A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Millions Improperly Claimed
U.S. Phone Subsidies
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Millions Improperly Claimed
U.S. Phone Subsidies

Wall Street Journal, by Spencer Ante

Original Article

Posted By:Fiesta del sol, 2/12/2013 8:59:38 AM

The U.S. government spent about $2.2 billion last year to provide phones to low-income Americans, but a Wall Street Journal review of the program shows that a large number of those who received the phones haven´t proved they are eligible to receive them. The Lifeline program—begun in 1984 to ensure that poor people aren´t cut off from jobs, families and emergency services—is funded by charges that appear on the monthly bills of every landline and wireless-phone customer. Payouts under the program have shot up from $819 million in 2008, as more wireless carriers have persuaded regulators

Comments:
The average American pays $2.50 a month to buy a vote for Obama.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: spit the bit, 2/12/2013 9:01:40 AM     (No. 9171667)

Well, knock me over with a feather.
Only 2+B?

Keep Obama in president.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Linder, 2/12/2013 9:12:57 AM     (No. 9171686)

"What difference, at this point, does it make?"


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: berthabutt, 2/12/2013 9:12:58 AM     (No. 9171687)

Shocked, SHOCKED, I say! $819B here, a couple trillion there; ya think it would add up to something after awhile. Gotta go clean the puke off my keyboard....


Reply 4 - Posted by: Bpl40, 2/12/2013 9:13:52 AM     (No. 9171690)

As one of his more eloquent supporters put it "He gonna do more". You bet.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Coy860, 2/12/2013 9:15:58 AM     (No. 9171695)

Isn´t Carlos Slim, Mexican trillionaire the owner of the company that manufactures these phones?


Reply 6 - Posted by: Wilko, 2/12/2013 9:16:33 AM     (No. 9171698)

They might want to check all the Social Security disability claims which are accepted without question as well.


Reply 7 - Posted by: realrep, 2/12/2013 9:28:07 AM     (No. 9171722)

Well...DUH. Follow the money. I read somewher that a BO contributor got a contract to provides services/phones. More money to the friend of BO means more contributions to BO.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 2/12/2013 9:34:48 AM     (No. 9171738)

And this is how our politicians sell us into debt slavery. One Obamaphone at a time.


Reply 9 - Posted by: toddh, 2/12/2013 9:40:35 AM     (No. 9171755)

The $819 billion was at the end of President Bush´s administration. President Obama more than doubled it. So it´s obviously President Bush´s fault.


Reply 10 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 2/12/2013 9:41:44 AM     (No. 9171758)

Not surprised. Land of freeloaders.


Reply 11 - Posted by: right-turn, 2/12/2013 9:57:07 AM     (No. 9171810)

In case you forgot ... that monthly charge on your phone bill is the ´Gore Tax´ ... remember him. Didn´t call it a tax though.


Reply 12 - Posted by: escaped commieny, 2/12/2013 9:58:03 AM     (No. 9171811)

Under Bush it was a call/receive phone, like a $10 trac or go phone. Under zippy they are iphone Computers, big difference. Plus as Youtube will reveal, they go pick up multiple phones with costly internet service.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Safari Man, 2/12/2013 10:01:00 AM     (No. 9171820)

Well, all you have to do is chine up.


Reply 14 - Posted by: enuf8, 2/12/2013 10:04:21 AM     (No. 9171830)

Oh yes, and one of the largest contributors to obama and his causes is the company reaping the rewards for these "free" phones we are all paying for these dependents.


Reply 15 - Posted by: rabbit, 2/12/2013 10:10:03 AM     (No. 9171854)

In Texas, recipients must prove every 6 months that they are still eligible. Not just certify; they must send in a copy of documentation providing eligibility.

Why don´t other states handle it that way?


Reply 16 - Posted by: JustRight, 2/12/2013 10:15:07 AM     (No. 9171864)

Another expensive, wasteful government program. Actually are there any other kind?


Reply 17 - Posted by: GringoinQuito, 2/12/2013 10:27:36 AM     (No. 9171910)

2.2 billion!!? I´m sick. Why are we being punished like this?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pineledger, 2/12/2013 10:34:01 AM     (No. 9171927)

That stash be something.


Reply 19 - Posted by: jrtrhd, 2/12/2013 10:47:23 AM     (No. 9171955)

That would be actual paying cell phone users who pay for this travesty through ´universal service fees´ on cell phones!


Reply 20 - Posted by: billkoch, 2/12/2013 10:52:08 AM     (No. 9171970)

I do not mind access to 911 cell phones, but not the ability to speak to others. When will we the payers wake up to what we pay for?????


Reply 21 - Posted by: wilarrbie, 2/12/2013 11:00:09 AM     (No. 9171983)

Do any of these people EVER get jobs from having the phones? And just WHY is it a function of government to make sure they have regular family contact?


Reply 22 - Posted by: GOPJihad, 2/12/2013 11:05:48 AM     (No. 9171989)

The Free Stuff Army marches on...


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 2/12/2013 11:23:48 AM     (No. 9172031)

The black lady from Cleveland told us "He gimme a phone"Boy what a big surprise?


Reply 24 - Posted by: mustang flyer, 2/12/2013 1:09:59 PM     (No. 9172290)

No point in having the free loaders prove their need periodically BEFORE giving them the phones right? They would have to read and write to answer the questions...



Post Reply   Close thread 723059




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"



Past presidents have
sent IRS after critics
Associated Press, by Tom Raum    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/17/2013 11:14:02 AM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service controversy dogging President Barack Obama is hardly the first time a White House and the tax agency have been accused of political meddling and bias. Over the past week, Republicans have been trying to link Obama to what the IRS has acknowledged was improper extra scrutiny of conservative political groups seeking tax-exempt status. That’s despite the fact that little — if anything — has surfaced to suggest White House officials had advance knowledge of the IRS actions. The line between IRS misconduct and the Oval Office appears less fuzzy in IRS political incidents in previous administrations.

Ad on Rush Limbaugh
featuring Belk
creates online stir
Charlotte Observer, by Ely Portillo    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/16/2013 12:38:35 PM     Post Reply
Charlotte-based Belk Inc. found itself in the middle of an online battle between political partisans this week, when an ad featuring the company ran on conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s radio program. The fight highlights the fine line companies walk with advertising and social media. The ad featuring Belk was apparently first noticed Monday by a group on Facebook that monitors Rush Limbaugh’s advertisers in an effort to pressure the talk show host financially. On Tuesday, the liberal website Daily Kos mentioned the ad in a posting. People started posting messages on Belk’s Facebook page protesting the ad.

W.H. Holds off-the-
record Benghazi briefing
Politico, by Dylan Byers    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/10/2013 2:31:40 PM     Post Reply
The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO. The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting. The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

Obama orders top aides
to praise Obamacare
during commencement speeches
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 4:20:38 PM     Post Reply
President Obama has ordered his Cabinet officials to praise Obamacare when giving speeches at college commencement ceremonies, even as the president’s aides fear that poor implementation of the law will tarnish his legacy. “To counter the criticism, the White House has told all Cabinet members and senior officials to use commencement speeches to drive home for graduating college students and their parents the benefits they gain from a provision of the law that allows young adults to stay on their family’s insurance plans until they turn 26,” Bloomberg reports. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., did her part to tout

John McCain Wants to
Blow Up The Cable Industry
As We Know It
Business Insider, by Jay Yarow    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/9/2013 1:19:00 PM     Post Reply
John McCain is going to release a bill that would dismantle cable as it´s currently constructed, Brenden Sasso at The Hill reports. The legislation would force cable companies and satellite TV providers to give consumers an option to pick and choose which channels they get. This is called "à la carte programming," and it´s long been a dream of consumers who only want a handful of channels. McCain tried to introduce similar legislation in 2006 and it went nowhere.

Benghazi: Incompetence,
but no cover-up
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM     Post Reply
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --

Benghazi Again
Time Magazine, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 11:21:13 AM     Post Reply
The Republicans, apparently with nothing better to do, are still chasing their tails over the tragic events in Benghazi on September 11.Actually, no. That’s not true. They’re chasing their tails over what happened after the tragic events of September 11. They’re mostly concerned that the Obama Administration tried to cover up the fact that this was a terrorist attack by a local militia (translation: local street gang) which aspired toward bad-butt Al Qaeda status. This is a pretty hard sell since, the day after the attack, the President called it an “act of terror.”



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

45 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 723059





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~