|
|
| |
Topic: Feds Buy 2 Billion Rounds of Ammunition |
Feds Buy 2 Billion Rounds of Ammunition
Breitbart´s Big Government, by William Bigelow
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 2/18/2013 12:46:05 PM
|
| Something strange is going on. Federal non-military agencies have bought two billion rounds of ammunition in the last 10 months. The Obama Administration says that federal law enforcement agents need the ammunition for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.” Radio show host Mark Levin is suspicious. He commented: To provide some perspective, experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [Department of Homeland Security] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war!
|
Comments: It is so tiring being unsettled all the time about what is happening in this country. The sad reality is that there is very little, if anything, I can do about it.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Coy860, 2/18/2013 12:51:59 PM (No. 9183157)
Agree, OP. Every day another thing to worry about. BUT this is what we get with 4 more years of Obama, so we must reach deep down for strength to always be one step ahead. When I feel beaten down, I think back to the conditions of our ancestors during the Revolution, walking on snow and ice with nothing but rags on their feet, leaving trails of blood. They were up to the task, and shall we because we are Americans.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
tusker, 2/18/2013 12:53:28 PM (No. 9183161)
Are ammo running in support of gun running.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
faith_and_reason, 2/18/2013 1:13:28 PM (No. 9183191)
The concern is not so much about patriots in DHS being armed. In case of civil war, they will not fire on their neighbors, fellow patriots. If Obama is openly pushing for civil war, the patriots would get that ammo to us by the ton.
The real concern is that Obama has an army of radical, anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Jewish, anti-Christian jihadists. And the bullets may already be in their custody!!
Who is guarding the ammo?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Amicus Veritatis, 2/18/2013 1:21:33 PM (No. 9183209)
“mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.” Really? With hollow-points? Wait a minute, what exactly are "other traing sessions?"
Hey, they work for us right? What could possibly go wrong? It´s only right that Federal non-military should practice alot. s/o
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
stevendm, 2/18/2013 1:25:12 PM (No. 9183218)
He´s just ensuring that the government can supply customer support for all of those Fast and Furious guns.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
LudicrousSextus, 2/18/2013 1:29:04 PM (No. 9183224)
´Suspicious´ doesn´t describe it. The *majority* of this ammo - from a year´s reporting now - is HOLLOW POINT AMMUNITION BANNED IN INTERNATIONAL WARFARE.
Thus we have an administration who won´t even act mildly tough with our *actual* enemies...
Stockpiling ammo with no other purpose (tho´ the Feds have claimed repeatedly, ´Hey, it´s just for target practice!) other than *shredding* anything it hits, and no targets in sight besides the American public.
And the jackass-in-chief thinks American citizen will ´give up´ any effective means of self-defense?
This is your government on drugs. *Strong* drugs...
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
NancyD, 2/18/2013 1:29:04 PM (No. 9183225)
You have to ask yourself WHY? WHY do the feds need 2 billion rounds?
It´s how they are handling Gun Control. Ok, they are too pansy to submit a bill on gun control, so they will just buy up all of the ammo.
I purchased some ammo today, but not all that I needed.
The Gov´t is trying to control us, without a doubt.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Vivi, 2/18/2013 1:33:18 PM (No. 9183235)
Those Democrat senators in states that went for Romney should be required to explain this post haste. Get them on the record.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
hershey, 2/18/2013 1:51:39 PM (No. 9183285)
What no 7 said.... I was looking online today and not a round of 22 long rifle anywhere.
My local store is out of everything but shotshells and some esoteric rounds. No .38, 45 or 9mm to be found.
If you can find it, buy it...
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mindyourbubble, 2/18/2013 1:52:28 PM (No. 9183287)
Why. Why. and etc. Who will tell??? Anyone out there got an answer?
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
franq, 2/18/2013 1:56:07 PM (No. 9183291)
Why? Two reasons: to use against us, and to keep the shelves bare.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
rmagnus, 2/18/2013 1:56:50 PM (No. 9183292)
If half the 300 million in this country is Republican that´s about 13 rounds to pump into each one of us. That should quell any opposition.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
mindyourbubble, 2/18/2013 1:59:49 PM (No. 9183299)
Another thought. Since they can´t disarm people, they have decided to buy up all the ammo so if one has a weapon...so what...they haven´ andy ammo.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
lostinmassachusetts, 2/18/2013 2:04:43 PM (No. 9183315)
That´s 6 shots for every man, woman and child in the United States. That should keep ´em in line.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
kanphil, 2/18/2013 2:08:30 PM (No. 9183321)
Never fear, I am sure our brave Republican elected officials will get to the bottom of this. s/
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
lhlande, 2/18/2013 2:38:31 PM (No. 9183373)
‘The president has lost some of the magic that he had four years ago?...Smoke and mirrors then, Smoke and mirrors NOW!!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
dman, 2/18/2013 2:42:48 PM (No. 9183381)
Levin is ´nuts´. Move along. Nothing to see here. /s
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
vesicant, 2/18/2013 3:06:00 PM (No. 9183425)
There is no proof of this at all. None. Time to get your foil hats rotated. Show me the RFPs, Levin and Bigelow. Then I´ll believe it.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Rob_NC, 2/18/2013 3:11:15 PM (No. 9183435)
...he did say something about a civil force that would rival the military did he not....
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Amicus Veritatis, 2/18/2013 3:27:27 PM (No. 9183464)
#18 is advised to see governmentbids.com. No tin foil here, just brass.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
JustRight, 2/18/2013 3:27:38 PM (No. 9183465)
And just how much taxpayer money will be used for the safe storage of all this ammo?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
fishbone, 2/18/2013 3:29:43 PM (No. 9183467)
The stores near me ration the amount of ammunition that individuals can buy. I don´t blame the stores as they´re only trying to ensure that no one person buys ALL of their stock.
I would dearly love to see the ammunition manufacturers ration sales to the Fed. If they were smart they´d realize that if push comes to shove, then the Fed will NOT be their friend.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Pat26.2, 2/18/2013 3:39:06 PM (No. 9183476)
Wrong. This is debunked here:
http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2013/02/dhs-buying-billions-of-rounds-not-so.html
People mistook the pricing quantity (1000 rounds) for the number of shipments. In fact, DHS was buying 240,000 rounds, not 2 billion rounds.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Boneshaker, 2/18/2013 3:59:12 PM (No. 9183508)
Criminals who sold and bought the illegal Fast & Furious guns complained they didn´t get ammo with the guns as Eric Holder promised.
/s
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
EagleJim, 2/18/2013 4:04:38 PM (No. 9183517)
I don´t readily believe they´re buying all the ammo to create a shortage for gun owners. The shortage will be short lived, unless they plan to buy them up for the indefinate future which I think is unlikely.
I see the ammo purchases as complementary to their purchase of large quantities of auto and semi-auto weaponry, communications gear, medical supplies, armored transport vehicles, etc.
Remember how Obama wanted a domestic fighting force as powerful as the military? I think DHS is building such a force. I think it´ll be a three tier force, comprised of the federal law enforcement agencies (with DHS leading it), state law agencies, and local law agencies, with DHS leading the three tier cooperative effort.
I think the ammo will be stockpiled, along with all the other materials being purchased, at various locations around the country. I suspect they´ll be located at federal, state, and local facilities in key locations.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
EagleJim, 2/18/2013 4:08:37 PM (No. 9183520)
The other day I saw a headline (didn´t get into the article) about a confidential informant inside DHS who said the agency is practicing to deal with a general uprising of the population.
Also, the other day I watched a 30 minute video on the current "Global Currency War" we´re involved in, and actually created, through our recent QE1 and QE2 printing of money, and still there are calls for a QE3. We´ve devalued our currency by around 20% which helps us pay our international debts and other countries are beginning to fight back by doing the same with their currency. And, a global race begins to have the cheapest currency.
Acording to the video, the two prior currency wars created the Great Depression, WW2, and the economic stagnation of the 1970s. The video further explained how currency wars ruin people´s savings and investments which could also result in civil unrest and upheaval, and international war.
When the population´s money is turned into worthless paper by the political class, how would the population react? Would there be a general uprising?
Lastly, there was an article the other day about a litmus test that Obama is putting to high-ranking military officers wanting to move up. According to the article, the litmus test is asking the officer if, under a certain scenario, he could order troops to fire on citizens.
I get the feeling that something wicked is coming this way.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
woodsman, 2/18/2013 4:18:30 PM (No. 9183540)
Odd...all of the reports indicate it´s hollowpoint handgun ammo....no 5.56 or 7.62?....given the shortages in these calibers the populace may indeed be better armed
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
nonsense, 2/18/2013 4:21:20 PM (No. 9183544)
It is to eliminate mass numbers of US citizens. "punish your enemies", "eliminate the opposition", "revenge" are oft spoken words by this regime. They have no desire to keep anyone around who does not adhere to the party line. We are now living under Pravda on the Potomac, and every other tin pot dictatorship since time immemorial.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mitzi, 2/18/2013 4:35:34 PM (No. 9183564)
Someone is sitting the the DOJ basement, carefully inscribing the names of Americans on the bullets ... two bullets per person.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
geekrunner, 2/18/2013 5:03:52 PM (No. 9183599)
OK, some of these comments are just kooky. Just sayin´.
However,one thing I´m not hearing, is what of these ammo manufacturers? Don´t you think that if someone who is a big shot in one of these companies would see a huge red flag when our Gummint is buying up (or submitting purchase orders for) so much ammo? Wouldn´t the Gummint submit to open bidding for a purchase of this size? This doesn´t pass the smell test to me. I´ll have to buy some ammo and get the low down on what is really going on.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
berthabutt, 2/18/2013 5:18:59 PM (No. 9183626)
Where are those in ammo sales/manufacturing who will confirm this overripe story or bury it? Surely some fine journalist will get the bottom of it...James O´Keefe?
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Rabidrabbit1, 2/18/2013 5:21:14 PM (No. 9183634)
It´s stimulus, back door gun control, and sets off the moon-bats! It´s a win-win-win situation for the libs.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
BigGeorgeTX, 2/18/2013 5:25:20 PM (No. 9183641)
Does anyone actually believe that with all the war technology at the government´s disposal, they would need that much low level technology to get the job done? They´re buying it up so that the people can´t.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
drkillj0y, 2/18/2013 6:25:41 PM (No. 9183731)
Sooo tired of this tinfoil hat screed. So they put out a call for bid on a huge number of ammo to be delivered over 4-5 years and ATK got the contract for most of it.
The real question is, what was delivered so far and did they actually used it up in training as they were supposed to.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|