Karl Rove was not happy. The conservative base of the Republican Party is not happy. The Ford/Bush-Reagan battle of ideology decades past suddenly renews. What’s going on with Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell? And yes, to wax Carvillian, it is the ideology, stupid. In fact, it is an ideological war. First, Mr. Rove and a leaked email. The date: September 14, 2010. The place: Sean Hannity’s television show. The occasion: The Delaware U.S. Senate primary, won that night by conservative activist Christine O’Donnell. Won by a more than respectable 6 points, 53%-47%. The news reached Karl Rove while appearing on Sean Hannity’s Fox News TV show, as seen here.
Comments: Jeffrey Lord absolutely destroys Karl Rove in this article by proving he actively worked against Tea Party candidates before and after they won their primaries and he continues to do so.
This lays to rest any argument from the Republican Establishment fan club of "cant we all just get along".
A must read for anyone still sitting on the fence of the issue.
Nah. Just a lot of wishful thinking on the part of the OP. Soldier on, my friend.
Why should we attempt to "destroy" any individual or group, Karl Rove´s or any others who is working to fund good candidates for our side? If you don´t like this one, send your money to that one. I´m glad to see them all.
Unfortunately for you the article destroys your argument as well as Rove´s. Rove talks a united front but when it comes to the rubber meeting the road, as the article describes, he has completely different story to tell.
In short, he is a bold faced liar as well as a back stabbing chiseler.
I do admire your tenacity though, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
A very revealing read. Me, being a part of the ´senior´ group, would rather see the ´establishments´ be diminished, to make way for others following. IMHO, too long as the establishment engenders inhibition for further change (meaning REAL getting back to minimal gov´t).
Money quote FTA Politically speaking, there is considerable umbrage taken by conservatives at the idea that a GOP Establishment that keeps losing presidential elections (2012, 2008, 1996, 1992, 1976) or wins them by unnecessarily narrow margins (2000 and 2004) — has the chutzpa to blame conservatives for losing elections.
Remember, OP, the enemy has a D behind the name. Rove does not. Save your energy to fight the bad guys, not those working on our behalf and not those who won´t help "destroy" them. And, yes, #5, if that PAC is funding candidates, power to it.
What #2 fails to comprehend is that whether or not O´Donnell was a disaster or not is NOT the issue. Mike Castle would have been a disaster in office, just like Jim Jeffords, Arlen Specter and Charlie Crist turned out to be. We never win in the long run by putting Democrats in office with an R by their name. It always comes back to hurt much worse in the long run. Castle was horrific.
Rove is a greasy back stabber. To go along with this establishment fathead invites further future loses for the Republicans. C. O´Donnell has nothing to do with this - for better or for worse she was chosen by the PEOPLE of DE to run...not by the establishment republicans. Forget C. O´Donnell, she was something more of an outliar who got my support nonetheless. For all her so called "crazy" ideas or behaviors, it´s better than those stuck on stupid that keep electing the same establishment hacks.
Take a lesson from the Dems Karl! They support their candidates warts and all.
I stopped donating to the Republican National Committee when Rove and cohorts abandoned Christine O´Donnell. Yes she was kind of kooky but she won the primary! She was not Rove´s kind of candidate so the top brass of the GOP trashed her beyond belief!
There are MANY of us out here who wish Karl Rove would just go away!!
1) The 11th Commandment of Ronald Magnus: "Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of a Fellow Republican."
2) Republicans are not Democrats. Democrats don´t care what sort of low life, anti-American, immoral, ignorant creep they elect. So long as they´re pro-abortion, anti-military and able to repeat the PC mantras, they´re in. Yellow dogs and all.
3) Tea Partiers, Libertarians, religious conservatives live in glass houses on this one. They stayed home and gave us another 4 years of the Obama regime. This did terrible damage to our country. We will pay the price of their ideological purity and religious bigotry for a generation.
4) Rove was right: these are unelectable candidates. O´Donnell was all over tv, and she was manifestly a fool. Anybody running for office who isn´t aware that the media belongs to the Democratic left is too stupid to serve effectively. Complaining about it is a waste of time. It´s not changing. The War on Women was a main plank of the Dims- how´d Aiken and Murdock miss that?
WE NEED TO WIN! It´s our duty to get it together and save the country.
17 I hope you feel better after that rant. It´s a pathetic argument though, lumping tea party and libertarian and single issue socons together...not to mention acting as if Karl Rove follows your advice.
Point #1 - PAGING ROVE AND GEORGETTE MOSBACHER...PAGING ROVE AND MOSBACHER....
Point #2 they shore do WANNA BE, tho, don´t they? Key question here: where are their spines?
Point #3 THIS Tea Partier did not stay home...nor did a whole slew of other Tea Partiers who cast their vote for a candidate who was...to quote my favorite RNC witch to flog, "going to be our candidate, so we should just shut up and accept him." You do the research honey. I know for a fact there were LINES and LINES of people voting to support the RNC candidate...and he lost. Glass houses? How dare you! The fact that you are among the ones using a very DEMOCRAT tactic of bullying and then blaming the victim disproves your #2 point. I suggest you rethink those words before you fling them out over the conservatives of Lcom again. We´re still here. We´re not going away.
Point #4 Well we wouldnt have known that despite the fact that the candidates won the primaries...THANK GOODNESS Rove was there to make primary decisions for the rest of us.
Listen, sweetheart, no one likes a brown noser. Our Victorian governess has already wagged their finger at us. Youre just copying. Thats okay. Recess is coming.
Would O´Donnell have seemed "kooky" if she had professional backing and coaching rather than a firing squad? And if we want to take the "support anyone with an R after their name" argument to its logical conclusion, that means we would all vote for 0bama with no hesitation if he only switched party affiliation - sounds pretty stupid, doesn´t it?
Religious conservatives actually voted for Romney in greater numbers than they did for either Bush in 2004 or McCain in 2008 but you go ahead with your meme to the contrary if it makes you feel better to believe it.
#20 O´ Donell should have had the basic smarts to be trained. A Ditz with a capital D was a sure fire way to lose a seat and that´s what she did. We can rail against Rove,but he has been down inthe trenches. O´Donnell, Akins and Mourdoch are prime examples of why we should be thinking with our heads and not our hearts.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
god of irony, 2/13/2013 8:55:46 AM (No. 9173774)
For those of you want to throw O´Donnell in the Tea Party´s face I remind you that it was Rove´s strategy of handpicking "likeable" moderates instead of principled conservatives that gave the House back to the Democrats.
If some Republicans stayed home doesn´t it follow that it was a loss because of the Establishment´s [Rove] tactics. So Rove couldn´t control all the Republicans,so blame them for not following their King.? What is different from Obama? Republicans do not like to be ´ruled´ over by those who use money [donated by Repubicans] to put down those they consider inferior. The R Party loses with Establishment candidates.
I was angry with Rove on primary night, then tried to excuse O´Donnell, then cringed as her kooky became crszy. Rove´s org gave money to many candidates, including O´Donnell. He personally gave to Rubio. And we must stop talking about THE Tea Party. There are many, and they´re not the same. Personally, I back the fiscal tea parties. We really need to get away from social issues. Our views are too divergent. Stick with the constitution and fiscal responsibility.
#13/19-friendly advice: Anyone wanting to accuse others of "bullying" might stop typing so much of her comment in all caps. Also, now we´re supposed to be afraid of Georgette Mossbacher, too? I doubt many outside of Texas even know who she is.
Great article and instructive thread that exposes just how myopic and disingenuous the remaining liberal Republicans are. Having spent years trashing other candidates from Paling and Thompson to Gingrich and Brachman and Perry and Cain and asserting that there is no t party and no establishment suddenly the Allen Edmund is on the other foot. Thanks OP.
#27, stop making sense. Seems many abused wives here are still in denial and enabling their pathetic husbands to sleep in with another hangover while they phone his boss making excuses while holding an ice pack over their black eye once again. You know, he pays the bills and what would they do - how would they survive - without him?
Awww...Im afraid I tweaked someones nose. I sowwy. I didnt realize you were the expert on conservativism or how to write to make a point about a topic. Why dont you wag your little finger at me again and see what happens? I should just roll over and submit shouldnt I?
It has become patently obvious who likes to go around telling people how to vote or define conservativism. Rove must love you!!
Not to quibble over writing conventions #37, but I think that should be an upper case T, as in the name given to Rove by his own pal, George Bush. Almost forgot about that moniker. Good choice, Mr. Bush.
There is no question that Rove will see any Opposition Research leaked during a primary campaign. Somehow some of the most erroneous got used against conservative candidates when Rove was supporting an establishment Republican. In fact in the presidential primaries, only Romney was spared these opposition research type attacks.
Any self-respecting paranoid would immediately come to the conclusion that Rove is a Democrat mole.
The rest of us (ahem!) can, after reading Jeffrey Lord´s article, understand perhaps why even GWB called Rove "T*** Blossom." (The Website´s Personal Daintiness Police won´t let me type what our previous President called him.) We can also wish for Rove´s permanent retirement from politics, not so much due to his political beliefs, or rather, complete lack of them, but because of his relentless backstabbing of people on his own team.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
pete moss, 2/13/2013 10:28:49 AM (No. 9173975)
O´Donnell seemed to be a bit of a nut case to me. Maybe that was just the way she was painted by the establishment, I don´t know. However, Mike Castle is/was a RINO. Which is worse? I´ll take the conservative, thank you.
From 2002 - 2010, the House, Senate and White House were all Republican. Part of that time, as I recall, the Republicans had a 60 seat majority in the Senate. What good did "the numbers" do? Why weren´t the tax cuts made permanent then? Why wasn´t there entitlement reform? Why wasn´t wasteful government spending cut? Republican majorities are not enough. We need candidates who will run on conservative principles and stick to them. That said, there is no point in demonizing Rove publicly. Is he really that powerful? Surely, a conservative PAC can defend against him by supporting conservative candidates.
Uh, no, #44. In 2010, the White House and senate were in Democratic hands. The house had been in Democratic hands since 2007.
Since when has Christine O´Donnell become the new heroine of the conservative cause? Sarah Palin refused to appear at a rally in Indiana in the summer of 2011 when she found out that O´Donnell was to be a speaker. The rally organizers had to disinvite O´Donnell twice. And everybody here hated O´Donnell.
Bottom line Rove was right above posters wrong. It´s easy for writers and radio hosts like Levin to scream and spit into the microphone how impure people like Rove are, and how anyone we disagree with is a useless rino. An operator like Rove has to show results he has to win, anyone running campaigns has to be pragmatic. As far as the candidates Rove gave money to who lost, Rove was not involve in the primary process. Could you imagine the posts if Rove didn´t fund those losing candidates, he would have been blamed for all the losses.
So Ailes fires little Dick Morris but keeps Geraldope, the drunk Beckel, nitwit Juan Williams and the "architect" Karl Rove. Methinks there should have been five firings instead of just one. Rove in general just rubs me the wrong way with his know it all smarminess. That blockhead Hannity does himself no favors by having this jerk on his TV and radio shows. RINOs like him need to be hunted down and flushed out of the party. Because if it doesn´t happen we will never win another presidential election.
What about Todd Akin? In the midst of a campaign for one of the 100 seats in the US Senate he exposes himself as a fool, unnecessarily spouting off over some moronic theory that rapes don´t lead to pregnancy. Then, despite pleas from all sides that he step aside, he marches boldly into the firing squad, collapsing in catastrophic failure. Have we no need to police our own?
Yes, the dems support their morons, but unlike the Republican Party, the dem party is thick with low-information welfare voters like those who re-elected Jesse Jackson, Jr. while he sat in the Mayo Clinic mental ward sucking his thumb.
And I am so, so glad that Karl Rove is being exposed and skewered by those who know him for what he is - a Rockefeller feel good make nice Republican establishment mouthpiece. I don´t understand how Texans can claim him. I mean, George Bush is a nice guy and I like him in spite of wishing he had done some things differently. But Rove - what is there to like?
I will continues to vote for the candidate who I agree with on the issues. I don´t need anyone to tell me who to vote for. Others who feel as I do will ignore those like Rove who feel a need to control voters.
Lotta heat, little light but very healthy and long overdue. The GOP was born of an enduring principle. What principle(s) does it stand for today? Er....hmmmmm; and that´s what all this sturm und drang is about. A clear majority believe principles are defining while others believe bromides like ´we gotta win´ will carry the day. Sadly, the current R Est is not only unprincipled, its also a loser; a twofer!
A Republican strategist is reminding his party that President Reagan is dead. Ford O´Connell, who worked on Sen. John McCain´s (R-Ariz.) 2008 presidential campaign, says if Republicans want to win the White House in 2016, they need to break free of the "obsessive Reagan disorder." Rule #1 of the political analyst´s newly released book, "Hail Mary: The 10-Step Playbook for Republican Recovery," is: "Ronald Reagan is dead. Accept it." Such a sentiment is sure to be tough to digest for a party insistent on using the 40th president´s legacy as a GOP litmus test to prove conservative credentials. "The Reagan fixation is a drag
For over five years, a consistent media claim has been that former Alaska governor Sarah Palin hurt Republican presidential nominee John McCain in 2008 and that he would have fared better with anyone else on the ticket besides her. A recent study by political science professors at Bradley University debunks this claim concluding instead that Palin was a net plus for McCain including with independents and moderates. The first serious study on this matter was conducted by University of Central Florida political science professor Jonathan Knuckey and was published in Political Research Quarterly in April 2011: Using data from the American National Election
After the Senate Conservative Fund (SCF) endorsed Matt Bevin, the Tea Party challenger to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), McConnell has reportedly gone on a rampage against SCF allies and the conservative candidates it has endorsed. Most recently, McConnell reportedly directed his anger at Nebraska conservative Senate candidate Ben Sasse, whom the SCF has endorsed in the open primary. According to National Review, on November 12, "Sasse walked into Mitch McConnell’s office to clear the air" and let him know he never intended to oppose McConnell´s leadership, but McConnell was having none of it.
All the talk about repealing and replacing Obamacare is now apparently going to be backed up with potentially substantive legislation that will be spearheaded by Texas Senator Ted Cruz (R) During an appearance on Fox News’ with Megyn Kelly, Cruz stated that he was going to release a plan to repeal Obamacare, and give Americans more healthcare coverage options. Cruz, as well Senators Mike Lee and Marco Rubio, have been at the forefront of the ‘Repeal Obamacare’ movement, for which they had been excoriated for doing so, by Senate moderate John McCain, and others.
On Monday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said it was disappointing that the Republican establishment is joining Democrats to wage war on conservatives. She also made the point that the same types of establishment politicians and their consultants who shy away from fighting for religious liberty are the same types that do not want to embrace conservatives. Appearing on Mark Levin´s radio show to discuss her book, Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas, Palin called out Republicans who would "shy away from any affiliations with the Tea Party," claiming that "says a lot about them." "There certainty is
Virginia´s incumbent Republican Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling helped Democrat Terry McAuliffe narrowly defeat Republican Ken Cuccinelli in several ways. Not only did Bolling refuse to endorse Cuccinelli, he also transferred $446,674 remaining in his gubernatorial campaign committee to his newly formed political action committee, the Virginia Mainstream Project, which spent no money to support Cuccinelli. Bolling´s new political action committee was ostensibly established to support Republican candidates running for the Virginia House of Delegates in 2013 and the Virginia State Senate in 2015. Its relative inactivity, however, suggests it was more likely a place for Bolling to park his 2013 campaign
I just don’t understand it. Everywhere we turn, we conservatives are told we need to moderate, be less extreme, be more bipartisan. The public just wants us all to get along and solve our major problems together. Democratic politicians and the liberal media harp on the alleged extremism of mainstream conservatism, the tea party, Sen. Ted Cruz, conservative talk radio and anyone else who dares to call out President Obama and his Democratic congressional cohorts in plain language for what they’re doing to the country. Nonsense. No one with a modicum of political power is more extreme than Obama’s Democrats are, yet
I have never been much of a conspiracy theorist. For me it was always Oswald by himself from the Texas School Book Depository and nothing in the intervening fifty years has disabused me of this notion. For the most part, I’m an Occam’s Razor kind of guy — the most obvious explanation is likely to be true. (Snip) To put it bluntly, Occam’s Razor has moved. Things that were once possibilities now seem almost certainties to me. Principal among those is that Obama’s academic records are perpetually unavailable for a reason — and that reason is most likely that they reveal
One of President Obama´s chief political assets has been his ability to excite young people like almost no politician in history. But the days of America´s youth fawning over the president are over. A new Harvard University Institute of Politics poll released Wednesday confirms what other surveys have shown in recent months: Millennials have soured on Obama so much this year that their opinion of him largely mirrors the American public´s. Even though Obama does not ever have to face another election, he should be worried about the findings for a couple of reasons, which we will dive into momentarily.
Good stuff from Jonathan Turley at today’s House hearing on executive power, although I regret that I couldn’t find a more user-friendly format for you to watch. There’s no compilation clip; you’ll have to make do with the C-SPAN embed by fast-forwarding to the time cues I give you and being patient while the vid buffers (and buffers, and buffers).(Snip)That brings us to point two: Even if Congress can’t stop Obama, the courts can. The problem there, though, says Turley, is that O and the DOJ have argued successfully in many cases that no one has standing to sue him
A stunning new study unveiled on Fox News´ Hannity finds that President Barack Obama’s White House calendar records just one face-to-face meeting between Obama and his Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in the more than three-and-a-half years leading up to the disastrous Obamacare launch. The startling statistic comes from a new Government Accountability Institute (GAI) analysis of Obama’s own official White House calendar, as well as the Politico presidential calendar, and raises new questions about Obama’s executive leadership and management throughout the implementation of his singular legislative achievement. More alarming still, the president’s schedule lists 277 private
[Video] President Obama on Wednesday declared that addressing income inequality would be the focus of “all” of the White House’s efforts “for the rest of my presidency.” In a sweeping address that touched on raising the minimum wage, investing in infrastructure and ending tax breaks for the wealthy, Obama warned that the American economy has become “profoundly unequal,” declaring economic mobility the “challenge of our time.” “The combined trends of increasing inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American dream, our way of life, and what we stand for around the globe,” he said in an hour-long
Just over two weeks ago, MSNBC host Martin Bashir delivered a harsh piece of commentary that culminated in the suggestion that someone should “s-h-i-t” in former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin‘s (R-AK) mouth. Bashir offered an abject apology on his next broadcast, but a chorus of critics continued to demand action against the host. After a reported “vacation” for the host earlier this week, Bashir announced, Wednesday afternoon, that MSNBC and Martin Bashir are parting ways. Here’s the statement from Martin Bashir, via email: After making an on-air apology, I asked for permission to take some additional time out around the Thanksgiving holiday. Upon
Nineteen people stood behind President Obama on stage in the Executive Office Building Tuesday as the president kicked off a new campaign to promote Obamacare. One of those people, a young Florida woman named Monica Weeks, introduced Obama after telling the story of being struck with Crohn´s Disease at age 19 and receiving expensive treatments for several years that were covered by her parents´ health care plan — because Obamacare allowed her to remain on that plan until age 26. Now, Weeks said, she has coverage through a job. "The Affordable Care Act gives young adults who are just starting