|
|
| |
Topic: Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees |
Fiscal trouble ahead for most future retirees
Washington Post, by Michael A. Fletcher
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 2/17/2013 12:00:10 AM
|
| For the first time since the New Deal, a majority of Americans are headed toward a retirement in which they will be financially worse off than their parents, jeopardizing a long era of improved living standards for the nation’s elderly, according to a growing consensus of new research. The Great Recession and the weak recovery darkened the retirement picture for significant numbers of Americans. And the full extent of the damage is only now being grasped by experts and policymakers. There was already mounting concern for the long-term security of the country’s rapidly graying population. Then the downturn destroyed
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
cincinnati whig, 2/17/2013 12:08:07 AM (No. 9180900)
bad news for cruise lines & Indian casinos
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Balogreene, 2/17/2013 12:24:18 AM (No. 9180912)
As a sixty-year old, I´ve known this for 20 years. Reviews are great, raises are 3% tops. I´ve worked for companies that ask people to re-use paper clips. That quit supplying paper plates, napkins, even paper cups. Companies no longer supply coffee. They brag about great quarters, or even making projections, but lay people off, and refuse to give even COLA raises.
I guess at least we have jobs, but it´s not as easy as it was. I have no children, but I know I had a good start. The young ones today don´t have that. They won´t unless we straighten things out.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 2/17/2013 12:24:38 AM (No. 9180913)
"Liberal and conservative economists worry that the decline in retirement prospects marks a historic shift in a country that previously has fostered generations of improvement in the lives"Such garbage. All these problems are lib problems, all lib schemes to get re-elected.
Now that the chickens have come home to roost, Yeah, blame conservatives.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Sanspeur, 2/17/2013 12:29:34 AM (No. 9180916)
Not to worry.. That´s why the death panels.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 2/17/2013 12:55:31 AM (No. 9180928)
The baker used to make a hundred pies a day and gave 20 to government to distribute to the needy. The Progressive government improved things with new rules on how to prepare the pies, programs to supply needy bakers with ingredients, and of course an increased levy of pies. Because the baker is spending time reading rules and sharing ingredients with the needy, he now only makes 90 pies a day. The government 30 to redistribute. However 6 are stolen, 3 are dropped or allowed to spoil before being delivered, and 1 goes to government collectors. The baker is going out of business yet the needy are still only getting 20 of the pies.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
chumley, 2/17/2013 12:59:43 AM (No. 9180930)
#2, I can sympathize. I am 52 and will likely never retire. I expect my 401k to be worth nothing and social security to be gone. If I am very lucky I will die on the job and get a better insurance payoff. I especially feel for my kids and grandkids. While my employment is far from optimal, it is better than none at all. They will be lucky to get part time with no benefits. Lots of people are getting no job at all. Thats what communism brings. Shared misery. Funny how we studied that in high school but the lessons seem to be forgotten.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
4Justice, 2/17/2013 1:31:49 AM (No. 9180937)
Me too. I am 50 and won´t ever be able to retire. I lost my retirement funds some 16 years ago and haven´t been able to make it up. So, I´ll work until I drop. I´ve already resigned myself to that fact, especially since Obama and the Dems took over.
Forget the pies...we´ll be lucky to smell crumbs!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 2/17/2013 2:31:40 AM (No. 9180950)
The American people should have voted for Mitt Romney.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Topic Thunder, 2/17/2013 2:36:01 AM (No. 9180952)
But NOT if you´re a retired government employee, then you´re set for life. The slave taxpayers have the privilege of supporting your lavish retirement until they drop dead!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Spidey, 2/17/2013 4:55:01 AM (No. 9180997)
It´s really funny to hear people claim that SS is solvent until the year 2020 or beyond when it´s simply another money in.money out program.
Idiots that write stories like this are totally oblivious that the root cause of today´s problems are a result of the left´s war on capitalism.Programs like SS were structured around a capitalist country and what´s supposed to fill that void when business after business goes under or moves overseas?
Who in their right mind is going to open or relocate here with the uncertainty of Obamacare and Dodd/frank regulations?
The left has always claimed that tax cuts don´t work but they´re getting a stark case of reality when the SS deduction went back up. Oh,those tax cuts work but not Bush´s.
Paying people to do nothing in the form of an unemployment check stimulates the economy according to the left. If that´s the case why not give everybody an unemployment check whether they work or not?
Then along comes the paycheck fairness act which will force more women out of the workforce rather than the employer paying a premium for their skill set and bypassing workplace seniority.
Women and black unemployment are up under Obama,yet they rabidly voted for him.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Butch, 2/17/2013 5:27:21 AM (No. 9181016)
No kidding #8. America could have an honest, hard-working problem-solver in the White House right now, rather than a professional flim-flam man who takes $1000-an-hour golf lessons in Florida while America crumbles - and rubs our noses in it.
Mitt Romney wasn´t perfect, but he was a thoroughly decent, well qualified candidate for that office. Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist who cares about only one thing in the entire world: Barack Obama.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 2/17/2013 5:28:54 AM (No. 9181017)
As another poster said, that´s what the Death Bill was for. Kill the seniors off by denying health care and the costs go down. The Death Bill worked out so swell for those 65,000 who are getting goobermint handouts for not being able to buy insurance, that the program is running dry already. Success!!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
ladychatalie, 2/17/2013 6:50:36 AM (No. 9181062)
I remember in the 1980s telling my older brother that there would be no SS by the time I qualify for it. Even then, politicians expanded the purpose of this program and used the money as part of the general fund for whatever waste, fraud, and abuse they could dream up. Bridges to nowhere, underpasses for turtles, studies on ketchup flow rates. Our government is and has been FUBAR since our dear Mr. Reagan departed.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
suziesuburbanite, 2/17/2013 7:50:52 AM (No. 9181151)
And Obamacare sucks money out of Medicare. Hate to say it but Bambam just really doesn´t care about old people
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Hooter, 2/17/2013 11:50:29 AM (No. 9181564)
Zero doesn´t care about anyone. But killing off the elderly is the plan.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
|
Three Cheers for Tesla
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 6:26:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I have always been skeptical of electric vehicles, mostly because of my perception that electric car makers are more interested in subsisting on government subsidies than in competing on a level playing field for my business. So I was intrigued when I got an email this morning from Jeff Evanson, Tesla Motors’ Vice-President of investor relations. Evanson, a long-time Power Line reader, pointed out that the company raised over $1 billion last week, and will use a portion of those proceeds to pay off its loan with the Department of Energy ahead of schedule. This will make Tesla
|
| |
|
|
This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
|
|
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist
|
GOP eager to link IRS scandal to ‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm
|
What If the Obama Scandals Had Surfaced Last Fall?
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi
|
|
A Breach of Trust
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair
|
Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative 501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
|
|
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent
|
| |
|
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
| | |
|
|