|
|
| |
Topic: Massachusetts will lose 60,000 jobs if Congress enacts sequestration, report says |
Massachusetts will lose 60,000 jobs if Congress enacts sequestration, report says
Boston Globe, by Tracy Jan and Bryan Bender
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:SoCalGal, 2/16/2013 4:41:59 PM
|
| WASHINGTON -- Massachusetts will lose more than 60,000 jobs, much of it in the defense industry, and $127 million in federal research funding, harming a critical sector of the state economy, if Congress allows across-the-board spending cuts to go into effect in March, according to a report released Friday by Representative Edward Markey of Malden. The automatic cuts, known in Beltway parlance as “sequestration,” were scheduled to take place in January under a 2011 budget deal to raise the nation’s debt limit, but the crisis was temporarily averted when Congress struck a last-minute
|
Comments: Obie´s baby.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jeffreyabigail, 2/16/2013 4:44:55 PM (No. 9180545)
How do you turn a hard-left winger like Mahkey into a right-wing conservative?
Threaten to cut military jobs in his state.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Keekng, 2/16/2013 4:48:14 PM (No. 9180549)
Blame Bam Bam boy, he started it!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 2/16/2013 4:50:15 PM (No. 9180555)
You hate the military. You always want to cut the military. When you get your way, you scream. If your politicians don´t lose their jobs in the next election, maybe they will be more thoughtful next time.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Griz70, 2/16/2013 4:55:50 PM (No. 9180569)
I wonder how many of those are union jobs?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
BetseyRoss, 2/16/2013 4:56:03 PM (No. 9180570)
Right on, #2. This was their idea and they are trying to pawn it off on the Republicans. Same with Obama spending trillions of dollars the past four years. He´s pretending he had noting to do with it, that we all have to pull his irons out of the fire and work together.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bighambone, 2/16/2013 5:01:48 PM (No. 9180578)
Notice that they did not mention who came up with this "sequestration" business in the first place, it was Obama and his crew, thinking that they could get the Republicans to wimp out and approve a lot of new tax increases to save the defense establishment from big cuts. Since it appears that the Republicans are not going to wimp out as Obama thought, Obama is now saying that "sequestration" is a " bad idea" without ever letting on that it was his idea in the first place, and of course so far anyway, the liberal Democrat still has Obama´s back.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 2/16/2013 5:02:40 PM (No. 9180580)
I can´t imagine there is another state more deserving of this that Massachusetts, who elected the "Indian" to the senate. She is one of the biggest liars of all time, they knew it, every single one of them, and they elected her anyway. I truly hope this happens to these enormous dummies.
If you live there and weren´t part of this travesty and the travesty of Ted Kennedy for 40 or 50 years, then move away. You deserve better.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Spidey, 2/16/2013 5:04:39 PM (No. 9180584)
I don´t believe this figure but even if I did why do you need so many people doing military research when you´re trying to phase the military out in favor of drone and robot warfare??
We´re also being told ta therewill be acute bef and chicken shortages if the sequesters go through.This is all from a tiny slice of government spending being cut.
Obama,who just rung a tax increase out of republicans in the fiscal cliff deal wants more tax increases to address the sequester. This after Walmart posted in worse earnings in 7 years due to the SS tax increase.
Maybe there´s some relief on it´s way from Britain who´s leading an international fight against corporate tax cheats like GE,Google and Facebook.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
horacer, 2/16/2013 5:06:54 PM (No. 9180589)
FTA -- The squeeze has already caused scientists trained in Massachusetts to be wooed away by other countries because “they can offer them more money and brand new spanking labs,” Erwin said.
How do I get a job in a spanking lab.
Who did the study. Is the 60,000 jobs over ten years, I assume so. If Markey and the Globe are saying it, I don´t believe it.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 2/16/2013 5:07:31 PM (No. 9180590)
Not building Keystone cut 60,000 jobs in Texas so the liberals in those blue states can go jump. My condolences to the conservatives that live there.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
rolanddd, 2/16/2013 5:10:18 PM (No. 9180599)
When Fauxcahantas had her first post-election news conference the question was raised "what are your plans to protect defense jobs in the state" and she immediately turned to Gov. Deval Patrick who told her "no, that question´s for you".
That is the level of concern and focus for defense jobs in the commonwealth.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
thethirdruffian, 2/16/2013 5:22:15 PM (No. 9180612)
Don´t they mean "if OBama fails to compromise?"
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
lazlototh, 2/16/2013 5:35:23 PM (No. 9180626)
I don´t particularly want defense spending cut, or to have employees working for defense lose their jobs, but Massachusetts consistently votes in a way that shows it desires both. Bad for the country, so I don´t want it. Bad for lots of good employees, so I don´t want it for them. But Massachusetts as a state has only itself to blame and its politicians should bear the responsibility, even though they won´t.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
judy, 2/16/2013 5:39:27 PM (No. 9180631)
Cutting 10% from the defense budget causes this... this is bull....why not cut the congressional staff, do away with the wasted travel, seminars, pay raises, jets to Egypt, aid to Syria, WH million $$$ parties. Of all the things the won has done this has upset more people than anything else. Soooo much gov waste. They must think the American people are stupid.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
mustang flyer, 2/16/2013 5:50:00 PM (No. 9180641)
60,000 jobs just in Massachusetts...this is a drop in the bucket. California has a bunch more and there will be many union jobs too...no time to weep for them, many states will lose many jobs also and the sad part is they will go elsewhere to keep making a living while Obama and his cronies keep cashing their paychecks...maybe this will jar a few of the undecided jerks, the Dems and Liberals when 2014 rolls around as to who did this and Obamacare...the hits will keep on coming. Don´t have far to look, no Republicans touched Obamacare and the Sequester was Obama´s brainstorm...stew while he destroys our research, our Military and soon enough...our country.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack, 2/16/2013 6:26:24 PM (No. 9180697)
Land of the Kennedy clan people you have no worry. Obama whom you support stood in front of the whole country and (just like the impeached William Jefferson Clinton (husband of the smartest woman in America)) said there would be NO sequestration and you can take that to the bank. But then he also said there would be no increases in taxes for under $250,000.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas, 2/16/2013 6:29:40 PM (No. 9180699)
It was BHO, who came up with this sequestration, and, as not to be called a racist, I agree with his plan. Let the cuts begin! We must all share in the pain of recovery as he has told us. I don´t buy it for a second because, if nothing else, it will cause such an uproar from across the Fruited Plains that no pol will feel they can go home, but even if it were true the cuts must start. Yippee Ki Yay. Just sayin.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 2/16/2013 6:43:12 PM (No. 9180710)
These Massachusetts Libturds have nothing but contempt for those who serve. Remember "do your lessons or you will end up in Iraq?" No sympathy here.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
gesundheit, 2/16/2013 6:45:18 PM (No. 9180719)
There´s a reason why Obama and the Democrats agreed to the Sequester in 2011:
Because Standard & Poore´s had just cut our bond rating from Triple A to Double A, and S&P and its fellow rating agencies were threatening to cut it further unless our government gave an indication that it was serious about controlling our debt.
Reneging on the Sequester now would prove that our government was not and will not be fiscally responsible as promised, with all the ramifications of such a revelation.
Every investor who bought a U.S. Treasury bond since the Sequester was agreed to bought it on the understanding that the U.S. government would keep its promise to cut spending. If the government does not go through with the Sequester, it will have lied.
And the global investment community does not like being lied to. It´s response will be to demand continually higher interest rates on American bonds until our government proves it can be fiscally responsible, if ever, while the world watches U.S. Treasuries sink into junk-bond status and the U.S. itself into bankruptcy trying to pay off ever-rising interest rates.
But this is too much for Obama to be worrying about when the quality of his golf game is in the balance.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 2/16/2013 6:47:10 PM (No. 9180721)
We´re running Trillion$+ deficits every year so the government can keep propping-up the economy in states like Mass. Eventually the gravy train will end.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Scribelus, 2/16/2013 6:55:11 PM (No. 9180726)
The cesspit of Obamaland. Plenty of room, especially for those in Massachusetts who chose the cessmakers. Schadenfreude.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 2/16/2013 6:57:49 PM (No. 9180727)
This couldn´t happen to a more deserving state. Deep deep blue {or blew } Massholes voted this fool into office, now let them live with the consequences.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
fritzilou, 2/16/2013 7:27:47 PM (No. 9180752)
How nice, a liberal state will now suffer like the other states that liberals have destroyed. Maybe they will wake up to what government does to destroy good hard working people. I hope so.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 2/16/2013 8:34:31 PM (No. 9180786)
Don`t worry everyone, there won`t be any cuts. Boehner and McConnell will cave as usual. That`s what they do.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
chumley, 2/16/2013 8:38:01 PM (No. 9180789)
They vote liberal and they talk funny. Who better to bear the brunt of their own policies?
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
realrep, 2/16/2013 8:38:19 PM (No. 9180790)
Don´t worry. The men can get jobs working for Bawney Frank´s friend....out of Bawney´s basement. There´s always job openings there. /s
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
doctorfixit, 2/16/2013 8:41:20 PM (No. 9180793)
Couldn´t happen to a more leftwing state.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
hummingbirds, 2/16/2013 8:44:16 PM (No. 9180798)
Reply 2 is correct. Obama started this. This is his baby!
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
stonepony, 2/16/2013 8:51:36 PM (No. 9180803)
in a word ..........good.......hope it does not impact too much on our brave men and women in uniform
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Penney, 2/16/2013 8:56:33 PM (No. 9180809)
Welcome to the real world, Massachusetts. ...Plus, the entire beltway, ´´Boomtown,´´ gang will also get to experience what they have done to the rest of the country due to their devistating statist dem policies! Their lefty/lib/statist political follies have indeed deemed, ´´CHANGE,´´ upon America the Beautiful.-YIKES!!!
...The lefties just might have second thoughts regarding conjuring up any future disasterous statist spending & deeming policies after they too get a dose of their own pricy, bitter, political correctness.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
wsdiego, 2/16/2013 9:01:15 PM (No. 9180814)
Serves them right for imposing the traitor that lost the war Kerry on the nation!
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
formerNYer, 2/16/2013 9:04:28 PM (No. 9180816)
good
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
tipover, 2/16/2013 9:42:42 PM (No. 9180828)
The Democrat´s have an out. The House has passed legislation dealing with the sequestration last year and passed it again this year. It just doesn´t have the tax increases the Dems want.
All they need to do is come up with a budget. /s
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Miss Patriot, 2/16/2013 9:47:26 PM (No. 9180829)
They are playng poker again. Let´s call their bluff. They aren´t worried about the Military. They are worried about Welfare cuts. That´s it They want people Republicans to get all worried and put pressure on our team. Stand Your Ground. Or You are Out Next Election!!!
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
FunOne, 2/16/2013 10:19:24 PM (No. 9180840)
The voters of the Bay State certainly have inflicted some rotten political types on the rest of us for quite a few decades. As such, I really can´t lose any sleep about anything that might impact them in a hurtful way.
If their current political leaders were to be in charge of planning the original Boston Tea Party, we would all be British subjects today.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
sickened, 2/16/2013 10:21:16 PM (No. 9180842)
"if Congress enacts sequestration"? Congress signed on to Obama´s sequestration plan long ago. There will be no new "enactment". Obviously, Tracy and Bryan are trying to push blame away from the President and on to the Congress.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Bluebonnet, 2/16/2013 10:51:37 PM (No. 9180858)
Aha! But the one said if they raised the debt limit in 2011, everything would be okey-dokey! But wait . . . the debt limit needs to be raised again! But wait . . . the one said he´d be open to a smaller deal! But wait . . . is he workin´ the phones negotiating this "smaller deal"?!? No he´s in Fla. taking $1,000 hr golf lessons!
There are good people in MA; please don´t put this on all of them.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 2/16/2013 10:56:08 PM (No. 9180861)
Scary, boo-hoo stories every day and every night.. The Republicans BETTER hold firm and I mean it. Make Obama eat this very unpleasant sandwich.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
stonepony, 2/16/2013 11:51:20 PM (No. 9180891)
#37.......there are good people everywhere. It seems in Mass there are enough of them. Maybe in another year this will go up another 60,000.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 2/17/2013 12:20:24 AM (No. 9180910)
Nothing has changed much since 1776. Ma. was also home to more British rule Tory´s than freedom fighters.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 2/17/2013 2:52:18 AM (No. 9180958)
Maybe Mass. should not vote for Indian Squaws.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 2/17/2013 5:49:50 AM (No. 9181026)
Boo hoo. Where´s the 60,000? In entitlement programs? If MA doesn´t like sequestration, let them borrow money to pay for it. Besides, all sequestration does is limit the 8% increase in goobermint largesse each and every year. It´s really no cut at all.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"
|
Afghanistan´s Benghazi: The Shoot-Down of Extortion 17
|
|
Townhall, by Diana West
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/20/2013 4:46:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Grief and politics don´t mix. When raw, aching grief and the dirtiest kind of politics meet, a hot volcano of pain and outrage erupts that is unstoppable. But it is necessary.(Snip)before Benghazi, there was Extortion 17, the call sign of a special operations mission in Afghanistan on Aug. 6, 2011. Three months after the strike on Osama bin Laden, 30 Americans -- including 15 from the bin Laden strike-team unit, Navy SEAL Team 6, and two other SEALs -- were killed in the costliest single-day loss for the U.S. military in the Afghanistan war, and the largest SEAL loss
|
Faulty wheel jeopardizes Kepler space telescope´s quest for alien life
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/16/2013 12:39:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A faulty steering apparatus may bring an early end to NASA’s Kepler space telescope, a $600 million tool in the space agency’s quest for life elsewhere in the universe. Kepler is the first NASA mission capable of finding Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone, the range of distance from a star where the surface temperature of an orbiting planet might be suitable for liquid water. Launched in 2009, it has discovered thousands of such planets, including a pair just 1,200 light years away.(Snip) But yesterday, Kepler’s mission ran into trouble.
|
|
The IRS´s Nonprofit Helper
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 4:10:56 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service last year supplied a left-leaning nonprofit charity with confidential information about conservative organizations, which the charity disseminated to the public, ProPublica reported yesterday. The charity in question was ProPublica itself. We should acknowledge that "left-leaning" is our characterization; ProPublica describes itself in its own tax filings as "entirely non-partisan and non-ideological." ProPublica is legally obliged to be nonpartisan, for it enjoys tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which means that contributions to it are tax-deductible.
|
|
A Tainted Campaign?
|
|
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 1:44:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
If it is proven that the IRS thwarted some groups from obtaining tax-exempt status in fear that their traditional or conservative messages might hurt the 2012 Obama campaign (especially if it did so under pressure from White House-affiliated operatives), and if it is proven that the Obama administration deliberately ignored warnings about lax security at the Benghazi consulate, missed real opportunities to send help, or deliberately massaged intelligence reports in order to mislead the pre-election public about the true nature of Benghazi in order to further a false campaign narrative of a near dormant al-Qaeda
|
|
Stealing Style From Granny
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Alexa Brazilian
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 7:45:00 PM
Post Reply
|
|
IS CONSERVATIVE THE new radical? The fashion world certainly seems to think so. This season, designers filled their runways with restrained silhouettes that echo the graceful, showing-less-is-more aesthetic of generations past. Designers are reimagining soignée staples for spring and summer—skirt suits, twin sets, below-the-knee dresses, kitten heels and frame bags—that appear anything but moth-eaten. In fact, fashion´s neoconservative coup d´état feels deliciously defiant, given the excessively revealing styles pop culture celebrates. A quick flip through any supermarket tabloid yields an
|
Sanford victory shows adultery, lies can´t trump party loyalty
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Robin Abcarian
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 12:01:45 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It would be too easy to make fun of the good Christian voters of South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District who saw fit to return their disgraced former Gov. Mark Sanford to the office he once held. I won’t do it. Well, maybe just a little. Sanford, whose political rise was fueled by his conservative principles and focus on family values, did not stay true to his wife. But in the end, the voters in South Carolina’s 1st stayed true to him.(Snip)“Obviously, there´s a vulnerability to me now that people respond to," Sanford told
|
Jay Carney attempts to throw CIA under the bus on Benghazi talking points
|
|
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/10/2013 5:07:56 PM
Post Reply
|
|
I’ll post the video when available. (Wow, GOP Rapid Response got this video out really quickly)(Snip for Video)Here are some tweets as it took place: Throwing CIA under bus never works, ask every prior President–> payback leaks — Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) May 10, 2013 Carney: Should we have overruled the intelligence community?We relied on what they thought.Fighting words. — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) May 10, 2013 “These were intelligence community talking points” -Jay Carney — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) May 10, 2013
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|