Some politicians should lose their jobs over the mess they created!!! I have a few suggestions!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
kanphil, 2/19/2013 6:08:53 PM (No. 9185574)
Obama, you lie!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Mickturn, 2/19/2013 6:34:20 PM (No. 9185618)
Yep that is what happens with incompetent leadership...look in the mirror bozo!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
KTWO, 2/19/2013 7:02:07 PM (No. 9185648)
Same old FUD. The nation will collapse if you cut one public employee. And if it is a unionized public employee the whole world disolves into anarchy.
And layoff a defense worker? Sure enough, we eill br invaded next week.
I don´t care anymore. Let´s find out.
The fact is that Democrats almost totally control Washington. The GOP House can´t pass anything and it can´t stop an EO and it cannot block an appointment and it can´t stop the executive departments or even get honest anwers from them.
The House can´t even stop O from killing people with Drones, in the US or elsewhere. And Holder totally controls the DOJ. Nothing will happen Obama dislikes.
What happens will be 99% Obama´s wishes. There is no political or moral reason why the GOP should abet this administration.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
JAN, 2/19/2013 7:15:06 PM (No. 9185665)
Your decision, Mr. President.
Or you can outsource the decisions to dingy harry.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
ArtieC, 2/19/2013 7:46:29 PM (No. 9185706)
How did Obama maneuver the republicans and the country into this ? And the Rs will get the blame.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
kono, 2/19/2013 7:57:58 PM (No. 9185716)
Essentially, unless the GOP caves on tax hikes, Obama will have someone beat the living tar out of the people, blame the GOP for it, and get full support from that press for his version of the ´truth´. Isn´t that just dandy.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
formerNYer, 2/19/2013 8:07:34 PM (No. 9185725)
I said this before the Republican should fold on the economy, let the dumbocrats OWN the economy. More revenue will only rake even more money out of the private sector leaving less for us to spend on things, slowing the economy, slowing the amount of tax revenues the government actually takes in and making matters worse, it´s the Republican only chance to retake the senate in 2014 and the white house in 2016. sorry for the caps MAKE THE DEMS OWN THE ECONOMY (PERIOD)
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 2/19/2013 10:34:44 PM (No. 9185901)
When Zippy suggests cuting foreign aid instead of domestic cuts, get back to me.
Even if he cuts delivering anchor babies, we would save a bundle.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
Barack Obama is rapidly losing his halo
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Peter Foster
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/23/2013 1:35:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is the worm turning against Barack Obama? After four-plus years of being given the benefit of the doubt by the bulk of the US media, the President now suddenly feels more vulnerable. Today both the New York Times and the Washington Post have run prominent and angry editorials and columns slamming the administration for its attempt to criminalise a Fox News reporter James Rosen for working a State Department source to obtain a story. The "Rosen Affair"--as it is now known--is poisoning the well in Washington at an alarming rate for Mr Obama, with an indignant White House press corps
|
Opium addicts of Afghanistan: Number of junkies TRIPLES to 150,000 despite war on drugs
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/21/2013 7:41:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A heroin addict father smokes the deadly drug contentedly as his two innocent children sit watching him adoringly. The oblivious man is part of a growing epidemic in the war-torn country of Afghanistan, which has seen the number of opium and heroin addicts tripling to 150,000, according to latest United Nations Figures, while 225,000 used the drug in 2012. In a country with a population 35million, there are now more than 1m addicts of one drug or another. It represents a major problem for the country, which produces 90 percent of all opiates in the world. Until recently
|
´I never knew people could love an old man so much´: WWII vet, 91, ´saved from daughter´s eviction´ after $138,000 raised online
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/21/2013 7:18:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A 91-year-old WWII veteran fighting to prevent his daughter from evicting him from his Ohio home has raised more than $138,000 from online donors to buy back his home, easily surpassing his goal. John Potter says he´s ´amazed´ by the more than 5,000 people who have donated toward his original $125,000 goal while telling his granddaughter, Jaclyn Fraley, ´I never knew people could love an old man so much.´ After Mr Potter´s daughter sent him an eviction notice earlier this year, Ms Fraley organized the desperate fundraiser for him in April while sharing with the public his dire situation.
|
Stocks are booming, so beware the bust
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Jeremy Warner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/21/2013 6:55:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The return of ´animal spirits’ usually points to better times, but it’s more complicated now. One of the defining characteristics of an asset bubble is that most professional money men know one when they see one, but on the “greater fool theory”--the belief that when making a questionable investment there is always some idiot willing to pay even more--are very reluctant to leave it.[Snip] With equity prices again hitting new, post-credit-crunch highs--the FTSE 100 is nearly back to its turn-of-the-century peak, and the US S&P 500 already is--the old question has arisen anew: are we once again in
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|