A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Democratic Disgrace
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Democratic Disgrace
Front Page Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 2/12/2013 5:58:09 AM

Every job has a minimum requirement. The absolute very least that anyone can do without being considered a complete and utter failure. The minimum requirement for a Commander-in-Chief is to stick around when an American diplomatic mission is under fire. Obama flunked even this minimal requirement by going to sleep and then flying off for a fundraiser in Vegas. The minimum requirement for a Secretary of State is to at least pretend to care why such an attack took place. Hillary Clinton failed that minimum requirement by declaring that it didn’t matter why the attack happened.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 2/12/2013 6:03:43 AM     (No. 9171405)

The only minimum requirement Obama has met is making sure the checks keep cashing and cards are refilled.Unfortunately that´s enough for his voters.


Reply 2 - Posted by: jalo1951, 2/12/2013 6:10:40 AM     (No. 9171410)

But his voters do not care and unfortunately for the moment there are more of them then us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: SourKraut, 2/12/2013 6:17:42 AM     (No. 9171420)

"What ? Me, worry ???"

Barack Hillary Obama-Clinton


Reply 4 - Posted by: binthere_dunthat, 2/12/2013 6:19:33 AM     (No. 9171422)

#2 At least there are more of them voting multiple times. If we had a voting system even as secure as Iraq´s, (finger stains) the current fraud would not be sitting in the White House sneering at all of us.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Grambo, 2/12/2013 8:02:13 AM     (No. 9171559)

The author could add to his list Congressman Henry Waxman who´s official reaction to Bill Clinton´s perjury was, "So what?"

They´re Democrats, it´s what they do. There is no honor among theives.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Grambo, 2/12/2013 8:03:13 AM     (No. 9171563)

thieves



Post Reply   Close thread 723043




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



$1M in jewelry stolen at
Cannes film festival
USA Today, by Bryan Alexander & Korina Lopez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 1:15:46 PM     Post Reply
CANNES, France -- This weekend, stars may sport a little less bling and the parties could be a little less sparkly. Thieves broke in the hotel room of a Chopard employee, where the jewels were being kept in a safe in a hotel room. The robbers ripped the safe off the wall and left with everything in it, about $1 million in jewels, which were meant to loaned out to stars during the festival. Ironically, the jewels were stolen around 2:30 a.m., a few hours after the cast of director Sofia Coppola´s new film The Bling Ring

Feds to Students:
You Can´t Say That
Wall Street Journal, by Greg Lukianoff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 10:05:38 AM     Post Reply
The scandals roiling Washington over the past two weeks involve troubling government behavior that had been hidden—the IRS targeting of conservative groups and the Justice Department´s surveillance of the Associated Press, among others. Largely overlooked amid the histrionics has been a shocker hiding in plain sight. Last week, the Obama administration moved to dramatically undermine students´ and faculty rights at colleges across the country. The new policy was announced in a joint letter from the Education Department and Justice Department to the University of Montana. The May 9 letter addressed the results of a year-long joint investigation

Strange Goings-On
at the White House
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 6:09:00 AM     Post Reply
The recent spate of Washington scandals has some liberals finally confessing in public what many of them have said privately for a long time. The Obama administration is arrogant, insular, prone to intimidation of adversaries, and slovenly when it comes to seeing that rules are followed. Indeed, the Obama White House is a strange place, and it’s good that its operational model is now likely to be finally dissected by the media. Joe Klein of Time magazine laments Obama’s “unwillingness to concentrate.” Dana Milbank of the Washington Post tars him as a President Passerby who “seems to want no control

This Is Exactly How Massive
the Texas Fertilizer Explosion Was
Atlantic, by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:53:55 AM     Post Reply
Representatives of the ATF and the Texas Fire Marshall provided an update on their joint investigation into the fertilizer plant explosion in West Texas. The short story is that the cause of the fire is undetermined. The long story is that the investigation has been as massive as was the explosion. At 7:29 pm on April 17, something caught fire in the seed and fertilizer building at the plant. Three minutes later, the fire department was dispatched; by 7:38 firefighters were on-scene. Three minutes later, more firefighters were called out. At 7:51, the fire was hot enough to change the sensitivity

The Unbalancing
Washington Free Beacon, by Matthew Continetti    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:47:37 AM     Post Reply
Since the presidential election we have been told, repeatedly and gleefully, that the Republican Party is doomed, that demographics and history are on the side of President Barack Obama and the progressive movement, that the GOP base is unhinged, and that Tea Party radicalism threatens to upend conservative hopes not only in 2014 but also in 2016. But in the space of one week that story, true or not, has been eclipsed by another one: Washington has turned on Obama. A trio of scandals has given the Republicans “an issue to seize on.” Nixon’s shade haunts the Justice Department

   

 



 
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

What About the Video?
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:37:58 AM     Post Reply
So, what about the video? The White House last week released nearly 100 pages of emails detailing some of the discussions within the Obama administration that resulted in major revisions to talking points about the Benghazi attacks drafted by the Central Intelligence Agency. From the beginning, there have been two big questions about the administration’s deceptive spin on Benghazi: How were the talking points whittled down to virtually nothing from the CIA’s original draft? And how did a previously obscure YouTube video gain such prominence in the administration’s explanation of what happened in Benghazi?



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama’s attempt at
damage control laughable

50 replie(s)
Boston Herald, by Joe Battenfeld    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/16/2013 6:00:07 AM     Post Reply
Nice try, Mr. President. Feigning anger, firing an unknown bureaucrat and fleeing the podium won’t cut it with voters, or stop the hemorrhaging of the scandals that have spawned a Watergate-like feel around the Obama administration. There was a certain panicky look about the way the president quickly delivered a rare evening White House statement to try to quell the growing outrage over the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups. The move showed how damaging the scandal has become to Obama’s second term and maybe even his presidency. But Obama took no questions and, more importantly,

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

   

 

  


 
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Benghazi Emails Directly
Contradict White House Claims

36 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 7:30:16 AM     Post Reply
The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches. The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD in articles here and here, directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the State Department.

NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´

36 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

   

Post Reply   Close thread 723043





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~