|
|
| |
Topic: Officials call for probe of sale of bulletproof vests |
Officials call for probe of sale of bulletproof vests
Los Angeles Times, by Jack Leonard and Robert Faturechi
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:earlybird, 2/13/2013 2:38:53 PM
|
| Local officials Tuesday called for investigations into the Los Angeles County Sheriff´s Department funneling hundreds of bulletproof vests to Cambodia through the city of Gardena.(Snip) The announcements Tuesday were prompted by a Times investigation published over the weekend that found that sheriff´s ballistic vests were shipped to Cambodia and not declared to customs officials, as required by federal law. Instead, they were stuffed inside one of a number of patrol cars that the Sheriff´s Department was shipping directly to Cambodia, avoiding the rigorous vetting process the U.S. government requires to prevent body armor from getting into the wrong hands abroad.
|
Comments: Good old Sheriff Baca. Wonder what he was paid for them?
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 2/13/2013 2:51:19 PM (No. 9174454)
Customs agents decided not to seek criminal charges, concluding that there wasn´t enough evidence to show that anyone involved in the transactions knew the relevant export laws.
LOLOLOL!! No, of course not. They used Gardena as a straw buyer and hid the vests in a patrol car because... um, because... uh... give me a minute.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 2/13/2013 2:54:50 PM (No. 9174464)
Since the govn wants to take our guns, perhaps they should provide all 300 million of us with mandatory bulletproof vests so we have a fighting change against the criminal element......./s
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
kOok, 2/13/2013 3:11:08 PM (No. 9174484)
Just tell the IRS ´I didn´t know the law´ when it comes tax time. See how far that gets you. Why is ignorance of the law a reason not to prosecute in this case? Could it be that they don´t want to prosecute ´their own´, but will come down hard on a ´civilian´?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 2/13/2013 3:18:39 PM (No. 9174501)
I seem to recall an old saying about "ignorance of the law"--Oh, yeah, it was "ignorance of the law is no excuse", that´s what it was! Guess what, that is the actual legal doctrine--except, of course, when it isn´t. But not to worry, as in the case of semi-automatic firearms, only the police and military are to be trusted with bulletproof vests, right?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rafter, 2/13/2013 3:35:40 PM (No. 9174535)
This issue and investigation has dragged on for more than ten years?
The people involved seem a little slow... in more ways than one.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
4Justice, 2/13/2013 3:41:28 PM (No. 9174543)
The government doesn´t want the citizens to be able to protect themselves or even stay safe from harm. I am just so sick of the tyrants who have taken over and our citizens who have allowed it to happen. I am sick of people in general. People could have stopped this whole mess from happening in the first place if they had stopped the infiltration of the communists into our school systems and institutions. They could have fought against all of this long ago if people had been alert and not so complacent. But people are lazy. They don´t want to fight or they give up too easily. They figure that it isn´t worth it or it´s too much trouble. I am starting to have nothing but contempt for the bulk of humanity.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Mushroom, 2/13/2013 3:53:00 PM (No. 9174569)
I was under the impression that we mere mortals weren´t allowed to buy bullet ´proof´ vests.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
enuf8, 2/13/2013 3:58:18 PM (No. 9174575)
Plays right along with the "why" two women were shot and truck riddled with bullets without verifying the make, model and color of the pickup delivering papers or that the two women did not look like a Chris Bonner. Plays right along with why they were told to stand down when the cabin he supposedly was in and let it burn to the ground--------Cover-up for something! LAPD was jury, judge and executioner. DOJ wants all Gitmo inmates to have a "fair" trial--for the citizens of the US - forgetaboutit.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
blunderbuss, 2/13/2013 5:18:15 PM (No. 9174708)
So if we do something like that its jail time. But if the LAPD does something like that its...aaaa ooooo kayyyyy
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
civilservant, 2/13/2013 6:22:22 PM (No. 9174809)
#8, by no means am I defending the LAPD-other side of the Country, know nothing about them other than Rodney King(shoulda beat his butt harder, says this Trenton boy) but it was the San Bernadino Sheriff´s office in charge of the ´accidental´ fire, if the reports are to be believed. That would fit the geographic location better too, I think. Again, just from maps and reports.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
drkillj0y, 2/14/2013 2:14:16 PM (No. 9176440)
Exporting restricted articles to a Communist country without a license. Failure to declare restricted articles in shipment exported to a Communist country. Smuggling of restricted articles. Conspiracy.
What happened to ´not knowing the law isn´t a valid excuse´ ??
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
How Apple scores its lower tax bill
|
|
CNN Money, by Jeanne Sahadi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:11:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Apple is one of America´s most profitable companies. And it pays a substantial income tax bill to the U.S. government -- by its own account, $6 billion in 2012 and an estimated $7 billion this year. But many tax experts and lawmakers say Apple´s tax bill should be bigger. A lot bigger. The concern is that Apple (Snip), while complying with U.S. laws, is nevertheless taking advantage of loopholes in the tax code to shift a substantial amount of income to offshore subsidiaries in low-tax countries. The result is billions of dollars in profits every year that go untaxed.
|
|
The Apple Tax Diversion
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:00:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You almost have to admire Carl Levin´s timing. Amid a furor over politicized IRS tax enforcement, the Michigan Democrat on Tuesday tried to change the subject to a hardy Washington perennial—corporate tax loopholes. Too bad his designated business pinata, Apple, AAPL -0.74% demonstrates instead the insanity of the tax code that Mr. Levin has done so much to write. Mr. Levin unveiled the results of his months-long investigation into Apple´s corporate taxes (Snip)What Mr. Levin did not do was present any evidence of anything illegal or even inappropriate. He did prove that Apple has smart accountants and tax lawyers.
|
IRS´ last two commissioners deny lying; official to take the 5th
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Joseph Tanfani*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/21/2013 11:17:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — As the Internal Revenue Service´s last two directors struggled to provide answers Tuesday about the agency´s improper scrutiny of conservative groups, a lawyer for another key IRS official said she would invoke the 5th Amendment rather than answer questions about the screening and why she didn´t tell Congress about it. Lois Lerner, director of exempt organizations for the IRS, will assert her right against self-incrimination during her scheduled appearance Wednesday before the House oversight panel.
|
|
About “Bush Appointee” Doug Shulman …
|
|
Red State, by Dana Loesch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/21/2013 1:39:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The left loves to remind everyone that the former IRS commissioner was a Bush appointee, because somehow this makes it OK that his IRS office abused power to criminally target conservatives. For a party that loves to blame Bush, they sure love signing off on everything Bush did and then maximizing it times eleventy. Shulman may have been a Bush appointee, but he was an Obama donor: Shulman donated $500 to the Democratic National Committee in 2004. So let’s start calling him “Democrat supporter” Doug Shulman. All this shows is that Bush wasn’t an ideological bigot.
|
| |
|
Finally !!!!! – Someone (Chris Wallace) Asks Where Was The President During The Benghazi attack….
|
|
The Conservative Treehouse, by Sundance
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/20/2013 4:33:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Seven months we’ve been waiting for someone, anyone, to ask the White House staff what was President Obama doing on the night the Benghazi attacks took place. We have researched this on our own and have him tracked from 4pm to around 7:30pm (EST). But after 7:30pm it is a total BLACKOUT – an unknown void of information. Finally after seven MONTHS. Chris Wallace asks White House Communications Director, Dan Pfeiffer, what was President Obama doing. (Snip) they are hiding what actually took place that night. They are desperately trying to cover the President’s intentional uninvolvement.
|
Pfeiffer on IRS Scandal: The Law Is Irrelevant
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/19/2013 1:06:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
White House advisor Dan Pfeiffer said “the law is irrelevant” when asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Sunday about whether President Obama thought the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was illegal: Stephanopoulos: What does the president believe? Does the president believe that would be illegal? Pfeiffer: I can’t speak to the law here. The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous (Snip) Stephanopoulos: You don’t really mean the law is irrelevant, do you? Pfeiffer: What I mean is whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact that the conduct doesn’t matter.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
| |
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
McCain warns Obama-Nixon comparisons are ‘overreaching’
|
|
Boston Herald, by Hillary Chabot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/20/2013 9:36:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
U.S. Sen. John McCain bucked the party line coming from many of his fellow conservatives this morning, saying suggestions that compare the trio of scandals gripping the White House to Watergate are “overreaching.” “I think it’s overreaching. We need a full and complete investigation and then we will decide the dimensions of it,” said McCain while campaigning for Republican Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez in Dorchester. “It is terrible but we have to have a full investigation before we leap to conclusions.” The maverick’s caution is a sharp contrast to the response of many Republicans
|
| | |
|
|